User talk:Pierre André Leclercq/Archive 1

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014-Cambodge Ta Prohm (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments thank you! OK, thank you for this invitation--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:51, 27 January 2015 (UTC) The leaves are distracting, but I think despite the compositional weakness, it is good enough. --Ram-Man 02:20, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014-Cambodge Ta Prohm (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ram-Man 02:22, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014-Cambodge Ta Prohm (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St-vincent sur jard , la côte (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014-Cambodge Ta Prohm (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St-vincent sur jard , la côte (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amiens, les hortillonnages, (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Really good quality. There are some small blurrish parts on the right side, but its not so significant --Hubertl 23:09, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Talmont-Saint-Hilaire Port Bourgenay (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:06, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Talmont-Saint-Hilaire Port Bourgenay (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:06, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malibu, Western Malibu, (Californie).jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:06, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Khustain Nuruu National Park (7).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I like this very much! --Moroder 12:31, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Londres.- House of Parliament 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO it's too dark and tilted CCW.--XRay 10:57, 19 February 2015 (UTC) Done Thank you, darkness and tilt corrected --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:09, 20 February 2015 (UTC)  Support IMO acceptable now.--XRay 06:44, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Londres.- Oceanic Village.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me, even when weak. Though of the blueish. Third opinion appreciated.. --Hubertl 17:38, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lille, Hôtel de la Préfecture du Nord (Fiche Mérimée PA00107725)..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and QI for me, even when it´s not very sharp --Hubertl 15:07, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cambodge Banteay Srei Temple (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:04, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cambodge Banteay Srei Temple (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 16:40, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cambodge Banteay Srei Temple (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:06, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beselare (Belgique).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Already OI for me, you could think about perspective correction with ShiftN --J. Lunau 14:50, 24 February 2015 (UTC)*  Comment yes I know the Shift software I've used a lot before Gimp. I would have the test again in difficult perspectives--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 13:57, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cambodge Banteay Srei Temple (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK now. --Bgag 14:24, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Bouddha couché du Temple Baphuon...jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 20:28, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2014 - December - Household items in use/Winners

	Photo Challenge Winner
	Congratulations! Your picture Bottle openers.JPG won the 1st place in the Photo Challenge Household items in use, in December 2014. You can find the results of the challenge here.

	Photo Challenge – Second Place
	Congratulations! Your picture Pounding in Laos.jpg won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge Household items in use, in December 2014. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Chosing next month's theme (April)

Hello Pierre Andre Leclercq,
we decided some months ago to ask the challenge winners if they could help to decide the themes for the next month needing themes - in this case April.
If you are ready to help us, just start a section on commons talk:Photo challenge (e.g. April themes), where you post your suggestion / decide which of the posted suggestions (e.g. from the other two winners) you like best. If you are looking for ideas, here's a list of suggestions that are waiting to be chosen - but you are welcome to propose another theme.
Best wishes, Anna reg (talk) 09:58, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello Anna reg,thank you to you for inviting me to assist in the selection of future themes to be proposed to Photo Challenge. With pleasure, I'll post some suggestions in the list of suggestions that are waiting to be chosen. Best regards.---PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 10:28, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

You are always welcome to do that - but my question was actually if you could help to decide the two April themes by choosing one favourite and posting that on the Photo challenge talk page. Best wishes, Anna reg (talk) 14:03, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello Anna reg , since you ask me to make proposals for the Challenge April Photo, I suggest: "Analog photography I: Analog photography equipment" et "Analog photography II: Analog photographs".- I have posted my proposition in "Commons talk:Photo challenge".- Best wishes,--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 14:38, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! I took the liberty to add the links to your suggestion - hope that's fine with you. --Anna reg (talk) 16:02, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angkor Wat, Siem Reap, Cambodge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:56, 01 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siem Reap, Victory Gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:20, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Model healthy village Laos (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine. --Palauenc05 11:47, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pouchkine.- le palais de Catherine (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:42, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Pétersbourg.- palais de Pavlovsk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:32, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Page utilisateur

Bonjour collègue,

Étant natif de la préfecture de ce département, je suis dans l'obligation de te signaler que, contrairement à ce que tu annonces dans ta page de présentation, la Charente-Maritime n'est pas dans la région Pays-de-Loire, mais dans la région Poitou-Charentes...

Bien cordialement, --Jebulon (talk) 21:29, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour Jebulon

Un grand merci pour ton intervention. Je corrige donc immédiatement mon erreur.

Il est vrai qu'avec la réforme des Régions il va me falloir revoir cette page de présentation, dans son ensemble... celà ne va pas être une mince affaire.

Bien cordialement, --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 10:33, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Saint-Sauveur-sur-le-Sang-Versé de Saint-Pétersbourg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:30, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscou.-Place Rouge Cathédrale Notre-Dame-de-Kazan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Where is Nathalie? Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 17:45, 04 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Pétersbourg.- palais de Pavlovsk (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 17:46, 04 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Puy de Sancy (8).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 23:22, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Puy de Dôme (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 23:24, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Monastère Gunji érigé par un prince mongol en mémoire de sa fille au XVIII° siècle (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:01, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Puy de Dôme (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:21, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Courtrai.- moulin musée, d-hotel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 20:56, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Palais sur Mer.- la plage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:54, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! L'Île d'Aix Phares.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Too much water. See the note for the proposed crop. --Halavar 23:48, 10 March 2015 (UTC) Thanks for your review. Done the crop you have proposed.- Please care to take another look?--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:10, 11 March 2015 (UTC)  Support Good now. --Halavar 12:54, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! L'Ile d' Aix.- Mairie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 15:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bailleul, le Beffroi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:38, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meteren Chemin du Vierayms.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 03:13, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lille, 13 rue du Pont Neuf PA00107706.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 14:42, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lille- Place du Vieux Marché aux Chevaux .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 14:44, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meteren Vallon de Méteren becque (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Hubertl 21:26, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meteren Vallon de Méteren becque (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Hubertl 21:26, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Middelbur le village Ndebele,.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 15:50, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mémorial d'Ascq.- Villeneuve d'Ascq (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 15:15, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mémorial d'Ascq.- Villeneuve d'Ascq.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:26, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A la maison Commune Villeneuve d'Ascq.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:08, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! L'Avenir Villeneuve d Ascq.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:08, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lille, l' estaminet 4 fils Aymon, 55 rue de la Barre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not the best composition (because of the motive itself, I presume) but good for QI --Hubertl 17:28, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hucqueliers Le monument aux Morts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:50, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lille 50 rue Gustave Delory (Fiche Mérimée PA00107912).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:46, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villeneuve d'Ascq, Musée de Plein air Ruches des abeilles noires.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:26, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villeneuve d'Ascq Église Saint-Sébastien (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok now for me. --Hubertl 11:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villeneuve d'Ascq, Musée de Plein air pigeonnier de Frethun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:30, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villeneuve d'Ascq, Musée de Plein air Forges d' Hondschoote.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 14:57, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014-04-06 Villeneuve d'Ascq, Musée de Plein air.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. A bit dark on the right side --Moroder 00:04, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

L'Île-Grande

Bonjour, votre image File:Ile Grande, plage au bout de l'impasse Run Losquet.jpg a un souci: - Ce n'est pas l'Île-Grande, puisque c'est une île plate - Le littoral de Pleumeur-Bodou ne ressemble pas du tout à cette photo. La localisation étant fausse, la catégorisation (plage du Finistère) est peut-être la bonne? Bien cordialement--Spendeau (talk) 11:19, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

• @Spendeau Merci à vous pour cette remarque. Mais je suis presque certain que cette photo a été prise sur l' Île Grande, dans le quartier de saint Sauveur en face de l' Île Trönnéo et Karreg ar Merk, le 25 mai 2003. Je suis allé sur l"île Grande, quatre fois entre 2003 à 2007, et cette photo a été prise lors d'une ballade de Toul ar Stand vers plage au bout de l'impasse Run Losquet. Cordialement.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 13:27, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
  • J'habite à 5km de l'Île-Grande, c'est pour ça que j'ai un doute; j'ai posé la question sur le projet Bretagne pour savoir si quelqu'un reconnaît l'endroit. Merci d'avoir répondu.--Spendeau (talk) 14:37, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
    • merci pour cette démarche de vérification auprès du projet Bretagne, si j'ai fait une erreur faites le moi savoir, de manière à ce que je la corrige, sur panoramio et flicker.- Cordialement --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 15:11, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
      • Je pensais au Yaudet près de Lannion et en fait, une personne a trouvé, il s'agit de l'autre rive du Léguer; j'ai rectifié les cordonnées sur la photo, la légende et la catégorie, reste à modifier le nom de la photo (que je ne sais faire)! Bonne continuation.--Spendeau (talk) 20:42, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
        • Un grand merci, Spendeau décidément ma mémoire me fait défaut... c'est vrai qu'à l'époque les GPS n'étaient pas courants. C'est donc bien sympathique d'avoir fait des recherches précises sur ce lieu.. Le nom du fichier a été corrigé, dans les commons mais aussi sur flicker et sur Panoramio. Cordialement à vous.---PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 21:11, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villeneuve d'Ascq, Musée de Plein air germoir de Warhem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Now, ok --Billy69150 18:20, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villeneuve d'Ascq, Musée de Plein air Méteren.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Much better --Crisco 1492 01:51, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1961 Chrysler New Yorker, front view (low).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, perhaps a big tight at left and right--Lmbuga 22:05, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1961 Chrysler New Yorker, rear view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good Imo--Lmbuga 22:25, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Primevère Polyanthus (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition, QI for me --Hubertl 02:45, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buick Skylark (Back view) 1972.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This is, what I would call a proper back. QI for me, even when the crop is not centered. --Hubertl 11:26, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chevrolet impala profil gauche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 05:43, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014-06-22 Duke's Club.- Chevrolet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:18, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chevrolet Bel Air Avant à Carmel Californie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:45, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buick Skylark (front view) 1972.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nothing wrong for QI, the fact, that it is not centered perfectly is not essential. --Hubertl 15:46, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1941 Buick Series 70 Duke's Club.- Villeneuve d'Ascq (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:50, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dodge Charger 1971 (Profile gauche).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:06, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1941 Buick Series 70 Duke's Club.- (Profil) Villeneuve d'Ascq.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:02, 6 April 2015 (UTC)  Comment. Is the rear axle of the car broken? ;-) -- Spurzem 16:10, 6 April 2015 (UTC)  Comment the back of the car was really low --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 09:12, 7 April 2015 (UTC) I meant the inclined wheel. -- Spurzem 16:01, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bakersfield, (CA) Truck Kenworth at Flying J Travel (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 19:49, 8 April 2015 (UTC) seems off vertical and too tightly cropped --Charlesjsharp 22:58, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aubechies, L'église Saint-Géry (xie siècle).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 16:37, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aubechies (Belgique).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI, nice composition -- Spurzem 16:37, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aubechies, L'église Saint-Géry et son cimetière.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me now --Hubertl 07:55, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aubechies section de Beloeil (Belgique) (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me now --Hubertl 07:55, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aubechies section Chapelle Saint Géry (Belgique).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me, third opinion appreciated --Hubertl 07:56, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Pen'tiere Avesnelles (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nord (département_français).--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:06, 15 April 2015 (UTC) Good quality -- Spurzem 21:15, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Pen'tiere Avesnelles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nord (département_français).--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:04, 15 April 2015(UTC) *  Support Good quality. --Hubertl 06:36, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-09-23 Kerascoêt village (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:47, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flêtre Café de la Mairie.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Excellent compostion. Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 16:12, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! GERBEROY Le vieux logis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok now. QI for me --Hubertl 17:24, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Champassak, Vat Phu (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Wiki loves Earth.

Bonjour Pierre André,

Au nom des organisateurs du concours, je vous remercie pour votre participation à Wiki loves Earth. Malheureusement, je suis au regret de vous annoncer que certaines de vos photos ne pourront pas être conservées sur Commons. Il s'agit de File:Réserve naturelle nationale de la dune Marchand.jpg et File:Villeneuve d' Ascq le Parc du Héron.jpg. En effet, la réglementation sur la propriété intellectuelle en France interdit de reproduire les panneaux signalétiques sans l'autorisation de leurs ayant-droits et les projets Wikimedia s'attachent à respecter cette réglementation. Nous essayons de faire évoluer les choses, mais en attendant, ces photos ne peuvent rester en ligne et j'ai donc dû demander leur suppression à titre préventif. Cela n'a aucune incidence sur votre participation au concours et j'espère que cela n'entamera pas votre motivation !

Amicalement, --EdouardHue (talk) 16:36, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

 Thank you. EdouardHue.- Je ne connaissais pas cette particularité de la réglementation sur la propriété intellectuelle en France. Je viens hélas de poster recemment de nouveaux fichiers pour lesquels leur retrait s'imposera.

File:Besse-et-Saint-Anastaise Massif du Sancy (3).jpg File:Vred.- Parc naturel régional Scarpe-Escaut Le Terril de Germignies-Nord (2).jpg et File:Vred.- Parc naturel régional Scarpe-Escaut Le Terril de Germignies-Nord (1).jpg.

Ma motivation en restera bien évidemment intacte - Cordialement à vous.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 16:46, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Les subtilités de la loi sont trop nombreuses et complexes pour être connues de tous, malheureusement. En voici l'illustration ! Pour les deux nouvelles photos que vous signalez, j'aimerais considérer que l'exception dite de minimis s'applique, contrairement aux deux précédentes où les panneaux étaient clairement l'unique sujet représenté. Je choisis de ne rien faire pour le moment . --EdouardHue (talk) 17:10, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veryac'h Plage de Kerloc'h (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. No noise. --Hubertl 23:53, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canny-sur-Thérain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me. Not dark enough for declining --Hubertl 17:24, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2015 - May - Panoramas

I'm afraid I have had to remove File:Champassak, Vat Phu (2).jpg since they it not first uploaded to Commons in May 2015, per the Photo Challenge rules. I appreciate you have reprocessed/cropped it, but it is still the same photograph. -- Colin (talk) 20:54, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Colin I actually thought it best with a. "restating / cropped" picture and to propose it in IQ. -. So I'll upload another picture within the rules of the challenge. With my apologies for this error, best regards.

fr: Je suis désolé. Je pensais que ce serait mieux de présenter une image "retraitée et recadrée" et de la proposer dans "Quality Image" au préalable. Je vais envoyer une autre photo qui sera faite dans les règles du "Challenge". Avec mes excuses pour cette erreur, meilleures salutations à vous.

--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 21:26, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Léger (Estaimpuis)..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:42, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veryac'h Plage de Kerloc'h (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 20:35, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veryac'h Plage de Kerloc'h (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for QI. --C messier 13:08, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth: files have to be uploaded during the contest period

Hello, i noticed you reinserted the WLE 2015 template to images you uploaded before the contest began, like here [1]. One image was uploaded in 2014, the other in March 2015. WLE 2015 France started on 2015-05-01, so please do not revert again (and i ask you this, not only because your edits broke the statistics display).

Please see http://wikilovesearth.fr/post/117697026816/reglement and Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2015/Rules & FAQ for the rules. Holger1959 (talk) 11:02, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

( English) Hello Holger1959. Sorry, I had not realized that the competition required the WLE 2015 photos uploaded in the period from May 1 to May 31 So I downloaded pictures erroneously assessed and promoted "Quality Image Promotion" which predated this period. Be assured of my apologies

(En français) Bonjour Holger 1959. je n'avais pas compris que le concours, WLE 2015 exigeait des photos téléchargées dans la période du 1 mai au 31 mai. J'ai donc téléchargé par erreur des photos évaluée et promues "Quality Image Promotion" qui étaient antérieures à cette période. Soyez assuré de toutes mes excuses.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 14:29, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

no problem :) thank you for your understanding, and for so many nice photos (even if 2 of them are now not eligible for WLE 2015). Holger1959 (talk) 15:31, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Puy de Sancy (2014).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:46, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Puy de Dôme rando (2014).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:18, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth Brazil

Bonjour,

Pour information et bien que je m'occupe surtout de Wiki Loves Earth France, il me semble bien que File:Cataractes d' Iguazu (3).jpg est admissible à l'édition brésilienne de Wiki Loves Earth 2015.

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 14:29, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour, VIGNERON

merci à vous pour cette information, voilà, qui est fait en espérant ne pas avoir commis d'erreur dans les codifications ci-dessous mises (sans leurs balises) :

"Wiki Loves Earth 2015|br" "Images from Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Brazil to check"

Cordialement.- --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 16:26, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lille, la Vieille Bourse (PA00107639).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:20, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Noordpeene, Chemin du Tom.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:14, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Excuse me, but haven´t you read?

This CIC-process was already finished. After 10 Days. I closed it, according to the rules. Now you opened it again. Tell me, how many days should we keep open the discussion? One month, half a year? If you want to organize the Quality Image consensual review, please do it. But then please do it completely. Not just voting. --Hubertl (talk) 21:55, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

• Hubertl it is a mistake on my part... I am sorry. I reopened this file at a late hour in the night, I mistaken with other.- Best regard- --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 07:41, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quièvelon l’imposante ferme du Mesnil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This one is better than the previous one. *  but not absoltely convinced, though QI for me. --Hubertl 15:10, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locmariaquer Entrée des Pierres Plates.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Hubertl 07:33, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Noordpeene, les prairies du Schoubrouck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Hubertl 10:24, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Artres la vallée de la Rhonelle (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:01, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morgat.-Rochers du Beg ar Kador.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for this camera. --Hubertl 15:48, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yucca flaccida plage Saint-Philibert, Morbihan..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Hubertl 05:25, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villeneuve d'Ascq, château du Sart, Club house du Golf du Sart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments In my opinion f4 not ideal, but good quality.--Famberhorst 17:09, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vilnius.-Église Saints-Pierre-et-Paul.- Autel de la Vierge couronnée.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not perfect, but ok --Poco a poco 17:34, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old Riga Vecrīga Town Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please check your image. It's leaning out. --XRay 16:40, 1 July 2015 (UTC) And there is noticable barrel distortion. --C messier 16:40, 1 July 2015 (UTC)  DoneCorrections done to the noticeable barrel distortion and in the tilted pic.Please care to take another look?--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:44, 2 July 2015 (UTC) Weak  Support Crop at the bottom not the best (half people), but IMO QI. --XRay 12:27, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vilnius.- Église Saints-Pierre-et-Paul (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:02, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le château de Rundal (Rundal Pils) (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:03, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Chateau Trakai (Lituanie) (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Xicotencatl 05:51, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tallinn.- 26 Pikk House of the Brotherhood of Black Heads (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support--Jebulon 19:35, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vilnius N-D de la Porte d'Aurore Vilnius.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 17:23, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tallinn rue Pikk La maison du voyeur.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Modèle été des villes

Bonjour, Pierre-André

Je te signale que, pour la campagne L'été des villes, les fichiers doivent contenir le modèle {{L'été des villes}} et la Category:Uploaded via Campaign:ÉtédesVilles, et non Category:Images from Été des Villes 2015 qui est inclu dans le modèle {{L'été des villes}}. C'est due a une faute de programmation, voir Le message de Jules78120. Pourras-tu y tenir compte quand tu utilises commonist? Je l'ai fait pour tes fichiers déjà téléchargés. Amicalement --Havang(nl) (talk) 08:11, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour Havang(nl) merci pour tes précieux conseils. Il est vrai que je m'y perds un peu dans les catégories. Le plus simple pour moi sera télécharger mes photos avec UploadWizard. Bien amicalement. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 09:31, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Entre-temps, on a adapté le modèle {{L'été des villes}} qui contient maintenant les deux categories et qui est donc suffisant à lui seul pour les categories de la campagne. --Havang(nl) (talk) 08:22, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2015 - June - Collections, Collecting and Collectables/Winners

	Photo Challenge – Third Place
	Congratulations! Your picture Muselets Champagne.jpg won the 3rd place in the Photo Challenge Collections, Collecting and Collectables, in June 2015. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Photo challenge/2015 - August - Personal Protective Equipment

salut Pierre André. J'avais viré la photo Mission Apollo XIII à Universal Studios Hollywood.jpg du Photo challenge, vu que je croyais qu'elle avait été téléchargée en 2012. Désolé, je me suis planté. Je la remets de suite. Bon courage pour la "deletion request" et tout les trucs en anglais ci-dessus que j'y comprends rien.--Classiccardinal (talk) 23:12, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour Classiccardinal. tu n'es pas le seul a demander la suppression de cette photo relative à l'attraction du vaisseau spatial Apollo XIII. La question qui se pose, est en effet celle de la possibilité de violation du droit d'auteur (images du film Apollo 13) avec les trois astronautes découpés dans du carton et qui sont mis en exposition permanente. Pour éviter tous litiges mieux vaut peut être retirer cette photo qui me semblait originale. Cordialement--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 08:33, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Challenge versus campain

Bonjour, Pierre-André, La campagne Été des villes du 21 juillet au 21 septembre n'est que simple campagne sans concours, alors on n'est pas critique sur les dates du télechargement et la date d'addition du modèle l'été des villes ; mais le challenge Wiki Loves monuments est un concours avec des règles strictes, seul les photo's télechargé entre 1 et 30 septembre peuvent participer au concours. File:Lille, Hôtel de la Préfecture du Nord (Fiche Mérimée PA00107725)..jpg téléchargé en février, et donné le modèle WLM aujourd'hui est donc hors concours, et ne devrait pas avoir le modèle WLM. Amicalement--Havang(nl) (talk) 15:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour Havang(nl) merci de m'avoir précisé que le challenge Wiki Loves monuments est un concours pour lequel les photos devaient être téléchargées entre 1 et 30 septembre. Je n'avais pas compris cette règle stricte et j'ai donc ainsi téléversé quelques autres fichiers par erreur pour lesquels je m'en excuse. Bien amicalement à vous. --Pierre André (talk) 15:21, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Lien vers statistiques WLM où on trouve les dates de télechargement: http://stats.wikilovesmonuments.cl/france. Seront même hors concours WLM les téléchargements après minuit en France mais avant minuit UTC qui compte pour le concours (2 heures de décalage!)--Havang(nl) (talk) 15:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

 Thank you. dommage que je ne serais pas beaucoup là en Septembre. Bon WLM à vous. --Pierre André (talk) 15:43, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Image du jour de Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 en France, 4 September 2015

Votre photo « Salle des Preux du Château de Pierrefonds (2).jpg » a été choisie par les bénévoles de Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 comme image coup de cœur (ou image du jour) du 4 September 2015. Vous avez ainsi remporté un tee-shirt Wiki Loves Monuments. Wikimédia France vous recontactera prochainement pour préparer l'envoi de votre lot.

Trizek ^{from FR} 15:09, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour Trizek|from FR, un grand merci pour cette distinction. C'est avec plaisir que je porterai le tee-shirt Wiki Loves Monuments. Cordialement --Pierre André (talk) 20:02, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

: Bonjour Trizek j'ai bien reçu mon tee-shirt Wiki Loves Monuments. C'est super sympa. Bonnes fêtes de fin d'année. Cordialement.--Pierre André (talk) 13:07, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Aerial photographs

Hi there! Three of your uploaded aerial photographs listed as taken in Tallinn, are actually not taken in Tallinn. I thought you might actually know where these are taken and fix the incorrect information.

• File:Tallinn.- Kompassi in Kesklinn (city center) (2).jpg
• File:Tallinn.- Kompassi in Kesklinn (city center).jpg
• File:Tallinn.-Kalevi Keskstaadion.jpg

Best regards! Flying Saucer (talk) 22:50, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Flying Saucer these photos were taken during takeoff of the aircraft in Tallinn.

I think they target the center of the historic city and the business center. If this is not the case can you tell me their precise geolocation.

 Thank you. Thank you, best regards. --Pierre André (talk) 10:27, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Salut

Hi Pierre...it's all ok? Salut --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 16:50, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

hi LivioAndronico. Yes all it's OK, thank you! I returned from a trip Sri Lanka in the last few weeks, and since I'm very overwhelmed. I think it will get better after the year-end holidays. Happy christmas, to you. Sincerely soon --Pierre André (talk) 22:01, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galle Closenberg Hotel (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:01, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dambulla Temple d'or (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok now for me, even when the shadows still strong --Hubertl 14:37, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dambulla Temple d'or (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok now for me, even when the shadows still strong --Hubertl 14:37, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lankatilaka Temple (5).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:13, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weligama beach (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:44, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weligama beach (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:32, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weligama beach (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:31, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kandi jardin botanique de Peradeniya (le parc) (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:30, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colombo Temple bouddhiste de Gangaramaya (15).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --Hubertl 15:26, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 January 2016 (UTC)