User talk:Ramblersen/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
File source is not properly indicated: File:P.v._jensen-klint_19,_anna_kirke,_1911-1928..jpg
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:P.v._jensen-klint_19,_anna_kirke,_1911-1928..jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
– Adrignola talk 17:54, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
- done, NVO (talk) 19:44, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
Ole Falkentorp og problem med upload fra Flickr
(This letter is in danish)
Goddag!
Nu håber jeg, at denne besked når den rette person, hvis ikke, så lad mig det venligst vide, tak :-)
Det ser ud til, at "Elekhh"(?) gerne vil bruge et af mine fotos af "Ved Vesterport", men er stødt ind i et problem, som har at gøre med det "lodret-tegn", | , jeg bruger til at adskille billed-titlens engelske, danske og tyske udgave med. Det er jo uheldigt, og jeg vil derfor fjerne dette tegn fra billederne, så ingen andre kommer til at stå med det problem :-)
Jeg vil være meget glad, hvis et af mine fotos kan bruges i en artikel om den dygtige arkitekt Ole Falkentorp, der jo slet ikke har den samme berømthed som andre dygtige danske arkitekter har fået (så vidt jeg ved). Det er dog lidt trist, at det ret kedelige billede jeg har i mit Flickr-album åbenbart er hvad, der er tilrådighed :-( Der må da finde langt flottere billeder af "ved Vesterport" på nettet et sted!?
Uanset hvad, så er du velkommen til at bruge, hvad du kan finde hos mig, og til at kontakte mig hvis du vil have det u-manipulerede fotos i fuld størrelse, hvis det skulle ønskes. Jeg vil i øvrigt se at få taget nogle flere billeder (og bedre) af det imponerende bygningsværk, som "Ved Vesterport" jo er!
Mvh. Jens Rost
Email:rost@pc.dk
http://www.flickr.com/photos/56380734@N05/5408431206/in/set-72157626326780073/
Category discussion notification | Category:Church buildings in Copenhagen has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. |
--Henrik (heb: Talk · Contributions · E-mail) 13:06, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fredensborg Houses 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fredensborg Houses 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Kategorisering af gadebilleder
Hej Ramblersen
Jeg kan se at du løbende uploader billeder af gader i København. Altid godt med bidrag. Imidlertid har jeg i de sidste dage været i gang med at sortere netop sådanne billeder og gader, og for at reducere arbejdet vil jeg godt lige forklare dig, hvordan kategori-systemet virker.
Som udgangspunkt gælder at billeder skal placeres i den eller de kategorier, der er mest præcise. Et billede af Gothersgade skal f.eks. placeres i Category:Gothersgade, ikke i Category:Streets in Indre By, Copenhagen. Kategorierne er sorteret hierakisk, dvs. at Gothersgade-kategorien er en underkategori til Indre By-kategorien, der igen er underkategori til Category:Streets in Copenhagen, der så igen er underkategori til nationale og internationale kategorier. De enkelte underkategorier skal placeres i den kategori, der er mest præcis, i eksemplet med Gothersgade skal den således være i kategorien for Indre By, ikke den overordnede for hele København. Her kan man så til gengæld placere de gader fra de bydele, hvor der endnu ikke er oprettet særskilte underkategorier.
Generelt bør man dog kun oprette nye kategorier, hvis man har noget at fylde i dem. Har man kun et enkelt billede eller to af en given gade, vil en ny kategori normalt være overdrevet. Vent hellere til der er en håndfuld. Ellers ender vi bare med en masse kategorier, som der næsten ingenting er i. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 13:06, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
- Tak for din henvenselse. Jeg kender for så vist godt kategorisystemet, men har ikke tænkt så meget over det fordi kategorierne tidligere har virket som sådan et syndigt rod og jeg tænkte jeg ville rydde op i dem ved en senere lejlighed. Godt at høre at du nu laver orden på sagerne - det fortjener du stor ros for - og jeg skal selvfølgelig nok fremover være mere omhyggelig. Med hensyn til de 'tomme' kategorier vil der typisk være en hel del enkelte bygninger som bør placeres i dem eller billeder som lige nu befinder sig i de mere generelle kategorier hvor de kan være nemme at overse, og derfor er det mere et spørgsmål om manglende 'oprydning' end manglende billeder som gør at de stadig fremstår tomme. Derudover er jeg selvfølgelig enig med dig at der intet behov er for kategorier med stort set intet indhold.Ramblersen (talk) 14:57, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Egeskov_Castle_-_Superellipse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
→AzaToth 00:50, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Værnedamsvej_-_Storm_P_mural.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Leoboudv (talk) 05:01, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Langelinie_-_Princess_Marie,_Denmark.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
87.61.168.144 13:11, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 05:20, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
File:Marble Church site, c. 1833.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Fred the Oyster (talk) 07:59, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
File:Marble_Church_site,_c._1833.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fred the Oyster (talk) 09:53, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Kastellet - Kongeporten.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Kastellet - Kongeporten.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Armbrust (talk) 12:49, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
- Must have deleted the source by accident when I fixed the description. It has now been restored.Ramblersen (talk) 18:56, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Larsens Plads - buildings and artwork.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Urbandweller (talk) 02:31, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
File:Ørstedparken - Bertel Thorvaldsen.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Urbandweller (talk) 03:46, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Palace Hotel from Copenhagen City Hall.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Palace Hotel from Copenhagen City Hall.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
High Contrast (talk) 07:48, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Please provide the specific flickr link for this image. Thank you in advance. --High Contrast (talk) 07:49, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Suggestion
Perhaps you should slow down a bit? Your contributions are most welcome, but you are leaving behind you a trail of spelling errors, wrong categories, categories in need of renaming, and missing sources. Someone has to clean up that mess, and, as it happens, I am often the one doing it. ----Urbandweller (talk) 09:16, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
- Ill take more care from now on. Sorry to have caused you trouble.Ramblersen (talk) 10:31, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you, and keep up your good work. --Urbandweller (talk) 10:37, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:39, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
File:Reformationsmonumentet - relief.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Urbandweller (talk) 06:47, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 05:54, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
File:Sankt Annæ Plads No. 1 and 3.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
The statue is still copyrighted. --Túrelio (talk) 06:51, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Bornholm - farm and horses.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bornholm - farm and horses.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Lymantria (talk) 17:54, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!Dear Ramblersen, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, |
- Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 04:34, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 10:21, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, 90.184.205.91 10:05, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 05:02, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Halsnæs Kommune shield.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Valentinian T / C 14:20, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
File:Egedal Kommune shield.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Hej Ramblersen. Alle danske kommunevåbener og øvrige offentlige insignier er omfattet af ophavsretsbeskyttelse på linje med almindelige kunstværker, og er beskyttet i kunstnerens levetid samt 70 år efter dennes død. Undtagelsen i Ophavsretsloven § 9 stk 1. gælder kun våbenbeskrivelsen, dvs. den juridiske tekst som beskriver kommunevåbenet, den gælder ikke tegningen, da denne er et "selvstændigt bidrag" hertil, og beskyttes iht. Ophavsretsloven § 9 stk. 2. Ophavsretsmæssigt anses en efterligning af en tegning som det samme som det originale kunstværk, dvs. ophavsretsbeskyttelsen gælder i den oprindelige tegners levetid + 70 år efter dennes død. Kun ganske få heraldiske kunstnere fra Danmark har været døde mere end 70 år. Alle kommunevåbener er beskyttet mod uautoriseret brug iht. Straffeloven § 132 stk. 1 og 2 som også omfatter efterligninger. Er de derudover registreret af Statens Heraldiske Konsulent erhverves tillige automatisk af logotype-beskyttelse i Patent- og Varemærkestyrelsen. Listen over de sidstnævnte kan findes her:[1] Ikke-registrerede kommunevåbener vil være omfattet af Ophavsretsloven samt Varemærkeloven. --Valentinian T / C 15:08, 14 May 2013 (UTC)