User talk:Nightscream/Archive 10
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I see you added University of Wisconsin System schools like University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point to the category. I think it's misplaced. These schools are not the University of Wisconsin, which has historically been attached to the University of Wisconsin-Madison. These "state" schools have never been named what you have categorized them as. So I'm fine if you want to change that category name to University of Wisconsin System, but I disagree with University of Wisconsin. There are long discussions about the topic on the English Wikipedia. Royalbroil 13:21, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 04:18, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:GerryAlanguilan.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:GerryAlanguilan.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:GerryAlanguilan.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:54, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Dave simons.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Dave simons.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Dave simons.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Diannaa (talk) 20:55, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
File:Dansmithflier.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:30, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot
File source is not properly indicated: File:TouréMay2006.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:TouréMay2006.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Martin H. (talk) 08:46, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello,
I restored the photo for now. It was tagged as copyright violation as it appears on [1]. Since this is smaller, I think it is OK. Yann (talk) 13:28, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- Hold and wave tagged it: [2]. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:16, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
File:2.11.11SpiderManTurnOffTheDarkByLuigiNovi1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Dream out loud (talk) 19:11, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Category:Movie theaters
Hi,
back in 2010 you made the Category:Movie theaters while the Category:Cinemas already existed. More people seem to place images in this category, so I made it a redirect. The reason I'm writing to you is that you placed this category in the Category:Entertainment venues in the United States and Category:Cinemas in New Jersey. This is not in line with the hierarchy of categories: not all theaters are in the US. Please be more careful when making new categories. --IIVeaa (talk) 18:41, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
File:Worldwide-plaza-fount-medium.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:38, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
cat yronwode
Hello. What is the reason for your creating a new category Category:Catherine Yronwode and moving images out of Category:catherine yronwode to populate it? Wondering, Infrogmation (talk) 21:08, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you!
Thanks for the image you just uploaded. It is historically significant and could be a great illustration for many projects.
Keep up the great work! —Tom Morris (talk) 09:42, 13 September 2011 (UTC) |
File:5.21.11MargueriteVanCookByLuigiNovi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JosephFumetti (talk) 00:45, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Permission box
The coding and wording that I used is adapted from about 3 users who have a similar permissions template for their uploads. I looked through the users who are recognized as being outstanding photographers and who were still active for ideas. You are welcome to adapt what I used for my current permission box. BrokenSphere (Talk) 14:32, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- I tried plugging your name into the template directly to see how it works - the result is here. You could copy the coding in your own namespace (e.g. User:Nightscream/Credits), modify the wording as you see fit, and put it into your image pages as a template. BrokenSphere (Talk) 14:52, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
- No problem. Taking this from my en profile - I was playing Final Fantasy X-2 when I registered and my username is derived from the Sphere Break mini game, although the term "broken sphere" is not actually used in relation to this mini game. BrokenSphere (Talk) 14:44, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- That clause applies more to commercial or for profit use of the image, which as I understand it is allowed by the CC. It is adapted from what I've seen other users put into their credit boxes in case these circumstances arise. You are welcome to modify or keep it out. BrokenSphere (Talk) 15:41, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
- The idea is that if someone would like to use one of my images in a commercial manner (and there is a lot of latitude as to what "commercial" means), I would like to receive some consideration if possible. It's not required, but it's a bonus if they do choose to go ahead and go through the process. Of course they may go ahead and use the image (s) anyway with or without attribution and with or without notification and compensation, as the enforceability of this clause is as you can guess, haphazard to nonexistent at best. There are many other contributors here who do not have such language if they use a customized attribution/copyright template, it is up to each person how they want to deal with possible commercial use of their works that they choose to upload here. However bottom line the intent of putting media up here to share for me has always been to share what I can, not to make money off it (there are better places, obviously). I have found that editorial use in websites, articles, blogs or even offline as some people have notified me about, for me is generally OK. The contact me part is more of so that I know where the image is being used so that I can link to it using the {{Published}} template. I don't claim to be an expert on CC or GFDL, so I hope that this discussion has not been too confusing for you! BrokenSphere (Talk) 15:19, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
File:4.28.11TimesSquareSignsByLuigiNovi2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
RE rillke questions? 14:00, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Baia-Bacoli, not Ischia !
Hi Nightsream. Pay attention ! All the aerial pictures that you have upload like this have a wrong location. It's not Ischia, but the bay of Baia (municipality of Bacoli), with the Castello Aragonese of Baia, not of Ischia (the Castello Aragonese of Ischia is on a little roun island!). Here we can see very well the bay of Baia with Punta Epitaffio and his port, the Castello Aragonese of Baia, then the modern round church of San Gioacchino in Bacoli. Can you please re-upload thes pictures with the correct name? Thank you very much. Best regards, --DenghiùComm (talk) 18:51, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
- Wounderful ! Thank you very much ! Cheers, --DenghiùComm (talk) 03:34, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:RenePaulChambellan.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:RenePaulChambellan.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:RenePaulChambellan.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) 13:30, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Category:Yuri_Lowelthal has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Bensin (talk) 02:39, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:KirbyKrackle 2010 photo cover.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:KirbyKrackle 2010 photo cover.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:KirbyKrackle 2010 photo cover.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:01, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
File:4.28.11TimesSquareSignsByLuigiNovi1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Lymantria (talk) 09:35, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Photographer's Barnstar | |
Thanks for taking and uploading photos from Wikipedia Day 2012! SarahStierch (talk) 02:38, 31 January 2012 (UTC) |
File:9.28.06Bergenline19thStreetByLuigiNovi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:30, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
File:9.5.07AMCGardenStatePlazaMallbyLuigiNovi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:31, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
File:12.21.10JoeQuesadaByLuigiNovi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yann (talk) 19:35, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 19:15, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Robliefeldpic.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Robliefeldpic.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Robliefeldpic.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
I'm not totally sure about this one, but I find it highly unlikely that the "author" (User:Ahwatukee) is the copyright holder, and thus has the legal right to release the image into the public domain. As there is no evidence provided, I've tagged it for deletion. Just thought you'd like to know. Cheers! (Note: I'll try to remember to check this page, but if you have anything fairly urgent to say in reply, it might be a good idea to direct your comments to my talk page over at the 'pedia.)Evanh2008 (talk) 10:20, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Category:Built_in_2011_in_New_Jersey has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |