User talk:Pietervdvn
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 20:58, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Albert Serreyn - Overlijdendsbericht.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Albert Serreyn - Overlijdendsbericht.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Albert Serreyn - Overlijdendsbericht.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 23:36, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
File:Statue of Shrek in the Alps of France.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:47, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Aanduiding speelbos.svg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Aanduiding speelbos.svg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Aanduiding speelbos.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 01:05, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Revalidatieziekenhuis De Mick Standbeeld zon en maan.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Revalidatieziekenhuis De Mick Standbeeld zon en maan.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
And also:
- File:Revalidatieziekenhuis De Mick 09.jpg
- File:Revalidatieziekenhuis De Mick zijaanzicht lang.jpg
- File:Revalidatieziekenhuis De Mick Schoorsteen.jpg
- File:Revalidatieziekenhuis De Mick zijaanzicht.jpg
- File:Revalidatieziekenhuis De Mick uitbouw.jpg
- File:Revalidatieziekenhuis De Mick met naambord.jpg
- File:Revalidatieziekenhuis De Mick.jpg
- File:Revalidatieziekenhuis De Mick met bareel en voormalig stookhuis.jpg
- File:Standbeeld Heropbeuring 06.jpg
- File:Standbeeld Heropbeuring 04.jpg
- File:Standbeeld Heropbeuring 05.jpg
- File:Standbeeld Heropbeuring 01.jpg
- File:Standbeeld Heropbeuring 03.jpg
- File:Standbeeld Heropbeuring 02.jpg
- File:De Mick vooraanzicht.jpg
- File:De Mick ronding aan achterzijde.jpg
- File:De Mick Detail.jpg
- File:De Mick Achterzijde.jpg
- File:De Mick perspectief 01.jpg
- File:De Mick zijaanzicht.jpg
- File:Standbeeld 'Heropbeuring' en revalidatiecentrum De Mick.jpg
Yours sincerely, Adeletron 3030 (talk) 00:49, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hey Adeletron 3030,
- Kathelijnevs is mijn moeder, ze heeft deze foto's speciaal voor Wikipedia gemaakt. Er is dus geen webpagina of dergelijke om te "bewijzen" dat de rechten vrijgegeven zijn.
- Mvg,
- Pieter Pietervdvn (talk) 12:12, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
- If your mother is the photographer, could you ask her to change the Flickr licensing? Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:13, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- You are mixing up two separate uploadsː one of them was done directly by me, without Flickr as intermediate step. These are attributed to Kathelijnevs; she made them especially for wikidata.
- The Flickr-images were not made by my mom, but by someone who gave me permission via email. Pietervdvn (talk) 23:59, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
File tagging File:Revalidatiecentrum De Mick 02.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Revalidatiecentrum De Mick 02.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Revalidatiecentrum De Mick 02.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
And also:
- File:Revalidatiecentrum De Mick 04.jpg
- File:Revalidatiecentrum De Mick 08.jpg
- File:Revalidatiecentrum De Mick 09.jpg
- File:Revalidatiecentrum De Mick 10.jpg
- File:Revalidatiecentrum De Mick 12.jpg
- File:Revalidatiecentrum De Mick 13.jpg
- File:Revalidatiecentrum De Mick 14.jpg
- File:Revalidatiecentrum De Mick 16.jpg
- File:Revalidatiecentrum De Mick 17.jpg
Yours sincerely, Johnj1995 (talk) 03:50, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Revalidatiecentrum De Mick 03.jpg
[edit]
Elisfkc (talk) 17:39, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Revalidatiecentrum De Mick 21.jpg
[edit]
Elisfkc (talk) 17:40, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 22:50, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
File tagging File:Rosa Reichel.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Rosa Reichel.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Rosa Reichel.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |