User talk:Palauenc05/Archive 22
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Langensalza 50 Pfennig 1921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bélesta Saint-Barthélemy Portal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
.jpg)
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ancient fortification with town gate in Bélesta (Pyrénées-Orientales).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Barthélemy in Bélesta (Pyrénées-Orientales) (northeast view)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dresden Hundert Milliarden vs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bélesta Saint-Barthélemy Inschrift 1648.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bélesta Place de l'Eglise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Altar cross at the Parish church St. Amandus, Konz-Könen, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Keystone (1630) in Le Boulou (France)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Benchmark by the "Königlich Preußische Landesaufnahme" at the Parish church St. Amandus, Konz-Könen, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Konz-Könen Altarkreuz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of Langensalza for the 60th anniversary of the volunteer fire department..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Entrance to the Museum of Prehistory in Bélesta (Pyrénées-Orientales), France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
One hundred billion Mark "Notgeld" banknote (1923) of Dresden.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
.jpg)
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ancient oratory at Bélesta (Pyrénées-Orientales).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lalande-de-Pomerol wayside cross 1861.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bélesta medieval gate east.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saint-Laurent-des-Combes église (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bélesta Prehistory museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1861) in Lalande-de-Pomerol, France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Laurent de Saint-Laurent-des-Combes (Gironde).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saint-Emilion Cloître collégiale Reliefstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trierer Märtyrer (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !
Bonjour,
Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !
Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.
Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.
P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:28, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Emmendingen 50 Pfennig 1921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Medieval marble relief stone in Cloître de la collégiale of Saint-Émilion, France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Essen hundert millionen 1923.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 50 Millionen Reichsbank Berlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Laufen 25 Pfennig 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former town gate, Rue du Porche in Bélesta (Pyrénées-Orientales), France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1812) near Wißmannsdorf, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote (1921) of Emmendingen (Germany), RV: town wall..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sculpture of "Fischers Maathes", Heuschreckbrunnen in Trier..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside shrine (1673) in Trier-Feyen/Weismark.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
"Notgeld" banknote: 100 million Mark (100 000 000), Essen (1923).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trier St. Katharina (Kernscheid).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trier-Kernscheid Wegekreuz (16850-1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trier-Kernscheid Grabkreuz Fragment.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote (1920) of Laufen (Salzach).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 million Mark banknote issued by the Reichsbank Berlin (1923).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Franzenheim Wegekreuz 26645.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Franzenheim Wegekreuz 26647.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schankweiler Nischenkreuz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross in the cemetery wall of Church St. Katharina and Barbara in Trier-Kernscheid.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church St. Katharina and Barbara in Trier-Kernscheid.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gilzem St. Johannes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1925) near Franzenheim, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1892) near Franzenheim, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lun bench at the sea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Geichlingen Wegekreuz2-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Signature of Michelin 3-star chef Dieter Müller.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
_Grabkreuz_1736_Detail.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trier St. Katharina (Kernscheid) Grabkreuz 1736 Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
_Grabkreuz_1736.jpg)
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cemetery cross (1736) in the wall of Church St. Katharina and Barbara in Trier-Kernscheid.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Newel Wegekreuz 1858 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trier St. Katharina (Kernscheid) Grabkreuz 1736.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pierreclos Château (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Grabkreuz_1736.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pierreclos Château (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Serrières Saint-Jacques-le-Majeur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Senf2QIC
Mich ärgert schon ein wenig, wenn ein technisch einwandfreies Bild wegen eines relativ geringen Mangels in der Gestaltung auf QIC abgelehnt wird. Ich habe auch schon Bilder allein wegen "composition" abgelehnt, das waren aber immer völlig schlimme Schnappschüsse mit komplett wirrem Hintergrund oder ohne erkennbar eingeordetes Motiv, mit aus Köpfen "wachsenden" Laternenmasten, Möbeln oder Zimmerecksen und ähnliche Gewaltfehler. Ich weiß nicht, ob du ein Faß aufmachen willst deswegen, wahrscheinlich lohnt das den Aufwand nicht, aber meine Unterstützzung hättest du. --Smial (talk) 12:07, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- Hallo Smial, danke für Deine Unterstützung. Einige Kameraden sind ja dafür bekannt, dass es ihnen Freude bereitet, Bilder runterzumachen, wenn irgend möglich. Mich ärgert das auch gelegentlich, aber es lohnt wirklich nicht, sich deswegen einen dicken Kopf zu machen. Sieht man andrerseits manchen Schrott, der durchgewinkt wird, fragt man sich schon, wo hier mit Anstand bewertet wird. Ich denke nur an eine Serie von Teilaufnahmen eines toten Vogels... Ob ich ein grünes Spiegelei mehr oder weniger kriege, was soll's. Um ehrlich zu sein, habe ich selbst gezögert das Bild zu nominieren. Ich füge zu einem historischen Objekt immer gerne die Umgebung hinzu, so war es auch hier der Fall. Allerdings den Baum als Kriterium heranzuziehen ist natürlich kompletter Blödsinn. Das Hauptobjekt sollte in der Mitte sein, das war mein Plan. Also, wie sagt der Kölner "et is wie et is". Gruß --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:27, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church Saint-Jacques-le-Majeur in Serrières (Saône-et-Loire), France, northeast view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.