User talk:Mbzt/Archive 4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:27, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Utilisation d'une photographie

Monsieur, nous vous contactons car la Bpi programme un festival de littérature contemporaine "Effractions" en mars 2023. Le visuel de ce festival est une création graphique originale qui reprend une photographie dont vous êtes l'auteur et représentant la façade du Centre Pompidou, côté rue Beaubourg. Ce visuel comportera naturellement des mentions graphiques indiquant le sujet et les dates du festival. Nous souhaiterions solliciter votre autorisation. A cet effet, pouvez-vous prendre contact avec nous le plus rapidement possible en nous adressant un courriel à servicejuridique@bpi.fr. Vous pouvez également téléphoner au responsable du service juridique de la Bpi, M. Dominique Rouillard, tel 01 44 78 45 12. Je vous remercie de l'attention que vous voudrez bien porter à ce message. Cordialement Programmatrice84 (talk) 12:52, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Quelle photo ? Mbzt (talk) 15:14, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/72/P1000954_Paris_IV_Rue_Beaubourg_reductwk.JPG 94.228.185.34 09:27, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Ok pour moi sous réserve de mention des droits de propriété intellectuelle sous le nom de mon alias Mbzt (conformément à la licence Common de cette image). En revanche, cette photo est régulièrement menacée de suppression sur Wikicommons en raison d'un usage jugé trop permissif de la liberté de panorama a minimis sur un ouvrage créé par un architecte mort depuis moins de 70 ans (voir ici). Il serait donc opportun de contacter également les ayant droits ou les responsables de Beaubourg pour avoir leur accord. Bien cordialement, --Mbzt (talk) 12:06, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 07:29, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! F4599 Paris 8 avenue de Wagram n01 rwk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 13:22, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:34, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! F0710 Rue Larrey enseigne theatre rwk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! P1320213 Paris IV rue St-Louis-en-ile boutique rwk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! P1310713 Paris III musee Carnavalet statue xxxx rwk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Wonderful. --多多123 17:04, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! F0725 Paris IV hotel Sully facade cadran solaire rwk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 14:46, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! F3680 Paris V eglise St-Etienne-du-Mont rwk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 19:23, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:54, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:39, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! P1080467 Paris VIII avenue Hoche n°6 rwk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:05, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! F6258 Paris 6e Eglise Notre-Dame-des-Champs de Paris Entree rwk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 17:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC)