User talk:Mdeazpeitia
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:00, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Fotografías de...
[edit]Hola, Mdeazpeitia. Cuando creaste la categoría Category:Photographs taken in the Royal Gardens of La Granja de San Ildefonso... ¿eras consciente de que cerca del 100 % de los archivos almacenados en la categoría madre Category:Royal Gardens of La Granja de San Ildefonso son fotografías tomadas en los Reales Jardines de la Granja de San Ildefonso? Un saludo. Strakhov (talk) 17:13, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- Hola, Mdeazpeitia. En respuesta a tu mensaje he creado la categoría Category:People in the Royal Gardens of La Granja de San Ildefonso. Otra posible categorización es una "por fecha" (para juntar imágenes "antiguas"). Por lo general usar en Commons categorías que comiencen por "Photographs" me parece una mala idea (salvo algunos casos muy concretos), pues del orden del, yoquesé, 96% (por decir un número) de los archivos de Commons son fotografías. Un saludo. Strakhov (talk) 18:23, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Santo Reina Victoria 1929.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Santo Reina Victoria 1929.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Santo Reina Victoria 1929.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Ahmadtalk 03:00, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Palais Erzherzog Carl Ludwig.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Palais Erzherzog Carl Ludwig.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Palais Erzherzog Carl Ludwig.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Triplecaña (talk) 10:05, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Real Establecimiento Litográfico arms.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Real Establecimiento Litográfico arms.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Real Establecimiento Litográfico arms.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Triplecaña (talk) 10:05, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Calle de la Princesa (Ermita de la Cara de Dios).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Calle de la Princesa (Ermita de la Cara de Dios).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Triplecaña (talk) 10:21, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Altars in Spanish Baroque Paintings has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
E4024 (talk) 18:47, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Fachada de la Ermita de la Cara de Dios from Calle de la Princesa (Ermita de la Cara de Dios) (cropped).jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Fachada de la Ermita de la Cara de Dios from Calle de la Princesa (Ermita de la Cara de Dios) (cropped).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
A1Cafel (talk) 13:42, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Palosirkka (talk) 15:40, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 21:26, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Artworks by former location has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Josh (talk) 21:42, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Historical images
[edit]Hola, Mdeazpeitia. Como veo que ha creado hoy la categoría "Category:Historical images of the interior of the Royal Palace of Madrid", le comunico que desde hace unos meses se decidió para todas las categorías de historical images lo siguiente: "phase out and eventually delete". Un saludo. Strakhov (talk) 16:44, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
- Gracuas y perdona Strakhov no tenía ni idea de ello.
- Mañana lo pongo para borrado. Gracias :) Mdeazpeitia (talk) 17:53, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Dames second class of the Order of the Starry Cross has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Socius sociologicus (talk) 07:38, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category
[edit]When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with {{SD|C2}} if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available or {{SD|C1}} if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused. In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page, as you did at Category:Canonizzazione di San Pietro Favre. ("C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion). Jmabel ! talk 02:10, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks !! I’ll do it as you say. Mdeazpeitia (talk) 06:59, 23 August 2024 (UTC)