User talk:Palauenc05/Archive 20

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frasdorf Sankt Florian.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lun relax.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:47, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lun Olive-Gardens (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lun Olivenbaum (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please fix the categorization. Olive trees is a redirection. EXIF data would be nice too. --XRay 03:48, 21 May 2021 (UTC)  Done --Palauenc05 08:34, 21 May 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:40, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sharp Centre for Design - fragment of facade.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sharp Centre for Design - fragment of facade.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lun Olivenbaum (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 18:19, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lun Olivenbaum 2000J (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 18:20, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Novalja Hafen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 10:52, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lun Olivenbaum Bonsai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:53, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nature reserve Olive-Gardens, Lun, Croatia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Port of Novalja, Isle of Pag, Croatia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jakisnica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --RockyMasum 13:12, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Seaside village Jakišnica on the Island of Pag, Croatia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 12:17, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:13, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hermanni boettgeri Pag.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:33, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lun Olive-Gardens (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:33, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Höhenmarke 1888.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:38, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Benchmark (1888) at so-called Wetterhäuschen in Salzburg (Austria)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Useful and used, good image -- Spurzem (talk) 11:27, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rab Hotel Arbiana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:24, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Wetterstation 1888.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Testudo hermanni boettgeri (Hermann's tortoise), female, seen on the Island of Pag..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Nice and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 13:20, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Either this is not ssp boettgeri or the ssp map on Wikipedia is wrong. Can you check please and I can delete my oppose if you are right. Also, image needs to be rotated about 15% please Palauenc05. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:14, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment Charles, I know you mean Testudo hermanni boettgeri var. Hercegovinensis. As the subspecific taxon’s nomenclature is currently quite controversial in literature, I’ve actually decided to avoid it. Of course, I should have mentioned the Island of Pag in the scope. As a matter of fact, the animals along the Croation Adriatic coast, especially the ones of this island population, are much smaller (about one half or even one third in weight) than the "boettgeris" in Macedonia for example. So what would you propose, should I add var. Hercegovinensis and/or mention the island of Pag? As for the tilt, I found that beautiful tortoise walking uphill on that paved sidewalk along the street, picked it up and released it in a wild area, where it is safe now. That’s why I didn’t turn the image ccw. --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:56, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment can Archaeodontosaurus advise please on Taxonomy. You really should rotate it though. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:14, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
•  Done Rotated ccw. --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:56, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment The genus is not definitively fixed. The species either, the varieties are not recognized. Individuals can reproduce among themselves: there is no consensus. The maps on Wikipedia are indicative only and not for reference. The scope as it is formulated seems to me to be an acceptable compromise. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:19, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1891) in Pivka, Slovenia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Buidhe (talk) 22:25, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 23:38, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hotel Arbiana in Rab, Croatia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. Very good, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 19:27, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 5 Hermanni boettgeri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Knopik-som 11:07, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Benchmark by the "Königlich Preußische Landesaufnahme" at the western wall of Saint Laurentius Church (Saarburg), Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 21:56, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saarburg Höhenmarke St Laurentius.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elne Weihwasserbecken PM66000305.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:59, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elne Cathedral benchmark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 18:20, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy-water font, possibly 1st century A.D.  in Cathedral Sainte-Eulalie-et-Sainte-Julie, Elne, France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 21:16, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Benchmark of Ministère de la Reconstruction et de l'Urbanisme, at Elne Cathedral, France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 16:20, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:27, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elne Kriegerdenkmal Maillol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:36, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elne Gedenktafel 1285.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, I was just wondering in which language it has been written. For me it looks like Spanish with a little French jaja, so this is Catalan --Michielverbeek 17:15, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Altar of Saint Gaudérique in Église Saint-Pierre de Prades (Pyrénées-Orientales), France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Good image, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 17:41, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:52, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Altar of Saint John the Baptist in Église Saint-Pierre de Prades (Pyrénées-Orientales), France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 17:44, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:53, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elne Gedenktafel 1883.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:54, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villeneuve-de-la-Raho Saint-Julien-et-Sainte-Basilisse (signs).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:38, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sundial (1684) at Église Sainte-Marie de Brouilla, France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Good, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 18:47, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 16:12, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reims Kathedrale Türriegel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:55, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Epernay Perrier PA51000019 Reiterstandbild.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 19:16, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Epernay Perrier PA51000019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 11:55, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château Perrier in Épernay (France).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 10:12, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Equestrian statue in front of Perrier castle, Épernay (France).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:26, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sous-préfecture de Reims, France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:49, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prag Relief Na mustku 382.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:54, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Postupice St Martin Wegekreuz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:46, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:07, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pozov (Postupice) board trailer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Almost excellent --MB-one 17:08, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prag Dum kramáre Kríže.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:56, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Postupice St Martin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and composition. @Palauenc05: EXIF is missing, will be useful to add it for info purposes. --Tagooty 15:51, 13 July 2021 (UTC)  Comment @Tagooty: I've explained several times that for some reason my system does not provide exif-data. --Palauenc05 15:58, 13 July 2021 (UTC)  Support Okay! I'm curious what system you use? --Tagooty 00:30, 14 July 2021 (UTC) @Tagooty: Never mind, exif-data aren't mandatory anyway. --Palauenc05 06:56, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reims Place Royale Sous-Préfecture.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:55, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dům kramáře Kříže, west house of historical town hall in Prague..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:27, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:27, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint Martin (east view) in Postupice, Czech Republic..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and used. --Tagooty (talk) 08:48, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:25, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Trierische Heimat Juli-August 1932.jpg

Hallo, hast du Zugriff auf die im Titelblatt erwähnte letzte Seite, und wenn ja, stehen dort weitergehende Informationen über das Bild (Eingrenzung Zeitraum*, Urheber, ...)? Ich würde es gerne ausschneiden. *Wenn diese Info stimmt, dann hätten wir schon mal 1855-1868. Grüße --P170 (talk) 13:11, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Toll, Danke! Da sind ja viele Informationen dabei. Das Bild wollte ich als neue Datei hier bei Commons hochladen. Passt? --P170 (talk) 15:14, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Kannst Du von mir aus machen. Mit korrekter Quellenangabe dürfte es keine Probleme geben. --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:17, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Welschbillig Wegekreuz K 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 09:10, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Welschbillig Brunnen 1878.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:18, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Welschbillig Nischenkreuz Marienkapelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:19, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Welschbillig Kirche St Peter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 20:32, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Mary's Chapel in Welschbillig, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:56, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:57, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fountain (1878) in Welschbillig, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:58, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Relief of Coat of arms of Welschbillig (Germany).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:17, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross near Welschbillig-Hofweiler, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:28, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mendig Wegekreuz 1689.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:48, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1696) in Welschbillig, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:44, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1766) in Welschbillig, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:42, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:48, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eitelsbach Duisburger Hof Wappen Hugo von Schönenberg 1573.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 08:48, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parish church St. Peter in Welschbillig, Germany (north-east view)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Useful and used; the only image of this view in the commons. -- Spurzem (talk) 09:56, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:17, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trassem Wegekreuz Kehrbachstraße 16 (Detail).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 16:01, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coat of arms (1573) of Hugo von Schönenberg at Duisburger Hof (Trier-Eitelsbach), Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:32, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cemetery cross (1785) in Newel-Butzweiler, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:50, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:00, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 1 August 2021 (UTC)