User talk:Msaynevirta/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 1


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Msaynevirta!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文（台灣）‎ | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
  • You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
  • You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
  • There are several tools to upload files.
  • Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.
Made a mistake?
  • Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
  • Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- 12:51, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Lumia625.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Lumia625.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

FDMS 08:10, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lumia625.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Lumia625.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 20:50, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging copyvios

Hi,

Please inform the uploader. Thanks for your help, Yann (talk) 20:50, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monitoimitalo Simpukka.jpg

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Msaynevirta!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

FritsHG eh?

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finnair a319-112kittila.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:35, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haukilahden koulu ja lukio 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:16, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Finnish Air Force files

Hello. Let us together clean up the category and prevent creation of new wrong and misinforming files. --Kwasura (talk) 07:47, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've started reverting edits made by FAF Flags and random IPs across different language Wikipedias. These mass changes of images made by those IPs seem somewhat suspicious, as we've had a vandal in fiwiki that tried to replace pictures in articles related to Finnish Defence Forces and Air Force. --Msaynevirta (talk) 09:24, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I know exactly what you are talking about. It could be the same vandal with different accounts. --Kwasura (talk) 10:33, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello again. I corrected File:Suomen lentomerkki ohjaajalle.svg and File:Suomen lentomerkki tähystäjälle.svg and nominated for deletion File:Suomen ilmavoimien ohjaajamerkki 1945-2001.svg and File:Suomen ilmavoimien ohjaajamerkki.svg. Please, participate. Sincerely, --Kwasura (talk) 10:41, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am engaged in the talk. Please, participate. Sincerely, --Kwasura (talk) 06:39, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Roundels of Finland

Hello and thank you for your contribution! Let us clean up this category now. Need to start with .gif and .png files, as we have good .svg images already created. Themselves .svg files are too many, we can easily keep one of each type: , , , and , but we do not need duplicates. Difficult part of this task is to find out correct proportion and colour. Without is we will have many problems with other users. What do you think? Sincerely, --Kwasura (talk) 11:41, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kwasura: I have a book about the Finnish aircraft warpaint (Keskinen, Kalevi; Stenman, Kari: Sotamaalaus, Suomen ilmavoimien historia 23. ISBN 951-98751-6-6). It is a good reference about the colours used by the FAF. According to the colour table in the book, the right colour for the blue swastika is Federal Standard 595 FS15123. The colour of the swastika was defined by a order issued by the FAF in 1934. Order defined also the proportions of the insignia. FAF issued also an order to subdue the white background of the insignia in January 1944. Order called for using grey paint, but VL (the Finnish State Aircraft factory) used the closest colour shade available, the colour called DN-väri. DN-väri was used for painting the undersides of the aircraft and it is the colour FS15414 according to the book. --Msaynevirta (talk) 13:14, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
FAF's order from 1934 about the insignias --Msaynevirta (talk) 13:29, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Msaynevirta: This is the colour you mentioned. Is it still used today for the modern roundel? What about the proportions? --Kwasura (talk) 13:36, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know if the colours are still same in the modern roundel as the book has only information about the markings from the WWII era. I think that the FAF's website is the best reference for now. --Msaynevirta (talk) 13:46, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Msaynevirta: Thank you. I corrected all I could. Will write the letter to the Finnish Air Force now and ask for more information. --Kwasura (talk) 10:30, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hämeen Lennoston lippu vs Lapin Lennoston lippu

@Msaynevirta: Hello Msaynevirta! You know, I can rename files too. If you have any suggestions- let's talk about it. We need to work as a team. My thoughts about it you can read on my talk page. Regards, --Kwasura (talk) 22:45, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kwasura: Hi, I think that I will move away from editing commons for some time. FAF flags and insignias are now in a good enough condition that pleases me even though there are some inconsistencies in the naming of the files etc. Also, why did you move the Hämeen lennoston lippu.svg back to the old name? The squadron has operated since 1974 from Rovaniemi and has been called Lapin lennosto for over 40 years. --Msaynevirta (talk) 23:15, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Msaynevirta: Hi, and I will be happy only after all the rubbish will be deleted and I will create five more missing files and correct FAF HQ flag according to the information I am about to get. I am appreciate your help though. About the flag names we need to establish a system how they need to be called. I believe that flag need to have its original name. Once introduced and given, flag can be inherited in the future by many different ore related units and organizations. This information need to be given in the file's description, but not by renaming the file over and over again. Same thing apply to Hämeen Lennoston lippu.svg. Yes, this Air Command exists no more and its flag is inherited by Lapland's Air Command, but it existed and was the true owner of this flag in the past. Another example is the 2 Polkupyöräpataljoonan lippu. This battalion fought with bravery and gained the battle honours, but currently is disbanded, and the flag is inherited by the Uudenmaan jääkäripataljoona. Sincerely, --Kwasura (talk) 23:45, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Roundels of Finland

Greetings. The category is almost fixed. Thank you for your help. I am planing to move tank insignia somewhere else, they are not belong to the FAF category. The big problem I'm facing is the lack of information about the current FAF aircraft insignia. FAF HQ did not responded to my letter yet. So the colour code of the blue and the thickness of the black border in not clear. Don't know what to do. Could use your help. Sincerely, --Kwasura (talk) 00:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't have any better reference for the current insignia than the FAF's website. It could also be possible to identify the shade from some pictures of FAF's aircraft (e.g. File:F-18C Hornet HN-403 Kokonaisturvallisuus 2015 02.JPG, but this method is pretty inaccurate. --Msaynevirta (talk) 13:04, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Finland Air force squadrons without squadron emblem.svg

Greetings! Will you back me up in deletion request? I know we have a consensus about this subject and this file is hanging here just because of one man's stubbornness. But I am sure we have enough expertise to fight this stubbornness. The cause is just. Sincerely, --Kwasura (talk) 18:01, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr photos

Hi! Sorry about the name in the Falcon 9 picture, I didn't notice. I don't use the Flickr2Commons tool in SpaceX's pictures because I think that the Flickrreviwer bot would be cofused if I put the CC-Zero SpaceX tag instead the CC-Zero. Do you know if the bot is still capable of reviewing the license?

Have a great new year! --Juandedeboca (talk) 01:04, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Juandedeboca: The SpaceX licence template has worked just fine with Flickrreviwer bot as it includes the same CC-Zero template. (See e.g. this file) --Msaynevirta (talk) 14:44, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
:@Msaynevirta:  Alright then, won't happen again! --Juandedeboca (talk) 16:13, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:CRS-8 (26239020092).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:CRS-8 (26239020092).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Falcon 9 first stage at LZ-1(two).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Falcon 9 first stage at LZ-1(two).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Dragon 2 hover test (24159153709).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dragon 2 hover test (24159153709).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lauttis Shopping Centre, May 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:46, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Länsimetro-Västmetron

Onko mitään erityistä syytä, miksi teit uuden version tästä kuvasta? File:Länsimetro-Västmetron.svg

Metrokartan tilanne ei näytä muuttuneen juuri miksikään. Kuitenkin nykyisessä versiossa koko Länsimetro-osa metrolinjaa on samanlaisella viivalla, mikä tekee 1. ja 2. vaiheiden erottamisen toisistaan mahdottomaksi. Artikkelissa en:Länsimetro puhutaan kuvatekstissä "pisteviivasta" ja "katkoviivasta", mutta itse kuvassa ei näy mitään eroa niiden välillä. JIP (talk) 20:15, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Uudessa versiossa linja on päivitetty Länsimetron seurantapalvelusta löytyvän linjauksen mukaiseksi. Päivitin koko linjan samalle viivatyylille, sillä metrolinja on tällä hetkellä kokonaisuudessaan rakenteilla, eikä toinen vaihe ole enää suunnitteluvaiheessa. --Msaynevirta (talk) 21:50, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Urheilupuisto metro station, May 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:57, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koivusaari metro station panorama, May 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:49, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Espoonlahden metroaseman työtunneli 2016-02-05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Domdomegg 21:56, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Dutch Panzerhaubitz fires in Afghanistan.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dutch Panzerhaubitz fires in Afghanistan.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Falcon 9 rollout with TurkmenAlem52E-MonacoSAT to SLC-40 (17108097439).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Falcon 9 rollout with TurkmenAlem52E-MonacoSAT to SLC-40 (17108097439).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Iridium-1 Launch (32312419215).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iridium-1 Launch (32312419215).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finnair Airbus A321 OH-LZA at Kittilä airport (Feb 2017) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit tight, but still ok --Poco a poco 17:31, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koivusaari metro station entrance (Mar 2017).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:53, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Urheilupuisto metro station entrance (Mar 2017) 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 23:14, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niittysillankulma 2, Espoo, Finland (Mar 2017) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 23:07, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Revontulentie 11B–D, Espoo, Finland (Mar 2017).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Both side are leaning in, you have to correct the perspective. Further, the image is a bit dark, please tone up the brightness and, if you can, tone up the shadows and tone down the highlights to get more dynamic range. --Basotxerri 15:33, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I corrected the perspective and tried toning the image. Is it better now? --Msaynevirta 17:21, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK now, thank you! Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:58, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tapiola metro station entrance (March 2017) 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some CA in upper left, but not enough for me to decline. Interesting shapes --Daniel Case 21:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vancouver Harbour Flight Centre, British Columbia, Canada (July 2016).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:49, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capilano Suspension Bridge, Vancouver, Canada (July 2016) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, interesting spot --A.Savin 14:10, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escalators at the Urheilupuisto metro station (Nov 2017, 2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --Cvmontuy 22:56, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niittykumpu metro centre, Espoo (February 2018).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments In Accordance with the techical and aesthetical requirements. I'd however think, that the very lamp on the pole on the left side could be cropped out. -- Liberaler Humanist 15:52, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Military area sign, Miessaari, Espoo (March 2018).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I assume the the sign was tilted that way. Geolocation would be helpful. Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:09, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tapiola metro station (Nov 2017).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Billy69150 11:40, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lauttasaari metro station (Nov 2017).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 15:58, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruoholahti metro station (Nov 2017, 3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:41, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Finnish Air Force fin flash 1918.svg

Greetings. I am about to nominate this file to be deleted. Would like to ask for your opinion first. Sincerely, --Kwasura (talk) 18:05, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Finland roundel WW2 border.png

File:Finland roundel WW2 border.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Kwasura (talk) 19:40, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Majakka, Kalasatama, Helsinki (August 2018).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support vibrant colors and clarity. good quality. Seven Pandas 02:11, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Järvenpää CHP-plant (August 2018).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support vibrant colors and clarity, good quality Seven Pandas 02:08, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Korkeakouluaukio, Otaniemi, Espoo (September 2018).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, the bottom could use some denoising (especially the cyclist's face) but it's ok at reasonable zoom level --Trougnouf 13:21, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A green house behind a golden grainfield in Henna, Orimattila (August 2018).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 23:58, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Majakka, Kalasatama, Helsinki (August 2018, 2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 14:22, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Urheilupuisto metro station entrance (February 2018).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 13:36, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niittytori, Niittykumpu, Espoo (February 2018).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Crop out that street light on the left and you'd have a stronger image --Daniel Case 17:27, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case: I recropped the image, what do you think? --Msaynevirta 15:51, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Could you sharpen that building a bit and remove the dust spot that's on top of the image? (by the edge, slightly left of the building) --Trougnouf 19:54, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Did some adjustments, what do you think? --Msaynevirta 23:28, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality, thank you. --Trougnouf 08:22, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haukilahti marina, Espoo (October 2018).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Can you remove spots in the photo?--Armenak Margarian 13:50, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Did some spot removal. --Msaynevirta 17:07, 16 November 2018 (UTC) Sky is very good, thank you but if you can remove also spots in the water? --Armenak Margarian 06:57, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Did some more spot removal on the water. --Msaynevirta 12:53, 17 November 2018 (UTC) Very good now --Armenak Margarian 19:17, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Autumn colours in Heinola, Finland (October 2018).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 15:30, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 130 TK juonto- ja latausjärjestelmä.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Xorx 21:32, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Vanha voimalaitos.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vanha voimalaitos.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escalators at the Urheilupuisto metro station (November 2018).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:50, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Espoo Cultural Centre (December 2018).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:12, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ticket hall of the Niittykumpu metro station (Nov 2017) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Carlos yo 14:03, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estação de Radar N.º 1, Fóia, Algarve (June 2018, 3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:13, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Espoo Cultural Centre (December 2018).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Espoo Cultural Centre (December 2018).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estação de Radar N.º 1, Fóia, Algarve (June 2018, 2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 21:42, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buildings along Nordkappgata, Honningsvåg (July 2018).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Ok imo. --ArildV 10:48, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Restaurant King Crab House, Honningsvåg (July 2018).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:29, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rock cairns on Kuikkapää in Urho Kekkonen national park, Sodankylä (July 2018).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 17:14, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lasikahvila café in Tapiola, Espoo (December 2018).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:50, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muorravaarakan ruoktu wilderness hut in Urho Kekkonen National Park, Sodankylä (July 2018).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support the left part is quite soft but QI to me --Podzemnik 07:16, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haukilahti rivitaloja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 12:25, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Väre building, Otaniemi (January 2019).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 17:10, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niittykumpu metro station (March 2019).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 23:58, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helsinki University of Technology Main Building, Otaniemi, Espoo (October 2018).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:58, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suvilahti gasometers, Helsinki (May 2013).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:37, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soukka shopping centre in Espoo (April 2015).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:36, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:37, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heinola fluting mill (August 2015).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:06, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruoholahti at night (October 2018).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:13, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lauttasaari metro station eastern entrance (March 2017).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:14, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iso Omena shopping centre, Matinkylä, Espoo (March 2019).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Noise reduction recommended --Ermell 06:39, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done. --Msaynevirta 08:55, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:13, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antonov An-2 LY-ABY, Selänpää Air Show (August 2010, 2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:01, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antonov An-2 LY-ABY, Selänpää Air Show (August 2010, 1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:48, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saab 91 Safir OH-SFJ, ex. SF-24, Selänpää Air Show (August 2010, 2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 19:30, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karhu-Korhosen kirjasto, Lemmenjoki National Park, Inari (August 2019, 2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 18:24, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karhu-Korhosen kirjasto, Lemmenjoki National Park, Inari (August 2019, 1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Milan Bališin 18:35, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saab 91 Safir OH-SFJ, ex. SF-24, Selänpää Air Show (August 2010, 1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 18:26, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haukilahti marina, Espoo (September 2014, 2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Streetdeck 09:45, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kivalon jääkärikämppä, Keminmaa (August 2019, 1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:31, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ford Focus II 1.6 Ghia 4d A (NGL-850) in Haukilahti, Espoo (September 2019, 7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 18:02, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ford Focus II 1.6 Ghia 4d A (NGL-850) in Haukilahti, Espoo (September 2019, 3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 18:02, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 06:40, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ford Focus II 1.6 Ghia 4d A (NGL-850) in Haukilahti, Espoo (September 2019, 6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 12:35, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Decommissioned 152 50 T gun turret in Isosaari, Helsinki (June 2019, 1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:17, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opening parachute jump of Selänpää Airshow (August 2010, 2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- Spurzem 20:02, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villitgeahči stream in Lemmenjoki National Park, Inari (August 2019).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Noise should be reduced. --Ermell 21:55, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Did some denoising and adjustments --Msaynevirta 00:50, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:18, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tractor plowing fields in Hämeenkyrö, Finland (May 2020).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 00:16, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hanasaari B power plant, Helsinki (May 2020).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 21:54, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Msaynevirta/Archive_1&oldid=429107200"