User talk:Poco a poco/2013-09

Archives 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Malbork, Polonia, 2013-05-19, DD 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:48, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Malbork, Polonia, 2013-05-19, DD 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:12, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Malbork, Polonia, 2013-05-19, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality IMO, but a bit of noise at upper side--Lmbuga 11:50, 1 September 2013 (UTC) I uploaded a new version Poco a poco 14:30, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Malbork, Polonia, 2013-05-19, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 11:46, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Malbork, Polonia, 2013-05-19, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 11:46, 1 September 2013 (UTC)  Comment Minor CCW tilt, note added. Good luck in the WLM 2013. --Iifar 14:07, 1 September 2013 (UTC) Tilt corrected, good luck to you, as well Ivar! Poco a poco 14:44, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Terminal de ferrys del Puerto Exterior, Macao, 2013-08-08, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Christian Ferrer 07:27, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente Gobernador Nobre de Carvalho, Macao, 2013-08-08, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like it, but one dust spot and the left seems very dark. What's the red mist btw? Mattbuck 10:57, 31 August 2013 (UTC)  Fixed the red mist: no clue, it looked spooky Poco a poco 09:31, 1 September 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 09:42, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Solenostemon scutellarioides, Jardín Botánico, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-21, DD 02.JPG

Hi! Please re-check attribution of this plant. See File talk:Solenostemon scutellarioides, Jardín Botánico, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-21, DD 02.JPG. --Kaganer (talk) 09:17, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

PS: Your photos are beautiful, I admire them a lot of years ;) --Kaganer (talk) 09:31, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

You are totally right...thanks for your remark and your words about my work :) Poco² 19:56, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Estación de FF.CC. de Riga, Letonia, 2012-08-09, DD 01.jpg

And also:

• File:Estación de FF.CC. de Riga, Letonia, 2012-08-09, DD 02.jpg
• File:Estación de FF.CC. de Riga, Letonia, 2012-08-09, DD 03.jpg
• File:Estación de FF.CC. de Riga, Letonia, 2012-08-09, DD 04.jpg

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 09:50, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kowloon Waterfront, Hong Kong, 2013-08-09, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Faizking321 20:33, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Oliwa, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-21, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Faizking321 20:03, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muelle de Sopot, Polonia, 2013-05-22, DD 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too much bright, can you put down Expo and/or highlights? --Christian Ferrer 19:00, 2 September 2013 (UTC)  Darkened although I am not really sure, it was very sunny and no clipping Poco a poco 18:49, 3 September 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 19:05, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muelle de Sopot, Polonia, 2013-05-22, DD 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The bottom of the image is a bit distorted, but good quality IMO--Lmbuga 21:02, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Oliwa, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-21, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 21:04, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muelle de Sopot, Polonia, 2013-05-22, DD 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 21:09, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Adam Mickiewicz, Oliwa, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-21, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted (see note) --Christian Ferrer 19:03, 2 September 2013 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 18:49, 3 September 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 19:05, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Jorge, Sopot, Polonia, 2013-05-22, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:59, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Adam Mickiewicz, Oliwa, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-21, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Even the duck contributes to the geometric composition :) --Myrabella 06:31, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro, Plaza Zdrojowy, Sopot, Polonia, 2013-05-22, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and composition. -- Felix Koenig 11:16, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Malbork, Polonia, 2013-05-19, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Colin 11:55, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente Gobernador Nobre de Carvalho, Macao, 2013-08-08, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please see notes. --Jebulon 15:35, 31 August 2013 (UTC)  Fixed Poco a poco 18:22, 31 August 2013 (UTC)Not the dust spot, dear don Diego !--Jebulon 14:53, 2 September 2013 (UTC) Oops, c'est vrai, maintenant ou jamais! Poco a poco 19:09, 2 September 2013 (UTC) Good.--Jebulon 09:37, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Oliwa, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-21, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Christian Ferrer 19:35, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muelle de Sopot, Polonia, 2013-05-22, DD 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:25, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Malbork, Polonia, 2013-05-19, DD 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:25, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Malbork, Polonia, 2013-05-19, DD 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Comment left side a bit blurry but otherwise QI --Rjcastillo 20:03, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Malbork, Polonia, 2013-05-19, DD 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 20:03, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro de Hel, Polonia, 2013-05-23, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Colin 19:43, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro de Hel, Polonia, 2013-05-23, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 19:29, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Malbork, Polonia, 2013-05-19, DD 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:31, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia Luterana, Sopot, Polonia, 2013-05-22, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:15, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Malbork, Polonia, 2013-05-19, DD 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:07, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Sheraton, Plaza Zdrojowy, Sopot, Polonia, 2013-05-22, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Xicotencatl 04:46, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente Gobernador Nobre de Carvalho, Macao, 2013-08-08, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice perspective but it's slightly tilted CCW. --Kadellar 14:29, 31 August 2013 (UTC)  Fixed Poco a poco 18:22, 31 August 2013 (UTC) I can see only half of the image, is it just me or an upload related problem? I have refreshed the page several times. --Kadellar 17:05, 3 September 2013 (UTC) It was actually not properly uploaded, it is fixed now Poco a poco 19:18, 4 September 2013 (UTC) Thanks! QI. --Kadellar 19:23, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Oliwa, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-21, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good --Christian Ferrer 17:13, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Malbork, Polonia, 2013-05-19, DD 53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Heuschrecke 19:00, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Malbork, Polonia, 2013-05-19, DD 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good --Rjcastillo 17:17, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Malbork, Polonia, 2013-05-19, DD 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality IMO, but perhaps it needs a little bit of perspective correction. No important in this image IMO--Lmbuga 20:52, 6 September 2013 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 21:39, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Oliwa, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-21, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 19:35, 4 September 2013 (UTC)  Comment Could you please denoise the sky, though? --King of Hearts 05:50, 5 September 2013 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 18:50, 5 September 2013 (UTC) Looks good, restoring original promotion. --King of Hearts 23:49, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Adam Mickiewicz, Oliwa, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-21, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:38, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Castillo de Malbork, Polonia, 2013-05-19, DD 13.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Castillo de Malbork, Polonia, 2013-05-19, DD 13.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:10, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento Neptuno, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 20:08, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Adam Mickiewicz, Oliwa, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-21, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:47, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muelle de Sopot, Polonia, 2013-05-22, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:47, 8 September 2013 (UTC) Five dust spots, see notes. --Lmbuga 15:05, 9 September 2013 (UTC)  Removed, among other improvements Poco a poco 19:15, 9 September 2013 (UTC) Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 19:46, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Oliwa, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-21, DD 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:51, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Oliwa, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-21, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The left part of the facade is not straight, maybe just a old building?--ArildV 14:42, 7 September 2013 (UTC) It is, but it also needed a perspective correction,  new version uploaded --Poco a poco 21:06, 8 September 2013 (UTC) Support --ArildV 20:01, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Jorge, Sopot, Polonia, 2013-05-22, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, I like the mood of the light --J. Lunau 15:29, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muelle de Sopot, Polonia, 2013-05-22, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very classical but nice composition. Borvan53 21:13, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro, Plaza Zdrojowy, Sopot, Polonia, 2013-05-22, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 16:04, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro de Hel, Polonia, 2013-05-23, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition.--ArildV 14:42, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Malbork, Polonia, 2013-05-19, DD 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice composition and light but is it possible to recover the upper part of the arch? I don't like the crop, just the tip is missing. --Kadellar 19:08, 3 September 2013 (UTC) Agree with you, but I have not solution for that, I tried a new crop, Poco a poco 20:07, 3 September 2013 (UTC) Can I revert and suggest a new crop with a note? --Kadellar 19:15, 5 September 2013 (UTC) Sure, go ahead, don't even have to ask Poco a poco 16:58, 6 September 2013 (UTC)  New version uploaded with the suggested crop Poco a poco 20:57, 8 September 2013 (UTC) I think it's better now, thank you! --Kadellar 17:42, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fisherman's Wharf, Macao, 2013-08-08, DD 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Dust spot ? (see note) Pleclown 11:19, 2 September 2013 (UTC) It also seems a bit yellow to me - throw some blue at it. Mattbuck 18:55, 3 September 2013 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 18:27, 5 September 2013 (UTC) Support QI --Rjcastillo 16:28, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta Alta, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality perspective may be slightly over-corrected, please look at the left side of the gate?--ArildV 20:08, 9 September 2013 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 21:38, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estación de FFCC, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me. The train has a bit of noise--Lmbuga 21:10, 9 September 2013 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 21:38, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Torre del reloj

Hola Diego:

Si la descripción de esta imagen fuese "plaza de la torre...", pues la torre está parcialmente tapada, cre0o que sería promovida a QI. Yo la promovería. Te lo digo aquí porque me cuesta decirlo en inglés.

Un abrazo--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 11:46, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Hola Miguel, espero que vaya todo bin por allá. He actualizado la descripción siguiendo tu consejo. Te mando otro abrazo! Poco² 12:43, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Kowloon Waterfront, Hong Kong, 2013-08-09, DD 05.jpg

Hola Diego, have you see? the FPCBot have no promoted your file. Amistosamente. Christian Ferrer 20:09, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Hola Christian, after all that jazz and the picture is not promoted :P Will look into that, thanks for the notice! take care, Poco² 21:14, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta Verde, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 20:06, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa de las Torturas, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 20:04, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayuntamiento Principal, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 20:28, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa Catalina, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support nice --Rjcastillo 19:53, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Nicolás, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --JLPC 14:50, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San José, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me, good--Lmbuga 20:34, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Real de Gdansk, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 20:27, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle Dlugie Pobrzeze, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 18:52, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gran Armería, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 18:52, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercado, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo.--ArildV 19:25, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa Catalina, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 19:06, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa Catalina, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:32, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa María, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 19:41, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gran Molino, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 19:41, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa de los Abades de Pelplin, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Sorry, sharp and good DOF, but I think that it can't be QI for me because too many and important issues: Dust spot, greens oversaturated and unnatural, noise at bottom (es: la mitad inferior) of the image, clouds are very overexposed IMO (blown out). See notes. The problem of the clouds is in my opinion not improvable --Lmbuga 20:54, 9 September 2013 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 21:38, 9 September 2013 (UTC)  Support Good for me. Now, the problem of the clouds is a insignificant question--Lmbuga 19:57, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa María, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment See note --Rjcastillo 20:54, 9 September 2013 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 21:38, 9 September 2013 (UTC) Support QI --Rjcastillo 02:57, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Malbork, Polonia, 2013-05-19, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle Wiejska, Hel, Polonia, 2013-05-23, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --The Photographer 21:00, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Nicolás, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:44, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayuntamiento Principal, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice If possible, please state the name of the street (and the category). It is an excellent street view.-ArildV 09:37, 15 September 2013 (UTC)  Done + some additional improvements after your feedback, thanks! Poco a poco 10:02, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayuntamiento Principal, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 14:15, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle Dlugie Pobrzeze, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine picture, please remove dustspot --Isiwal 09:49, 15 September 2013 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 10:02, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre del Reloj, Kowloon, Hong Kong, 2013-08-11, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:58, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre del Reloj, Kowloon, Hong Kong, 2013-08-11, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Felix Koenig 10:27, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre del Reloj, Kowloon, Hong Kong, 2013-08-11, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good, but unfortunate lamppost or streetlight covering the clock. I'm wondering if the problem is that the first two pictures are much better. Without having the first two images in mind, maybe this can (or should) be QI.--Lmbuga 11:40, 14 September 2013 (UTC) I see your point, I updated the description because it is not only about the clock tower but I rather tried to capture the square around it Poco a poco 12:46, 14 September 2013 (UTC) Good for me--Lmbuga 15:07, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento a Juan III Sobieski, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 10:29, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa María, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:13, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa Catalina, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 10:26, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta Alta, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 00:29, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estación de FFCC, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 00:29, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa Catalina, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 18:52, 11 September 2013 (UTC)  Support Simple and intresting -- Yndesai 09:55, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa Catalina, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. Me vas a hacer comprarme un angular... --Kadellar 09:31, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Pregunta

¿NO sabrás donde los usuarios podemos hacer una queja por un uso abusivo de las atribuciones de un administrador? Sé que hay un sitio, pero no lo encuentro--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 20:31, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Si sabes, pro favor, reponde en mi página de usuario. Hay un tal Turelio impresentable. Lo digo sabiendo lo que digo pues yo he sido burócrata en commons, pero no me acuerdo y no lo encuentro--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 20:34, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Gracias. Hay otra página para abusos de administradores (creo, pues la he usado, aunque no la encuentro hoy). En mi opinión este proyecto deja mucho que desear.

Espero que no te encuentres nunca con inconveniencias o incompetentes. No diversifiques tus actividades o te encontrarás con problemas. Si hasta yo he sido burócrata (y solamente hay 8 actualmente), ¿que se puede esperar de alguien que es administrador?

Lo digo en serio--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:24, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Miguel, deja el ordenador y vete a dormir, y vuelve mañana más despejado, algo así a veces ayuda, Poco² 21:41, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

gracias, pero es lo que pienso de siempre, no es nada nuevo. --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:47, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Si piensas que aquí hay normas y que se aplican normas, te confundes. Depende del administrador que decida la discusión. La discusión se decide a partir de experiencias personales y amigos. Es lo que hay. Espero que nunca te encuentres teniendo que fundamentar razones, aún teniendo la razón, en una discusión: Es muy muy jodido--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:52, 19 September 2013 (UTC) Quizás cierre la votación aquel que desea más darte por el culo: Ten ojo

Te voy a comentar lo sucedido, pero deseo que no tomes partido. Deseo que oigas y calles. Es posible, pues yo no lo sé todo, que yo no tenga razón. NO, por favor, NO TE IMPLIQUES EN NADA: Es solamente un comentario que hago porque me divierte hacerlo.

En la galipedia se propuso una imagen para imagen de la semana. Como es habitual en la galipedia (wp.gl), la imagen era mala y, además procedente dfe flickr.

Yo expresé en la página de propuestas a imágenes de semana que no me convencía y subí una nueva versión a commons que seguía sin convencerme.

El trabajo que hice no fue grande. Podría ser una "foto retocada", pero no la marqué como tal (retouched image) porque ese concepto no aparece en ninguna ley de ningún país y porque, según la ley, todo lo que es retocar

una imagen es imagen derivada.

He hecho una imagen derivada, por lo tanto. Pero se borra `por tener problemas con los metadatos.

Es absurdo. Si es una imagen derivada, yo soy autor y tengo derecho a variar los metadatos. Si la es original (cosa que ocurre en esta) no obliga a compartirla igual, puedo poner que todos los derechos son reservados y después, porque así me apetece, compartirla con la mismna licencia que la imagen original.

Ese es el problema. Los metadatos (como en casi todas mis imágenes) ponen que la obra tiene todos los derechos reservados. Eso ocurre cuando creas la imagen en tu ordenador. Cuando la comparto, decido la licencia, y decido compartirla con la misma licencia que la imagen original o con cc-by-sa-3.0.

Yo hw expresado en la página de propuestas a imágenes de semana que no me convencía y he subido una nueva versión a commons que seguía sin convencerme.

El trabajo que hice no fue grande. Podría ser una "foto retocada", pero no la marqué como tal (retouched image) porque ese concepto no aparece en ninguna ley de ningún país y porque, según la ley, todo lo que es retocar

una imagen es imagen derivada.

He hecho una imagen derivada, por lo tanto. Pero se borra `por tener problemas con los metadatos'. INCREÍBLE, INAUDITO.!!!!

Es absurdo. Si es una imagen derivada, yo soy autor y tengo derechO a variar los metadatos. Si la imagen original (cosa que ocurre e esta) no obliga a compartirla igual, puedo poner que todos los derechos son reservados y después, porque así me apetece, compartirla con la mismna licencia que la imagen original.

Ese es el problema. Los metadatos (como en casi todas mis imágenes) ponen que la obra tiene todos los derechos reservados. Eso ocurre cuando creas la imagen en tu ordenador. Cuando la comparto, decido la licencia, y decido compartirla con la misma licencia que la imagen original.

Di, si eres capaz que esto no es copyvio, en iglés. Lo siento, yo no soy capaz y por eso pienso que este proyecto es una mierda. Lo contrario sería decir que la mierda soy yo.--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 23:17, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Pregunta

¿NO sabrás donde los usuarios podemos hacer una queja por un uso abusivo de las atribuciones de un administrador? Sé que hay un sitio, pero no lo encuentro--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 20:31, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Si sabes, pro favor, reponde en mi página de usuario. Hay un tal Turelio impresentable. Lo digo sabiendo lo que digo pues yo he sido burócrata en commons, pero no me acuerdo y no lo encuentro--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 20:34, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Gracias. Hay otra página para abusos de administradores (creo, pues la he usado, aunque no la encuentro hoy). En mi opinión este proyecto deja mucho que desear.

Espero que no te encuentres nunca con inconveniencias o incompetentes. No diversifiques tus actividades o te encontrarás con problemas. Si hasta yo he sido burócrata (y solamente hay 8 actualmente), ¿que se puede esperar de alguien que es administrador?

Lo digo en serio--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:24, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Miguel, deja el ordenador y vete a dormir, y vuelve mañana más despejado, algo así a veces ayuda, Poco² 21:41, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

gracias, pero es lo que pienso de siempre, no es nada nuevo. --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:47, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Si piensas que aquí hay normas y que se aplican normas, te confundes. Depende del administrador que decida la discusión. La discusión se decide a partir de experiencias personales y amigos. Es lo que hay. Espero que nunca te encuentres teniendo que fundamentar razones, aún teniendo la razón, en una discusión: Es muy muy jodido--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:52, 19 September 2013 (UTC) Quizás cierre la votación aquel que desea más darte por el culo: Ten ojo

Te voy a comentar lo sucedido, pero deseo que no tomes partido. Deseo que oigas y calles. Es posible, pues yo no lo sé todo, que yo no tenga razón. NO, por favor, NO TE IMPLIQUES EN NADA: Es solamente un comentario que hago porque me divierte hacerlo.

En la galipedia se propuso una imagen para imagen de la semana. Como es habitual en la galipedia (wp.gl), la imagen era mala y, además procedente dfe flickr.

Yo expresé en la página de propuestas a imágenes de semana que no me convencía y subí una nueva versión a commons que seguía sin convencerme.

El trabajo que hice no fue grande. Podría ser una "foto retocada", pero no la marqué como tal (retouched image) porque ese concepto no aparece en ninguna ley de ningún país y porque, según la ley, todo lo que es retocar

una imagen es imagen derivada.

He hecho una imagen derivada, por lo tanto. Pero se borra `por tener problemas con los metadatos.

Es absurdo. Si es una imagen derivada, yo soy autor y tengo derecho a variar los metadatos. Si la es original (cosa que ocurre en esta) no obliga a compartirla igual, puedo poner que todos los derechos son reservados y después, porque así me apetece, compartirla con la mismna licencia que la imagen original.

Ese es el problema. Los metadatos (como en casi todas mis imágenes) ponen que la obra tiene todos los derechos reservados. Eso ocurre cuando creas la imagen en tu ordenador. Cuando la comparto, decido la licencia, y decido compartirla con la misma licencia que la imagen original o con cc-by-sa-3.0.

Yo hw expresado en la página de propuestas a imágenes de semana que no me convencía y he subido una nueva versión a commons que seguía sin convencerme.

El trabajo que hice no fue grande. Podría ser una "foto retocada", pero no la marqué como tal (retouched image) porque ese concepto no aparece en ninguna ley de ningún país y porque, según la ley, todo lo que es retocar

una imagen es imagen derivada.

He hecho una imagen derivada, por lo tanto. Pero se borra `por tener problemas con los metadatos'. INCREÍBLE, INAUDITO.!!!!

Es absurdo. Si es una imagen derivada, yo soy autor y tengo derechO a variar los metadatos. Si la imagen original (cosa que ocurre e esta) no obliga a compartirla igual, puedo poner que todos los derechos son reservados y después, porque así me apetece, compartirla con la mismna licencia que la imagen original.

Ese es el problema. Los metadatos (como en casi todas mis imágenes) ponen que la obra tiene todos los derechos reservados. Eso ocurre cuando creas la imagen en tu ordenador. Cuando la comparto, decido la licencia, y decido compartirla con la misma licencia que la imagen original.

Di, si eres capaz que esto no es copyvio, en iglés. Lo siento, yo no soy capaz y por eso pienso que este proyecto es una mierda. Lo contrario sería decir que la mierda soy yo.--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 23:17, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Pregunta

¿NO sabrás donde los usuarios podemos hacer una queja por un uso abusivo de las atribuciones de un administrador? Sé que hay un sitio, pero no lo encuentro--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 20:31, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Si sabes, pro favor, reponde en mi página de usuario. Hay un tal Turelio impresentable. Lo digo sabiendo lo que digo pues yo he sido burócrata en commons, pero no me acuerdo y no lo encuentro--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 20:34, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Gracias. Hay otra página para abusos de administradores (creo, pues la he usado, aunque no la encuentro hoy). En mi opinión este proyecto deja mucho que desear.

Espero que no te encuentres nunca con inconveniencias o incompetentes. No diversifiques tus actividades o te encontrarás con problemas. Si hasta yo he sido burócrata (y solamente hay 8 actualmente), ¿que se puede esperar de alguien que es administrador?

Lo digo en serio--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:24, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Miguel, deja el ordenador y vete a dormir, y vuelve mañana más despejado, algo así a veces ayuda, Poco² 21:41, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

gracias, pero es lo que pienso de siempre, no es nada nuevo. --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:47, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Si piensas que aquí hay normas y que se aplican normas, te confundes. Depende del administrador que decida la discusión. La discusión se decide a partir de experiencias personales y amigos. Es lo que hay. Espero que nunca te encuentres teniendo que fundamentar razones, aún teniendo la razón, en una discusión: Es muy muy jodido--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:52, 19 September 2013 (UTC) Quizás cierre la votación aquel que desea más darte por el culo: Ten ojo

Te voy a comentar lo sucedido, pero deseo que no tomes partido. Deseo que oigas y calles. Es posible, pues yo no lo sé todo, que yo no tenga razón. NO, por favor, NO TE IMPLIQUES EN NADA: Es solamente un comentario que hago porque me divierte hacerlo.

En la galipedia se propuso una imagen para imagen de la semana. Como es habitual en la galipedia (wp.gl), la imagen era mala y, además procedente dfe flickr.

Yo expresé en la página de propuestas a imágenes de semana que no me convencía y subí una nueva versión a commons que seguía sin convencerme.

El trabajo que hice no fue grande. Podría ser una "foto retocada", pero no la marqué como tal (retouched image) porque ese concepto no aparece en ninguna ley de ningún país y porque, según la ley, todo lo que es retocar una imagen es imagen derivada.

He hecho una imagen derivada, por lo tanto. Pero se borra `por tener problemas con los metadatos.

Es absurdo. Si es una imagen derivada, yo soy autor y tengo derecho a variar los metadatos. Si la es original (cosa que ocurre en esta) no obliga a compartirla igual, puedo poner que todos los derechos son reservados y después, porque así me apetece, compartirla con la mismna licencia que la imagen original.

Ese es el problema. Los metadatos (como en casi todas mis imágenes) ponen que la obra tiene todos los derechos reservados. Eso ocurre cuando creas la imagen en tu ordenador. Cuando la comparto, decido la licencia, y decido compartirla con la misma licencia que la imagen original o con cc-by-sa-3.0.

Yo hw expresado en la página de propuestas a imágenes de semana que no me convencía y he subido una nueva versión a commons que seguía sin convencerme.

El trabajo que hice no fue grande. Podría ser una "foto retocada", pero no la marqué como tal (retouched image) porque ese concepto no aparece en ninguna ley de ningún país y porque, según la ley, todo lo que es retocar una imagen es imagen derivada.

He hecho una imagen derivada, por lo tanto. Pero se borra `por tener problemas con los metadatos'. INCREÍBLE, INAUDITO.!!!!

Es absurdo. Si es una imagen derivada, yo soy autor y tengo derechO a variar los metadatos. Si la imagen original (cosa que ocurre e esta) no obliga a compartirla igual, puedo poner que todos los derechos son reservados y después, porque así me apetece, compartirla con la mismna licencia que la imagen original.

Ese es el problema. Los metadatos (como en casi todas mis imágenes) ponen que la obra tiene todos los derechos reservados. Eso ocurre cuando creas la imagen en tu ordenador. Cuando la comparto, decido la licencia, y decido compartirla con la misma licencia que la imagen original.

Di, si eres capaz, que esto no es copyvio, en iglés. Lo siento, yo no soy capaz y por eso pienso que este proyecto es una mierda. Lo contrario sería decir que la mierda soy yo.--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 23:17, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Me he cansado de opinar (he escrito muchas líneas que no aparecen) y de observar que prohiben palabras (a ver si estas pasan la criba. --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 23:37, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

No tenías que contestar, no esperaba mayor contestación. A veces, necesitas un amigo para comentar lo que pasa y relajarte, no para que te conteste. Gracias por estar ahí--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 11:47, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kowloon Waterfront, Hong Kong, 2013-08-09, DD 05.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kowloon Waterfront, Hong Kong, 2013-08-09, DD 05.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 17:01, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Canal de la Peyrade, Sète, Hérault 01.jpg

Hola Diego, I think you're right, this image would be better with more exposure, but I had a little problem with my software, and I don't want to begin another the entire editing and I don't want to edit jpg because I am afraid of losing quality. It's a pity, thanks anyway. --Christian Ferrer 17:57, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Salut Christian, Well, fine to me. If you would like me to give it a try out of your RAW file, just tell me!! Poco² 20:34, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

It is not worthwhile because I had to do a large job to remove manually some défaults and it would be a work too much long which to remake it to correct a version which is already acceptable. However I will have been curious to compare your editing work with mine, then another time surely. Thank you, I take note of your assistance. Good evening or hello, according where you are. --Christian Ferrer 05:57, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Good morning! Ok, understood, nobproble, you know where I am...Poco² 06:24, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Castillo de Malbork, Polonia, 2013-05-19, DD 17.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Castillo de Malbork, Polonia, 2013-05-19, DD 17.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:24, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

WLM in Thailand

กรุณาใส่รหัสโบราณสถานที่ถูกต้อง ในงานที่ท่านส่งเข้ามาเพื่อการประกวดภาพถ่าย Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in Thailand ทุกชิ้น ขอบคุณครับ
Please add valid Monument IDs to all of your submissions to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in Thailand. Thank you.
--taweethaも (talk) 12:52, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Well, that's what I always try to do, is something missing? Poco² 15:24, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

It's all good now. I just see that you have added IDs to the files. The WLM tool https://toolserver.org/~platonides/wlm2013/uploads.php?country=th&limit=1000&tz=GMT&order=older is not real time but I use it as a basis to notify people. Sorry for your inconvenience. --taweethaも (talk) 10:08, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo Wat Arun, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good IMO--Lmbuga 23:14, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo Wat Arun, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments wow! --Ralf Roletschek 21:15, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento Neptuno, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:17, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa María, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 23:21, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San José, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 23:16, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San José, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:15, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo Wat Arun, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 18:55, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo Wat Arun, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good composition.--ArildV 18:18, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo Wat Arun, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:18, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo Wat Arun, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 18:47, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo Wat Arun, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments again, nice time exposure! --P e z i 22:45, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo Wat Arun, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good --Rjcastillo 19:48, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo Wat Arun, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:38, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo Wat Arun, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:38, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo Wat Arun, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 19:38, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo Wat Arun, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice time exposure --P e z i 22:05, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento Neptuno, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 19:49, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa Catalina, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 16:31, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta Verde, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 20:47, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estación de FFCC, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 19:52, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gran Armería, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 19:52, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayuntamiento Principal, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 20:46, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Adam Mickiewicz, Oliwa, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-21, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:51, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Nicolás, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:34, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercado, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 21:14, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta Alta, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support nice picture --P e z i 21:10, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa de los Abades de Pelplin, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:03, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa de los Abades de Pelplin, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 20:31, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre del Reloj, Kowloon, Hong Kong, 2013-08-11, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very nice IMO, just for info a very little little CA on the top left of the tower (very hard to see) --Christian Ferrer 20:35, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre del Reloj, Kowloon, Hong Kong, 2013-08-11, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:29, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Nicolás, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 11:00, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estación de FFCC, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:23, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa de los Abades de Pelplin, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:23, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estación de FFCC, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:28, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Jorge, Sopot, Polonia, 2013-05-22, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 10:35, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa María, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Mattbuck 18:59, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Talk page archival

Hi Poco, please archive your talk page. What a mess!! ;-) The QICbot was trying for an hour to get a confirmed edit on your page. --Dschwen (talk) 17:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Ha! Jetzt haben wir den Schuldigen! --Ralf Roleček 19:02, 23 September 2013 (UTC) oder er darf mal ein halbes Jahr keine Bilder nominieren, so als Strafe, daß er den Bot ärgert? Und wir nehmen ihm die Kamera weg.

Sorry! hab ihr mich lange gesucht :S Ja, das stimmt, ich habe mir diesmal ein bisschen Zeit gelassen, Juni-August zu archivieren. Das Problem ist halt, dass ich sehr beliebt unter Bots und anderen Wesen bin :) Poco² 20:42, 23 September 2013 (UTC) PS: Die Kamera gebe ich nicht her!!

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Muelle de Sopot, Polonia, 2013-05-22, DD 20.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Muelle de Sopot, Polonia, 2013-05-22, DD 20.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 08:15, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Oliwa, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-21, DD 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:45, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Oliwa, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-21, DD 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment cars distracting a bit (right side) but photo is good. imo --Rjcastillo 11:27, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Oliwa, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-21, DD 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 12:50, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento Neptuno, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:40, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo Wat Arun, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 11:29, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo Wat Arun, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 12:23, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre del Reloj, Kowloon, Hong Kong, 2013-08-11, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 12:23, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo Wat Arun, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 23:31, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo Wat Arun, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 23:29, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo Wat Arun, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 06:23, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo Wat Arun, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 23:48, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo Wat Arun, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 23:36, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa María, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good but CA (see note) --Christian Ferrer 06:12, 22 September 2013 (UTC)  Done, thank you Poco a poco 07:09, 22 September 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 08:57, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wat Pho, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 19:09, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo Wat Arun, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Noise is not as its best, but OK for a nightshot. --Tuxyso 21:50, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wat Pho, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 21:55, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wat Pho, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 21:55, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wat Pho, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 21:55, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wat Pho, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:18, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta Alta, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support See note. QI --Rjcastillo 19:05, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercado, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:51, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wat Pho, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:26, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa María, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pro for a good (and unusual) than a centered composition for the interior of a church, nice idea. Nonetheless the massively distorted elements in the top left are a bit disturbing. Have you tried to crop them out? --Tuxyso 21:53, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre de San Jacinto, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 08:07, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estación de FFCC, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:26, 26 September 2013 (UTC)