User talk:PetarM/Archive 6

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Saint Naum Monastery (манастир Свети Наум код Охрида, Македонија).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Naum Monastery (манастир Свети Наум код Охрида, Македонија).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fresco of Seven Saints in Saint Naum Monastery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very good --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:29, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:57, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Fishing by lighthouse (Adriatic Sea) at sunset

Fishing by lighthouse at sunset (Adriatic Sea)

Hi Petar, Thanks for uploading this nice image, do you know the location & country of the lighthouse. If you do, it can then be categorized more precisely. (I will watch here for any reply). Thanks...Jokulhlaup (talk) 09:10, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

@Jokulhlaup  Done --Mile (talk) 18:56, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Many Thanks for the quick response --Jokulhlaup (talk) 15:59, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

+

Hi Petar. Thank you for the last photos. Guduric, Kostas, Melli etc. I wish you different travels for new photos. I'm sure you like this job.--Kingbjelica (talk) 15:39, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cortinarius (koprenke).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very high-quality depiction of the mushroom. -- Ikan Kekek 03:23, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Звоно Манастирa Моштаница (Bell Tower, Monastery Moštanica, Republika Srpska).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Звоно Манастирa Моштаница (Bell Tower, Monastery Moštanica, Republika Srpska).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agile frog (Rana dalmatina).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 08:04, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Archiving FPC

Hi! Thank you for cleaning up the FPC list by removing the 'withdrawn'. :) However, if you remove noms from the FPC list you must also archive them in the Log and close all of them as 'not featured'. I have done that for you now and closed them. If they are not closed, the noms will be in the system until the voting period is over and they will eventually end up in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review until someone find them and close them and perhaps can put them in the right Log. --cart-Talk 13:12, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agile frog (Rana dalmatina).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Very good for me but we must add a geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Agreed. You are more or less picking between this photo and this one. And not letting this go through just because that is a QI isn't right. Not that it's important but I bet this would be a QI. Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:08, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
• I have added geolocation. Sixflashphoto thats photo is fine, not feautered for me, neither can be VI, why...because of flash, he lost colors. I have just checked pictures on Google, would not get so dark brown color like that one. --Mile (talk) 09:23, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support I feel this is best in scope. And your argument is convincing. Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:29, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 14:41, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments in Serbia

Hello! First, thanks for the great photo — File:Cortinarius (koprenke).jpg.

Second, I have one question. I visited Serbia recently, a month ago (18-21 September) and I was in Belgrade and Novi Sad. I made a lot of photos and some videos (despite the weather could be better)! Some of them can be used even in Wiki Loves Monuments. Is there some plans to have a competition of «Wiki Loves monuments in Serbia» for next, 2018 year? Maybe you know? :) The photography contest was a year ago, in 2016. --Brateevsky {talk} 11:47, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Agile frog (Rana dalmatina).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Agile frog (Rana dalmatina).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cortinarius (koprenke).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cortinarius (koprenke).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Common slowworm (Anguis fragilis).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 18:45, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wedding ring with heart shadow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Someone might be bothered by the depth of field... IMO it's good applied here. Excellent shot! --Basotxerri 17:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rdeča mušnica (Amanita muscaria).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Where did you photograph it? --C messier 13:02, 10 October 2017 (UTC) GQ for me, however indication of the location is a good pratice. Tournasol7 16:19, 10 October 2017 (UTC) * Done --PetarM 16:44, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Common slowworm (Anguis fragilis).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Common slowworm (Anguis fragilis).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Wedding ring with heart shadow.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wedding ring with heart shadow.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Amanita muscaria var. aureola, immature.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment No question this is great and I'm a bit surprised there isn't a single VI in a category of over 900 images already. My question to myself is does this image represent all Amanita Muscaria var. Aureola. It could absolutely but should it? Do you think this should be the VI for all of Amanita Muscaria var. Aureola or should the scope be changed to add something along the lines of Immature fruiting body? I could see it both ways really. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:17, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment A photographic identification on an immature specimen is extremely difficult. The Label is supposed to be an identification reference, this is not the case here. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:50, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
• I can only add immature. Other will stay. I can make category there, but wont pushing othe photos into, its problem with mushrooms, even "knowers" get poisoned. --Mile (talk) 10:05, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment I'm not overly concerned with misidentification here. I'm trusting the source since with Mycelium when it starts to fruit, it almost never sends up one fruiting body. So I'm trusting that since I see nothing obviously wrong with the identification of the photo that the specimen is identified correctly. I also wouldn't create a new category. I see no need for that. I'm just wondering if the scope needs to say that this is an immature fruiting body. What did you mean by "The Label is supposed to be an identification reference"? -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:54, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Probably to be in Infobox !? Can be, if they make En.wiki article, otheriwise will be added to Amanita muscaria as representing, just made talk about that there. --Mile (talk) 21:07, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Adding immature would be a good compromise. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Wolf spider (Lycosidae; Slovenia).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wolf spider (Lycosidae; Slovenia).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drum of a washing machine (Bosch Maxx WFO 2440).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:02, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Drum of a washing machine (Bosch Maxx WFO 2440).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Drum of a washing machine (Bosch Maxx WFO 2440).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G80/G85.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:10, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:23, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vittoria Randonneur tire (trekking bicycle).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:54, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2017 - September - Vacations/Winners

	Photo Challenge – Second Place
	Congratulations! Your picture Fishing by lighthouse at sunset (Adriatic Sea).jpg won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge Vacations, in September 2017. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 02:58, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fishing by lighthouse at sunset (Adriatic Sea).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments One of the winners of the last photo contest (vacations). Excellent. --Jacek79 16:30, 4 November 2017 (UTC)  Info This image was already nominated on November 2nd. See below. --Milseburg 16:44, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! EM100005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 17:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jewish cemetery in Chernivtsi (Еврейское кладбище в Черновцах).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice! Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:47, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

thanks for this feedback

Just wanted to say thanks for your comment at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alexander Hamilton Custom House Collector's Room ceiling (40511s).jpg/2. I did play around with the colors a bit, and found this one to be the most "true" to how I think it looked. That's not to say it's the one that looks the best, necessarily. :) But I was hesitant to get into tweaks like that when there was already a good amount of support by that point. Just wanted to let you know it's appreciated and wasn't simply ignored. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  05:32, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dish with fruits.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 20:07, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rings of time Information Age (Digital Revolution).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Original & well done. QI. --Selbymay 08:22, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gentiana acaulis (stemless gentian).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:21, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gentiana acaulis, flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Question Why an own category for this single photo? We have a lot of close-ups here. Either you put all close-ups in your new catogory, or you compare this it with the other, i.e. you link your VIC that category (BTW, it is easy to create an own category for a single photo, although there exist a lot of similar photos, and then to nominate it for VI.) --Llez (talk) 05:24, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment Llez is right. You have to rename this category to " Gentiana acaulis - flower " and place the images inside. Then redo a VI nomination with this category. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Info talk, Llez Because they make close-up cats of flowers, so i made it. And i actually dont see any stacked macro there, but you can compare with all flowers there too. Simply - no challenge. Which one to put here ? These needs needs stackinig, i think singular shot is away to show any macro. Compare with that Category too. No problem. But i wont doing redirection of other shots. --Mile (talk) 08:55, 18 November 2017 (UTC) p.S. I cant put into Category " Gentiana acaulis - flower " since i saw on other flowers what they do for macro...its "Close-up photographs of... "
  
  •  Comment The scope is "close-up" not "Focus stacked". For a close-up, it is not absolutely necessary to stack. So, in this scope you must compare with all other close ups, not only with focus stacked ones. I photographed hundreds of shells, but I had never the idea to create an own category for each stacked shell (for the most pictures of other authors are not). You say, compare it with the photos on the other category, but for VI it is mandatory, that the picture is in the same category as the pictures you have to compare. BTW in the file desription I found no hint, that is is focus stacked, according the description it is "only" Macro photography. In addition, it does not fullfill criterion 5, it is not geocoded. --Llez (talk) 16:13, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
• I put it in main category, geo added. @Llez its 15-20 mm, doing macro its more than clar when you see single shot (check that Category) and when stacked image. You won't never see all in detail in the single shot. And yes, its under Category:Focus stacking images of flowers from beginning. --Mile (talk) 06:54, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

 Info If you still add "flower" to the scope - the picture shows only the flower, not the whole plant - I will support --Llez (talk) 08:11, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 Comment I put flower. --Mile (talk) 16:01, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 20:08, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Gentiana acaulis (stemless gentian).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gentiana acaulis (stemless gentian).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paphiopedilum Pinocchio (yellow).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent --Llez 17:36, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Paphiopedilum Pinocchio (yellow).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paphiopedilum Pinocchio (yellow).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zygopetalum hybrid (Dunkle Blüte).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 11:36, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shimano Hyperglide cassette 8-speed CS-HG51 11-32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:15, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dish of blueberries.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:01, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Electric guide 3×2.5 mm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:11, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Zygopetalum 'Dunkle Blüte'.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zygopetalum 'Dunkle Blüte'.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:12, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2017 has started

Hi, "Wiki Science Competition" 2017 has started It is a world event. The upload phase in Asian, American and European countries without juries ends on December 15th. Here you can find more details. This is a manually inserted message for commons users with knowledge of the English language who are also globally active or who have uploaded images related to the competition's themes (science buildings, microscopic images, scientists, wildlife...). #WSC2017 #WikiScience #WikiScience2017 Wiki Science Competition

--Alexmar983 (talk) 05:18, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dish of blueberries.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dish of blueberries.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Shimano Hyperglide cassette 8-speed CS-HG51 11-32.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Shimano Hyperglide cassette 8-speed CS-HG51 11-32.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Electric guide 3×2.5 mm.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Electric guide 3×2.5 mm.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2018! ;)

			* Happy Holidays 2018, PetarM! *
			Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Ho! Ho! Ho! It’s Christmas time! May love, success, luck and friendship come knocking at your door throughout this Christmas season. Have a wonderful Christmas. . --The Photographer 15:00, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kifli made with spelt flour (Serbian cuisine).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:38, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kifli made with spelt flour (Serbian cuisine).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kifli made with spelt flour (Serbian cuisine).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christmas table (Serbian cuisine).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good Charlesjsharp 13:00, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 January 2018 (UTC)