User talk:RockyMasum/Archive 01

IP block exempt

I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page Commons:IP block exemption carefully.

Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Commons via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. ~ Nahid ^Talk 09:16, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your support.--Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) 06:42, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Problem in VI scope

Hi, please note you have not understood the Valued Image Scope. Re-read this paragraph How to choose your scope carefully. To chose a photo within the more specific scope, but not too narrow and not too broad, but just right. And Note that scope is not a simple description of your image. Rather, it defines a generic field or category within which your image is the most valuable example. If you doubt do not hesitate to ask before. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 20:55, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your support. Now it is more clear to me.--Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) 06:38, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Shaheed samsuzzoha, university of rajshahi.JPG

Where you took this picture, from a plaque or such? ~ Moheen ^(talk) 22:59, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

From a poster. Any problem?--Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) 06:19, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

It should be mentioned. ‍‍‍‍ ~ Moheen ^(talk) 06:55, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

@Moheen Reeyad: Oh next time I will be carefull about that.--Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) 11:19, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calligraphy of Rabindranath Tagore.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:40, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Habibur Rahman Memorial Sculpture.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is imprecise. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 20:40, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Scope changed from Sculptures in Bangladesh to Martyr Habibur Rahman Memorial Sculpture
•  Support Good now. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 08:56, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:42, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mohammad Shamsuzzoha.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is imprecise. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 20:39, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Scope changed from Martyred of Bangladesh to Mohammad Shamsuzzoha--Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) 05:34, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Now OK. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 08:36, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:42, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

File renaming template

The correct template is: {{rename| ''new name'' | ''the number of the Criterion'' | ''verbal explanation'' | user=your nick}}
for example: {{rename|Main gate of university of Rajshahi.jpg|1|typo|user=Masum-al-hasan}}
{{rename|Main gate of university of Rajshahi.jpg|3|wrong number collection|user=Masum-al-hasan}}
When you are an original uploader, use Criterion #1, uploaders have special favours ;-)
If you would like to learn more, read the table on Commons:File renaming page, please.
Good luck! Wieralee (talk) 09:34, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification.--Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) 11:41, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rice threshing in Bangladesh.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:45, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Inani Beach (south-north exposure), Bangladesh.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We do not understand the scope. He must be missing a word in the caption, as it is also difficult to understand. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Caption has been renamed.--Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) 06:45, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment It would be good to put the view orientation. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 16:51, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment No response! IMO, It would be good with this scope as: Inani Beach (south-north exposure) ~ Moheen ^(talk) 16:59, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment @Moheen Reeyad: Done.
•  Support OK now. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 17:40, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Antonov An-24 at BAF Museum, Bangladeh.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:52, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:55, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Choto Anhik Temple.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Perspective needs to be corrected. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 06:03, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment@Moheen Reeyad: Perspective correction is not possible. Because there is a building just front side of the temple and I think that is the best angle from which the photo was taken. Thanks--Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) 17:42, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Done Perspective correction --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Useful. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 06:40, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fourth Science Building, University of Rajshahi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is imprecise. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 22:10, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment@Moheen Reeyad: Scope has been changed from Buildings of Rajshahi University to Fourth Science Building, University of Rajshahi--Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) 09:17, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Scope is OK now. But perspective needs to be corrected. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 14:04, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Done Perspective correction.--Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) 17:42, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:05, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kamaruzzaman Chattar - East exposure..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It would be good to put the view orientation. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment It would be useful that this image is used. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 18:09, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Thank you for nominating this image. This is a valued architectural image. I support the nomination. --Nahid Hossain (talk) 00:51, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose It would be good to put the view orientation --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nominating doesn't respond to comments. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:32, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Done View orientation.--Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) 13:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Ok for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:04, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Info Sorry. IMO, I do not want to count first support. Because, supporter was not careful about each of the six VI criteria. It seems to point of interest. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 16:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Useful. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 16:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:34, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sir Azizul Haque Memorial Sculpture.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:00, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment It would be useful that this image is used. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 22:36, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shabash Bangladesh, (Sculpture at University of Rajshahi).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope ~ Moheen ^(talk) 20:31, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:25, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sculpture of Provisional Government of Bangladesh.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:15, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support, Rare and best in scope. --Nahid Hossain (talk) 02:33, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:32, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jagannath temple, Puthia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:03, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dean's Complex, University of Rajshahi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Perspective correction necessary. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Done Perspective correction.--Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) 11:40, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Done Ok it was not very easy. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Pramatha chaudhuri.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 07:05, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:19, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kantaji Temple in 1870's.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:32, 20 August 2016 (UTC)  Support Rare and most valuable for this place. --Nahid Hossain (talk) 09:15, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued image

I think you would like to review this image. I nominated this image about 3 months ago, but no one seems to be interested in reviewing. - Mar11 (talk) 04:43, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

@Mar11: I changed the scope and again submitted it for review. Because you did not named the category in right way.--Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) 06:16, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arun Kumar Basak.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Nahid Hossain (talk) 05:09, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose @Archaeodontosaurus: @Nahid.rajbd: I do not understand why you support a VI image of a Wikipedia user?? Charles (talk) 22:06, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment This is a scientist who has two articles that were not censored. For illuster this is the best, there is no problem. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment I think VI review procedure is not voting. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 07:38, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Sorry, I didn't make myself clear. The professor has an article on Wikipedia, but one that was created by a member of staff at his University and who now nominates him for VI. I agree the article has not yet been deleted on 'notability' grounds. I am not keen on this sort of promotion/marketing on Wikipedia. Charles (talk) 09:49, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment @Charlesjsharp: I like to inform you that it's not a matter of promotion/marketing on Wikipedia. He is one of the top scientists and the only Professor Emeritus in the Department of Physics in Bangladesh. He has many other national and international recognition as well. The article on him in English Wikipedia is not completed yet that's why one may confuse.--Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) 17:04, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support useful (and important - two interwiki)--Grtek (talk) 16:24, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

File:After Eid ul-fitr prayer.jpg

File:After Eid ul-fitr prayer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 11:32, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks and some more

Thanks for reviewing the nomination. There are few more. Nomitation 1, Nomination 2, and Nomination 3. I don't know why no one is interested in reviewing the nominations. Can you fix if there is any problem in the nomination and then review them? - Mar11 (talk) 09:14, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

@Mar11: Now your nominated photos are reviewing. Hope this process quite clear to you.--Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) 17:26, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in the Bangladesh - Thank You!

Hi there! Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in the Bangladesh. We're excited to see people uploading thousands of photos from all over the country! You and others have collectively uploaded 7,115 photos so far, all of which are viewable at Category:Images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Bangladesh.

We encourage you to continue contributing through the rest of the month. Uploading your photos of monuments isn't the only way to contribute, however. If you're interested, there are auxiliary ways to contribute - which include improving Wikipedia's coverage of historic and cultural sites of Bangladesh, as well as finding existing free photos that can be shared on the Commons. While these contributions don't count towards the contest, we are still keeping track of them and they are great ways to contribute to the spirit of the project. If you are interesting in contributing to Wikipedia, Wikipedia tutorial is also great place to start.

If you're on Twitter & Facebook, give us a follow @WLMBangladesh for updates, news, and more.

If you have any questions between now or the end of the month, feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Thank you!

On behalf of #WLMBangladesh Team - Nahid Sultan (Talk), Wednesday 14:48, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

---

Hi Masum-al-hasan, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
• Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

INeverCry (talk) 17:08, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Struggle of Bullock Cart (Sculpture), Sonargaon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 22:51, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zainul Abedin Sculpture.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 22:50, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Category:Pair of Lepidoptera

Hi Masum-al-hasan. As you see, this category duplicates an existing one, so please don't create it again... --LamBoet (talk) 07:36, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paris Road, University of Rajshahi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment @Archaeodontosaurus: Geocoding added.--Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) 15:48, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:09, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. INeverCry (talk) 01:24, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mosque at Taha-Khana of Shah Shuja.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment @Archaeodontosaurus: Geocoding added.--Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) 15:47, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:05, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. INeverCry (talk) 01:24, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Amjupi Nilkuthi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. INeverCry (talk) 07:30, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sculpture of Surrender of the Pakistani occupation force at Racecourse Maidan on 16 December, 1971.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. INeverCry (talk) 07:36, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 16:47, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

উইকি লাভম মনুমেন্টস ছবি প্রতিযোগিতায় কমপক্ষে ৫টি ছবি আপলোড করায় আপনাকে ধন্যবাদ!

সুধী, প্রথমেই ছবি প্রতিযোগিতায় ৫টি/তার বেশি ছবি আপলোড করার জন্য আপনাকে ধন্যবাদ জানাচ্ছি। আমরা পূর্বেই ঘোষণা করেছিলাম যে, ডাকযোগে কোন সার্টিফিকেট প্র্র্র্রেরণ করা আমাদের পক্ষে সম্ভব হবে না। সার্টিফিকেট সংগ্রহ করার দুটি উপায় রয়েছে, যদি আপনি প্রিন্ট কপি নিতে চান তাহলে দয়া করে ঢাকা, চট্টগ্রাম ও রাজশাহীর আমাদের নির্দিষ্ট উইকিপিডিয়া সম্প্রদায়ের সদস্যদের কাছ থেকে সংগ্রহ করতে পারবেন। অথবা, কেউ চাইলে আামরা ইমেইলে সার্টিফিকেটের সফ্ট কপি পাঠিয়ে দিবো। অনুগ্রহ করে, এই গুগল ফর্মটি পূরণ করুন। আমরা পরবর্তিতে আপনার সরবরাহ করা ইমেইলে যোগাযোগ করবো। এছাড়াও, এ বছর বাংলাদেশের বিজয়ী ছবিগুলো দেখতে এই পাতায় যান ও সকল দেশের বিজয়ী ছবি দেখতে এখানে ক্লিক করুন। উল্লেখ্য, আন্তর্জাতিক বিজয়ী ঘোষণা করা হবে ডিসেম্বরর প্রথম দুই সপ্তাহের মধ্যে। আন্তর্জাতিক বিজয়ী ও বিভিন্ন হালনাগাদ তথ্যের জন্য চোখ রাখুন আমাদের সামাজিক যোগাযোগের পাতাসমূহে @WLMBangladesh ধন্যবাদ।

#WLMBangladesh আয়োজকদের পক্ষ থেকে - নাহিদ সুলতান (আলাপ), Thursday 11:34, 03 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prensenting of guard of honur to the acting President Sayed Nazrul Islam on 17 April, 1971.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. INeverCry (talk) 07:39, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:14, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Illustration showing military units and troop movements during the war..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. INeverCry (talk) 07:41, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:15, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sculpture of The Historic Teliapara Conference.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. INeverCry (talk) 07:40, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

 Support I like it! --Buddpaul (talk) 21:49, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gokul Medh (South Exposure).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It would be good to put the view orientation. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment@Archaeodontosaurus: Done.--Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) 17:05, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Govinda Bhita.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kherua Mosque (Front view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It would be good to put the view orientation. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

 Comment @Archaeodontosaurus: View orientation added.--Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) 17:09, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:21, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vasu Vihara.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
First Science Building, University of Rajshahi (East-North exposure).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:11, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 21:22, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shaheed Minar Complex at University of Rajshahi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 14:48, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Halti Beel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:56, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:36, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ekushey Padak.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. Yann (talk) 20:03, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 04:03, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anisuzzaman.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 21:25, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Useful.--Pierre André (talk) 21:34, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:15, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shomi Kaiser.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose Geolocation is needed. Yann (talk) 20:01, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support For portraits, as for the Shoots studio, geolocation outside of an imortant event is not useful. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Well, she is talking at an event here, so geolocation is possible. Why not providing it? Yann (talk) 10:43, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment If we can have the geocoding of the event it's better. But it would be a shame to lose a portrait for this. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:39, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:49, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope. Geolocation would be a plus, but I don't think it's a deal breaker not to have that minor detail. lNeverCry 04:05, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:57, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nirmalendu Goone.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose Geolocation is needed. Yann (talk) 20:01, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support For portraits, as for the Shoots studio, geolocation outside of an imortant event is not useful. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Well, he is talking at an event here, so geolocation is possible. Why not providing it? Yann (talk) 10:44, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment If we can have the geocoding of the event it's better. But it would be a shame to lose a portrait for this. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:40, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
  • We don't lose anything by following our common accepted rules. Yann (talk) 19:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:53, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope. If geocoding for portraits was a rule it would be an unnecessarily harsh rule IMHO. lNeverCry 04:08, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:58, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shital Pati.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 19:31, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cover page of a Bengali magazine Bangadarshan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. Yann (talk) 16:46, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Afzal Hossain.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 01:41, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 14:14, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! সুপারি.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 14:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Abm shawkat ali.jpeg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Abm shawkat ali.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:42, 26 December 2016 (UTC)