User talk:Multichill/Archives/2017/April

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
File:Koeto reh.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:35, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:48, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Met categories for individual artworks

Can you auto-create categories for the individual Met artworks that have 4+ uploaded images? I guess being identified by Wikidata id. This should make navigation significantly easier.--Pharos (talk) 04:41, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Work in progress at https://tools.wmflabs.org/multichill/queries/commons/met_categories_to_create.sql / https://tools.wmflabs.org/multichill/queries/commons/met_categories_to_create.txt . Multichill (talk) 21:06, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Orazio Gentileschi - Danaë and the Shower of Gold - 2016.6 - J. Paul Getty Museum.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Orazio Gentileschi - Danaë and the Shower of Gold - 2016.6 - J. Paul Getty Museum.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Renames

Hello, I didn't realize the numbers were important, I just got tired of looking for paintings that were not well described, not easy to find them (working on Goya's list of works). A few times I uploaded something only to find it was already there under another name. I will pay attention to that, and will not request renaming files from your project. Tremendo (talk) 15:54, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Files

Hi I would like to upload others files but I couldn't with Flickr2Commons. Could you help me ? The files are here. Regards. --Panam2014 (talk) 14:05, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Sluitsteen WMH HBM 1820 nr. F 25-15a - Kerspel Goor - 20482415 - RCE.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

199.191.125.65 21:12, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Media needing category review by usage has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Steinsplitter (talk) 16:27, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ankry (talk) 13:21, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ankry (talk) 13:21, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ankry (talk) 13:21, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ankry (talk) 13:22, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:40, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Can you possible update the license template mentioned here User talk:Jcb#Netherlands Nationaal Archief license and its linked discussions because it need to be update and I'm not familiar with editing license templates. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 19:59, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Shame

It would be a shame to lose another admin.: [1]. --VanBuren (talk) 12:27, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

typo RCE

Hee, Multichill,

toevallig liep ik ertegenaan dat een aantal van de RCE-afbeeldingen het symbool "‰" in de titel heeft - waar eigenlijk een klinker met trema had moeten staan. Bijvoorbeeld hier: File:Interieur, blazoen in kamer soci‰teit - Haarlem - 20097344 - RCE.jpg. Ik weet niet zeker of het alleen een ë is, maar waarschijnlijk de overgrote meerderheid wel. Ik heb er een aantal voorgedragen voor hernoeming, maar dat moet vast ook semi-automatisch kunnen. Zou jij misschien een query kunnen/willen draaien hierop, en misschien kun je zelfs de hernoemingen doorvoeren? Dit lijkt me vrij onomstreden. Geen prioriteit natuurlijk, maar schoonheidsdingetje :) Effeietsanders (talk) 16:24, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

komt 371 voor Effeietsanders. Voor zover ik kan zien is het altijd een ë (zelfs als de rest hoofdletters zijn). File:Exterieur_MAARTEN_VAN_ROSSUMKAPEL,_HOHENLIE‰N_TURFLISEEN,_R™MERPARAMENTWERK,_DETAIL_-_Zaltbommel_-_20275710_-_RCE.jpg heeft ook nog "™" als fout, dat lijkt aan de kant van het RCE te zitten. Basvb (talk) 17:35, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Bedankt @Basvb: . Ik ben begonnen om ze handmatig te doen, de lijst is wel erg handig. De ™ moet een Ö zijn, en er zijn ook ¢ tekens, die een Ó moeten zijn. Maar ik zal eerst hierdoorheen lopen, en kijken of ik daarna nog eens een query daarop kan runnen. Effeietsanders (talk) 15:01, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
PS: ik heb de query wat aangepast om ook die andere afwijkende symbolen te ondervangen (alleen een é lukt me niet met zekerheid, omdat dat een komma wordt) en de redirects eruit gefilterd: dan krijg je deze lijst van ~320 op dit moment. Ik heb nog geen manier gevonden om het semi-automatisch te hernoemen.
File:Soyer type 011 1930.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 11:28, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Informatiebord - Eindhoven - 20528214 - RCE.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a derivative work of a non-free work, please explain why on the file's talk page.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Yours sincerely, Vera (talk) 15:11, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Vera (talk) 09:47, 30 April 2017 (UTC)