User talk:Misburg3014

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Misburg3014!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, which produces: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|correct name}}` For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Your request

Hi,

I tried to help you with your edit protected request but I'm not complete sure if I did it in a correct way, could you please check my edit when you have some time?

Thank you, Huib talk 12:33, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can see you added the missing comma. That's great, and the text seems to be perfect now. Thanks! --Misburg3014 (talk) 20:05, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad-Gandersheim-Stiftskirche-Fenster.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI IMO --Vassil 19:33, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche-Schloß-Ricklingen-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sorry, where is the church ? I see a (ceiling ?) painting of a crucifixion. Please take care of files names, categories, and name of nominations. According to the guidelines, bad names are a good enough-reason to decline... (would be a pity because it is a good image !!)--Jebulon 15:15, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
DoneI Added various categories to the picture. The description itself already was sufficient, so I do not understand the objection. The church is in Schloß Ricklingen, Schloß Ricklingen is a village in Lower Saxony which is a part of Germany, and that's what the description states. --misburg3014, 2 November 2011} Good now, thank you. The description in the file page, + the categorization were bad, it is no more the case. To be a QI formerly, a picture must have 1) a good and valid file name, 2) a good categorization at the good level, 3)a relevant description in the file page and 4) a good name in the QIC nomination page. This one is QI--Jebulon 15:09, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hannover Expo-Wal-2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Schön scharf und gut belichtet --Haeferl 18:12, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hannover-Herrenhausen-Großer-Garten-Galeriegebäude-Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. --JLPC 22:00, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberstdorf - St.Maria-Loretto - Deckengemälde.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:59, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schöllang-bei-Oberstdorf - Burgkirche - außen-SO.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Needs perspective correction. Mattbuck 21:41, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
* Perspective improved. --Smial 14:34, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laeiszhalle Hamburg, Großer Saal -- Innenansicht Bühne.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Amazig for this type of camera. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 19:01, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hannover-Linden - Bethlehemkirche - innen - Fensterrosette.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok imo.--ArildV 09:57, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herbstmandala-auf-Steintisch.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak Support Good quality. DoF not the best (f/3.2). Categorization should be better. --XRay 06:28, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Göttingen - St.Johannis - Fenster-über-Eingang.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality -- Spurzem 07:26, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland!

Hallo Misburg3014!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2016! Das Organisationsteam freut sich über 38.988 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen, die in diesem Jahr hochgeladen wurden, und möchte sich ganz herzlich bei Dir für deinen Beitrag zum weltweit größten, von Ehrenamtlichen organisierten, Fotowettbewerb bedanken!

Du hast noch bis zum 18. Oktober die Gelegenheit Wettbewerbsbeiträge anderer Fotografen im Rahmen der Vorjury zu bewerten. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du dich daran beteiligst und mithilfst die besten Bilder des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs auszuwählen. Alle Informationen zur Vorjury findest Du hier.

An dieser Stelle sei noch auf die Preisverleihung von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland hingewiesen: Diese findet am 25. November 2016 ab 20 Uhr in den Räumen von Wikimedia Deutschland in Berlin statt. Alle Interessierten laden wir ganz herzlich zur Teilnahme ein. Für die Fotografen der Top-10-Bilder und die Sonderpreisträger werden Reisekosten sowie eine Übernachtung durch Wikimedia Deutschland übernommen.

Nochmals vielen Dank für deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikipedia bebilderst! Solltest du Fragen haben, so kannst du dich gerne an infowikilovesmonuments.de wenden.

(DCB im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 01.10.2016)

Einladung zum Mitmachen bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2017

Hallo Misburg3014!

Vielleicht hast du es schon mitbekommen: Im Moment läuft – noch bis zum 30. September 2017 – der internationale Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2017. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos von Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen! Wie du mitmachen kannst erfährst du auf unserer Mitmach-Seite, bei Fragen und Problemen kannst du dich auf unserer Support-Seite melden.

(Martin Kraft im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 12:37, 19 September 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Use of photos in academic publication?

Hello, Misburg3014. Thank you very much for uploading so many creative commons photos!

I am an art historian who researches medieval churches mostly in northern Spain. Your photos of the the Aljafería Palace in Zaragoza have been tremendously helpful to me and have featured in my presentations. I was hoping to use one of them in an article I wrote about Santo Sepulcro in Torres del Río following a conference on Mudéjar art. The publishers of the ebook insist on using your full name for the photography credit. Would you be willing to have the photos published along with your full name? I can send you links to the conference website so you can get a sense of what kind of publication it would be. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhaedongkim (talk • contribs) 20:25, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your kind and polite words! I am glad whenever somebody can make any use of my photos which I primarily took for myself and usually upload only in case that there where not already sufficient ones for the respective building or other object. Did you also take a look at the old cathedral in Zaragoza? As far as I remember one of its walls is decorated with the same style. According to the picture license it would be sufficient to mention my alias, but I do not mind telling my real name which is „Andreas Kromke“ and, in case you need my academic title: „Dr.-Ing. Andreas Kromke“. The alias is derived from the town I used to live in. And yes, of course you can use my photos for whatever. I hope you will get the same answer from the two other persons you contacted, and, yes, I am interested in the result, i.e. the publication. Regards, Andreas. --Misburg3014 (talk) 19:36, 29 November 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you so much for the use of your photo and for the suggestion to look at Zaragoza's cathedral. I am expanding my research in that direction! I will keep you updated about the progress of the publication, and if you'd like any future use of your images. They are so helpful! Rhaedongkim (talk) 23:57, 5 December 2017 (UTC)rhaedongkim[reply]

File:Petersberg - St.Peter - Krypta.JPG

File:Petersberg - St.Peter - Krypta.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Martin Sg. (talk) 21:55, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kloster-Loccum - Kirche - Ostfenster.JPG

File:Kloster-Loccum - Kirche - Ostfenster.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Martin Sg. (talk) 22:02, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Magdeburg - St. Petri (Innenraum, HDR).jpg

File:Magdeburg - St. Petri (Innenraum, HDR).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Martin Sg. (talk) 13:26, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019

Hallo Misburg3014,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2019 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Es sind viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die aber in Zukunft unbedingt benötigt wird, dann freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Mitte September 2019 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg bei größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 14:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toledo cyl-panorama-mirador.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 16:48, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Misburg3014

Contents

Your request

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland!

Einladung zum Mitmachen bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2017

Use of photos in academic publication?

File:Petersberg - St.Peter - Krypta.JPG

File:Kloster-Loccum - Kirche - Ostfenster.JPG

File:Magdeburg - St. Petri (Innenraum, HDR).jpg

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019

Quality Image Promotion

Navigation menu

User talk:Misburg3014

Your request

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland!

Einladung zum Mitmachen bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2017

Use of photos in academic publication?

File:Petersberg - St.Peter - Krypta.JPG

File:Kloster-Loccum - Kirche - Ostfenster.JPG

File:Magdeburg - St. Petri (Innenraum, HDR).jpg

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019

Quality Image Promotion

Navigation menu

Search