User talk:Nobelpeopleuploader

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Nobelpeopleuploader!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:41, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Your FPC votes

Hi, When voting for FPC, please follow Commons:Featured picture candidates criteria, not your own made-up. BTW you need to justify your opposing votes [1]. Thanks, Yann (talk) 19:07, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

I second this complaint. It looks very much like you are on some kind of revenge disruption for your recent failed FPC nomations/delists. I urge you to either remove your incomplete oppose votes or change them to ones that specify a correct reason per our judging criteria. It is not acceptable to oppose because you dislike photographers nominating their own photos, or that you don't like monkeys. This is your final warning. If you continue this, I shall ask an administrator to block you. -- Colin (talk) 19:44, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Unfortunately I feel I'm not welcome here. I have removed all my opposing votes and all my supporting votes. --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 22:00, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

By the way you should take a look on some of the other times I have nominated pictures for the featured picture voting procedure. These nominations have failed before. So please don't try to say that I'm opposing because of my recent nomination. And my comments when opposing are not wrong, and there are no guideline saying that I must write a comment when opposing. Just saying... --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 22:08, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

I couldn't find the paragraph I'm thinking about but I think Nobel is right, and we only ask to justify an oppose as a courtesy. Doesn't mean I support the behaviour. - Benh (talk) 22:16, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

• Hi, your votes are welcome but actions voluntarily disruptive are not of course, on my personal level the opposes without justifications are acceptable as I presume of the good faith of the voters and consider these votes as no wow. Just my opinion. -- Christian Ferrer 23:24, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Conclusion: The different opinions by different users above confirm my previous statement: "Wikimedia sites, like Commons, are the Wild West. Most of us here are amateurs. And it's normal here on Commons that people judge many other things than the pictures". --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 23:04, 16 March 2015 (UTC)