User talk:Nablicus/Archive 1
This is a Wikimedia Commons user page.
If you find this page on any site other than Wikimedia Commons, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nablicus/Archive_1.
|
Image deletion warning | Template:Politicalposter has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
GeorgHH 11:45, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Template:Logo1 has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
GeorgHH 11:53, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Anti.emu.sweden.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
GeorgHH 11:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Europaparlamentet logo.png has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
GeorgHH 11:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Euro coins
[edit]Why are you uploading smaller version of images? Herr Kriss 16:50, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- Because of the proportionality between the coins. For example, the 1-cent coins shouldn't be of the same size as the 2-euro coins. In a gallery (for example: http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belgiska_euromynt) it looks very strange if all coins, independent of denomination, are equal in size. Don't you think?
- Glentamara 17:00, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- But you made many coins photos smaller, so you made it worse. I think that the best solution is making gallery in table with correct sizes using [[Image:, not with <gallery>. Herr Kriss 17:22, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- PS:If you answer then do it on my page, it's how we talk on Commons. In this way i'll see orange box with notification about new message. Herr Kriss 17:23, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- But you made many coins photos smaller, so you made it worse. I think that the best solution is making gallery in table with correct sizes using [[Image:, not with <gallery>. Herr Kriss 17:22, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- Its how some people talk on Commons. Other people, like myself, prefer to keep a conversation in one place, and to watch our watchlists. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 17:32, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- That's why we have size modifiers on images. Please see m:Help:Magic words#Size for details on that and m:Help:Table for details on making tables of images that are similar to what <gallery> produces (but more appropriate for coin sets), and stop uploading smaller version of images per Commons:First steps/Quality and description#Images. Thanks! — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 17:32, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Please link images
[edit]
Hello Nablicus/Archive 1!
Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.
To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.
You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.
The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!
Thank you. — Manecke 15:49, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:Lisbon Treaty Ratification Map.svg
[edit]Hello,
Image:Lisbon Treaty Ratification Map.svg
Poland hasn't yet ratificated ratified the Treaty. Only our Parliament did agree that President shall ratificate ratify it, but he hasn't signed it yet. So Poland should not be dark green, but light green.
Regards, Rozek19 (talk) 08:58, 14 June 2008 (UTC) (corrections injected for easier comprehension: "ratify", "ratified" by Mareklug talk 08:47, 11 August 2008 (UTC))
Free Trade Areas in Europe.svg
[edit]Damn you're quick!- J Logan t: 15:22, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
- Correction, the log shows February. How on earth did I just make a png showing the same thing, with the same title and with the same colours (bar one) as yours without knowing it even existed till just now?- J Logan t: 15:24, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Ratification maps
[edit]I don't understand why you made these maps: Image:Treaty of Accession 2005 Ratification Map.svg, Image:Treaty of Nice Ratification Map.svg -when both were fully ratified long before they were made. They are they intended to show? Thanks.- J Logan t: 19:36, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- The maps are used in articles [1] and [2]. These are useful to show what countries that have ratified the treaties, just as with the Treaty of Lisbon. Any problems? --Glentamara (talk) 19:57, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not complaining or say they should be taken down, its just odd you'd create a ratification map when there is no difference in ratification. I think it is taken that it is ratified by all the members as it came into force, so it doesn't really clear anything up for the reader. In fact there may be a problem in that subsequent members would have ratified it via their accession treaties - not just the 15.- J Logan t: 10:27, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
European Union Members.svg
[edit]Because you have drawn a full border around Kosovo which doesn't correspond to [3].--Avala (talk) 10:22, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
EU maps
[edit]Hi! First of all thanks for your nice maps of the European Union. But there is one single point of criticism: In this and some others of your maps, the EU-member Malta is missing completely. Would be nice, if this could be solved, because your svg-maps are chiefly the most high-grade ones. Best wishes, --Tafkas (talk) 18:28, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- I will fix it tomorrow, when I got time. Best regards --Glentamara (talk) 19:32, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
I have protected this image because of a editwar. Since you worked on this image i would like to hear you opinion about what version should be used. The discussion can be found at Image talk:EU on kosovo independence.png
Thanks, Sterkebaktalk 17:12, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Is there any way that the outlines of the Netherlands, Russia and (in particular) Sweden be removed so they can be the same colour as their respective countries without looking like separate countries? 71.99.96.174 20:11, 26 October 2008 (UTC) (Therequiembellishere)
- I believe the user is referring to the lakes, per this discussion.--Patrickneil (talk) 02:15, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
File:2_euro_coin_Fr.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eusebius (talk) 21:34, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
File:European_election_poster_09_Lund_(2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 09:26, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
File:European_election_poster_09_Lund.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eusebius (talk) 09:39, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
File:Euro opinion Denmark.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Ysangkok (talk) 01:13, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 14:03, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Image:EurozonenDeFactoJure.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:EU1976-1995.PNG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Frihandelsblock.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:EUkandidatlander.PNG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:ERM2SV.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:EUoutsideERM2SV.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:EurozoneOmkring07.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:EU1952-1973.PNG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:EurozoneAnslutning.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:EuroareaSV.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Overwrite or switch?
[edit]Please see discussion Commons:Village pump#Overwrite or switch? --ŠJů (talk) 00:51, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
colours in Schengenzone.svg
[edit]Hi Glentamara, As a regular maintainer of this map, could I ask that you change the colours, please? In thumbnail form, it is very difficult to distinguish between the non-EU members and the EU planned members. I don't see why you have to use blue so much: the UK and Ireland have distinguished colours, so why not the rest? How about using yellow for the the non-EU members, for example? (and pale blue and grey are too similar too - the status of Cyprus is most unclear vis a vis Turkey). --Jon Maynard Friedman (talk) 22:45, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
- I have now changed the color of the EU member states that not participate yet. --Glentamara (talk) 08:02, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
File:Eurozone.svg
[edit]He Glentamara, There is a discussion on Talk:Eurozone on your image (especially if the turkish part of cyprus should be in). As in the text and the other 2 figures there it is clear that that part is not in (yet?), would it be possible to change the figure (and/or to contribute to the discussion there?) L.tak (talk) 14:02, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Category:Euro coins (Malta) has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
-- Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:08, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Once again File:ICCmemberstatesworldmap102007.png
[edit]Hi Glentamara!
Could you be again add a country to the map of ICC member states. The Seychelles have ratified the Rome Statute yesterday [4] (10 August 2010), it will enter into force for the Seychelles on 1 November 2010. I'm not fully sure whether it is appropriate for the Seychelles to be marked in dark green as of now (although I think so because they have become a member state pending coming into force) but I wanted to raise your awareness for this to be done at the time you see fit. Thanks for doing that. Unfortunately, I can't do it myself as I am not underway very often at Commons and don't have the rights necessary to upload a file. Greetings. --141.35.14.94 13:31, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
File:CFA_franc_zone.svg
[edit]Hi!
In this map of the West-African CFA-region http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:CFA_franc_zone.svg, Guine-Bissau (between Senegal and Guine-Conacry) is not marked as a member of the CFA-ECOWAS region, which is wrong. Since 1998 or so, that country has the CFA-Franc as currency, e.g. see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CFA_Franc_map.svg May you change that? Otherwise i could try to do that, but i've no experience with wiki-images and don't wanna get confused with any "copyright" issues. Thanks a lot! Zebaba (talk) 05:36, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
- Done! --Glentamara (talk) 06:05, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
File:10 cents Euro coin Lv.gif has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Idem: File:10 cent coin Lv serie 1.png, File:20 cents Euro coin Lv.gif, File:20 cent coin Lv serie 1.png, File:50 cents Euro coin Lv.gif, File:50 cents Euro coin Lv.gif, File:50 cent coin Lv serie 1.png, File:2 euro coin Lv serie 1.png, File:1 cent Euro coin Lv.gif, File:1 cent coin Lv serie 1.png, File:2 cent coin Lv serie 1.png, File:2 cents Euro coin Lv.gif, File:5 cent coin Lv serie 1.png, File:5 cent coin Lv serie 1.png, File:5 cents Euro coin Lv.gif, File:1 Euro coin Lv.gif and File:1 euro coin Lv serie 1.png.
-- Asclepias (talk) 22:54, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:10 cent coin Lv serie 1.png
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:10 cent coin Lv serie 1.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Idem: File:1 euro coin Lv serie 1.png.
Asclepias (talk) 00:17, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Source needed
[edit]Hi! I was looking at the article about the Euro and saw . I am sure that there has been made many polls about this subject, but it is also normal that results vary from poll to poll. Recently, a small majority in Denmark was against the Euro (source in Danish), so it would be nice if you could provide this illustration with a sources to the data, or at least update the colours to reflect the results of the recent opinion polls (and of course provide a link). Thanks :-) --Masz (talk)
- As the file name reveals, the data is from the Eurobarometer 69. --Glentamara (talk) 17:06, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
- By the way, here is another file related to the euro opinion in Denmark.
Please give images good descriptions
[edit]
Please give some thought to writing a good description of uploaded images. This ensures that they can be used. It also helps those that review and improve categories do a better job, which also ensures that images will get used in novel and interesting ways. Thanks, and happy editing!
Yonatanh 20:59, 7 February 2007 (UTC)