User talk:Pudelek/Archive3

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ružomberok - Hrabovo pano.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ružomberok - Hrabovo pano.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Hello! Is it possible to give an English description to this picture? Ružomberok apparently is a city in Slovenia, but I don't know what Hrabovo means...
--Berru (talk) 20:30, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nesselsdorf U.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:23, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 22:30, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braşov (Kronstadt, Brassó) - Piaţa Sfatului.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The quality is not stunning, but it's enough. Nice composition. --Tupungato 23:18, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

The QI Barnstar

			* * The Quality Images Barnstar * *
			I hereby award Marcin Szala a.k.a. User Pudelek. Thank You for all the cool QI's and Your tireless contributions. Over 200 Quality Images - very good result! Well done! -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:13, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

:)

You are welcome!
I not always support Your nominations, however You really good photographer and me is pleasant Your creativity. Your contribution are good.
Yours faithfully --George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:10, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braşov (Kronstadt, Brassó) - city hall.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kronstadt - Schwarze Kirche un Synagoge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:56, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braşov (Kronstadt, Brassó) - athletic stadium and city wall in Old City2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:56, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braşov (Kronstadt, Brassó) - the Orthodox church of the Dormition of the Theotokos.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braşov (Kronstadt, Brassó) - athlethic stadium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition and otherwise also good. --Cayambe 14:55, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johannes Honterus - Denkmal in Kronstadt.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done. --Cayambe 14:52, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braşov (Kronstadt, Brassó) - market square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. (The half cropped bird should be removed and geocode added) --Berthold Werner 16:22, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bastionul Ţesătorilor - Weberbastei - Takácsok bástyája.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 16:24, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tatra 605.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good and rare --Berthold Werner (talk) 18:43, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Could you categorize the picture down to the scope? --Eusebius (talk) 13:19, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
  •  Info - done --Pudelek (talk) 09:43, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 15:06, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braşov (Kronstadt, Brassó) - city hall (Casa Sfatului).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 14:11, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bus station in Braşov.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Mbz1 02:48, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braşov (Kronstadt, Brassó) - train station - interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good view. Some CA should be reduced though. -- Smial 00:09, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Braşov (Kronstadt. Brassó) - old mural.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 22:05, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prejmer (Tartlau) - street.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done. --Cayambe 21:02, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prejmer (Tartlau) - Evangelical Church.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting topic. Interesting photo. Maybe you could add a couple of words more to the image desctiption. --MattiPaavola 22:52, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braşov (Kronstadt, Brassó) - view from White Tower.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me. --Cayambe 18:53, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prejmer (Tartlau) - stone monument.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A touch under exposed maybe but a quality image I feel --Herbythyme 13:50, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sinaia - military cemetery from WWI.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:28, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

QI candidate syntax error

Hi,

For some reason your first nomination for QI from today doesn't show up on the candidates page. Could you check the syntax and the file name.

Thanks, --MattiPaavola (talk) 12:41, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braşov (Kronstadt, Brassó) - gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I love the promotion and the athmosphere. Would also look good as b/w. --Ikiwaner 21:13, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braşov (Kronstadt, Brassó) during rain.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, I can live with the small, almost blown sky. --Cayambe 21:51, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Black Church (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Eusebius 10:43, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Romanian Patriarchal Cathedral - external mosaics.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Romanian Patriarchal Cathedral - external mosaics.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 00:03, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peleş - gardens1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine. --MattiPaavola 12:36, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peleş - gardens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine. --MattiPaavola 12:36, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle Peleş in 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine. --MattiPaavola 12:36, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sinaia monastery - entrance.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine. --MattiPaavola 12:36, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peleş - sculpture 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done. Please, add geocode. --Cayambe 20:40, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

:)

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! --George Chernilevsky ^talk

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pelişor castle.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. -- Smial 12:13, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sinaia - military cemetery from WWI (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The background gives the image depth. No important colour information in this image so it's good to choose b/w. --Ikiwaner 17:19, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peleş - gardens - sculptures.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 06:29, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peleş - sculpture in gardens.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit more crop at top may be better(out black from top), but overall is good QI --George Chernilevsky 06:29, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bucegi 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 18:40, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Múzeum slovenskej dediny 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine. --MattiPaavola 18:01, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bucegi mountains panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice image, the clouds rolling in add to it :) --Herbythyme 09:51, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Athletic stadium in Bucegi mountains.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me. --Cayambe 19:16, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bucegi 2009-07 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me. --Cayambe 20:56, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pelişor Castle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Criteria met, also QI. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:24, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 18:20, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Notification of use of image

Dear Marcin Szala,

The Centre for Extended Learning at the University of Waterloo develops online credit courses. This often requires searching for images on the Web to be used with the textual and audio course materials.

We would like to include material which you have placed under the Creative Commons Licence in our Conrad Grebel University College (University of Waterloo) course, History 247, Mennonite History: A Survey, taught by Marlene Epp. The material we wish to reproduce in the course is as follows:

1. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:German_military_uniforms_(Reichswehr_and_III_Reich)-_Dresden.jpg Copyright for such material is clearly credited. Material is impartial in nature and is used for educational purposes only. These CDs are distributed, at no additional cost, as part of the course materials to University of Waterloo students who are registered in this course, regardless of their geographic location. All material is password protected and this image would be used for the life of the course. Thank you for making your work available under the Creative Commons Licence. If you have any conditions for the use of your image(s) please contact me via the email address listed below. If you have any questions concerning this request, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Thank you.

Antonina Joukova Web Course Developer Distance Education, University of Waterloo ajoukova@uwaterloo.ca http://www.uwaterloo.ca/ http://de.uwaterloo.ca/

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bucegi 2009-7 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 10:01, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sinaia monastery - the Great Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The crop is slightly tight at the bottom to my taste, but a QI anyway IMO. --MattiPaavola 23:17, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bucegi - atletic stadium.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Cayambe 19:03, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bucegi 2009-07 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. Yarl 19:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy Trinity Cathedral, Sighişoara.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Clearly the best in the category. -- MattiPaavola (talk) 02:02, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:04, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bucegi 2009-07 7.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --George Chernilevsky 13:53, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bucegi 2009-7 6.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --George Chernilevsky 13:53, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bucegi mountains.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me. --Eusebius 14:21, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House in Prahova valley.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 19:59, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sighişoara (Segesvár, Schäßburg) - detail.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 07:27, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katzendorf (Caţa) - Kirchenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, though a bit dark IMO. --Cayambe 09:50, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braşov in the evening.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Foreground a bit distracting, but good enough for me. --Eusebius 09:56, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bucegi - athletic stadium1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I don't feel that you show anything in this picture. --Snurre86 10:50, 10 January 2010 (UTC)  Comment It looks different to any stadium I've seen in Australia, so yes, I think it's informative. However it looks a bit rotated. --99of9 23:45, 12 January 2010 (UTC)  Support It looks ok to me. Maybe there's a CCW tilt to be corrected though. --Eusebius 09:50, 15 January 2010 (UTC)  Comment Looks like File:Bucegi - atletic stadium.JPG --Snurre86 19:19, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sighişoara (Schäßburg, Segesvár) - view from CT2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 23:22, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zvolen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  RequestCould you add the name of the two churches in the description, if you know them? --Myrabella (talk) 08:38, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

 answer I added image notes with description. Or better would be a description under photo? --Pudelek (talk) 10:33, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

•  Support - seems to be the best overview picture in the category including the subcategories. -- MattiPaavola (talk) 11:30, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support I agree, and it is now even more documented. Side comment: the image notes don't appear directly when the image is inserted in a WP. (exemple through the :en:WP) so an additional info in the description itself would be useful. --Myrabella (talk) 13:00, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose =>
undecided. Myrabella (talk) 23:16, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sighişoara (Schäßburg, Segesvár) - Clock Tower from park.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Cayambe 18:53, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sighişoara (Schäßburg, Segesvár) - The Shoemakers Tower.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 17:48, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sighişoara (Schäßburg, Segesvár) - old city.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, with acceptable CA (mainly green fringe along the vertical line of the door at left). --Cayambe 18:15, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! "Pro Patria" - Sighişoara (Schäßburg, Segesvár).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think that is good --Herbythyme 16:33, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gravestone in Sighişoara (Schäßburg, Segesvár) - part.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sighişoara (Schäßburg, Segesvár) - World War I memorial (cath.).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --George Chernilevsky 15:56, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mediaş (Mediasch, Medgyes) - Church of Saint Margaret - main altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 07:33, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall in Zamość.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support OK to me, all criteria met. --Myrabella (talk) 12:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mediaş (Mediasch, Medgyes) - wall tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 14:25, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orthodox Trinity Church in Sighişoara (Segesvár, Schäßburg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 15:51, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! German sign in Mediaş (Mediasch, Medgyes).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentVery high image quality, but slight CW tilt? --MichaelBueker 08:50, 6 February 2010 (UTC) Rotated CCW, now promoting. --MichaelBueker 11:16, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sighişoara (Schäßburg, Segesvár) - old building 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted CW and has some CA (e.g. bottom right shadows of cars). Can you fix that? --Leuo 20:43, 2 February 2010 (UTC)  CommentI uploaded new version --Pudelek 11:43, 3 February 2010 (UTC) Better now, attractive buildings. --Iotatau 20:09, 3 February 2010 (UTC) Forgot to check: please add geocode. --Iotatau 20:11, 3 February 2010 (UTC)  Info geocoded --Pudelek 23:32, 5 February 2010 (UTC) Thanks, now QI for me. --Iotatau 23:42, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sighişoara (Schäßburg, Segesvár) - The Tower of Tailors.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment nice image - CCW tilt? --Herbythyme 16:35, 26 January 2010 (UTC) Comment New version --Pudelek 15:18, 28 January 2010 (UTC) Better now. Cropped car and board are a pity but hard to avoid; rest is ok. --Iotatau 19:02, 3 February 2010 (UTC) P.S. Please add geocode. --Iotatau 20:13, 3 February 2010 (UTC)  Info geocoded --Pudelek 23:30, 5 February 2010 (UTC) Thanks, now QI for me. --Iotatau 23:40, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Synagogue in Mediaş (Mediasch, Medgyes).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Cayambe 19:08, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orthodox church - dome - Mediaş (Mediasch, Medgyes).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good to me. --Cayambe 19:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! M41 hungarian locomotive.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good locomotive image. --Iotatau 21:39, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braşov - panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good to me. Interesting contrast of old and new buildings. --Iotatau 17:15, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braşov - panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good to me. Interesting contrast of old and new buildings. --Iotatau 17:15, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sárospatak - WWI memorial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. Acceptable unsharpness in the corners. Please geocode! --Leuo 19:37, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hukvaldy castle - window.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 08:39, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windows in Hukvaldy castle.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also good. --Cayambe 14:52, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Érmihályfalva (Valea lui Mihai) - street.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, though a bit dark imo. --Cayambe 10:10, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hukvaldy Castle - Third Gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please add coordinates. If you regularly geocoded I'd promote your images more easily :-) --Iotatau 11:18, 18 February 2010 (UTC)  Comment Done :) --Pudelek 11:13, 19 February 2010 (UTC) QI now. Good lighting emphasizing the wall structure. --Iotatau 11:36, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CoA of Archbishops of Olomouc - Hukvaldy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 16:56, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hukvaldy Castle - St. Andrew's chapel.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. Good exposure handling (white wall not blown). --Iotatau 20:15, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Präsident - copy in Tatra Technical Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:35, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House in Hukvaldy.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I'd correct perspective distortion (see left wall) and remove the cut off roof at the right. --Iotatau 07:53, 21 February 2010 (UTC)  Info New version --Pudelek 15:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC) Thanks, good now. --Iotatau 18:31, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tatra 12 - firefighting car.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, with some acceptable noise on the floor. --Cayambe 20:31, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NW Präsident copy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, with acceptable noise in the background. --Cayambe 21:54, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tatra 87 Kopřivnice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 16:02, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NW B Kopřivnice.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 19:16, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nesselsdorf T - 2 cars in Tatra Museum.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 19:26, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nesselsdorf T - firefighting car.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also good. --Cayambe 19:26, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tatra 605 Kopřivnice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Archaeodontosaurus 07:56, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tatra 97 Kopřivnice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Archaeodontosaurus 07:54, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tatra 623.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Cayambe 15:30, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Emil Zátopek museum.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice colours, good image. --Cayambe 19:55, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nesselsdorf U.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good light, text well readable. --Ikar.us 09:58, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

coat of arms

Bonjour. From France I have put this night your "cartouche" in the Category:Reliefs of coats of arms in Poland . I hope it was not a mistake ! Congratulations for your photographs !--Jebulon (talk) 00:00, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cmentarz wojskowy 281 - nagrobek.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Elekhh 05:27, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Renaissances houses in Zamość.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. Is the style called Renaissance there? --Ikar.us 19:00, 9 March 2010 (UTC)  Info Yes, that is, of course, the Renaissance :) --Pudelek 10:32, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kartusz - ratusz w Zamościu.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 18:50, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Houses in Zamość in the evening.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Light is beautiful, the dark parts have still detaile. Perhaps crop top and bottom? --Ikar.us 23:44, 8 March 2010 (UTC)  Info Done --Pudelek 18:37, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cmentarz wojskowy nr 11a.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Houses in Zamość 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Ikar.us 14:44, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tatra 75 Kopřivnice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Iotatau 21:28, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ipê (Avaré) REFON.jpg

Hi Pudelek! The tilt has been fixed and other voters chose to change their vote. Perhaps will you want to reconsider yours too? I hope so. — Xavier, 00:38, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral in Zamość - main altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo. --Doomych 13:43, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WWI cemetery nr 225 - Brzostek. Head of Jesus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --George Chernilevsky 17:48, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Use of your image.

Hi there,

I am using your image as part of a Web site mock up.

Shaun

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pelecanus onocrotalus - Opole.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition. -- Avenue 22:30, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chałupa Chemików.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very sharp. The base is perhaps a bit overexposed, but it's understandable, given the contrast, and a minor problem. I support. --Pline 20:18, 15 March 2010 (UTC) Support as user Pline, although some CA is visible far left and right. --Johannes Robalotoff 19:05, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Equus quagga granti - Opole1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --kallerna 13:22, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exhibit of California Sea Lions in Zoo Opole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments looks okay for QI --Carschten 20:28, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral in Zamość - vault.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Jebulon 21:40, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zalophus californianus - feeding and perfomance - Opole 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI as far as I'm concerned. Nicer than my QI on a nearly identical subject. User:Juliancolton 2010-03-29T15:48:39

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Horch P2M.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Request Category is missing. LUV or something like that. --Ikar.us (talk) 15:48, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Support ? There are enough categories on the description page. --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:54, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose There were categories for who used it and where is it now, but not about what it is. I've added them now, Category:Horch vehicles and Category:Military light utility vehicles. In the categories I found File:Bundeswehrmuseum Dresden 23.jpg, another photo of the same museum installation, which shows the car better. --Ikar.us (talk) 17:03, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
  • better? these photo is overexposed and has a strange perspective --Pudelek (talk) 20:04, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment Thank you, Ikar.us, for having improved the categorization of the image: that's adds value. Reviewers who find images which in his/her opinion are better within the scope should nominate these images and move all the candidates to a Most Valued Review. So could you please set up a MVR to ease the comparison of the two images at the review size? --Myrabella (talk) 09:36, 23 March 2010 (UTC).
•  Comment Hard to say if rigth one shows car better, both photos have some Pro and Contra. Rigth one: Flash made some overexsposing, low angle (would make a shot from bit higer point), suspension clearly seen. Left one: A bit underexposed, but for a margin less than rigth one is overexspoed. Better composition. Hard to call. --Mile (talk) 17:35, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Support I will support, even its not so perfect, but lets say till better show up. --Mile (talk) 11:17, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. IFA P2M Dresden.jpg: +1 <--
2. Bundeswehrmuseum Dresden 23.jpg: 0
=>
File:IFA P2M Dresden.jpg: Promoted. <--
File:Bundeswehrmuseum Dresden 23.jpg: Declined.

--Ikar.us (talk) 18:19, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bacówka na Rycerzowej - 2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Crisp detail and clear lines. -- Daniel Case 01:16, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muzeul Naţional de Istorie Naturală Grigore Antipa and skyscraper.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok. --Berthold Werner 13:03, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Traffic in Oslo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok. --Berthold Werner 13:03, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stained glass in Žilina - kraj Žilina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good--Jebulon 00:05, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liptov - Stained glass in Zylina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me --Jebulon 00:05, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stained glass in Žilina - Čičmany.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good image, interesting example of non-religious stained glass.----Jebulon 00:05, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ku pamięci - Bełk 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good idea, good shot, QI for me.----Jebulon 22:53, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kośćůł we wśi Palowicy.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. It seems tilted CW by about 0.9°, though, and there may be a faint dust spot left of the upper tower.--Avenue 04:44, 2 April 2010 (UTC) The tilt was fixed days ago, and I've only just noticed. Now QI to me. --Avenue 11:17, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cmentarz wojenny nr 91 - nagrobek niemiecki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Such photos should allways be b/w! Imo QI --Skipper Michael 19:49, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Your photo of Opole, Poland

I would just like to say thank you for allowing me to use your photo of Opole. I have an interest in Poland and have created a website called webpoland at http://www.webpoland.org If you wish to see the article please go to http://www.webpoland.org/en/places-in-opolskie/opole.html

If you would like to write an article about Opole or any other place in Poland for WebPoland I would be delighted to receive it.

Thank you once again.

David Smith WebPoland

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ku pamięci - Łaziska Górne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments beautiful color, very sharp QI IMO --Croucrou 20:05, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Presidential's aircraft crash

Just to say how I'm sad these days for Polish people, even if he's native of Silesia...--Jebulon (talk) 10:02, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Track from Beskyd to Tanečník.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice atmosphere --George Chernilevsky 11:55, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ku pamięci - Bełk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Ianare 00:36, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gibasówka jesienią.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Carschten 16:35, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Draisine in Sedlo-Beskyd1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Ianare 02:29, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vychylovka - track.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Ianare 02:29, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle Náchod - CoA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice detail and useful. --Elekhh 00:11, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Čadca.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I guess it would be nice to have an image showing that the town is situated by the Kysuca river but there isn't a good image available in Commons (File:Kysuca river in Čadca (winter).jpg isn't very illustrative within the scope IMO, and this remote view even less). The nominated image depicts the city center; it is described in several languages and geocoded. It seems to me the most valuable one for the scope. --Myrabella (talk) 21:16, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:05, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gibasy - ruiny.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not bad for me. Very good atmosphere. --Jebulon 22:27, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle Náchod - gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I, Ottavio Piccolomini y Aragon (1599-1655), first duke of Amalfi, Prince Piccolomini & of the Holy Empire, Fielmarshal of the Empire, Knight of the Toison d'Or, owner of the CoA visible here, hereby decides to promote this picture, because it's my good pleasure.--Jebulon 21:54, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Street in Náchod - dec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well composed. --Cayambe 11:34, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Multi-storey car park in Liberec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good exposure, good composition, sharp --Croucrou 08:09, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Náchod - architectural detail.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment A little bit dark, imho. Скампецкий 23:47, 29 April 2010 (UTC)-Good for me--Jebulon 09:33, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building in Liberec by night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 17:19, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old saxonian CoA - Militärhistorisches Museum der Bundeswehr.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. I disagree with the name of the file --Jebulon 21:54, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Militärhistorisches Museum der Bundeswehr - exhibition 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:14, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liberec (Reichenberg) - former city bath.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments a very very little bit tilted. I'll promote if fix. French annotations and translation added int the file page.--Jebulon 14:43, 12 May 2010 (UTC)  Comment I uploaded new version --Pudelek 19:04, 12 May 2010 (UTC). Much better now, I support--Jebulon 22:42, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

FPC careless reviews

Hi Pudelek,

You may be interested in participating in this_discussion. Cheers, Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:42, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS August der Starke in Dresden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 16:06, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Floods in QI

You might be interested in an ongoing discussion regarding QI floods of late, here. Cheers, ianaré (talk) 19:22, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rüstkammer, Dresden - armour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Hard conditions for a photographer, QI --George Chernilevsky 09:27, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hofkirche bei Nacht (Dresden).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 19:05, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Semperoper bi night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good (and rather wintery) evening view. -- MJJR 20:56, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hofkirche Dresden bei Nacht.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments meets the Qi standards IMO.--Jebulon 23:52, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dresden - Augustusstraße bei Nacht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. Possibly a bit of lens flare, and the ghosting is a bit weird but unavoidable. I do like the overexposure in the shop window - reminds me of Lost. Mattbuck 22:23, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Margaret Church - ribbed vault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 09:24, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rüstkammer, Dresden - Harnisch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit dark maybe, but pretty cool. Mattbuck 16:17, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hofkirche by night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like this --Cesco77 10:07, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloßplatz - Dresden - night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok to me. Please, add geotag. --Cayambe 07:16, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goldener Reiter bei Nacht1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and detailed night picture --Cesco77 19:37, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HfBK Dresden bei Nacht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice colours, a good compromise between under- and over-exposure. Mattbuck 14:34, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Čadca - city center.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 14:43, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! EN57 2018 rb - Gleiwitz.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 14:25, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaštieľ Divinka.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tiny bit of CA to the right but passes for QI. Lycaon 13:32, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goldener Reiter bei Nacht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok to me. --Cayambe 17:27, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bytča (Nagybiccse) - mosaic in the catholic church.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very kitsch vision of this subject, but I like your work with colors. --Jebulon 23:53, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building a bridge - highway D1, Považská Bystrica1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments tilted cw if I'm not wrong (look at the cranes)--Jebulon 20:25, 23 June 2010 (UTC)  Comment You are right... I uploaded a new version --Pudelek 21:34, 23 June 2010 (UTC) Much better now, thank you. QI to me. --Jebulon 22:05, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building a bridge - highway D1, Považská Bystrica.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and informative--Jebulon 20:27, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ An image you created has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Joseph church in Žulová.

review

 Support this --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:25, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Žulová - kostel svatého Josefa.JPG: 0
2. Žulová - kostel svatého Josefa1.JPG: +1 <--
=>
File:Žulová - kostel svatého Josefa.JPG: Declined.

File:Žulová - kostel svatého Josefa1.JPG: Promoted. <--

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mikulovice (Niklasdorf) - Bělá.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK, pretty good. --King of Hearts 04:28, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mikulovice (Niklasdorf) - bridge over Bělá river.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 08:29, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mikulovice (Niklasdorf) - bridge over Biela.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Carschten 13:02, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mikulovice (Niklasdorf) - footbridge.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good IMO--Jebulon 22:21, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fram Museum (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best view. COM:FOP#Norway sasy OK for buildings. --Ikar.us (talk) 22:45, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 18:34, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Gräfenberg (Lázně Jeseník), hotel Priessnitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- George Chernilevsky 20:39, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lázně Jeseník (Bad Gräfenberg) - villa Adelheid.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- George Chernilevsky 07:49, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Used Your Photo of a Gondola

Hi,

I used your image to make a silly comparison on my website: http://comparexy.com/compare/Chairlift+vs+Gondola

Thank you for the photo, Doug DesCombaz (contact@comparexy.com)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Hukvaldy.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok to me, although a tighter crop at both the bottom and top would be better IMO. --Cayambe 08:20, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Žulová - kostel svatého Josefa1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me--Jebulon 21:01, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Javorník (Jauernig) - CoA of Ludwig von Pfalz-Neuburg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 11:50, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Umieściłem twoje zdjęcie na www.slaskcieszynski.com.pl

http://www.slaskcieszynski.com.pl/o.1/tu

Pozdrawiam, Łukasz Herok

Opole - nowy układ

Hej! Przepraszam za usunięcie opisów de ze strony Opola. Robię jej przebudowę i jeszcze nie zdążyłem wszystkiego uporządkować. --Lestat (talk) 12:46, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Javorník (Jauernig) - radnice.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok to me. --Cayambe 15:07, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vlčice (Wildschütz) - old gravestone1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Javorník (Jauernig) - psychedelic gate.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- George Chernilevsky 06:31, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vlčice (Wildschütz) - shrine.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Pitke 19:04, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kamienica Margrabska - Kraków.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 17:24, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gorce - old hut.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Mbdortmund 00:40, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gorce 2010 - hut.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 10:35, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rafting on the Belá river.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good to me.--Jebulon 23:50, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Múzeum liptovskej dediny v Pribyline - 04 - kostol.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are parts that are a bit overexposed, but given the setting it is understandable; the crop could be looser on the bottom, but it's not redhibitory. Rama 07:30, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gorc - znak pomiarowy.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:57, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Javorník (Jauernig) - CoA of Ludwig von Pfalz-Neuburg.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Javorník (Jauernig) - CoA of Ludwig von Pfalz-Neuburg.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liptovský Hrádok (Neuhäusel in der Liptau, Liptóújvár) - castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK to me. --Cayambe 19:44, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Múzeum liptovskej dediny v Pribyline 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Carschten 09:46, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liptovský Hrádok (Neuhäusel in der Liptau, Liptóújvár) - WWII memorial.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI.--Mbz1 04:39, 2 September 2010 (UTC) why "socialist" ?--Jebulon 09:44, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liptovský Hrádok (Neuhäusel in der Liptau, Liptóújvár) - WWII memorial - part.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good -- George Chernilevsky 05:18, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liptovský Mikuláš - center.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice -- George Chernilevsky 07:48, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liptovská Mara - church tower and water reservoir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe a very little tilt (not sure), but otherwise very good, despite the cars and mobilhomes.--Jebulon 23:10, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Partizánska Ľupča (Deutschliptsch, Németlipcse) - evanjelický kostol.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Carschten 16:33, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liptovská Mara - church tower1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Perspective correction needed. On the other picture nominated here I can see that the tower is not leaning in reality. --Johannes Robalotoff 18:36, 15 September 2010 (UTC)  Support IMO it looks more interesting without correction. --Kae 18:35, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liptovská Mara - church tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Albertus teolog 10:35, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Likava Castle 03 - Pudelek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportGood--Jebulon 08:19, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Likava Castle 02 - Pudelek.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support a very little CA, but otherwise good --Jebulon 08:22, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forest amphitheatre near Likava castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo Albertus teolog 08:15, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malá Fatra by Pudelek 03 - Pekelník.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 09:14, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malá Fatra - view from Snilovské sedlo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lovely. Mattbuck 16:39, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malá Fatra by Pudelek 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Cayambe 18:44, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malá Fatra by Pudelek - gondola lift.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also good. --Cayambe 18:44, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malá Fatra by Pudelek - Snilovské sedlo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 07:34, 29 September 2010 (UTC) Could you add geo coordinates, please? Thank you! --Kuli 09:06, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malá Fatra by Pudelek 04 - on the Veľký Kriváň.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Stunning. Mattbuck 22:29, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malá Fatra by Pudelek 02- Velký Rozsutec and gondola lift from Vrátna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. Mattbuck 22:29, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tatra T148 - firefighting car.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Alofok 19:40, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malá Fatra by Pudelek 06 - Chleb.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nothing wrong there. Mattbuck 12:11, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malá Fatra by Pudelek 05 - upper station of the gondola lift.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Didn't I promote this one previously? Mattbuck 12:11, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hronov - morový sloup 2010 (part).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good! --Kuli 12:45, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malá Fatra - pillar of the gondola lift.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good composition --Carschten 13:46, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

{{User Silesia}}

Witaj, przecież Niemy mają zazwyczaj interfejs po niemiecku, więc przy langswitchu będą mieli komunikat właśnie w języku niemieckim. W czym tu problem? Yarl ✉ 18:08, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Holy Cross, Nin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:48, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:26, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Přítok Opavice (Goldoppa).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Decent enough, thugh a crop on the right might be better. Mattbuck 22:21, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hronov - the Bell Tower.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Carschten 21:19, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heřmanovice - farní kostel sv. Ondřeje.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit unsharp, but generally good. Mattbuck 12:06, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teplické skalní město (Wekelsdorfer Felsen) - Martinské stěny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, with some chromatic aberration in the tree at the upper left. Please, add geolocation. --Cayambe 10:05, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teplické skalní město (Wekelsdorfer Felsen) - Střmen 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pekne Alofok 17:41, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teplické skalní město (Wekelsdorfer Felsen) - old descriptions.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pekne Alofok 17:41, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teplické skalní město (Wekelsdorfer Felsen) - Skalní chrám (Felsendom).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pekne/Nice Alofok 17:41, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Police nad Metují - town hall.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Composition problems, fixable IMO. You can chose : 1) I miss the right part of the fountain, OR 2) There is a disturbing "half-person" and a bad edge of a building, right too. Extend if possible, or crop...--Jebulon 22:21, 7 October 2010 (UTC)  Info I chose number 2 ;) --Pudelek 08:41, 8 October 2010 (UTC)Then it is not centered;)--Jebulon 21:08, 11 October 2010 (UTC) Now --Pudelek 11:39, 12 October 2010 (UTC) Good. Thanks--Jebulon 22:57, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adršpašské skály (Adersbacher Felsenstadt) by Pudelek 04 - climbers.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA right, but acceptable (and correctible). Very sharp, good contrast and relief, nice composition, useful. QI.--Jebulon 22:46, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adršpašské skály (Adersbacher Felsenstadt) by Pudelek - panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 14:08, 24 October 2010 (UTC) Inaccurate description: Where is it? Geocode would be great. -- H005 15:11, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Donatus in Zadar (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Good, because without the tower, which belongs to another church (the cathedral if I'm not wrong). But you may add Exterior as subscope, I believe.--Jebulon (talk) 23:28, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Church of St. Donatus in Zadar to Church of St. Donatus in Zadar (exterior) --Pudelek (talk) 10:37, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

• I add "exterior". You are right, tower is from cathedral --Pudelek (talk) 10:37, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support I think it is the best in the scope--Jebulon (talk) 23:21, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment - I'm not so sure about that. No matter that the tower belongs to the neighbouring building, it is somehow in the whole composition. What about these ones: . --MrPanyGoff (talk) 13:26, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Matter of taste ?... I still think the Pudelek's one is the best, and I have some arguments. Please open a MVR if you like, it should be interesting to vote, with explanations. Thanks for researches !--Jebulon (talk) 22:37, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:54, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adršpašské skály (Adersbacher Felsenstadt) by Pudelek 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Cool. Mattbuck 17:03, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kopalnia kwarcu Stanisław - wyrobisko.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:02, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Große Iserwiese in the fog.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:02, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kostel sv. Vavřince v Teplicích nad Metují 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. Please geocode it. --AFBorchert 06:18, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jizerka (Klein Iser) by Pudelek.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. Please geocode it. --AFBorchert 06:18, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adršpašské skály (Adersbacher Felsenstadt) by Pudelek 02- Malý vodopád.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice, but some overexposured areas, and the water is noisy left. I need other opinions before supporting.--Jebulon 22:49, 21 October 2010 (UTC)  Weak support very good composition, medium quality and not perfect lightning. But that's QI, not FP, so I weakly support --Carschten 18:08, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dunaszeg - diesel locomotive C-50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --V-wolf 05:59, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Csesznek 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good to me--Jebulon 17:45, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pannonhalma - stutue and archabbey.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. A geocode would be appreciated.--Jebulon 00:56, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Csesznek 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --LutzBruno 21:14, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Csesznek 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --LutzBruno 21:14, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Csesznek 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --LutzBruno 21:14, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Broumov (Braunau) - street.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, clean...OK for QI, imo.--MrPanyGoff 21:29, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chatka Górzystów o zachodzie słońca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Image seems tilted slightly and I think a bit perspective correction is needed. --Jovianeye 03:44, 5 November 2010 (UTC)  Support imo it just seems like a tilt. A very good photo --Carschten 17:31, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

wykorzystanie zdjęcia do celów politycznych?

Witam, chciałbym zapytać czy możliwe jest wykorzystanie zdjęcia zalinkowanego poniżej w celach politycznych, tzn. ulotki, plakaty wyborcze itd.? Proszę o odpowiedź na adres amayama@o2.pl http://pl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Plik:Oppeln_-_Altstadt.jpg&filetimestamp=20081013091206

pozdrawiam

File:Adršpašské skály (Adersbacher Felsenstadt) by Pudelek 04 - climbers.JPG

Hi Pudelek.

As you remember maybe, I was happy to support this picture in QIC, a very good one. I noticed a very visible chromatic aberration at the right of the photo. This CA is still here, and I'm afraid other reviewers will see it ! Do you think you could correct this ? I would like to support it in FPC too !! Or perhaps you need help for removing ? Regards from Paris --Jebulon (talk) 17:16, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

 Done. Not perfect, but much better I think. I  Support now ! Do you agree ? I uploaded the new version, but feel free to revert if you prefer ! Good luck !--Jebulon (talk) 21:04, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Was happy to help you ! Please call for other helps if you need ( Info: I used the GIMP, free software, with -for the first time !!- the cloning tool)--Jebulon (talk) 21:33, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Well...Not featured... It is not my fault... It was a really good one...Let support another picture of you another time...--Jebulon (talk) 00:26, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coat of arms of Benedictus XVI, Veszprém.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good--Jebulon 16:32, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Using your photo on LinguaTrek.com

I am using your photo here. You are listed as the author by name (Marcin Szala) in the images alt text. Please let me know if you would like to be attributed in a different fashion. Thanks for sharing!

File:Reenactors in Austerlitz.jpg

Do you know, is it real bearskin on the helmets? Thank you. --Kürschner (talk) 12:32, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. It looks like real bear, but I cannot believe it, to bad. --Kürschner (talk) 21:11, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Varaždin - statue near Old Town.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, but who is that man? It is a bit useless without a correct ID. And please give the child's head back !--Jebulon 21:59, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Varaždin - town hall.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Need a better categorization to be more usefull.--Jebulon 22:45, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Novsko ždrilo 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Mbz1 16:59, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maslenica Bridge (A1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good... please add geotag. --Cayambe 20:41, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nin - Church of St. Cross.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 06:36, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ražanac - wall tower.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --George Chernilevsky 06:37, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maslenica Bridge (D 8), Croatia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Great composition, the red contrasts beautifully agains the background, the the bridge is very sharp. Would be nice to have some extra info in the caption (length, height of the bridge, when was it built, which places does it connect, name of the river). --Murdockcrc 17:50, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Varazdin castle

Hello Pudelek
I tried something with GIMP on your picture. It my opinion, it is a little bit better. I removed a magenta fringe along the tower left, and the disturbing red pipe in foreground. I hope you'll enjoy. If not, feel free to revert to your own version, no worries in this case. Friendly, --Jebulon (talk) 18:40, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A1 motorway near Gospić.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please add geotag.Andrei Stroe 16:22, 25 November 2010 (UTC) QI to me. Rama 09:12, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Varaždin - stari grad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not bad, but underexposed IMO. The copses are too dark. Fixable.--Jebulon 22:44, 20 November 2010 (UTC) I've lightened the green channel a tad. Rama 09:13, 27 November 2010 (UTC) I've tried other improvements.--Jebulon 18:45, 28 November 2010 (UTC) Final result looks nice.--Kirua 20:03, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nin - ruins of Roman temple.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Jebulon 23:54, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nin - Gornja vrata.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Carschten 18:19, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nin - city wall 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Carschten 18:19, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nin - city wall 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good, I like the composition --Carschten 18:19, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Baćina lakes.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Seems like the best image of this area to me. Just one comment: if should be more thoroughly categorized. So far, it belongs to one category only. Isn't there a "Lakes of Croatia" category where you could put this image and make it more accesible? --Murdockcrc (talk) 22:30, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

• I added category Dalmatia and Dubrovnik-Neretva County --Pudelek (talk) 22:38, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Geolocation is wrong. --Ikar.us (talk) 10:56, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
  • Changed location.  Support now. --Ikar.us (talk) 12:18, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
    • Thanks for new location :) --Pudelek (talk) 15:43, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:39, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of St. Anastasia in Zadar - tower.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imho --Berthold Werner 15:59, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of St. Donatus in Zadar - interior 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Noise acceptable, and needs explanations IMO. But very appealing visually.--Jebulon 16:56, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of St. Donatus in Zadar - interior 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. Shame of the kjdhkbkb (censored) tourist ! --Jebulon 16:53, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of St. Nicholas in Nin - by Pudelek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, but the 5° CCW tilt (based on the horizon and pylon behind the woman) was too strong IMO. I've tried to fix it; feel free to revert. --Avenue 14:58, 7 December 2010 (UTC)  Comment yes, I know that old version was tilted (my artistic vision). New version is not bad --Pudelek 15:09, 7 December 2010 (UTC) I've reverted to your artistic version. You should decide which version to use, not me. --Avenue 15:20, 7 December 2010 (UTC)  Comment I choose your version --Pudelek 16:26, 7 December 2010 (UTC) I would promote it, but think I've done too much to be seen as neutral, so will leave it for someone else to review. --Avenue 03:33, 9 December 2010 (UTC) Support Picture imperfect but sufficient to QI --Archaeodontosaurus 08:32, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Maslenica Bridge (A1).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Maslenica Bridge (A1).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:04, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paklenica panorama - near Anića Kuk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good to me--Jebulon 23:50, 21 December 2010 (UTC)