User talk:Orgullomoore/1

Image:Pominik Okulickiego 1.JPG

Part is assigned for removal. Correct version of file it Image:Pomnik Okulickiego 1.JPG. Matio 20:03, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:IMAG0026.JPG

Please choose more understandable names for images. Thank you. --EugeneZelenko 05:14, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Done. See Kitchen Sanbec ✉ 07:44, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

Vaya lío tienes

(About Image:Príncipe BaltasarCarlos cazador Velázquez lou.jpg)

Lo que dices es un poco contradictorio, si supones que la obra tiene copyright cualquier uso por mucha creatividad u originalidad que tuviera sería una violación del copyright. Como verás cuando leas lo siguiente el asunto es el contrario.

En las fotos de cuadros y otras obras de arte, hay dos copyrights posibles: el de la obra en sí, y el de la foto. En un cuadro de Velazquez de 1635 es evidente que el copyright ha caducado. En cuanto a la foto, el autor la licencia bajo la GFDL, así que todo está en orden.

Pero en Estados Unidos, la foto estaría también en el dominio público, mira en:Image:Elgreco.christ.500pix.jpg y en:Bridgeman_Art_Library_v._Corel_Corp, lo que se dice básicamente es que una reproducción de una obra en el dominio público, por muy complicada que sea de hacer, no puede tener copyright.

Saludos. Sanbec ✉ 08:25, 11 May 2005 (UTC)

Otra cosa, mira la imagen que te dicen arriba, súbela con un nombre menos críptico y completa la información de licencia. Sanbec ✉ 08:27, 11 May 2005 (UTC)

Traducir

Gracias por corregir mi página de usuario. Lo de feel like posting (y muchas otras cosas) se lo copié a User:Anna, si está mal, avísala. Lo de let fue un error mío, propio de un en-1.

Cuando pueda reviso tu traducción de Criteria for inclusion. Saludos. Sanbec ✉ 16:01, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Imágenes de Josemanib

Ya les he puesto el tag adecuado. Mira mi página de usuario y mis contribuciones, creo que te dará algunas pistas de cómo funciona esto. Sanbec ✉ 22:27, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Eurocalculator

I've read your request at Commons:Picture_requests#Eurocalculator. So I took mine and made a picture of it. If this [1] is what you want, I (or you) can upload it. Just let me know if it's what you desire. --Jailbird 6 July 2005 12:42 (UTC)

Ok, have just uploaded it to the Commons and inserted the picture in the Spanish and English articles. But since I don't speak a word Spanish, you should do the caption there yourself. --Jailbird 9 July 2005 11:03 (UTC)

Taller graphico

Oh, that ! you don't speak french, no worry, image haven't any language~ The choice is more enter the english one, which have an higher level : they make illustration (what need time and really good habilities); and the french one, which is more basic : we just cleanup images. We build this basic taller because we aren't enough, or good enough, and that's why this little taller is able on the french wiki, and maybe on the spanish : because we choice a work which don't need many people and don't new great abilities. I think wiki-es will soon do the same than the french one, and this day you will be able to copy the french one :] Yug talk 03:52, 16 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Stewart-peppers.jpg

Hi, what is the difference between your version of this photo and the original version at flickr.com, except that yours is 4 times larger in filesize? Thuresson 04:34, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

Ediciones en votación de administrador

• Por favor, restituye la página tal como estaba antes de tu edición. Si la discusión se está realizando en esa página debe permanecer. En todo caso debe ser un administrador quien haga las modificaciones y no una de las partes implicadas. En mi opinión editar las ediciones de outros usuarios —en este caso— por alguien que no es un administrador constituye una forma de vandalismo. Un cordial saludo. --Prevert^(talk) 23:22, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

• No es una cuestión que puedas decidir por tu cuenta, se está debatiendo una cuestión delicada y hay un hilo de discusión importante que debe permanecer visible como está. Tus ediciones indiscriminadas que quitan unos comentarios y dejan otros son totalmente impropias. Ya es totalmente irregular comentar los votos de otras personas. Te ruego que no interfieras en las ediciones de otros usuarios, igual que otras personas no lo hacen con las tuyas. Si quieres retirar algún comentario solicitaselo al administrador que inicio la votación. Espero que restituyas la página tal como estaba. Un cordial saludo. --Prevert^(talk) 23:40, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

• ¿Resulta tan difícil respetar las ediciones de otros usuarios que no opinan como tú? Está claro que formas parte de uno de los grupos que está participando en este debate, por lo tanto, solomante puedes intervenir con tus opiniones no como editor de las opiniones de otros. Tus ediciones no son neutrales. Deberias comprender que no puedes actuar como árbitro. Me gustaría conocer cuál va a ser tu postura final. Un cordial saludo. --Prevert^(talk) 00:02, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

• Lamento que no quieras entenderlo, quizás en el futuro cambies de opinión. Un cordial saludo. --Prevert^(talk) 00:16, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

• Lo siento pero no me es posible. Sólo decirte que si este asunto se hubiera planteado al contrario yo hubiera respetado tu opinión. Un cordial saludo. --Prevert^(talk) 00:37, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

Votos reales

Mi lengua nativa no es el inglés, el mensaje en español es el siguiente: Por favor, juego limpio. Más votos de usuarios que no son verdaderamente de Commons. Antes de continuar con la respuesta, te agradecería que me señalaras cualquier frase que hayas leido en mis mensajes que pueda ser motivo de duda (o de interpretación errónea) por las traducciones entre un idioma y otro. Volviendo a la respuesta: la votación implica a los usuarios reales actuales —quienes contribuyen a este proyecto—. Aun siendo cierto que los archivos que aquí se publican son para usar en otros proyectos, seguir el criterio por ti expuesto falsearía las condiciones de la votación. Incluso no sería necesario realizarla, directamente debería aplicarse lo que pensaran los usuarios de los wikis de mayor tamaño, como son más numerosos tendrían derecho a imponer su punto de vista.

De tu mensaje saco otra conclusión que explicaría las diferencias que mantemos en esta votación, si piensas que este wiki es una extensión de la wikipedia española comprendo mejor vuestra postura —aunque piense que es equivocada—, sin embargo yo pienso que Commons es un lugar de encuentro común, por lo tanto, lo que aquí ocurra debe ser consensuado entre todos y es independiente de los debates que se producen en los wikis de los distintos idiomas. Por eso para mi en definitiva cerrar la votación en las condiciones actuales es un completo error. Si quieres que aclare cualquier otra cuestión estaré encantado de hacerlo. Un cordial saludo. --Prevert^(talk) 03:59, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

• Si tú consideras que hay otros votos que no son válidos deberias señalarlo (cuando escribí el mensaje, el último de los votos que citas no se había producido. No sé quien es, como no sé quienes son la mayoría de los que han votado en uno u otro sentido). Los casos que he indicado son bastante claros y en alguno de ellos hay constancia de su voluntad de actuar incorrectamente. Por último, te pido que si puedes y quieres hagas una prueba para comprobar si mi postura es legítima, en todos aquellos mensajes donde ponga mi nombre imagina que pone el tuyo y al revés. Puedes probarlo con otras personas también. No tienes porque hacerlo ahora mismo, deja pasar unos meses y después dime si hay algo en mi forma de actuar que no es correcto. Por otra parte, a estas alturas aunque aparezcan más votos el asunto ya está muy claro: se trataba de llegar a un acuerdo no a una imposición. Podría poner algún símil con el mundo real, pero podría ser malinterpretado, por ese motivo me abstendré de hacerlo. Al fin al cabo, este y todos los wikis podrían cerrar mañana y el que leyese a continuación todo lo que sucedió en esta votación no tendría una gran opinión de todos nosotros. Un cordial saludo. --Prevert^(talk) 07:20, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

Image deletion warning

Image:Västerbotten county.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Thuresson 18:17, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

Orgullobot

Hi, I left some questions on Commons:Village_pump#Orgullobot. Thanks, pfctdayelise (translate?) 23:23, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, I love your bot! :D It should really improve the process at COM:DEL and hopefully we won't ever have people complaining about Commons admins deleting images in use again. I'm impressed that there might even be a "reversion" bot. I think as long as there is some way of accessing the record of where it orphaned images, manually unorphaning them is OK (hopefully this will very rarely be needed).

Here's a related problem: what about substituting an image for another? This is common in replacing PNG images with SVG. As in, the bot looks everywhere for the use of the PNG image, and in every instance replaces it with the SVG image. That seems like a pretty similar problem. I think the SVG people would love it if you could solve that one. :)

Also an unrelated problem, that I would like to see a solution for: on en: there is a script en:User:Jnothman/afd helper. It has two parts. Firstly, it gives each article a "nominate for AFD" link in the "toolbox" section on the left. Then it gives each AFD discussion a "vote" link next to the regular "edit" section". This second bit, is not necessary for commons, but the first bit could be very useful. "Deletion helper" would only apply to images. When you click "Nominate for deletion", it adds {{Deletion request}} to that image, then puts {{subst:Idw|IMAGE NAME}} on the uploader's page. (This doesn't exist in the AFD Helper, and it's what I would really like to see in a Commons tool. Not sure how hard it would be.) Then it opens up template:deletion requests and puts this

=== [[Article or :image title]] ===
REASON --~~~~
* {{vd}} --~~~~

while filling in the image title. the user then has to change the reason.

Whew. OK, what do you think? Is it possible? :)

Thanks, pfctdayelise (translate?) 00:47, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

I left a comment about a possible substitution-bot at Category_talk:Redundant#A_way_to_simplify_this. Now, for this bot. It would be great if there was an easy way for admins to use it, rather than having to ask you every time. Could it be turned into a standalone tool like CheckUsage? (But, it would have to check that someone was a commons admin as well - it would be terrible if it got abused by just anyone). Or make an extra link in the toolbox or an extra tab on the image page, in a script that was somehow restricted to admins? (Hmm, I don't think that would be possible because everyone can see the source...) Hm...I can't think of a good solution for that just yet. pfctdayelise (translate?) 01:13, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

---

I thought of how the bot can be used easily by just admins! Have special pages that just list images for it to orphan/replace (one page for each). Protect both these pages so only admins can edit them. Then only admins can add new entries. And the bot can just go through each page once a day or something, and remove an entry after it has checked it. What do you think, is it possible? pfctdayelise (translate?) 00:09, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

I think it's fine if there are a few manual cases - admins should expect that - the important thing is that the bot can flag these very clearly and loudly to the admin, so they know that they have to check them before deleting the image. pfctdayelise (translate?) 01:43, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

---

I found where the "SVG people" are - at Commons:Transition to SVG. Well, I hope so. :) I made a note there about your bot too. pfctdayelise (translate?) 12:54, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Hi Orgullo. Are you aware of wikinews:Wikinews:Bots? Are you planning to make a bot to copy Commons images directly to Wikinews? (By the way, if you want Wikinews:User:Orgullobot, I'll be happy to give you that account. ;) User:dbenbenn 09:23, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Hi. Yes, I am aware. I don't take sides on these types of issues. I am only writing the bot because someone asked me too, and as long as it doesn't kill anyone, I'm not worried about the political part. I couldn't care less if people store their images on commons, locally, or in their shoes. Ah, and no thanks, I'll just register a different account.--Orgullomoore 10:33, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

If you change your mind, and decide you want that account, please just send me an email and I'll send you the password. User:dbenbenn 13:55, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Bot requests?

Hello, Orgullomoore. Haven't seen you around for a while...

I was wondering if you're still running your bot here? And if so, would I be able to make delinking requests to you on a semi-regular basis?

For example, Image:TJC.jpg needs delinking. It's used in 33 wikipedias! Which reminds me, did you ever get a chance to implement the multi-language messages? :)

cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 14:15, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

:( That's really disappointing! Maybe we just have to wait for the universal login.

We could hide the fact that it's a bot by renaming it something like "delinker", maybe? Hmm, I don't think active fraud will go down very well. :) Would you mind showing me some of the messages? --pfctdayelise (translate?) 22:34, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Sigh... that's really annoying. We REALLY REALLY need a bot to do this work. It's not fun for ANYONE to delink an image from dozens of articles. Because no one enjoys doing it, no one does it, and then images stay for ages and ages instead of being deleted... I wonder if these projects would prefer the redlinks? Somehow I doubt it.

Although I do disagree with replacing PNGs with SVGs en masse, but that was not the fault of the bot or the bot operator but the person who made such a request. Nyeh. Let's pray that we can do something with a universal login system. What are you up to these days if not botting? pfctdayelise (translate?) 14:01, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

OK, I thought of maybe what we can do.

1. get universal login.
2. set up a delinker bot only to be (requested to be) used by Commons admins when an image is being speedy deleted or has been decided to delete from COM:DEL.
3. when the bot delinks, it should somehow save a list of articles it changed. then, if there's a problem, there's a reference list for a human to go and fix.
4. it should make it clear that the bot is not to be held responsible for the changes, but the Commons admin who requested it to be used.
5. local projects should be told about it (announcement on their VP). If they dislike it, they should either supply human volunteers to do such delinking or accept redlinks caused by image deletion ( ;) somehow this might not be popular)
6. then, finally, we can go ahead! pfctdayelise (translate?) 15:13, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

knot images

i do not know why did you removed the title on the image of the know, you have done it already with two of the knots. is there a problem about having an edge? i am uploading the knots now as svg. when there is no reason for the edge then have a look at the others:

• 
  nail knot
• 
  surgeon's loop
• 
  Bimini twist
• 
  Ashley's Bend
• 
  Blood loop
• 
  Blacke's hitch
• 
  blackwall hitch
• 
  binder's knot
• 
  beer knot
• 
  becket hitch
• 
  barrel hitch
• 
  bale sling
• 
  Bumper knot
• 
  Bachmann
• 
  Axle hitch
• 
  Ashley stopper
• 
  alpine butterfly
• 
  arbor knot
• 
  packers
• 
  Corned Beef & Salt Pork Knot
• 
  adjustable hitch
• 
  Albright
• 
  Cowboy bowlone

i would prefer edges to stay becouse then i can have the same look on all articles. so tell me why is that you remove the edges? —LadyofHats 12:45, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Category moves

Anybody object to moving Category:Maps of New York to Category:Maps of New York State? ...

I support, and my bot can do the job, unless you like doing it by hand, of course ;) ...

Thanks for your generous offer, Orgullomore!  Regardless of the debate re New York (City/State), I've identified at least three non-contentious moves I'd be grateful for a bot to handle. (Yes, I have done some mass categorisation by hand and it nearly fell off.) One is a simple matter of incorrect capitalisation; the other two are categories I created and populated, but whose names I've now decided are unhelpful.

But before I continue, please let me know how easy, tricky, demanding or undemanding such requests would be. I'd like to know what it's reasonable for me to ask. Thanks, David Kernow 17:20, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

...The problem is, I don't have bot status on Commons...yet. I've hinted at it before but I never got a firm answer. So I think I'll do that now...

According to Commons:Bots, "A bot flag can be requested at Commons:Administrators", so maybe you should copy your Village Pump request there...?  There doesn't appear to be any description of how a request is handled, though. I'd hope that if after say a week there was no objection, or at least a consensus in favor, a 'bot admin' would present a flag... Regards, David 10:32, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Just seen that there's a list of eleven bots waiting to be checked, which is four more than those listed above (presumably with flag) so I wonder how long we'd have to wait... David 10:38, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

::Hmm...perhaps I should be brave and run it without a flag? (With a long nap between each edit....)--Orgullomoore 10:48, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

If that might upset people, it would be counter-productive. Perhaps if you place the request in Commons:Bots, wait a day or two and if there's no reponse, try asking one of the people whose bot has been flagged how they managed to gain a flag (and how long it took, etc.)...?  Regards, David 11:04, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

BTW I don't mean to suggest that you stop the Orgullobot thread at the Village Pump; all good feedback for the 'bot admins' to consider... David 11:08, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Re:About/pages

Bienvenido done. Anna 21:53, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Admin

• Gracias por el apoyo que has mostrado en mi elección como administrador. No dudes en comunicarme cualquier aspecto en el que pueda colaborar contigo. Gracias. --Lmbuga 22:51, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Ping

In case you didn't see, I left a comment for you three days ago at Commons:Village pump#Orgullobot would love to have a flag. User:dbenbenn 23:12, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Riight. That could be done, but isn't a bit dangerous? It gives any user the power to incriminate the bot moving any category to any other one, and that can be a hefty task to revert if two categories are merged. How would I make sure it's actually a legitimate request?--Orgullomoore 02:28, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

w:User:NekoDaemon only does the move if an administrator is the most recent editor of the category. That ought to solve the problem. (Bonus points if Orgullobot makes a log of non-admin rejected category moves.) User:dbenbenn 05:34, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

I see you've got Orgullobot working on category redirects. Yay, that's awesome! Here's a minor bug report: when updating a category link, the bot could check whether the new category is already there. For example, this edit changed Category:Timor-Leste to Category:East Timor, but East Timor was already there, so now it's there twice. User:dbenbenn 20:04, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

I see you've got Orgullobot working on category redirects. Yay, that's awesome!

Yes indeed (hello dbenbenn!) so do we start adding requests here...?  Thanks, David Kernow 12:38, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Yes, that will be fine.--Orgullomoore 18:00, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Great – I've just added four rename requests to User talk:Orgullobot/commands per the documentation (which seems very clear – nice work!) so here's hoping all works well. Thanks again, David 22:57, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Hi chaps, sorry to butt in, but is this kind of working now? If so, we should publicise it a bit (at least on Commons:Bots). Can we also add a big notice to User:Orgullobot/commands just reminding admins that it should always remain protected (in fact, can Orgullobot only follow it if it is protected? that we be a good protection too), and if the idea is that non-admins add commands to User talk:Orgullobot/commands and admins transfer them across if appropriate, can we add something to that effect too? --pfctdayelise (translate?) 12:30, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Hey, bud. Yes, it's working. Yes, we can and I think we should publicize it more (though I don't want to be annoying...). Yes, we can and I think we should add a notice. No, the bot doesn't touch the page if it's not protected (good idea, but I had it first :P). Yes, we can and should add a notice about the talk page. --Orgullomoore 21:07, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

No tag bot

Hi Orgullomoore. If you're interested in extending User:Orgullobot, here's an idea that would be really useful: tagging newly-uploaded images that don't have source or license tag. w:User:OrphanBot does that on the English Wikipedia. Specifically, if an image is uploaded with a blank image description page, Orgullobot could add {{subst:nsd}}. And if an image is uploaded with no copyright tag, Orgullobot could add {{Untagged}} (a template we'd want to create). Of course, the bot can get a list of newly-uploaded images to check from Special:Newimages, especially using the "Show new changes starting from" feature. Cheers, User:dbenbenn 02:13, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

Hey, dbenbenn. That sounds like a great idea, thanks for bringing it up. The first part (if an image is uploaded with absolutely no description at all) is very easy, and I will get on this tonight. For the second request, however, we would need two things: 1) For the template to be created first and (2) for the bot to keep an updated list of all the possible license tags, but it definitely seems feasible. Let me know what you think, ciao--Orgullomoore 04:55, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

For "no license tag" we have {{subst:nld}} yet. See {{Nld}} --Sanbec ✉ 09:05, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

I made Template:Untagged. I think it's better to have a separate template. An image with no copyright tag might very well have copyright information (for example, "I took this photo, and it's GFDL."), so one has to be a little more careful when deleting.

Category:License tags is your updated list of copyright tags. User:dbenbenn 15:11, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

I've got it running. How would you say it's doing? Anything you would change?--Orgullomoore 03:30, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Awesome! A minor bug: at Image:Animal0026.gif the bot replaced the image description with {{No source since}}; instead it should have appended {{Untagged}}.

w:User:OrphanBot also leaves messages on uploaders' talk pages. I have no idea about the details, but you might want to consider doing that, too. User:dbenbenn 03:44, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

This is too quick (instant!). It should allow at least 20 minutes if not 2 hours before tagging images. Some people might upload a bunch and then put the summary, or whatever. Give them a small chance, at least! pfctdayelise (translate?) 10:35, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

No, don't! Anyone who doesn't put the tag in the upload summary can easily remove the {{Untagged}} when they do add the tag. User:dbenbenn 03:37, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Hmm...now I'm being pushed and pulled. Since two or three people asked me to wait (desired time period ranging from 20 minutes to 24 hrs.), I put a wait time of 2 hrs. Could you guys talk amongst each other and work something out? For now, I'll leave it at 2 hrs. As far as I'm concerned, it really doesn't make a difference.--Orgullomoore 03:41, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Okay, obviously you have the situation under control; I didn't mean to tell you what to do. I guess it is better to wait now that you're doing talk page messages, too.

About the talk page messages[2]: perhaps you could make it subst a template? (Have the bot do something like {{subst:no tag message}} ~~~~) Then we could provide translations, similar to Template:Idw. That would be nicer to people who don't speak English. User:dbenbenn 04:33, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Bah, I don't have the situation under control, I just do what they tell me to do... :P It's when they tell me to do two opposite things that I start to scratch my head. In any case, no offense taken, just a bit of confusion. Regarding the messages, sounds like a good idea. I'll get on it soon. Ciao--Orgullomoore 04:36, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

:) I just think waiting a little while is a good idea because it still gets the job done without annoying people who know the process but are just slow. Also you might want to consider setting up a special page for people to respond at, since I can foresee your talk page getting flooded pretty quickly. pfctdayelise (translate?) 08:08, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Logo of the United Nations

Ok, thanks for the info. However, by accident, I uploaded some copies of this file and I can't delete them. I don't know if there's an easy way to rename images, can you tell me? By the way, the images that can be deleted are here and here --von Ryan|^{My page on Wikipedia} 21:22, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

No, thank you! --von Ryan|^{My page on Wikipedia} 21:30, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Ouch!

Check settings on bot... [3]

Note licencing tag move and edit summary. Cary "Bastique" Bass ^parler _voir 01:04, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Gemito

Fixed. It was taken by me two weeks ago. User:G:dallorto.

Image:Crassus.jpg

Please delete it. Can't fix the copyright. Anatolian 10:43, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

OK, and thanks. --Dalton Scavassa 15:11, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

missing license warning after uploading an image

Hi, please wait a few minutes after warning about a missing license. I always (half-automatically) insert the requested information after uploading the image, but this may take a few minutes. If this is not possible, please set my name on an ignore list. I've uploaded about 600 images already and all of them are well-licensed. Just trust me ;) -- aka 19:25, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

My images have license, too. Look twice next time. Helix84 06:18, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Hola de Silvestre....  :-)

Hola te comento que debido a tu esperiencia sobre estos proyectos te invitaría a que supervisaras la siguiente discusión:Category talk:Comunidad Valenciana, así como a participar.

Simplemente deseo que algunos temas que impiden la colaboración de un gran número de usuarios en los cuales me incluyo yo.

Esta nueva aventura a sido a petición de otros usuarios, y recurro a tí al igual que a los usuarios Sanbec y Anna por vuestra experiencia y creo inparcialidad. --Silvestre 19:54, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Category redirect help

Hello. Could you please do this?
Category:Coats of arms of french cities -> Category:Coats of arms of French cities
Category:Coats of arms of belgian municipalities -> Category:Coats of arms of Belgian municipalities
Category:Coat of arms of swedish municipalities -> Category:Coats of arms of Swedish municipalities
I've had them on my user page under the "To-do" section for a while now.... waiting for a bot to come along...
If anyone disagrees, may them speak now or forever hold their silence....
Fred Chess 00:48, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Hi Fred and Orgullomoore,

Using the template explained in the documentation, I think you need to add the above to User talk:Orgullobot/commands. However, the bot doesn't seem to be reading this page... I'd add the requests to User:Orgullobot/commands, but don't have the permissions necessary. Help please!  Thanks, David Kernow 10:06, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Rotterdam after World War II

Hello,

You noticed that a forgot to tag a Picture called Rotterdam_after_World_War_II. I tried to change the licensing or tag but I don't know how. Picture is owned by Rotterdam City Archive, photograhper is unknown. Picture dates back to 1940 (so, during the war). Picutre can be used for personal, educational and/or non-commercial purposes and only in low resolution. Could you please tell me how to change the tag?? I tried it using 'edit' but it did not work.

O, and furthermore. I uploaded a wrong picutre under the name: Rotterdam_Harbour.jpg But I don't know how to delete is.

Miriam8 10:50, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Hi again, found out that I have to use this tag:

Is that okay??? And could you please help me delete the false photo.

Miriam8

GFDL-user

Hello, would you please do this modification? Template talk:GFDL-user Helix84 12:29, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Mistakes on licensing mi pics

Thanks abouth chek my pics,i´m such a new guy on wikimedia commons but i´ve several pics to share!!!

Muzeum Sułkowskich

This photo (Muzeum Sułkowskich - sala militariów.jpg) is destined to remove, because I uploaded better version of it (Muzeum Sułkowskich - sala militariów.JPG). I wrote it, but only in polish - sorry :-). Lestat 17:47, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Administrador

• Se me pasó darte las gracias por tu apoyo en la elección de Lmbuga, sirva este mensaje para corregir esa omisión. Un cordial saludo. --Prevert^(talk) 12:32, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:Lelantcrossing.jpg

I've fixed the typo. Thanks for pointing it out. --Bjh21 12:57, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Category redirect to a non existing category

Category:Historical maps of the world -> Category:Historical world maps

sample

--kogo 18:46, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Untagged Images

I have seen, that you are working to help with „Untagged Images“. Can you please use {{subst:nld}} . That will help to find all these media in the Category Images with unknown source as of 16 May 2006. See also Commons:Untagged images for more informations. -- Rüdiger Wölk 20:19, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:Moringa_seed_pods.jpg

Thanks for the comment. I left a comment on Commons talk:Licensing regarding this image and its license when I created the image. Would you mind taking a look and responding there? Thanks! Waitak 10:53, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

I've sent a request to the photographer, and will either tag the image for deletion, or update the copyright. What's the policy on how long I can leave it pending his response? Waitak@en (talk) 11:06, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Escudo de Racing Club

Hola, no entiendo mucho inglés (en la parte de Licensing). Sé que el escudo tiene copyright y estoy en Argentina donde me dijeron que se puede poner escudos de fútbol tengan o no copyright pero avisando que no se puede usarlos de manera comercial. ¿Dónde tengo que anunciar eso en Licensing? Gracias por tu aviso. --Suizo 02:34, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:Sequin_Murad_III_1576.jpg

Thanks for your msg. I solved the problem.

Carlomorino

German translation of your boot: problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file

Hallo Orgullomoore, I have translated your template to German. It is not a verbatim translation (if you look in the dictionary). It would be great if you could insert this languege version in your template. To help the newbies I also inserted links to help/information pages of the shown problems in German. I propose to do the same in English and Español version. regards -- gildemax 18:21, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

==[[:Image:XYZ.jpg]]== |English | Español | deutsch | +/- Danke, dass Du Dateien auf Commons hochgeladen hast. Es scheint, dass es bei dieser Datei ein Problem bei der [[Template:Bitte_Informationen_zu_Bildern_hinzuf%C3%BCgen|Beschreibung]] und/oder der [[Commons:Lizenzen|Lizenz]] gibt. Bitte löse diese Probleme bei der oben angeführten Datei. Danke. --[[User:Orgullomoore|Orgullomoore]]

---

image:Venturi6.svg file corrupted

Hi, i received the message that you left at my talk page. This image was part of a diagram of venturi effect i made, but this file in particular it is corrupted (it was accidentally uploaded) and i think it should be deleted.image:Venturi6.svg--HappyApple 18:42, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Copyrights

Hello O. I noticed your remarks on my "User talk" about the missing copy right indications. I added the template {{PD-self}} to the 3 images "NYW-TransmissieL-Smith01/02/03.png" because I made them myself. As for the 2 other images "Lattice_....", I only corrected them. They were allready present. I can not trace, however, the originals in the history. I'm rather not to experienced. Maybe you're able to find them, and notice the copy right status. Nijdam 15:25, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

The Images: Image:Lattice of the divisibility of 60.png and Image:Lattice of the divisibility of 60.svg, are not complete and have been correced by me. I didn't create them however. As far as I have seen they are not used any more and may be removed.Nijdam 16:04, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Sorry to bother again: Also the image Image:Lattice of the divisibility of 60-2-.png may be removed.Nijdam 16:11, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Re: WelcomeBot

me=as happy as this old man

Really?! *delighted* Yeah, that would be great!

Would it be possible to only give welcomes to users who have made at least one edit/upload? Since around 200 people sign up each day, but I think a lot of those are essentially empty accounts...

you're the best! :D

--pfctdayelise (translate?) 07:44, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Did you notice the edit summary it's leaving???? Can you make it something like "Welcome to the Commons!" instead? Thanks, pfctdayelise (translate?) 00:30, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

It is actually extremely useful to identify these active and new users. I checked out several of their contribs and there were quite some copyvios. Could Orgullobot also produce a list of people it's welcomed? Then I can easily check them and delete the copyvios, tag the NSDs, etc. pfctdayelise (translate?) 12:02, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Very good, thankyou! pfctdayelise (translate?) 03:14, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

One last thing. Can you subst the welcomes? It's slightly less bot-like. :) Thanks, pfctdayelise (translate?) 08:51, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Using Orgullobot

Hi again Orgullomore,
Is it possible for someone who isn't an admin to be permitted to add tasks to User:Orgullobot/commands?  If so, I'd be very grateful to be given this privilege. I'm taking part in an overhaul of Category:Maps and, as you can see from here, having Orgullobot move map categories sooner rather than later will make the work much easier. Yours hopefully, David Kernow 11:26, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

We're gonna have to think of something tricky...first I'll take a nap :-D--Orgullomoore 00:06, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

I just had an idea that I think will work, I'll let you know when I get the kinks out of it.--Orgullomoore 03:51, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your replies, Orgullomore. If your idea works, great; otherwise, perhaps I may be made a temporary admin for a fixed period, subject to review and extension...?  Regards, David 15:38, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Try adding your requests to here ...

Have just done so. I was warned that no skin called "orgullobot" existed, but am guessing that's because User:David Kernow/orgullobot.css isn't (going to be) associated with one. Thanks for your efforts to help; much appreciated!  Yours, David 22:50, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

...Okay,

(a) I think User:David Kernow/orgullobot.css is working!

(b) I realise Orgullobot doesn't create the new categories or delete the previous ones once it has moved their contents... is this intentional / a necessary limitation / something else...?

Thanks for what looks like some nifty work!  Best wishes, David 00:41, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:Beppegrillo.jpg

From [4] with this license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/it/ --Ssspera 15:32, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:eclipse.jpg

Esta imagen la he hecho yo. Igual que otras que existen sobre astronomía. , , etc No se como poner ahora este dato en el historial de la imagen.

Imagenes de astronomia

Orgullomore, estas son hechas por mi, y las cedo.

File:Exoplaneta.jpg

La del eclipse la acabo de añadir yo y como la anterior, por algún motivo la habían borrado... Pues creo que es conveniente avisarte. Un saludo --RoyFokker 18:23, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Category:Maps in Galician

En la siguiente edición de Orgullobot:

(diff) (hist) . . m Category:Maps in Galician; 22:46 . . Orgullobot (Talk | contribs) 
       (Robot: Changing Category:Historical maps of Silesia)

en la que el bot movió Category:Maps in Galician de Category:Maps by language a Category:Maps by language used, el texto que aparece en el sumario sugiere un error de interpretación de la categoría. Supongo que no tiene más trascendencia porque con la edición no hubo problema, pero te lo comento para que no se confunda esta categoría con otra. Un cordial saludo. --Prevert^(talk) 09:29, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Changing Category:Historical maps of Silesia

I noticed that this bot has been making changes with the wrong edit summary, it comes up with the message "Changing Category:Historical maps of Silesia" on a whole bunch of pages in my watchlist that have nothing to do with silesia. no big deal since the category changed ok, but just pointing it out Astrokey44 21:21, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Bot error [and Orgullobot stalls?]

Your bot replaced the Category:Country locator maps on several images with Category:Locator maps for countries but this cat is not existing. Please have a look what happened there! See Image:Europe location BG.png as example. --Denniss 22:29, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

From User talk:Denniss#User talk:Orgullomoore#Bot error [and Orgullobot stalls?]:

I'm responsible for asking Orgullobot to move these maps; I've since realised that Orgullbot doesn't create new categories itself (perhaps this is a necessary limitation; am enquiring) but you should find Category:Locator maps for countries now exists. Sorry for the hiatus. Best wishes, David Kernow 05:25, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

In addition to realising Orgullbot doesn't or can't create new categories, I've also noticed a few of the category moves I've requested via User:David Kernow/orgullobot.css have stalled. They appear on the current version of User:David Kernow/orgullobot.css as of now as the requests that are still active. If there isn't a quick fix, no problem; let me know and I'll complete the moves manually. Orgullobot has already saved much time and effort with the map categories and I look forward to much more!  Yours, David 05:38, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Hey David: Thank you for your patience with my bot. Regarding the category moves, there is no reason why the bot doesn't move an existing category page to the new, non-existing one. This is something that has been brought to my attention before, but that I haven't had time to work on. I shall try to find the time to do so some time this week...

Thanks for your message!  Considering all the time and energy Orgullobot saves moving the contents of categories, it's a small chore to need to convert a redlink category into blue. In fact, it gives me the opportunity to check the new category's own categorisation. Also, I realise that not all categories Orgullobot leaves behind are best deleted; some deserve a {{Categoryredirect}} as users may search for them. In other words, don't feel pressured from this corner to try to "fix" this behavior – it has its own quirky benefits!  (If when/you do fix it, perhaps even include a parameter/switch for Orgullobot users to toggle and stop Orgullbot from deleting the old category and creating the new one, i.e. to revert to Orgullobot's current behavior!)

Also, regarding the appearent stalls, there are many reasons these can occur. One thing, for example, could be that I lose electricity in my home (due to a storm, outage, a virus on my computer--whatever)...

I hadn't realised Orgullobot's operation relied on your computer – although, thinking about it, I realise that's probably sensible. Understood and appreciated.

At other times, the bot produces errors and brings the bot to a screeching hault. With time and tinkering, these have become less common and more manageable, but perfection is difficult to reach ;).

Ditto (i.e. understood and appreciated). It's curious how Orgullobot either doesn't retry – or, if it does, make any more progress – with a move that was left incomplete. A quick scan of the few requested moves on User:David Kernow/orgullobot.css that Orgullobot left incomplete didn't suggest a pattern, i.e. something systematic causing Orgullobot to abort – for a while I wondered if it might be lowercase "[[category:...]]" entries – but I haven't taken a close look at them. If subsequent stalls prompt an idea, I'll let you know.

As an additional trivial sidenote, I'm glad the /orgullobot.css thing worked out for you. Speaking of this page, note that <!--commenting out--> requests has no effect on the bot. If that request has been carried out, the best thing is for you to remove it from the page, and if you wish to archive your requests, move it to another page. Ciao--Orgullomoore 21:45, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks; I've now moved previous completed requests to User:David Kernow/orgullobot.css/previous, although it's just occurred to me that maybe they need to be moved away from /orgullobot.css/... entirely...?  Best wishes and thanks again for a very useful bot!  Yours, David 00:05, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

---

Wow, this conversation is getting so complex :-D. Let's see.

Orgullobot doesn't retry when an error occurs because it's usually an error in my own programming ... I just caught one of these recently so you may come to find that now some of those cat moves that just wouldn't go before now do.

Understood. I'll let you know if/when I realise Orgullobot has now completed some of the moves that previously stalled.

Your constant reminding me about things that Orgullobot does wrong or of things that you would have Orgullobot do is very helpful to me. Thank you for your dedication.

Seems little compared to the dedication needed to construct and maintain one of these bots!  It's my pleasure to contribute whatever I can to such a useful tool. Re extending Orgullobot's abilities to include creating and deleting categories, the thought occurred to me that deletion might not be a good idea even if Orgullobot were able to do it; instead, could Orgullobot be made to insert a {{Categoryredirect}} once it finishes (or aborts) depopulating a category?  I reckon this should (a) make accountability/reversion easier; and (b) if Orgullobot aborts rather than completes a category move, users can more easily find where Orgullobot has placed the population it has managed to move. Also, I guess placing a {{Categoryredirect}} would be easier to implement. What do you think?

...As long as [requests] are removed specifically from User:David Kernow/orgullobot.css then the bot will not touch them...

Thanks; I'll continue to move them to /orgullobot.css/previous for checking before losing sight of them.

Best wishes, David 03:35, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:Rueda_-_Iglesia_-_Columnas_nervuradas.jpg

Done. --Ecelan 09:29, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Re:

Please, see again the license in bold now. FML ^hi 13:39, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Welcomes from Orgullobot should be signed

I got one, and noticed it says "Please be sure to sign your name on Talk pages" ... yet doesn't sign the message itself. AnonEMouse 22:23, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:A_001.jpg

Can be deleted as was uploaded in error by myself. Its tagged accordingly (I hope). -- Ianbrown 12:31, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:Mapka_pojezierza2.png

Sorry. I don't know what does this mean. I don't speek english. Tylko tyle umiem napisać. Czy mógłbyś napisać po polsku (ewentualnie po niemiecku)? )Please on polish or german.):)MARCIN N 14:31, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Admins who have had account name changes

It seems to me that Orgullobot doesn't recognise that User:Rüdiger Wölk is an admin, is that true? His account was formerly User:Skinmate, he is an admin though. pfctdayelise (translate?) 00:09, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

About old photographies

Hello. I added an license at all the photos you talked about me. I'm sure the autors are died since 70 years, so I add this : PD-Art. (Sorry for my english, i'm french !) --Yôkaï 10:10, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:Mieczyslaw Mietla.jpg

Done. Xabipl 12:13, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:Gabrieli2.jpg

I hope all it's all right now. For the photo I have an authorization from the family. You can refer to the written number and for confirmation to it-Wiki (Username:Cloj). Bye. --Cloj 20:03, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Frascati

I uploaded this foto twice, so my intention was to signal to delete it: what's the standard way to do this? --mac 10:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

User:Orgullobot/Welcome log

Some comments for improving this page.

Could you please use [[Special:Contributions/UserName]] instead of full link for reducing page size?

Will be great to split list on days (may be hours) for simplifying removing of reviewed uploads.

EugeneZelenko 14:05, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Please read this! :)

I agree, it would be good to split by days at least.

Also maybe link directly to gallery instead of/as well as contributions. pfctdayelise (translate?) 16:20, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Orgullobot: Good news and a query

Hi Orgullomoore,
I found out why Orgullobot seemed incapable/unwilling to move these categories: they used templates to insert their "[[Category:...]]" entries. (Take a look at this for an example.) So I've amended the categories specified by the templates accordingly – there's nothing amiss with Orgullobot!

However, moving the last category listed in the first link above (Category:California county locator maps) looks more tricky. The category for each map image is specified thus:

[[Category:California {{{type|county}}} locator maps]]

Would Orgullobot be able to cope with the following and other similarly unusual syntax?

{{move cat|California {{{type|county}}} locator maps|Locator maps for Californian counties (white)}}

I haven't tried it to see in case the unusual syntax causes Orgullobot to grind to a halt. I'm glad, though, that the problems I've had trying to rename these categories don't originate from Orgullobot.

Yours, David Kernow 15:43, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Category:Locator maps for subcarpathian voivodships of Poland

You changed category name from Category:Subcarpathian Voivodship Counties to Category:Locator maps for subcarpathian voivodships of Poland, but this name is bad - it should be Category:Locator maps for subcarpathian voivodship counties of Poland or Category:Locator maps for counties of subcarpathian voivodship of Poland.
mir @ 18:29, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Though Orgullomoore's Orgullobot made the change, I gave the instruction; thanks for pointing out my error. I'll now instruct Orgullobot to rename the category to Category:Locator maps for subcarpathian voivodship counties of Poland. Hope that's okay. Regards, David Kernow 03:59, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Now it's looking OK :) mir @ 06:25, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Re Weird category calls

Hi Orgullomoore,
Thanks for your reply re the above; it's good to know amending more sophisticated category names is possible. I'm going to postpone trying to update Category:California county locator maps however, as I feel I ought to seek the creator User:Dbenbenn's approval. In the meantime, there are still other map categories awaiting Orgullobot's magic. Best wishes, David Kernow 07:25, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:IndiaWorldMap.png

Hi Orgullomoore I hope this is not a RTFM question. I did browse around, so please forgive me if I missed the answer. The image in question was created and uploaded by a user called Clevelander in the English Wikipedia. I added the tag {{PD-user|Clevelander}}. Have I done the correct thing? Should I add more references? Is there anything else I should have done that I have missed?Jannetta 12:06, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Hi Orgullomoore, thanks for pointing out the duplicate image. I have checked the usages of Image:IndiaWorldMap.png and there were only about four, so I changed them all to LocationIndia.png on the Commons. I'm now happy for you to delete Image:IndiaWorldMap.png, if you still wish to do so.Jannetta 12:59, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

KinugawaMaru.jpg

I'm not sure what happened to the image details for this file. I added them back. It's definitely a public domain document, downloaded from the U.S. Navy historical image archives. Cla68 13:20, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

an idea...

Hello Orgullomoore, my most favouritest bot operator of them all... :)

I had another idea for Orgullobot. Could he scan all uploads, and keep a log of any that have "logo" (case insensitive) anywhere in the title? He doesn't have to do anything else special. I (or others) will check the log (because sometimes they're OK... just not very often).

Thanks! --pfctdayelise (translate?) 15:00, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Enwikipediagrowth6.PNG

I forgot to add summary and license. Just added it and removed the {untagged|day=2|month=June|year=2006}. HenkvD 21:32, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Image License

Regarding this image license. Is it OK now? --Profero 21:38, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Agencia Brasil

Desculpe-me pela demora em responder e se escrevo em português. Vi que entende em espanhol, espero que compreenda o que escreverei. Aparentemente, houve uma falha de comunicação na Agência Brasil/Radiobrás. Dias atrás pessoas de tal instituição me contactaram esclarecendo sobre os direitos autorais de tal site. Pode ver sobre o assunto em pt:Wikipedia:Esplanada/anúncios#Imagens da Agência Brasil são de uso livre. 555 02:00, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Zzzz-03

Hi, I am pretty new in Wikimedia. Is that OK now? --behmod

Orgullobot edit summaries

Seeing this rather scared me, I thought it had been abused... but no, the category change is fine, the edit summary is just wrong. pfctdayelise (translate?) 15:23, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Dodonaea_viscosa_seeds.jpg

Aunque el aviso era para Manuel Anastácio he incluido la etiqueta de esta imagen Image:Dodonaea_viscosa_seeds.jpg {{PD-USGov-USDA}}. Estoy haciendo un seguimiento de algunas imágenes subidas por usuarios protugueses por eso lo he visto. Un cordial saludo. --Prevert^(talk) 18:03, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Please rename cats

Rename Category:Location maps of Friesland to Category:Location maps of municipalities in Friesland (0 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Please add a reason. Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username. Location maps of Friesland;Location maps of municipalities in Friesland;r;

Rename Category:Location maps of Gelderland to Category:Location maps of municipalities in Gelderland (0 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Please add a reason. Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username. Location maps of Gelderland;Location maps of municipalities in Gelderland;r;

Rename Category:Location maps of North Brabant to Category:Location maps of municipalities in North Brabant (0 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Please add a reason. Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username. Location maps of North Brabant;Location maps of municipalities in North Brabant;r;

Rename Category:Location maps of North Holland to Category:Location maps of municipalities in North Holland (0 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Please add a reason. Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username. Location maps of North Holland;Location maps of municipalities in North Holland;r;

Rename Category:Location maps of South Holland to Category:Location maps of municipalities in South Holland (0 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Please add a reason. Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username. Location maps of South Holland;Location maps of municipalities in South Holland;r;

Rename Category:Location maps of Utrecht to Category:Location maps of municipalities in Utrecht (0 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Please add a reason. Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username. Location maps of Utrecht;Location maps of municipalities in Utrecht;r;

—the preceding unsigned comment is by Siebrand (talk • contribs)

Moved as listed below (to follow "Locator maps for" format used in Category:Locator maps):

Category:Locator maps for municipalities in Friesland

Category:Locator maps for municipalities in Gelderland

Category:Locator maps for municipalities in North Brabant

Category:Locator maps for municipalities in North Holland

Category:Locator maps for municipalities in South Holland

Category:Locator maps for municipalities in Utrecht

Regards, David Kernow 20:35, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

please read above

#User:Orgullobot.2FWelcome_log (I think maybe you need to keep the bot talk page separate...) pfctdayelise (translate?) 16:22, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

OK thanks. Just wanted to make sure that you'd read it... :) pfctdayelise (translate?) 04:38, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Very good!! I made a slight change so that it automatically shows all subpages. pfctdayelise (translate?) 03:19, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Auto-tagging new images

Hello Orgulloomore,

Regarding Orgullobot's tagging of new images without sources, license tags, etc. could you please adjust it so that it does not use tags like {{Untagged}}, but rather tags that sort the files by date, such as {{subst:nld}}? Thanks, I'd appreciate it, as part of a new scheme reorganization scheme I'm trying to promote. —UED77 01:47, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Etiquetas licenciosas

¡Ya está! Se me olvidó... vaya cabeza tengo. Gracias por el aviso, Kyle! Mortadelo2005 13:22, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Images

I see you have uploaded Image:Abadiano Vizcaya localizacion.png and Image:Bandera Abadiano.png. The author of both images is not Txo (the uploader), is me, please correct them. Willy 15:56, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Gracias. Willy

Oberstenfeld

Hi admin,

Why unknown source? Its taken be me and I give it to Wikipedia for anybody, there is no linscense, I'm no professionell.It was just a picture of a trip ciao mike Junkermike 12:22, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Bienvenida

Cambié la bienvenida en inglés de Orgullobot por una en gallego a un usuario de Galicia. Este mensaje es para avisarte. Un cordial saludo. --Prevert^(talk) 18:06, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Donald_Cammell_directing_Performance_in_1968_-_a_film_accused_of_appealing_to_pederasts.jpg

Hola, I am sorry, that upload was a mistake, I realized too late that there was no way to license it on Wikimedia. Later I uploaded it to the English Wikipedia, which has an option for movie frames. Haiduc 04:48, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Template:See a doctor

Hello. Dear Mr. Bot, could you remove Template:See a doctor from all articles and categories where it is used? Only when it is used as "inclusion". for example, don't remove it from Template:Deletion requests.

Thank you

Fred Chess 12:15, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Bienvenidas

Hola, gracias por la bienvenida ^^. He visto que has (bueno, tu bot) hecho un subst de la plantilla en mi página de discusión. Ya sé tus manías tu costumbre de hacer subst de plantillas que no necesitan actualizarse con los cambios y tal, pero te lo comento porque me hubiese sido más fácil añadir el /es a la plantilla que no borrar lo que habías puesto para poner la plantilla de nuevo en el idioma en español. Pero vamos, que es sólo una tontería. Y ya que estamos, teniendo en cuenta que en mi página de usuario tenía puesto el babel, podría haberme dado la bienvenida en español, aunque igual es un poco complicado para el bot distinguirlo, además de inusual teniendo en cuenta que da la bienvenida a la primera edición y creo que pocos ponen el babel en su primera edición. Bueno, pues nada, sólo esas sugerencias. Saludos. --Ciencia Al Poder 09:52, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Coluna Prestes 02.jpg

Hi. It exists a template for images from http://www.exercito.gov.br/. But, the problem is that I not found. Could you resolve this problem for me? Thanks and sorry my bad english. -- Fernando S. Aldado 05:49, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

File copyright

I can't seem to find the problem with the file I added. Could you tell me exactly what is wrong? Niladmirari 08:39, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Okay, the file is already replaced with another one which has a correct license. How do I remove something from Wiki Commons Niladmirari 21:11, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

licensing

Sorry, it is a lapse of memory I corrected thank you --Luc Viatour 08:50, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Copyright informations

I have just added the copyrhight informations for Image:True_humility.png. Thanks for your message. I found this picture on the english wikipedia, but for some reason it was missing from Commons. Because of its date, it's in the public domain, but i forgot to add the information to Commons. All apologies Israfel fr 09:23, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

East Timor coin images

Hello Orgullomoore! Please check Image:Coin_TL_01cent.PNG, Image:Coin_TL_05cent.PNG, Image:Coin_TL_10cent.PNG and Image:Coin_TL_25cent.PNG, if the licence peroblem is now fixed. The original poster at Tetum-Wikipedia gave free licence for use there and I only published them here. If there is another way needed, please inform me how to do it. Greetings, --Patrick 07:20, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Anchomanes_giganteus0.jpg

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you.--Orgullomoore

It was a empty fiel, an empty photo so I deleted the information to see if it would delete itself, I guess not. I will go back and put a delete tag on it, Thanks for letting me know, I believe there is a second one out there as well.WayneRay 10:35, 14 June 2006 (UTC)WayneRay

Pregunta

He visto que te han propuesto para administrador, me gustaría votar favorablemente por tu candiadtura. Antes quisiera saber cual es tu posición con respecto a la toponimia de Galicia, si apoyas la actual situación con los nombres oficiales y nativos en Galicia y en España (los mismos que en inglés y que siguen la política establecida en Commons) o defiendes otro punto de vista. Un cordial saludo. --Prevert^(talk) 10:35, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

• Gracias por la respuesta. Creo que estás haciendo un buen trabajo y una vez aclarado este punto tienes mi humilde apoyo. Un cordial saludo. --Prevert^(talk) 20:21, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Firma

Me gustaría que la firma que ponés con el bot cuando dejás el aviso de falta de etiquetados lleve la fecha y la hora y no sólo tu nombre. Eso me ayuda a verificar la fecha en que se notificó al usuario para poder contar 7 días y borrarla. Saludos. Barcex 00:31, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

AYUDA FOTO heydrich

http://www.nazi-lauck-nsdapao.com/BS105.htm LINK DE LA PÁGINA DE LA FOTO.RECORDAR QUE ES UNA FOTO DE CASI 70 AÑOS

Cambiar licencia

hola, como puedo cambiar la licencia si no la he puesto cuando subía la foto?--MarkCat 16:15, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Santa_maria_novella,_cappella_tornabuoni,_domenico_ghirlandaio9.JPG

i am sorry, I just forgot to put the licence template. Cheers--Sailko 15:26, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Hollywood_sign1.jpg

Hi Orgullomoore, thank you for your message. In actual fact, I downloaded a file called Image:Hollywood_sign1.JPG in order to do some improvement on Photoshop, but the software changed the file extension to lower case (Image:Hollywood_sign1.jpg) when I uploaded it.

I have uploaded the improved image in Image:Hollywood_sign1.JPG dan as such, the file Image:Hollywood_sign1.jpg ought to be deleted. In fact, I left a message in the file that says: "Please delete photo. I was trying to edit Image:Hollywood sign1.JPG." LOL. The lettering obviously was not clear enough to attract your attention. — PM Poon 07:04, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Misplaced welcome - Special:Contributions/Smacklake

Hmm, I can't figure out why this user got a welcome...?! :) Maybe a small glitch, not important. pfctdayelise (translate?) 09:50, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

I thought you should still be able to see that in the logs, or somewhere...? pfctdayelise (translate?) 10:07, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Licencia equivocada

He encontrado que una imagen en la que el usuario que la ha cargado reclama ser su obra propia (own work) está sacada en realidad de una página web de un ayuntamiento. La imagen en questión es Image:Església.JPG y aparece en http://www.llivia.org/fotosllivia.html (la quinta imagen). Esto no es muy lícito que digamos, no? --SMP (talk page) 14:22, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Most of the own works of this user are probably copyvio, e.g. Image:Farmacia llivia.jpg (a postcard), Image:Llivia1.jpg and Image:Castell.JPG (Google Earth screenshots), Image:Llivia-25000-fullscan-60procentverkleind.jpg, Image:Llivia-fullscan.jpg, Image:Llivia-1-15000-gestitchte-scan-jpg50procent.jpg and Image:Llivia planol.jpg (scanned maps). In addition, if you type "Llívia" in Google Images Search you will find most of his other contributions.--81.36.147.116 15:06, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing that out.--Orgullomoore 06:03, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

No! No soy yo el que ha cargado esta imagen! acabo de consultarlo y es User:MarkCat, y también es él el que ha cargado las imágenes que denuncia el usuario 81.36.147.116. Yo sólamente quería indicarte que había visto ésta infracción en una imagen que no es mía!.--SMP (talk page) 14:03, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Licencia markcat

wenas, la imagen que dices puse que era de la nasa y me la querían borrar, por eso le puse lo otro. entonces que debo hacer para poner imagenes que no son mías? (tanto si tinen copyright como si no) gracias

Babel

Does the babel on your userpage intentionally have Aragonés twice? Jon Harald Søby 07:03, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Admin

Hello. Congratulations. You are now a Wikimedia Commons administrator and you now can place {{user admin}} on your user page. Don't loose the fun with these admin rights. ;-) If you have any questions for example on deletion guidelines just ask me (I am as well on IRC in #wikipedia-de oder #wikimedia-commons channel most of the time). By the way Category:Against policy and Category:Unknown need urgently some help on reducing the number of copyvios awaiting their deletion. ;-) Have fun, Arnomane 09:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Safdarjung_tomb.jpg

Ok licence detail added. thanks for the tip off.

Pratheepps 07:49, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Butterfly On Pink Flower.jpg

Thanks for the heads-up, let me know if there are any more problems. The photgraph is my own, I took it myself, so now I believe it has the correct tags. Mattman723 03:37, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Scilla(RC).jpg

Hello, The photograph is my own, I took it myself. I thought I had uploaded with the tag "Own Work.." but I must have done something wrong. And I am not able to change it. Sorry for my clumsiness. Any help is welcome! --Gipsy 05:57, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Orgullobot making bad substitutions

As part of its substitutions for category:satellite pictures, Orgullobot is changing the wikitext to read "category:category:satellite pictures" (here's one example - http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Wfm_jura_landsat.jpg&diff=2224882&oldid=1731635) -- Finlay McWalter 23:57, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

'Tis my mistake, Finlay; a typo I passed onto Orgullobot. The error should be reverted now, but if you find any exceptions, please let me know. Apologies, David Kernow 02:07, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Anchomanes_giganteus0.jpg

There was no photo when I found it, so I only deleted the category it was in so it didnt' show in the article as a red rectngle. Whomever uploaded it didnt attach the picture or something and probably should be deleted I can only assume, WayneRay 02:14, 26 June 2006 (UTC)WayneRay

Image:Der_Spiegel_Pacific_Revolutionaries.jpg

Hola, he sacado la imagen de la wiki inglesa. --KamaradeHacker 10:45, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

La de Kim Sung, tambien de la wiki inglesa. --KamaradeHacker 10:46, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

La de Hassan Nasralla, de Rotten.com (no entro usualmente, fue en la busqueda de imagenes) --KamaradeHacker 10:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

La de Mao, de una pagina peruana, Bandera Roja. --KamaradeHacker 10:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

No sabia que licencia ponerles, tampoco como cambiarle la licencia, puedes conseguirle una plantilla adecuada a las imagenes antes que sea borrada en siete dias? --KamaradeHacker 10:51, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Gracias! --KamaradeHacker 23:52, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

a la de Der Spiegel, le puse "Magazinecover", como estaba en la wikipedia, pero igual dice que la van a borrar. --KamaradeHacker 23:56, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Gracias, conseguire la licencia de las otras, y lo arreglare. --KamaradeHacker 11:58, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Pictures

Image:Bild_Benutzer_Christ_(Louis88).gif

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you.--Orgullomoore 17:30, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:45px-Commons-Computer.png

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you.--Orgullomoore 17:53, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

These Pictures are from Wikipedia! I only uploaded them twice because I need them by wikinews! --Flight Attendant 12:38, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

=Your message

Sorry, I forgot. I fixed the missing licence information. Bye --G.dallorto 18:52, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Central_Ghana_districts.png

Hello Orgullomoore, you told me about copyrightproblems with the above image. Like I mentioned in the description: it is from en:districts of ghana, "Created by (user:)Rarelibra for public domain use". Where is the problem? If there is one, there will be much more. There are all in all 11 images like this, 7 of them I loaded down in commons - I plan to do this with 4 more. Best regards, looking forward to your answer Ahanta 13:49, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Oh, excuse me, I forgot the public domain-button, no answer necessary best regards Ahanta 13:58, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:DSC00469.JPG

Já carreguei nova imagem com a licença correta. Está tudo certo agora? Jonas Tomazini 15:05, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Images from User:Seiman

Hello Orgullomoore, my english is not so good. But all images from User_talk:Seiman are from the adidas-website! http://www.press.adidas.com/de/desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-149/ Please delete this football-images --Viele Grüße - kandschwar 15:08, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

about Image:Nanyue001.png

I am the author of this picture, and i have added copyright information of this pic, it will be published under GFDL, thanks for your kind attention.--长夜无风 05:07, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:correfocs1.JPG ... image:correfocs7.JPG

I dont understand what is the problem with that picture. I take this photographys on 23 jun3 2006, at can Pastilla (Mallorca), it is published unde GFDL. Pérez 04:11, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Impaciencia

Por favor, señor, espérese 3 minutos después de haberme subido una imagen para poner la plaltilla que tenga que poner. Todas esas fotos las hice yo en mi vieje a las Alpujarras. No tienen copyright. GabriIL 14:55, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

please keep your bot a bit short

I am sysop-bureaucrat on cs.wikisource and therefore I support to controll all images and texts if they have a proper licence. But what your bot is doing is a bit strange. i uploaded today the image Image:Kiplingcropped.jpg, and after some seconds I wanted to upload all informations on the picture incl. the licence. But there was an edit conflict with your bot. You must programm it a little bit else, it must wait a moment after the first upload, not to give the messages 5 seconds after the upload. It leads to edit conflictc and other problems. Please do it. -jkb- 15:14, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Guh, algún error ha ocurrido. No debería avisar tan pronto. Gracias a los dos por avisar.

Guh, an error has occurred. It shouldn't be warning that quickly. Thanks to the two of you for noticing.--Orgullomoore 16:17, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Lo que pasa es que solía correr ese bot en mi propia computadora, y ahora lo he trasladado al m:Toolserver, y la hora que indica ese sistema es diferente que el mío, ¡así que iba 7 horas adelantado!

What happened is that I used to run that bot on my own computere and I have recently moved them to the m:Toolserver, and the system time is obviously different, so the bot was moving 7 hours ahead of time!--Orgullomoore 16:20, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Multiwiki bot support

No sé si he entendido bien el mensaje, ¿se trataría de hacer funcionar unha copia del bot en el propio ordenador para una wikipedia determinada? Un cordial saludo. --Prevert^(talk) 17:24, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Me parece una posibilidad muy útil para controlar las imágenes borradas. ¿Como podemos contactar para probarlo (activarlo) en la Galipedia? Yo tengo activada la opción de correo en Commons. También podría crear una cuenta de Msn si fuera necesario. Un cordial saludo. --Prevert^(talk) 17:54, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Siempre estoy dispuesto a ayudar :) Si puedo este fin de semana si no a partir del lunes crearé la cuenta. Un cordial saludo. --Prevert^(talk) 20:17, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) [edit]

Image:Josef_Fottner,_Desert.jpg

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you.--Orgullomoore

Well. This painting belongs to me and is placed in my living room! I made a picture of it and placed it commons.wikimedia. I think this is correct? --Richard Huber 11:33, 2 July 2006 (UTC)