User talk:Onlymyself65536/2009
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
File:Bina.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Denniss (talk) 18:12, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Gina_Lee.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Denniss (talk) 16:59, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Gina_singer.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Denniss (talk) 17:00, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:BigQ.JPG
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:BigQ.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:BigQ.JPG]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Denniss (talk) 17:00, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Annie_lin.JPG
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Annie_lin.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Annie_lin.JPG]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Denniss (talk) 17:00, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Copyright violations
Hello Onlymyself65536,
You have uploaded several files that are copyright violations and you have done so despite our requests not to do so, and despite our instructions. If you do not stop uploading pictures that are not free, your account will be blocked. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Image casebook useful. Please leave me a message if you have further questions. Martin H. (talk) 18:08, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:02, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Taco.jpg was uncategorized on 29 August 2009.
- Image:Ms.Dancing Queen.jpg was uncategorized on 29 August 2009.
File:Ms.Dancing_Queen.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Martin H. (talk) 15:18, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
You have been blocked for a duration of 1 week
You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 1 week for the following reason: uploading unfree files after warnings.
If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.
|
Martin H. (talk) 15:26, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Angel hong.JPG
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Angel hong.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Angel hong.JPG]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
--Túrelio (talk) 08:38, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
File tagging Image:Angel hong.gif
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Angel hong.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:Image:Angel hong.gif]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Túrelio (talk) 08:39, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Angel_hong.PNG
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Angel_hong.PNG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Angel_hong.PNG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin H. (talk) 06:09, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
No, you are not the photographer. You need the photographers written permission that everyone can reuse the image for every purpose including commercial use. See Commons:First steps. If you dont have the photographers written permission you can not upload the image here. Uploading images to your blog does not make you the photographer or give you the copyright. --Martin H. (talk) 06:22, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, it must be a photograph you created entirely by yourself. See Commons:第一步 (正體中文)/選擇許可協議 (hope thats your language?). --Martin H. (talk) 06:37, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently uploading media that is in violation of Commons' licensing policy, despite our warnings not to do so, and despite our instructions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|your reason here}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See block log.
(toolbox: contributions • page moves)
|
Your contributions show me that you are not willings to contribute here inside the projects licensing policy. Furthermore you tried to trick Commons with manipulation of EXIF data, that not acceptable. See File:Angel hong2.JPG for further evidence. Commons excuses mistakes like maybe your first uploads, but not lies. --Martin H. (talk) 20:56, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
- A note regarding the mentioned photograph: Yes, File:Olnymyself65536.JPG was deleted as a private photograph not in use in any project and no longer usefull as the person who uploaded it is blocked. --Martin H. (talk) 05:42, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
See User talk:Editor65536, User talk:Mypicture65536, User talk:Comebackagain --Martin H. (talk) 16:16, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
- And please stop this unblock requests for your sockpuppets accounts. I ran a checkuser on your accounts. --Martin H. (talk) 18:10, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Is that a joke? This is an image you copied from a random website - ok, you provided the source to the website - with a random license, you selected the free art license.
Again, in simple words: Content on Commons must be free, free to use by everyone for every purpose including commercial use. The copyrigth holder must agree to this terms. The copyright holder is, in most cases, the photographer or the photographers employer. To upload an image here you need a written permission from the copyrigth holder that he agrees to free reuse under a free license. In this case you not even know the copyright holder and you not have any piece of written text that says, that the copyright holder published this photo under the free art license. Didnt you read Commons:First steps? Commons:First steps/License selection is clear and easy here, have a look at the image File:Decision Tree on Uploading Imagesv2.svg there: image is not 100 years old, you not created it yourself, the owner of rights is not known -> do not upload....!
Stay at File:Decision Tree on Uploading Imagesv2.svg and lets have a look back to your only correct upload so far: File:Rabit zheng.jpg. Also this image is not 100 years old, it is not your own work, the author is known (Patrick Hsu), the author of course not died 70 years ago, and did the copyright owner agreed to a free license? Yes, he did, he published the image on flickr under the terms of the cc-by-2.0, that license allows for modification and commercial reuse by everyone as long as the author is attributed.
I have little confidence that you understand it now. Please read Commons:First steps again carefully, it is also available in Chinese. --Martin H. (talk) 01:31, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- Whats so difficult? Just because someone uploads an image from some random website under a wrong license - does this give you the permission to do so too? No. The next example: Someone uploads an image from some random website, you want do to so too, lets speak again to this instrcutional image:
- The picture is not >100 years old
- It is not created by yourself
- The copyright holder is maybe unknown and maybe known. Lets assume the first uploder did provide the correct copyright holder.
- So the copyright holder is known
- He is not dead for 70 years
- And now the important question: Did the owner agrees to YOUR upload?? NO he didnt, you not even asked!!
- Do not upload.
- Whats so difficult? Please ask questions here, I dont want a new question on my talkpage every day. My talkpage is not your personal help desk. If you not even understand the very, very basic rules (who is the copyright holder, can I do something with other peoples property without their permission?) you should think if this is the right place for you. Do not copy any images from random websites without prior written permission. --Martin H. (talk) 10:10, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Onlymyself65536.JPG was uncategorized on 3 November 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Olnymyself65536-2.JPG was uncategorized on 3 November 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- I categorized your three images into Category:Wikipedians in Taiwan using HotCat. If you are not in Taiwan, you can edit the categories to something else under Category:Wikipedians by country. --Teratornis (talk) 19:53, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
what the hell ?
Dear Martin H. (talk)
can you explain why my 2 pictures were be replaced by FlickreviewR
Is there any problem ?
--onlymyself65536 (talk) 00:46, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Template:Flickr free
If you want to upload photos from Flickr to Commons, please search with {{Flickr free}}. That finds only Flickr photos which have a license suitable for Commons (cc-by or cc-by-sa). Then you can use {{Flinfo}} to get the information you need to paste into the basic upload form. --Teratornis (talk) 19:56, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
已经翻译完了
已经翻译完了,在Commons:OTRS/zh 这里。不用这麽客气。--Fanghong (talk) 01:53, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
File tagging Image:MCAS Excel 2007.PNG
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:MCAS Excel 2007.PNG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:Image:MCAS Excel 2007.PNG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Túrelio (talk) 09:09, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
File:Cookie_Monster.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Justass (talk) 09:11, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
File:Kermit_the_Frog.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Justass (talk) 09:11, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
File:Oscar_the_GROUCH.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Justass (talk) 09:11, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
File:Big_Bird.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Justass (talk) 09:11, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi Onlymyself65536,
in order to save you from future troubles with copyright problems, take a look at COM:CB. Regards. --Túrelio (talk) 13:26, 15 November 2009 (UTC)