User talk:Pedu0303
Just write:
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 09:17, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Santanamapa2.PNG was uncategorized on 20 September 2009.
- Image:Palacete Baruel 2.jpg was uncategorized on 10 October 2009.
- Image:Higienopolis 2.JPG was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:00, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Higienopolis.JPG was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:00, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Marcha para Jesus.jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:00, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Força Sindical Maio.jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:00, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Pre-candidatos.jpg was uncategorized on 10 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:57, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:Teatro_Alfredo_Mesquita.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Teatro_Alfredo_Mesquita.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Teatro_Alfredo_Mesquita.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
–Tryphon☂ 20:37, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Aniversário_de_Santana.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Aniversário_de_Santana.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Aniversário_de_Santana.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
–Tryphon☂ 20:38, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:SESC_Santana.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:SESC_Santana.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:SESC_Santana.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
–Tryphon☂ 20:38, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Bairro_de_Santana.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Bairro_de_Santana.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
–Tryphon☂ 22:10, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Teatro Alfredo Mesquita.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
–Juliancolton | Talk 12:33, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
File:Bairro de Santana.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
NW (Talk) 23:39, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
File:Bairro de Santana.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
NW (Talk) 23:39, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
OTRS and images
[edit]Please do not reupload File:Bairro de Santana.jpg or you will be facing a temporary block. No OTRS email has been sent but if one is sent and received then the image will be undeleted. Bidgee (talk) 02:45, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
You asked for help...
[edit]Hi Pedu0303. You asked for help here. You did not tell which image it was. But I can see from the links above that you uploaded some images from Flickr. If you want to upload images from flickr it is only possible if they have the right license. Like {{Cc-by-sa-2.0}} or {{Cc-by-2.0}}. If it has "nc" or "nd" it can't be used without a written permission from the owner. If it is your own image you can ofcourse upload it but then you must make it clear that you own the account on Flickr. If that did not help you at all feel free to ask again (on this page) :-) --MGA73 (talk) 18:18, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
(moved from my talk page - please answer where the debate started, it makes easyer to follow the debate):
- Sorry
It is this image: http://www.flickr.com/photos/kassapian/3108738195/ People delete it 4 times, see if the rights are approved by the wiki. I have talked with the photographer several times and he approved. Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pedu0303 (talk • contribs) 23:55, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
- The image has the license "Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.0 Generic". The problem is "Noncommercial". If you know the user you can either ask if he will change the license on Flickr or if he will send a permission to OTRS (see help above). --MGA73 (talk) 15:23, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Bad name...
[edit]Hi! You added {{Bad name}} on some images like File:Panoaltodesantana.jpg but you did not leave a link to the correct file. If you want the images renamed please use {{rename|New name}} then we can move the file. --MGA73 (talk) 19:12, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Files you uploaded may be deleted
[edit]The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commonswikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 01:47, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- You need to get in touch with an OTRS volunteer about this - as the bot's notice and a message further up my bot's talk page state, I am unable to help you with this. Please leave a note on the OTRS Noticeboard with the details of the email you sent, including the date and subject header. If someone else sent the email, then you need to check with them to make sure they actually did so. Please don't leave messages on my bot's talk page, as it makes the bot not work. Thank you. Hersfold (talk/work) 17:50, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
File:Alto_de_santana.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Pedu0303 (talk) 16:57, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
File:Panoaltodesantana.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Pedu0303 (talk) 16:59, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
File:Altodesant5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Pedu0303 (talk) 17:13, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
File:Panoaltodesantana2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Pedu0303 (talk) 17:15, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:18, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:39, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
File:Zona Norte SP Montagem.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gunnex (talk) 21:27, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Alfredop.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Alfredop.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
–moogsi (blah) 23:48, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
File:Morumbi Montagem.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gunnex (talk) 05:51, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
File:Sampa Montagem 2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gunnex (talk) 06:37, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
File:Carandiru.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gunnex (talk) 16:57, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
File:Santanacapeladesanta.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
André Koehne TALK TO ME 09:24, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Propaganda de 1970 Preconceituosa - Jardins.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Gunnex (talk) 07:07, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- Considering {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}-fail + copyvio via (as indicated) http://blogs.estadao.com.br/reclames-do-estadao/category/imoveis/page/2/ (image not shown) or (same site) http://blogs.estadao.com.br/reclames-do-estadao/2010/08/27/desigualdade-explicita/ (2010, Grupo Estado, Copyright © 2007-2014 Todos os direitos reservados) = http://blogs.estadao.com.br/reclames-do-estadao/files/2010/08/1970.1.7-im%C3%B3veis-incorreto22.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 07:08, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Cruzeirodosul.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gunnex (talk) 07:43, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Spmetropolitanomontagem.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 12:50, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Agua fria.jpg
[edit]