User talk:Pbrks/2008 July - 2011 May
|
This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to this page. |
 First steps tutorialOur first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.  Getting helpMore information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
 Goodies, tips and tricks
 Made a mistake?
| |
| (P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) | ||
--SieBot 00:31, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
TUSC token 380f1456c520707549f5bb47f9ee7849
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Thank you....
... for your SVG upgrade to my bodyshapes.jpg graphic. 67.190.164.113 06:07, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
| You've uploaded a derivative work | We're sorry, but Image:Flag of the CPLP.svg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.
|
The original (the flag) is copyrighted. I'll upload the image to en.wiki under the same name and with a fair use rationale. /Lokal_Profil 01:08, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Mouse mechanism diagram.svg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Mouse mechanism diagram.svg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
Benh (talk) 19:26, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
If you must demote and retouch images, please have the courtesy to notify the creator. Jeremykemp (talk) 02:04, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
No need to withdraw
You don't need to withdraw your VI candidate. It's OK like this. --Mr. Mario (talk) 03:12, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | Image:Grand Prix of Cleveland.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 10:35, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Punnett square.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mechanical mouse movement.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Doppler effect.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Pi Kappa Phi CoA.svg
Se my coments on en.wiki Graphics Lab. Pretty sure Image:Pi Kappa Phi CoA.svg can only be used under fair-use though. (Unless we find the blazon and recreated it based on that). /Lokal_Profil 01:47, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scythe.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dynamite-5.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dynamite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Air conditioning unit.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP promotion
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Air conditioning unit.svg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Air conditioning unit.svg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
Congratulations ! Benh (talk) 19:07, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Window air conditioner.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Computer mouse with a ball
the problem of the oicture is that mouse have two light sensor at each weel to understand the direction.212.5.66.98 09:51, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
With respect, have you looked at the pan on the stove in th SVG? The perspective is all wongky, and I really don't think it's quite ready to be replaced. Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:39, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cartesian Theater.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Glowstick.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Drum set.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cartesian Theater.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
File:POTY_barnstar_1_2008.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
125.162.46.15 03:44, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
[Skeleton]
hey, I made a skeleton of a Spinosuarus with Inkscape and something happened where you can't see it. I was hopping you can help me and fix it. Tell me if you can or have done it on my user page. Bugboy52.4 (talk) 01:16, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the comment. I didn't even notice that that it wasn't in that rectangle box, but the picture gets cut off when I put it there, see this image . And i was hoping i could make it look like this [1]
![[1]](https://en.wikipedia.com/wiki/File:Spinosaurus_skeleton_2.png){kind=link}
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Standard drum set.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Set Promotion
Congratulations!
The set of images you
edited
for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: French heraldic crowns.
French heraldic crowns.
-- Eusebius (talk) 07:14, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Cool logo!
I see that it is catching on. Very neat! -BlueCaper (talk) 22:25, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- You know, File:User Pbroks13.svg! But before that, I created user logos for myself and the family members of mine that are Wikipedians. I am guessing by your confusion that you thought of the idea independently. -BlueCaper (talk) 00:05, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
POTY 2008
Well, I went ahead and set up the emergency voting system I had briefly discussed with JalalV. Something where, even if every other person flaked out, I'd still be able to run POTY myself.
Not quite completely set-up, but all that's left is pasting in some startup-code into the remaining pages linked in each gallery for voting.
Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:30, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
POTY 2008
No, that doesn't need done. This method replaces that, because I never actually heard another word about or from anyone able to run the automatic server thing. =/
What I do need is people willing to occasionally check the vote pages, remove any opposes or nasty comments (FPs are automatically included in this contest and the goal is not to rehash the FP debate, but to celebrate the great content of the last year), and just generally check for any problems. I'll e-mail you about a couple other issues. Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:33, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
re: AccountEligibility script for POTY 2008
- Congratulations, you're eligible. :) —Pathoschild 02:13:47, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- Hah, thanks a bunch! Pbroks13 02:15, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- You're welcome. —Pathoschild 02:17:00, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Tchoř is eligible for voting. Could you please remove your oppositions? BTW, nice shadowing on your phone ;-). Lycaon (talk) 15:51, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- P.S. You can find extra info here. Lycaon (talk) 16:27, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Phone.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
VI review
Hi there, if you have some time, I think we could use your opinion on this VI review. Cheers, --Eusebius (talk) 17:50, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Thank you, but would you mind one small change?
Hello, I'd like to thank you for making File:Pharyngeal jaws of moray eels.svg into an SVG. Voters at the Wikipedia Featured Pictures had a consensus that the title should be removed and cropped to the subject. The background can be changed to simple blue without gradient effects. Is this too much for you? Thanks and please reply here
Checking POTY votes
Hi, Assuming that we can't get a bot to verify voters eligibility, you might find the code at User:Pruneau/monobook.js useful. if you add the part after "Add a link to check eligibility for POTY 2008" to User:Pbroks13/monobook.js, a link will appear in the left column on all user 9and user talk) pages, leading to Pathoschild's utility. For example, I can see a link in the left column of this page leading to [2]. I've found that it makes checking the votes much less cumbersome. Cheers, Pruneautalk 12:21, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
SVG validation
Hi.
Well, I'm not a SVG-pro, but I reduce the number of errors by:
- cleaning the defs
- saving as simple SVG
- adding manually the DOCTYPE declaration
For File:Pharyngeal jaws of moray eels.svg only one error remains, and it has to do with Gaussian blur.
I'm working on it. --Coyau (talk) 22:03, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- I've got it !
You just have to remove every occurrence of «inkscape:collect="always"» in the file. You'll have to do that in a text editor
The DOCTYPE declaration is simple: just add «<!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.0//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG-20010904/DTD/svg10.dtd">» at the beginning of the file, just between «» and «<svg». Always in a text editor.
I hope it will help. --Coyau (talk) 22:32, 4 March 2009 (UTC) - PS. Then try to validate "by file upload" to be sure, upload it here and add the template:ValidSVG. --Coyau (talk) 22:35, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- I don't know. I've got a valid version (the one I made trying to explain how to do it). If you want I can upload it. --Coyau (talk) 20:10, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- I have problems with both the W3 validator and with inkscape. Inkscape leaves all of those inkscape namespaces and also sodipodi which is the app that was available to Linux before Inkscape a very long while ago by internet/computer time standards. Those inkscape and sodipodi namespaces might make the image easier to edit with inkscape (I have not seen any problem with editing images that had these namespaces removed though) but for browser display it is just a lot of text that needs to be ignored. The validator only likes namespaces that it approves of and that is my problem with that. The inkscape namespace is valid xml and therefore should be approved. I am kind of glad that it doesn't approve of that though because the validator makes it easy to find the "mostly useless for viewing" xml and removing it. However, the validator also doesn't like perfectly formed license xml and that is where my problem is with it. One of the nice things about svg is that it can contain the license, literally.
- I don't know. I've got a valid version (the one I made trying to explain how to do it). If you want I can upload it. --Coyau (talk) 20:10, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- That Inkscape doesn't clean up after itself is to me a problem. It is very difficult to compare Inkscape to GIMP since they make completely different images, but Inkscape makes SVG that are mostly the equivalent of GIMPs xcf (the application leaves guides in its finished images, for instance) and it seems like an abuse of the rules that it manages to do that. When it is a mature application, it seems like a user should just be able to touch a button or select a menu option and have all of that inkscape and sodipodi namespace cruft disappear and make an image which is much easier to view and nicer to share.
- The WC3 is large enough and mature enough to acknowledge and validate Creative Commons licenses -- at the very least. This statement is very much political, btw.
- So, there is everything I remember about validating SVG and problems with the way the developers play in the free world with their authoring of applications and their claims of validation. I would like to think that the people are better behaved than their applications and online approval systems are.
- Not that my opinion has ever been asked about these things.... ;) -- carol (talk) 17:08, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Done. --Coyau (talk) 20:06, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- From 439 KB to 422 KB and the image remains unchanged. When I did this it was much more dramatic as the file size went from 983 KB to 288 KB (File:Camara_de_fotos.svg#filehistory). SVG presented a lot of new concepts for me also -- it is an interesting way to make pictures via computer display. -- carol (talk) 20:24, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, the only thing I ever did to reduce file size was vacuum the defs. I'm still not very good at reading XML, I'll have to work on that. Pbroks13 (talk) 17:10, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pharyngeal jaws of moray eels.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cigarette diagram.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pharyngeal jaws.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Compact disc.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Field hockey ball
Hey, Pbroks, i saw your creation about field hockey ball, i am the one who request for improve the existing images. Your image is not bad. All i need is the view under in 13px, but you just make FG ball only, can you make the rest of two? Your help will be appreciated. Thanks. --Aleenf1 (talk) 13:21, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Featured Picture Promotion
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Phone.svg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Phone.svg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
--Karel (talk) 21:33, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
|
|
File:Edmonton-flag.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Svgalbertian (talk) 04:55, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Featured picture promotion
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Pharyngeal jaws of moray eels.svg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pharyngeal jaws of moray eels.svg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
--Karel (talk) 20:41, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- Hello, I just wonder why does the label in the image say "Pharyngeal Jaw" instead of "Pharyngeal jaw". There's no need for capitalization. --Eleassar (t/p) 11:27, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
FP promotion
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Drum set.svg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Drum set.svg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
Maurin Quina vectorization
I was astounded when I saw Phone.svg, at first I thought it was a photograph, as I initially only saw a thumbnail of it. I've been wanting a good vectorization of the poster Maurin Quina by Leonetto Cappiello, as I'm completely mesmerized by it. I've tried myself, and a friend has as well, but we both failed to even come close to something worthy of a big print. So, as it happens, I'm hoping you will also fall in love with it and commence the vectorization right away. Here are the highest resolution images I could find: 1, 2. Thank you for listening (well, reading.) 83.254.195.21 18:23, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, I'm working on it. In order for it to look really good, this may take me a while. Do you need it by a certain time? Pbroks13 (talk) 21:34, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you! No, take all the time you want, I'm so happy you're doing it! And if I may ask, what tools do you use and how long experience do you have? 83.254.195.21 08:45, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- Well, for vector images (which is basically only what I do) I use Inkscape. And my first thing I ever vectorized was this, so I suppose I've been doing it for a little less than a year. Pbroks13 (talk) 19:17, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- Alright, thank you again. I'll look into it. :-) 83.254.195.21
- Well, for vector images (which is basically only what I do) I use Inkscape. And my first thing I ever vectorized was this, so I suppose I've been doing it for a little less than a year. Pbroks13 (talk) 19:17, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you! No, take all the time you want, I'm so happy you're doing it! And if I may ask, what tools do you use and how long experience do you have? 83.254.195.21 08:45, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
I just thought you should know, I'm still working on it, and its really coming along. Should be done pretty soon! Pbroks13 (talk) 18:22, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- Done! File:Maurin Quina.svg Pbroks13 (talk) 00:49, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- WOW. I am most amazed, and most grateful. I expected you to do it well, but this is PERFECT. As soon as this comes up on my wall, I'll photograph it and put here! I adore you, man. Thank you. 83.254.195.125 23:53, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
- Not a problem! I'll be looking forward to the photo. Pbroks13 (talk) 03:31, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
- WOW. I am most amazed, and most grateful. I expected you to do it well, but this is PERFECT. As soon as this comes up on my wall, I'll photograph it and put here! I adore you, man. Thank you. 83.254.195.125 23:53, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
You sir are a saint!
for doing this: File:Coat of Arms of Niger.svg. I can't tell you the number of hours I've wasted yelling at Illustrator trying to produce something a third as nicely done as that. Every time I work on Niger related article, I saw that poorly edited mess I produced: now we have a lovely and accurate image. As a note, the government websites have used the Commons image in the past (even with the wrong background color), and so you've done them a favor a well.
Thanks again! T L Miles (talk) 16:09, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Spherical wedge
Hey there Pbroks,
I found this image to be well-made and well-suited to Wikipedia's article on the Spherical cap. I recently wrote Spherical wedge, and was wondering if you'd have the time to create an image in the likeness of http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SphericalWedge.html – with an alpha instead of a theta. A similar color scheme to the spherical cap image would be great. If you're unable to do it, that's fine and I completely understand. If that's the case, though, I'd be very grateful if you could forward me to an application I can use to construct a sphere of my own, as I'm quite inexperienced in the world of vector images and such. Cheers, —Anonymous DissidentTalk 13:18, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
I see that this will now be promoted to QI, congratulations :-). One thing that I now realise, that still bothers me, is the size of the raindrop in (d) compared with (c) and (e). I know it is only diagrammatic and not to scale, but there should be a reasonable progression in size. If (c) is at least 2mm, then (d) should be no more than 2.5 times bigger in diameter/radius, it appears to be about 4 times larger. And to graphically show the progression of size (e) should look to be bigger than (d). The easiest thing is to make (d) smaller, perhaps 3/4 its current size? --Tony Wills (talk) 11:58, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- I completely agree that it should be to scale, and I'm pretty sure I correctly made them that way. If you look at File:Raindrop sizes proportion.png, you'll see that (d) is almost exactly 2.5x larger than (c). So we can say (b) is 1mm, (c) is 2mm, (d) is 5mm, and (e) is about 6mm, granted its not perfect, but it's pretty close. Pbroks13 (talk) 17:45, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, you're right. I didn't actually measure them, It was just my perception (some people claim perception is reality ;-). I was looking at how many would fit vertically if the 5mm one was a sphere, but then of course they are flattened. If you ever get around to editing for some other reason, perhaps make it nearer 4mm so that skewed eyeballs think there is a size graduation too :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 10:32, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- PS There's a twist, I had an edit conflict with the bot giving you a medal :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 10:32, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shape of Raindrops.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
File tagging File:Saugeais flag.svg
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Saugeais flag.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Saugeais flag.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
J Milburn (talk) 20:14, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:DBWF Flag.svg
|
|
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:DBWF Flag.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
J Milburn (talk) 12:11, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
FP promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:College of Arms-Lant's Roll.svg, which was nominated by Svgalbertian at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:College of Arms-Lant's Roll.svg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
File talk:Doppler effect.svg
File talk:Doppler effect.svg might need your attention while being undersnowed by the many bot moves. --Foroa (talk) 12:29, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Public domain license of File:College of Arms-Lant's Roll.svg
Hi, File:College of Arms-Lant's Roll.JPG is rightly in the public domain because of age, but File:College of Arms-Lant's Roll.svg is your derivative work and you can't license it with age because your work is not old. You should give it a Creative Commons license or self-release it in the public domain without the Art/old note. Awesome work, btw Regards Hekerui (talk) 16:49, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
- Done. Thank you. Pbroks13 (talk) 23:04, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
|
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Coat_of_arms_of_Bosniaks_in_Serbia_and_Montenegro.SVG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Coat_of_arms_of_Bosniaks_in_Serbia_and_Montenegro.SVG]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Multichill (talk) 20:02, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Can you improve the realism of File:Baseball current event.svg, I recently uploaded some images you might find helpful File:Baseball.svg, File:Baseball2.svg --Svgalbertian (talk) 19:27, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
File: North America.svg
Hello! In your edition of the file Iceland is part of the northern american continent. Thats FALSE! As you can read in the article Iceland, Iceland isnot part of North America. Please correct the file, thanks!84.112.187.22 03:17, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Spider internal anatomy-en.svg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spider internal anatomy-en.svg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 00:04, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
I am interested in using the following image:
File:Air conditioning unit-en.svg
Thus would be used in an English text book for university students.The aim of the book would be to teach writing skills for bar charts,flow charts,etc.
I would like permission to use this image without the need to print the whole licensing agreement.
If this is possible what acknowledgment would you require?
You can contact me on: 2010ielts@gmail.com
Many thanks,
Phil
Tip: Categorizing images
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]][[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 12:56, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:VI reviewer status change.svg was uncategorized on 10 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:56, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Principality of Albania (Prince's standard).svg was uncategorized on 3 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Principality of Albania (Crown Prince's standard).svg was uncategorized on 3 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Principality of Albania (Princess' standard).svg was uncategorized on 3 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Minute Maid Logo.svg was uncategorized on 12 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:30, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Upper Deck Logo.svg was uncategorized on 12 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:30, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
|
|
File:Federal_Bureau_of_Prisons_Seal.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
66.173.140.100 12:49, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
nice work
File:MultinationalForce-IraqDUI.svg
Decora (talk) 15:50, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
|
|
This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to this page. |