User talk:Prazak
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
-- Rüdiger Wölk 22:19, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.226.195.75 (talk • contribs) at 15:52, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Warnings
[edit][Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | interiot's tool | page moves | block log | block list]
October 2007
[edit]{{Copyrighted free use provided that}} is missing required copyright provision in Image:Eotyrannus -1.jpg
Hello. I noticed that page Image:Eotyrannus -1.jpg does not include the required copyright provision in {{Copyrighted free use provided that}}, causing it to display only instructions, not a valid copyright restriction containing a required provision. Please add the required copyright provision, or remove the tag {{Copyrighted free use provided that}} (or other tag that redirects to {{Copyrighted free use provided that}}). Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 04:09, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Eotyrannus -1.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
GeorgHH 12:12, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Znak obce Hrádek u Frýdku-Místku.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 11:48, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:NJ-sign.gif
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:NJ-sign.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 23:36, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Koruna_od_Martinkovic.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Koruna_od_Martinkovic.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Siebrand 23:37, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Galium_palustre.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Hemmingsen (talk) 15:07, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
- You can safely ignore this notice and the one immediately below. Commons' policy on reproductive photographs was changed in the mean time and I've withdrawn the deletion requests. I apologize for the noise. Hemmingsen (talk) 16:24, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Coleanthus_subtilis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Hemmingsen (talk) 15:20, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Kenneth Kaunda.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
--|EPO| da: 15:52, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Peter_Strasser.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Peter_Strasser.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Peter_Strasser.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Kam Solusar (talk) 04:58, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 23:26, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Drátník - věž Sokol.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Luzula luzuloides.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Vlajka obce Brantice.gif was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Frienstein3.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Frienstein1.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Misidentified image File:Veronica officinalis.jpg
[edit]Hi Prazak, I corrected the ID of your photograph File:Veronica officinalis.jpg. This image shows Veronica prostrata, probably subsp. prostrata, not Veronica officinalis. I discussed the matter on a page of the German Wikipedia de:Redaktion Biologie/Bestimmung. The leaves look completely wrong for Veronica officinalis, e. g. because they are too deeply indented, and the flowers look also different. Please compare typical images of Veronica prostrata subsp. prostrata [1] and Veronica officinalis [2]. Please note that you should not compare your photograph with an image of Veronica prostrata subsp. scheereri, because this taxon looks very much different from subsp. prostrata with its linear leaves and usually dark blue flowers. Best regards --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 21:46, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:L'Accordéoniste.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:L'Accordéoniste.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:L'Accordéoniste.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 13:25, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Photographer's Barnstar | |
Hallo,
wir möchten darüber informieren, dass wir Dein/Ihr Bild (Wiki-Commons) zum Blick auf den Smrk / Poledník (CZ) - selbstverständlich inklusive der Copyright-Hinweise und Urheber-Angaben - in unserem nicht-kommerziellen Projekt << FVKS-Kalender "Unterwegs" 2014 >> zum Thema „Ausblicke" verwenden. >> http://www.kalender.fvks.eu >> http://kalender.fvks.eu/2014/02/09/blick-auf-den-smrk-poledník-cz/ Wir hoffen, alles korrekt umgesetzt zu haben. Der Kalender begleitet auch unseren im Jahr 2014 laufenden Fotowettbewerb (fotowettbewerb.fvks.eu), ebenfalls zum Thema „Ausblicke". Grüsse FVKS - Förderverein Kulturstadt Görlitz-Zgorzelec e.V. kalender@fvks.eu, Agata, Cornelia, Matthias fvks (talk) 20:11, 1 February 2014 (UTC) |
File:Vlajka obce Blučina.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TFerenczy (talk) 21:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
File:Vlajka obce Litohoř.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TFerenczy (talk) 21:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
File:Vlajka města Bučovice.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
109.238.80.85 11:55, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
File:Znak obce Dolní Lutyně.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gumruch (talk) 21:33, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
File:Znak obce Mikuleč.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— Draceane talkcontrib. 21:08, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
File:Znak obce Voleč.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TFerenczy (talk) 19:40, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
File:Vlajka obce Lipník u Třebíče.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— Draceane talkcontrib. 09:10, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
File:Znak města Dubá.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |