User talk:Moroder/Archives 2012-1

Spina bifida

I took the liberty of placing the image where it should go, and to reformulate the scope. Bonne jounée...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:11, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

thanks --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 08:53, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Woodcarved polychromed reliefs by Martin Vinazer

Perfect for the insertion but it lacks the scope I am proposing, "polychromed reliefs Woodcarved Vinazer by Martin." Good Day. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! But the following makes more sense: "Polychromed reliefs woodcarved by Martin Vinazer". Unfortunately I do not know how to insert the text. Could you please let me know? Regards--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:32, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

No problem, you edit the SET (as if you wanted to vote) and you add the text under the heading "Scope". --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:46, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Ah... got you. Thanks --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:55, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ultrasound images of fetal spine, spina bifida.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:09, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Claritas (talk) 19:28, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piciulëi in La Poza Sëlva .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough for QI, I think. --Haeferl 01:44, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sella y Saslong dinviern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Set Promoted

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Polychromed reliefs woodcarved by Martin Vinazer.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Polychromed reliefs woodcarved by Martin Vinazer.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:23, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statues of Sacred Heart of Jesus Christ woodcarved by Ludwig Moroder.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Moroder, Moroder... The homonymy is it a coincidence?
The name of the author of the statute must appear in the scope. I suggest : " Statues of Sacred Heart of Jesus Christ by Ludwig Moroder". --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:46, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

No, my grandfather.

•  Support Congratualtion. All criteria are met. On the caption of the photo should write: The material (wood), technology (polychrome), year and size. So it would be perfect. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 21:06, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Done.--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:56, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:23, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Murfreit Sella.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and nice, typical landscape for the region. --NorbertNagel 20:44, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Lietres y Pra da Ri Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI and good caption --Archaeodontosaurus 09:03, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church of Bula Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria hilf Gnadenbildin Pufels Gröden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Vassil 09:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Col de Sëura Runcadic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 09:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Lasties input.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The white balance is wrong IMO.--Jebulon 17:11, 14 January 2012 (UTC) Info Reversed to the original wb--Moroder 23:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)  Comment Snow seems gray. If to raise brightness and contrast (it is better curves) the photo will look better, well and sharpnesses it is possible to add. ;) --Aleks G 22:00, 15 January 2012 (UTC)  Info Thanks, you're right, I've tried my best, afraid of doing too much!? --Moroder 19:13, 15 January 2012 (UTC).  Support Last version looks good to me. --Iifar 13:14, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Nuchal scan.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Nuchal scan.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:48, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puez.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, but the horizon in the middle is not extra. Maybe a crop of a half part (almost) of the sky would help.--Jebulon 18:37, 20 January 2012 (UTC) :mieux?--Moroder 19:04, 20 January 2012 (UTC)  Support could be sharper, but overall QI to me --Carschten 18:30, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cal da la Sone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Aleks G 22:44, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Canssles Furcela de Forces de Selles Val Gardena.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition, well exposed, QI --LC-de 08:27, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niblintiera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Hard to evaluate! But I think it is good quality... size looks good, colour looks plausible, it's readable, not too noisy, and I can see the texture of the paper. Anything else I should have looked for? --99of9 02:46, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sas Rigais Furchëtta Sas dla Porta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments You have at least two dust spots in the sky, I've annotated one, the second is very close, I didn't annotate it, because I wanted to avoid the confusion with your own (very more) interesting annotations.--Jebulon 18:55, 27 January 2012 (UTC) :I killed my eyes cleaning them - you must have some tricky gadget to find them?!--Moroder 19:17, 27 January 2012 (UTC)Imac...--Jebulon 20:22, 27 January 2012 (UTC) Good quality to me. --NorbertNagel 23:55, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orgun nuef dlieja dedite Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Annakirch in Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Aleks G 22:07, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cir Stevia Pic in Gröden.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI IMO.--ArildV 22:29, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luech Plazola te Sëlva.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Image use

Hello,

You have took some very wonderful and great images, just wanted to drop a note as requested per license of usage of your images. On http://www.wallpaperfor.me/photography/langkofel-dolomites

Of the image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ASaslonch_da_Sacun_ora.JPG

If the work has not been attribute appropriately or inefficiently please free to contact via our email: ping@wallpaperfor.me

Thank you for enriching and providing great images for everybody. Wallpaperfor.me

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mastle y la Odles.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Qi, even a very fine pic --LC-de 16:20, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saslonch da Sacun ora.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:56, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King David by Johann Baptist Moroder-Lusenberg Urtijëi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:56, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puflatscher Schwaige.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --NorbertNagel 21:13, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
August Runggaldier: bronze of his son.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Good but I propose "August Runggaldier: bronze of his son". A scope had better be as short as possible. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

•  Support Good topic --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:09, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment Please create gallery and link to it in the scope. พ.s.

10:26, 3 February 2012 (UTC)  Done--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 19:22, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:37, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skiing under the Murfreit towers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and nice image composition. --NorbertNagel 19:39, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hananias and Paulus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments sehr schön --Carschten 21:31, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lech Crespëina vs Col dala Pieres Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 23:26, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lech Dragon 2005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and intresting images.--ArildV 15:20, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lech dl Dragon bis.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Looks good for me. --Moonik 09:33, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lech Dragon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 11:27, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Portal Annakirche St. Ulrich Gröden.jpg

Hello, Wolfgang! I have already corrected that is necessary... ;) --Aleks G 14:22, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cuecnes in Gröden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:05, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portal Annakirche St. Ulrich Gröden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment If a little to correct, will look better ;) (the file is updated) --Aleks G 13:11, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forces de Siëlles Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Vassil 07:15, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Nervous ?

Hi Moroder,

I'm so sorry the crop of the door with lions in Vienna makes you "nervous"... Is it something I could do to improve ? Thanks for funny comment anyway !--Jebulon (talk) 23:52, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi Jebulon, you know good aesthetics is profound wellbeeing --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 23:58, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Maybe this

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holzbrücke über den Eisack in Atzwang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 04:43, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Törggele Brücke in Kastelruth über den Eisack.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quite good picture, but, I think, it is necessary to correct balance white (a yellow shade), the left inclination and it is possible to add contrast. --Aleks G 23:02, 27 February 2012 (UTC)  Info There is a natural inclination of the bridge which rises from the left to the right side of the river. The picture itself is not tilted. The light of pale sun shining in that afternoon was yellowish, should I correct it? The contrast of images is imo a rather personal matter of taste - thanks for your review :-) --Moroder 21:46, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Urtijëi from Bulacia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit unsharp, but OK. --Mattbuck 23:46, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sermon-on-the-mount.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Vassil 12:36, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

QI Landscapes

I loved all 4 of your landscapes at screen resolution but when I went full resolution I thought they all seemed unusually soft especially for the fine camera you were using. Did you sharpen them before uploading? Saffron Blaze (talk) 22:52, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi, thanks a lot for your appreciation - Usually I try to manipulate pictures coming out of my camera as little as possible. I prefer to have soft images and I don't like to sharpen them at all. In these pictures taken some years ago I used a low aperture, as I was accustomed with analogue photography. Now, I was told that an aperture higher then 8 reduces the sharpness of the image. That is the reason why they might look smooth and not sharp enough. Is this the point?. Best regards --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 00:50, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Diffraction above F8 can soften images although F10 isn't too bad, but it might be in play with those at F16. I suspect that it may have more to do with the lack of shrpening in the PP. Digital images usually need some sharpening either in camera or during PP due to the nature of the sensors. Regardless of the reason I think a small bit of sharpening could realy make these pop even at full res. Cheers. Saffron Blaze (talk) 01:05, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your information, but I still have to become more confident with sharpening. I use Photoshop Elements, do you have suggestions? --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 01:09, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

I use Photoshop CS 3 so I suspect you will have "Unsharp mask" under "Sharpening" in the Filters list. Try it with conservative setting. I use a small radius (1.7 - 2.4 pixels) and perhaps just 20-40% with threshold at 1 or 0. That is usually enough to sharpen up a hi res image without degrading anything. You don't want to do too much as that will emphasise any noise in the image as well. I tried it with this file Plans_de_Cunfin_y_Dantersasc_te_Gherdëina_.jpg and I think you would like the results. Saffron Blaze (talk) 12:08, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promoted

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Wood carved altar angels by Jakob Crepaz-Maidl.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Wood carved altar angels by Jakob Crepaz-Maidl.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--MrPanyGoff 00:59, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promoted

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Chiesa dell'Ospedaletto Atlantes by Josse de Corte, Venice.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Chiesa dell'Ospedaletto Atlantes by Josse de Corte, Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--MrPanyGoff 10:06, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Engel Friedhof Berlin.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 00:52, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cross on the Crespëina pass Gröden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 00:21, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jëuf de Crespëina Parc Naturel Puez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 00:21, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Station on St. Jakob church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 17:40, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Peg Wooden Dolls

• Hi, you nominated this set of images. What do you think about my comment?--MrPanyGoff 14:54, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promoted

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Gesuati church statues by Giovanni Maria Morlaiter, Venice.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Gesuati church statues by Giovanni Maria Morlaiter, Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--MrPanyGoff 17:00, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chedul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 04:32, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plans de Cunfin y Dantersasc te Gherdëina .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 04:32, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langkofelhütte Gherdeina.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 04:32, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Col dala Pieres Ostflanke (SE) Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tomer T 16:38, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Gardena Cisles.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me (the file is updated). --Aleks G 20:57, 3 March 2012 (UTC) Thanks Aleks --Moroder 22:08, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Peg wooden dolls.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Peg wooden dolls.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--MrPanyGoff 11:12, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

RE:intentional

No, my reasoning is whether the composition is correct? The seagull should not be distracting from the actual subject as the existence of the seagull would draw at least some attention of the person viewing the image to itself. Please see image guidelines.

• The arrangement of the elements within the image should support depiction of the subject, not distract from it.
• Foreground and background objects should not be distracting.

If the seagull adds positively to the image, then I'll support but if it is distracting, then I'll oppose.--Gauravjuvekar (talk) 06:11, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi Gauravjuvekar! Thanks a lot for clarifying this and the WP POV to me. In that sense I should say that it was intentional. I strongly believe that the seagull is not distracting like a small antenna which was retouched, on the contrary imho the bird makes the monument with a long and very interesting history and which is not in a museum but on a very trafficked square, much livelier and does not disturb imo the artistic value of it or the observer who wants to appreciate it from the artistical point of view. I could have waited otherwise for the bird to fly away, while imho it is a good "snapshot".I hope you'll agree with that. Best regards!--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:40, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colleoni in Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 08:56, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

chromatische Aberrationen

Hallo Wolfgang,
wenn ich sowas nicht sofort erledige, hab ich's schnell wieder vergessen: ich schulde dir noch eine Antwort von hier. Die chromatischen Aberrationen habe ich gelindert indem ich den ungefähren Bereich mit den diesen in Photoshop markierte und dann (nur) die Sättigung der Farbe, die der jeweilige Farbsaum hatte, ordentlich reduzierte. Das Ergebnis hat mich selbst positiv überrascht, klappt ganz gut. Viele Grüße vom Niederrhein --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 21:00, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Hallo, hab's natürlich bemerkt an den Tauben aber der snapshot ist einfach einmalig, um ihn nicht zu publizieren...Werde nun versuchen, dieses alte Foto etwas zu verbessern. Gruss--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:08, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Hab's nun versucht, aber CA ist auch auf der Schrift, also überall wo es Kontrast gibt. Glaube kaum dass ich das reparieren kann. --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:18, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Ulrich Ludwig Moroder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 11:24, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bartolomeo Colleoni di Andrea Verrocchio laterale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment--What's that bird doing over there?--I'll promote if that's intentional.--Gauravjuvekar 14:23, 7 March 2012 (UTC)  Info Intention of the seagull to whisper something in Colleoni's ear :-)) Moroder Probably not the best moment of the day. Too dark, details are lost, especially near the saddle area. + a lot of dustspots in the sky, and intrusive TV antenna at bottom. Sorry.--Jebulon 16:00, 7 March 2012 (UTC)I propose an edit. --Vassil 16:08, 7 March 2012 (UTC) Info Thanks Vassil! I also uploaded a lighter version --Moroder 17:35, 7 March 2012 (UTC) SupportFar much better now ! I remove my oppose vote, and support it.--Jebulon 11:03, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Kirche St. Jakob hinten

Hallo Wolfgang, ich war vorhin über die Kandidaten für Qualitätsbilder auf dein Foto File:Kirche St. Jakob hinten.JPG gestoßen, dass mir ganz ausgezeichnet gefallen hat. Leider ist bei deiner Bearbeitung der Datei das Rauschen und die chromatische Abberation verstärkt worden. Ich habe die Datei deshalb eben nochmal mit der neuesten Version von Adobe Lightroom nachbearbeitet. Das Ergebnis findest Du unter File:Kirche St. Jakob hinten-2.JPG. Allein die von dir vorgenommene perspektivische Korrektur konnte ich allerdings nicht nachvollziehen (hier müsstest du allso eventuell nochmal nachhelfen). Ich hoffe, dass meine Bearbeitung trotzdem von Nutzen ist. Das Bild gefällt mir nämlich außergewöhnlich gut und es wäre schade, wenn es die Kandidatur als Qualitätsbild nicht erfolgreich abschließen könnte. Herzliche Grüße nach Italien. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:06, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Frank, es freut mich sehr, dass dir das Bild gefällt und danke für die Bearbeitung. Ich habe schon bemerkt, dass mit der Aufhellung durch Photoshop, ein Halo um den Kirchturm entstanden ist oder besser gesagt sichtbar wurde. Leider habe ich mit der Entfernung von CA usw keine Erfahrung und vielleich auch nicht das richtige Werkzeug dafür. Wass ich nicht ganz verstehe, dass du die Perspektive nicht korrigieren konntest. Grüsse an Berlin (Meine Tochter studiert an der Kunsthochschule Weißensee in Berlin Textildesign) --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 08:55, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

oops, dachte du wärst Berliner. Also Gruss an Napa Valley --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:00, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Kein Problem. Ich bin gebürtiger Niedersachse, nun wohnhaft in Sonoma. Bei der Perspektive hatte ich eine vertikale Korrektur versucht, dabei reichte der Platz im oberen Bildbereich aber nicht mehr aus (sobald ich den Schieberegler für die vertikale Perspektivkorrektur bediene, bewegt sich die Kirchturmspitze aus dem sichtbaren Bereich heraus). Keine Ahnung, wie sich das besser lösen lässt. Mir war aber ohnehin vor allem wichtig, die chromatische Abberation zu entfernen. Ansonsten finde ich das Foto nämlich große Klasse. Herzliche Grüße aus Kalifornien und nochmals Glückwunsch zu dem hochwertigen Bild. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:47, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi Frank, according to user:Carschten there is an other problem with this image. Your correction of CA caused the church to become less sharp - do you think you can fix it? Regards --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:59, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canal Grande from the Accademia bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good--Jebulon 23:29, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Pantalon in Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Vassil 23:05, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DSC 8750 modifié-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Full-size image doesn't load for me. Info I've checked it - don't see any problems --Moroder 18:51, 9 March 2012 (UTC) Must have just been taking a while. Mattbuck 19:30, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Top Neue Burg Vienna.jpg

Hello Moroder,

Thanks for helpful comments and kind support.

I understand what you mean about the "tilt" of this picture. I've tried a correction by rotation, but when the issue is solved below (near the capitals, for instance), then I have a new tilt above, the series of helmets is no more horizontal.

That is why I think it is a natural perspective effect, not a "distortion". I could "stretch" the picture artificially, but in this case, the result will look unnatural (I've tried). I'm sorry.

As for the crop. Do you think I must crop out the capitals of the columns (then the "tilt" will look very more "visible") ?

Next time (if any...), I'll try to take a frontal picture ... e basta !

Anyway, thanks again for support.

As Austrian, I don't know what do you think about the capital of your country, but as foreign visitor, I can say that I am absolutely fan !

I hope that my pictures of Vienna will be attractive for new other visitors, because it is really a city to be seen !

Greetings from Paris, --Jebulon (talk) 01:05, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi Jebulon, Thanks a lot for reviewing and appreciating so many of my pictures. I feel that not always perspective shoult be artificially altered as I already expressed in some of my reviews. Definetly I believe that taking out the capitals of your pictures would do a lot of good, I havn't tried it though on your foto.

To tell you the truth I am not Austrian but South Tyrolean, former Austria and now we are Italians... That does not mean that I don't like our former capital... Best regards Wolfgang --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:11, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Caro fratello d'Italia  ;) !

I'm trully and deeply sorry with my mistake about your nationality. I hope I did not hurt you in any way, if yes, I apologize, and obviously it was not my intention... Really, I was sure you were Austrian (You have a german name, you speak german "als Muttersprache", most of your pictures have a "south germanic" mood IMO, even the ones of the sculptures by your ancestors...). History of our old Europe is somewhat strange, isn't it ? Again, I'm sorry. But Vienna is a very nice city, anyway!--Jebulon (talk) 10:25, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Mon cher ami, you don't have to be sorry and by no way to apologize because my nationality is a bit complex and I feel more Austrian or Tyrolean (you noticed it from my pictures...), althogh I don't regret to have the Italian citizenship since they took off Berlusconi (which is a shame) from the government. Vienna is marvellous (it is one of the first big cities I visited in my youth) and I appreciate the many beautyful pictures you shot there. Stay well!--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:07, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmolada nelle Dolomiti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and very impressive view --Taxiarchos228 18:19, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel al Gambero Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment CA on the birds --Carschten 19:48, 9 March 2012 (UTC) Yeaa, do you think I can fix it?--Moroder 20:48, 9 March 2012 (UTC) With a RAW file: yes. Otherwise I'm not sure (yellow CA are rare...). The overall quality of the image isn't very good (I think because of camera), but it's nice image... Hmm --Carschten 20:52, 9 March 2012 (UTC) It was some time ago --Moroder 20:56, 9 March 2012 (UTC) Oh, 2004. I didn't see it and now I don't know less how to vote here --Carschten 21:03, 9 March 2012 (UTC)  Support Good quality under the given circumstances --Carschten 21:19, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gondola lift to Pass Gardena Sella Ronda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 08:12, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Gardena - Gröden winter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 06:42, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Damiano Chiesa by Adolf Wildt Bozen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting composition and DoF work. Difficult shot, successful.--Jebulon 15:16, 13 March 2012 (UTC)--Jebulon 15:16, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canal Grande from Rialto Bridge Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great quality, good colors. DimiTalen 17:22, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument Bartolomeo Colleoni by Andrea Verrocchio Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:11, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bartolomeo Colleoni di Andrea Verrocchio laterale sinistra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:11, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aesculus hippocastanum in Urtijëi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit bright and low contrast, need more opinions, but weak oppose. Mattbuck 17:22, 9 March 2012 (UTC)  Info Changed crop and contrast --Moroder 19:06, 9 March 2012 (UTC) The new version is worse, due to overexposure now. General contrast is better though. Mattbuck 19:30, 9 March 2012 (UTC) We say "you can't have the full bottle and a drunk wife." Do you think I could do better?--Moroder 20:51, 9 March 2012 (UTC) Yes. Mattbuck 01:26, 13 March 2012 (UTC)  Info New version, thaks to Mattbuck--Moroder 18:14, 13 March 2012 (UTC) wonderful colors! --Ralf Roletschek 14:05, 14 March 2012 (UTC)<

The (not so) very old roof of St. Stephen

Hi Moroder !

Thank you so much for improvements of my picture. IMO, we'll share a promotion soon !

Obviously you are right with your very useful and interesting comments.

I'll remove my first nomination.

And I definitely love Vienna !--Jebulon (talk) 12:42, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

It is a great pleasure to give you suggestions--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:01, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Angels statues by Josef Limburg, St. Hedwig cemetery in Berlin.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Angels statues by Josef Limburg, St. Hedwig cemetery in Berlin.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Structures roofs St Stephen's cathedral Vienna modifié-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 11:26, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

• Maybe we could share this one ?  ;)--Jebulon (talk) 16:38, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

how do you mean share? it's yours! I don't really count it as mine!--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:52, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

OK thanks, I take it for mine !--Jebulon (talk) 16:43, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Elisabeth group Rudolf Moroder detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 15:39, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elisabeth of Hungary Moroder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 23:53, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Marmolada nelle Dolomiti

Hi! Sei italiano vero? Sono un utente di Wikipedia in italiano da 4 anni pensavo che i diritti si "trasferissero"... Cercherò di muovermi anche su Commons... ;) è vietato parlare italiano? Cioè, c'è una tacita regola che dice di usare l'inglese? Grazie! --Pottercomuneo (talk) 08:59, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Su Commons, lo dice anche il nome, sono permessse tutte le lingue, ma preferisco l'inglese come "lingua universale" per non escludere gli altri, ma se hai + facilitá in italiano sei il benvenuto, cordialità --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:59, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beggar from the group of Saint Elisabeth Rudolf Moroder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment great, but please see notes. --Carschten 15:32, 16 March 2012 (UTC)  Done Thanks! fixed --Moroder 22:45, 16 March 2012 (UTC) Good quality. --NorbertNagel 16:36, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tor Exner, Tor Bruneck Sella.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful! DimiTalen 06:53, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crëusc de Secëda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very well! DimiTalen 15:21, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Bartolomeo Colleoni monument, Venice.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Bartolomeo Colleoni monument, Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirche Sankt Michel Kastelruth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 09:31, 22 March 2012 (UTC)Nice place. Do you think you could increase a bit the light on the main subject, only it, without to overexpose the sky ?--Jebulon 09:40, 22 March 2012 (UTC) I've done it on a new upload as other version - I am afraid it increases the noise!? --Moroder 10:25, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siegesdenkmal Bozen west.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments No FOP in Italy. Marcello Piacentini died in 1960. --Coyau 00:41, 9 March 2012 (UTC)  Info This does not apply to state owned monuments --Moroder 05:55, 9 March 2012 (UTC)Are you sure the proportions are good ? IMO, the "circles" should be ...circular ? --Jebulon 15:21, 13 March 2012 (UTC) Info I like your perspicacity (you already noticed once in a steeple a oval clock of mine) but I'd like this monument also to look tall. The picture was taken from the bottom and therefor the medals look oval. It lost "hight" correcting the vertical lines. If I do a horizontal correction it looks too meager...should we correct everything?--Moroder 17:53, 13 March 2012 (UTC) After a long reflexion...--Jebulon 01:07, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Group of Saint Elisabeth by Rudolf Moroder.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Group of Saint Elisabeth by Rudolf Moroder.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Hello

Hello, my name is Regina and I am a student of Alicante, Spain. I am doing a homework and i would like know if I can use this picture. Thank you for the attention and sorry to bother you.

Hello Regina it is no bother at all, I'm glad if you use my pictures but it would be a pleasure to know which one. Good success --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:00, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

The mysterious story of the floating sarcophagus

salut, Ô Moroder !

Thanks for (numerous) comments about my pictures.

Do you know the place ?

as you surely know, the Kaisergruft in Vienna is a crypt (a series of crypts) under the Capuchins church. As a crypt, it is very dark. And as it is a cemetery, I thought that I could not (respect due to the resting place) use mono nor tripod, neither flashlight, for the pictures of sarcophagi. Then, I had to wait for long exposures, then I had to put my camera along walls, fences, etc... In order to avoid motion blur.

In this special case, I took a very very tilted picture, and therefore I had to correct the tilt with my software by rotation.

But obviously, when the sarcophagus was at least reasonably horizontal, the rest of the picture around was no more a good rectangle, obviously!

so I decided to chose one of the colors of the real background (light grey, from the wall), and I made a mask (manually) all around the main subject.

That is the tale of the quest of the QI !--Jebulon (talk) 22:03, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

BtW, there is no garbage behind the mermaid, only the scenery of the not-in-use attraction ! --Jebulon (talk) 22:03, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

It is a pleasure and very constructive to have a fair discussion with you. Sorry for the garbage, the right word oviously in a metaphoric sanse would be junk. I am not good in making backgrounds but don't yoiu think you can make a fading backgound which probably would look a bit more solid. I understand that the conditions to take the pictures were not good specially without a tripod and a light, for that the picture is really good. - I don't remember the Kaisergruft very well, I've been there in the sixties.

I don't use a denoising tool but what ads noise in my opinion is the tool to lighten the dark spots like in the altars (you promoted one and declined the other (I agree the picture is not really top) best regards --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:50, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

PS:the Erzherzogin sarcophagus: no, I did not use a tripod. I just hold firmly my camera along a wall (or a column), and let's go, hope and pray, with the remote control. Anyway, impressive place, no doubt...--Jebulon (talk) 16:09, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beggar from the group of Saint Elisabeth Rudolf Moroder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good !--Jebulon 01:16, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Ulrich-in-heaven.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 19:38, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Ulrich-in-the-battle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 19:29, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anges and Jesus Jakob Crepaz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Vassil 19:33, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Sacrifice of Isaac Franz Xaver Kirchebner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 15:39, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church Urtijei internal view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit noisy (curtain and crucifix above the altar), but very impressive. Good for QI in my opinion.--Jebulon 17:04, 24 March 2012 (UTC) I had to eclaircir les tons foncés which generated noise - still studiing how to denoise pictures - thanks for your appreciation --Moroder 22:12, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Saint Elisabeth group Rudolf Moroder detail.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Elisabeth group Rudolf Moroder detail.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santantone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, inspite of (acceptable) CA in the tree at left In my poor opinion, you generally use the denoising tool a bit too strongly...--Jebulon 22:41, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Antony church Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

File:Villa Riffeser Stufan Urtijëi.jpg braucht noch eine Lizenzvorlage

Wäre es möglich, noch eine Lizenzvorlage hinzuzufügen? Danke. -- RE rillke questions? 16:23, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costamula de sot Urtijëi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 05:09, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Resciesa from Secëda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I am concerned about the file size given the megapixels this has, however, this is a stunnig photograph and the annotations make it very informative. Nice work. -- Saffron Blaze 22:21, 29 March 2012 (UTC) Thanks, you're right, I'll check on the original, rather strange; i uploaded a new version --Moroder 22:37, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Agnes in the parish church of Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 00:39, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa-Grohmann.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 17:10, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Stetteneck Urtijëi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments aber knapp: der Beschnitt ist ziemlich eng, aber der Kontrast zwischen den penibel geraden Horizontalen des (leider sehr schattigen) Gebäudes und der stark ansteigenen Straße gibt diesem Bild das gewisse etwas. --Carschten 17:01, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wilhelm Senoner Statuen auf Raschötz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 07:12, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Bridge in Venice by Calatrava.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bridge in Venice by Calatrava.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 09:39, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Mountain trees.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments :-) --Carschten 21:37, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wilhelm Senoner Resciesa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and impressive landscape. Nice. --Tomer T 11:52, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Hop i solved this one

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Graphic_Lab/Photography_workshop#Chromatic_aberration :-)

- Greetings --Grunpfnul (talk) 23:59, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Römerberg houses on the west side.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe a little lack of contrast, but good to me.--Jebulon 10:09, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Erwähnung

Freut mich, dass ich weiterhelfen konnte. Eine Erwähnung wäre nicht nötig gewesen, aber tut der Konsistenz der CC Lizenz keinen Abbruch ;-) Für's nächste Mal muss es aber wie gesagt nicht sein (gilt nur für meine Person - ich muss nicht überall stehen *g*). Gerne bearbeite ich auch über meine Talk Page Anfragen, falls Sie noch einmal Bilder korrigiert haben möchten. Ansonsten drücke ich noch die Daumen, dass es mit der QI Nominierung der beiden Bilder klappt :-) --Grunpfnul (talk) 01:26, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waidbruck Pfarrkirche Haus Solderer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:29, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Josef and child sculpture Gröden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Thesurvived99 18:36, 15 April 2012 (UTC)  Comment This files needs a proper name that describes the subject Poco a poco 19:02, 15 April 2012 (UTC) Thanks for the review, unfortunately I don't know how to change filenames --Moroder 20:52, 15 April 2012 (UTC) Edit summary and add {{rename|the_new_name|numeric_reason_for_renaming}} and wait for an administrator or filemover to rename it. See Template:Rename.--Jkadavoor 09:15, 16 April 2012 (UTC)Tks --Moroder 11:55, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lusenberg-Virgin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Thesurvived99 18:36, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Variante

Danke für die Variante, aber es führt wohl kein Weg daran vorbei, mich nochmal auf die Brücke zu hocken ;-) Ist zum Glück nicht sonderlich weit von mir entfernt. Danke Dir auf jeden Fall --Grunpfnul (talk) 11:03, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Hystogramme

Hallo, ich habe deine Kommentare gelesen und -obwohl ich eben gerade eine neue Version von File:Glyptothek, Königsplatz, Múnich, Alemania14.JPG hochgeladen haben-, frage ich mich wie ich zum Abschluß kommen soll, was am Hystogramm zu ändern ist, wenn ich es mir anschaue. Worauf muss man überhaupt achten?? Sorry für diese trivialen Fragen, aber noch einen weiteren Schub werde ich mit deinen ersten Ratschlägen leider nicht weiterkommen können. Viele Grüsse, Poco a poco (talk) 21:26, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Wie du hier siest ist das Spektrum mit den hellen Licht werten leer. Mit Photoshop oder anderen Programmen kannst du dein Bild erweitern... Gruss

--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:45, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Zuerst vielen Dank für deine Hilfe. Ich habe eben gerade die 3 Bilder editiert und erneut hochgeladen (auch andere), bitte, sag mal Bescheid, was du davon hälst, viele Grüsse, Poco a poco (talk) 20:31, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Virgin parish church Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 15:08, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skiing Aspen Mountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment strong CA --Carschten 21:37, 9 April 2012 (UTC) War leider nur mit G11 unterwegs --Moroder 21:47, 9 April 2012 (UTC)  Done Corrected CA --Moroder 18:14, 14 April 2012 (UTC) OK. --Tomer T 12:26, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Elisabeth of Hungary Moroder.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Elisabeth of Hungary Moroder.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Pisa Brescia - Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness not perfect, but composition, choice of the subject, colors, light, are very good. QI for me.--Jebulon 14:00, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Mountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment strong CA --Carschten 21:37, 9 April 2012 (UTC)  Done Corrected CA --Moroder 18:14, 14 April 2012 (UTC) There's a curious lighter patch on the right. Was this taken through a window? Also could do with a brighter sky IMO. Mattbuck 23:07, 22 April 2012 (UTC) Thanks for reviewing! No it was taken from the chairlift. I gess different reflection from the snow on the trees. Why a lighter sky? The picture was taken in the morning (Aspen time)--Moroder 05:59, 23 April 2012 (UTC)  Support now --Carschten 12:33, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosary-Madonna-Mersa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Architecture in Brescia - window.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality ! --NorbertNagel 18:25, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haus Solderer Waidbruck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:50, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Revivalism (architecture) in Brescia house Cadeo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too tight crop at the right, but QI tough for me. -- MJJR 12:57, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Brescia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 04:44, 28 April 2012 (UTC)