User talk:Riva72
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Image Tagging Image:Tarnopolskie.gif
[edit]The source added. --Riva72 15:31, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
The painter
[edit]Witaj
Tak sobie myślę, że powinieneś bardziej jednoznacznie napisać, że dysponujesz jego prawami autorskimi jako spadkobierca, bo tak jak teraz, to trzeba się trochę naszukać i upewniać poprzez analizowanie nazwiska twórcy i Wikipedysty, dopiero z tego wyciągając wnioski.
Będąc w trochę podobnej sytuacji stworzyłem specjalnie dla kopii z książki mego Ojca taką kategorię: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Illustrations_from_%22Historia_Polski_1914-1939%22
W niej jest zdanie as the heir of the author I release it under CC-BY-SA license ("jako spadkobierca autora udostępniam to wg licencji CC-BY-SA"), co oszczędza mi niepotrzebnych pytań ze strony upierdliwych "śledczych" Wikimedia Commons.
Pozdrawiam Julo 20:43, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- answer: Witam. Dziękuję za wiadomość i wskazówkę. Uważam jednak, że podana przeze mnie informacja 'photo taken by me (owner's permission granted)' jest wystarczająca i nie potrzeba dodatkowych wyjaśnień. Pozdrawiam i życzę miłego wieczoru. --Riva72 20:58, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Regarding A deletion request: 'Image:SophiaGal.JPG'
[edit]I have deleted the image at your request. Can you please help me understand why you wanted it deleted? --Gmaxwell 22:09, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Kasowanie grafik
[edit]Nie rozumiem o co chodzi z tymi drzeworytami, ale generalnie licencji cc-by-sa jak i uwolnienia do domeny publicznej nie można cofnąć.
Prosiłbym o wyjaśnienie o co chodzi.
Pozdrawiam --WarX 18:24, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Dołączam się do pytania, zwłaszcza w kontekście mojego komentarza z 4 grudnia 2006 (powyżej). Julo 16:06, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Jak widzę oszukując adminów doprowadziłeś do skasowania części grafik. Liczę na szybkie wyjaśnienie sprawy, bo jeżeli nie to niestety będę Cię musiał trwale zbanować w tym projekcie i z mozołem przywrócić skasowane grafiki.
Pozdrawiam --WarX 14:56, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Do NOT alter my comments
[edit]Alter my signed comments like that once more and you'll be in serious trouble. Please do NOT. --Cat out 15:00, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
You have been blocked
[edit]The reason for the block is available in the block log. The administrator listed there in the block log can give you further information.
See also the contributions of this user or the Upload log in order to find out why this user has been blocked.
--Cat out 16:18, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
A request for a deletion
[edit]The person who owns the works whose pictures were taken by me holds the rights to decide if the pictures of these works can be distributed and if they can be released into the public domain. What is more, the painter died in 1971 so the works by him are not in the public domain yet. Uploading photographs or scans of works by this artist is, therefore, prohibited. I was granted permission by the owner to take the photos for my personal use only. I ask you to delete all the photos of Marian Iwańciów works available with the commons immediately. In my opinion, the 'speedydelete' template is justified. I am sorry for the corrections done by me to your message posted at 'Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Attention'. --Riva72 18:15, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Cool cat: I want to inform you that my 'punishment' ended at 6:16 pm. --Riva72 17:46, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- I am sorry, I cannot comply to your request. Please use Commons:Deletion requests. The issue is too complicated to qualify under "speedy deletion".
- No one was punished to my knowledge. You were merely given a 2 hour cool-off period.
- --Cat out 18:35, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the answer. Can you tell me if this template is all right? Image:Mari1.JPG. --Riva72 18:41, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Please start a case on commons:Deletion requests. Do NOT use speedy deletion of ANY kind. --Cat out 18:43, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Tell me please: ..but if there is the speedy deletion category and the files apply to be deleted in at least one category (one of the cases) why I should start the case on commons:Deletion requests? --Riva72 18:51, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- They do not apply. Please use the right process and make this easier for both of us. --Cat out 19:36, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- I used the right process.. Besides your message cannot be treated as an explanation.--Riva72 19:39, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- As the reviewing administrator, I say no. If an administrator removes a speedy deletion template, you can't revert him/her. Warx and I both feel this isn't speedy deletable. Since I do not see an "obvious" reason for deletion, your only option is COM:DEL. --Cat out 19:51, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- The fact that there is this much debate on this issue and opposition to the deletion alone suffices for starting a deletion request rather than speedy deletion. You can start one deletion request with all of the photos of works created by that artist together. If they are clear copyright violations and there are no other issues at hand here (and some trusted users here at Commons have stated otherwise) then they will be deleted after ample time is given for everybody to voice their concerns. I don't see the problem. Yonatanh 19:44, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- As the reviewing administrator, I say no. If an administrator removes a speedy deletion template, you can't revert him/her. Warx and I both feel this isn't speedy deletable. Since I do not see an "obvious" reason for deletion, your only option is COM:DEL. --Cat out 19:51, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- I used the right process.. Besides your message cannot be treated as an explanation.--Riva72 19:39, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- They do not apply. Please use the right process and make this easier for both of us. --Cat out 19:36, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Tell me please: ..but if there is the speedy deletion category and the files apply to be deleted in at least one category (one of the cases) why I should start the case on commons:Deletion requests? --Riva72 18:51, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Please start a case on commons:Deletion requests. Do NOT use speedy deletion of ANY kind. --Cat out 18:43, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
You have been blocked
[edit]The reason for the block is for edit waring with the speedy deletion's inclusion on a number of images despite warnings. The administrator listed there in the block log can give you further information.
See also the contributions of this user or the Upload log in order to find out why this user has been blocked.
--Cat out 20:21, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
The deletion request
[edit]Hello! I have just placed the template for a deletion request. Can you inform me, please if I did it correctly? This is the case of: Image:Mari1.JPG. Do I need to place the template at my discussion page? I hope that it is not necessary. Thank you. --Riva72 22:03, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- You can mass nominate a range of images. See: Commons:Deletion requests/Colombian money (2007-03-03) for an example.
- You can use something like: {{delete|<deleiton reason>|Deletion page}}
- -- Cat chi? 01:16, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for the information. I have done separate requests.. Before I got your message, I had tried to do it the 'collective' way. Unfortunately, I could not manage to do it. --Riva72 01:42, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- You basically list them on the same page, this is preferable because then you need to argue your point once. -- Cat chi? 01:43, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- I see your point, thank you! So I have to correct it with the method you described earlier? --Riva72 01:47, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- You don't "have to". But doing so saves you and everybody else a lot of time. Otherwise people would have to vote on 30 things instead of 1 and you'd have to watch all 30 debates. -- Cat chi? 01:49, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- I see your point, thank you! So I have to correct it with the method you described earlier? --Riva72 01:47, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- You basically list them on the same page, this is preferable because then you need to argue your point once. -- Cat chi? 01:43, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for the information. I have done separate requests.. Before I got your message, I had tried to do it the 'collective' way. Unfortunately, I could not manage to do it. --Riva72 01:42, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- reset
Please stop editing this page and leave process to take its course - thank you --Herby talk thyme 11:37, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- Herby, thank you for your message. I have reverted your change. I believe my answers are needed.. I will leave the process to take its course but if I notice the reason for my words in the case I will not hesitate to raise them. Thank you for understanding. --Riva72 11:46, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
You would be very wise to back off a little - you have been blocked before to allow you to cool down. Reverting the explained edit of an admin puts you very close to another block in my opinion. I will reflect on this but expect to here more. You are doing your case no favours at all - I suggest for you own sake you take a break before one is enforced on you --Herby talk thyme 11:58, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- As I stated above: I will leave the process to take its course but if I notice the reason for my words in the case I will not hesitate to raise them. No additional comments on my part needed. --Riva72 12:02, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Your deletion request
[edit]I have deleted all the pictures mentioned in your deletion request. Sorry for the length of the procedure and the inconvenience it caused you. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 08:32, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you. --Riva72 09:59, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi again. I deleted all redundant deletion requests. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 17:35, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Zdjęcie blokady
[edit]Zadeklarowałeś wolę szukania rozwiązania zgodnego z procedurami Commons, co jest wystarczające do zdjęcia blokady. Proszę nie nadużywać tej możliwości. Pozdrawiam! A.J. 16:04, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Changing the licence
[edit]Hello,
Usually you can not change the licence once you have put on a file, unless you do it quite quickly after the upload (a few days would be fine). The reason is that the licence is a legal binding, saying "I, author of this work, have chosen to grant these rights on it". Simply imagine : if I want to use your image now, I see it is in PD, and I include it in a publication without mentioning the author: this is legal. Now you change the license to CC-BY-SA, and you say that I should have quoted the author... who is right ? I hope you understand the issue.
Now if you have uploaded your files quite recently, we understand that you may have done a mistake and you surely can change this (but remember to log in, otherwise we will believe it is vandalism !). And, of course, you may only change the license of your work :-)
Another possibility is a dual license: both licenses together on the same page. Users may then choose their preferred license when reusing the picture. Cheers, le Korrigan →bla 08:03, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Indefinitely blocked
[edit]You have been blocked for a duration of {{{1}}}
[edit]
-- Bryan (talk to me) 14:09, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Please merge your account with Wikipedias
[edit]Hi,
I have noticed that you are using account Riva72 at Commons and in Wikipedias but you have not merged them into a global account yet. Global accounts become mandatory since 15 April 2015, and all non-merged accounts will be renamed.
As of now, most likely you have accounts Riva72 in other projects, notably in English, Polish and Ukrainian Wikipedia, which are not merged with your global account. Please click on Special:MergeAccount and finish the unification process. You can check the state of your account unification at Special:CentralAuth/Riva72
If you don't merge your accounts by 15 April, your accounts in English, Polish and Ukrainian Wikipedia can be renamed.
If you have questions you can ask them on my talk page. Best regards — NickK (talk) 19:19, 20 March 2015 (UTC)