User talk:Mattbuck/Archive15

Archives October 2007 - June 2008 June 2008 - August 2008 August 2008 - December 2008 December 2008 - April 2010 April 2010 - September 2010 September 2010 - May 2011 May 2011 - December 2011 January 2012 - March 2012 April 2012 - July 2012 August 2012 - October 2012 November 2012 - January 2013 February 2013 - April 2013 May 2013 - July 2013 August 2013 - October 2013 November 2013 - December 2013 January 2014 - February 2014 March 2014 - April 2014 May 2014 - July 2014 August 2014 - September 2014 October 2014 - November 2014 December 2014 - February 2015 March 2014 - September 2015 October 2015 - December 2017 Current

Commons:Quality_images_candidates#October_4.2C_2013

Hi Mattbuck- I think I have resolved the issues with this image. Thanks-Godot13 (talk) 03:58, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 30 2013

Hi Mattbuck, I am new in the Wikimedia, so it took some time until I realized that someone commented on my picture (Herrenrefektorium Kloster Maulbronn). Thanks for that. You were right. There was some CA in the picture. I corrected it now. Harro52 02:18, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, that's probably QI now. You can renominate it if you wish. I would say however that I think it's oversharpened. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:09, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Camden Road railway station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:49, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Highbury and Islington station MMB 06 378012 378015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:34, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rievaulx Abbey MMB 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:30, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finsbury Park station MMB 22 313043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:04, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «M1 Redland Road.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duffield railway station MMB 01 101XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle Combe Circuit MMB C3 Castle Combe Saloon Car Championship.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice view --Christian Ferrer 06:19, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Southgate railway station MMB 11 321XXX 321401.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:19, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Why was my Ceiling Cat image deleted?

Your claim was that it was a "derivative of a copyrighted work". What part of it was disputed as being under copyright? If it's the Ceiling Cat, I was under the impression that it was a public domain image, given how many derivative works there are out there (eg. Ceiling Cat blasting lasers out of his eyes to blow up the Death Star, etc.) with no apparent problems. If it is under copyright, I'd certainly be interested in knowing where you found out. If it's a matter of the person in the picture, I can assure you that both the photographer and the model are OK with the image being uploaded here.

It's the Ceiling Cat part. Just because something is widely available on the internet does not mean it is free of copyright. See COM:Licensing for more information. Think of it along the lines of the song "Happy Birthday to you" - you will never see that in a film because it's under copyright and the owner has been rather litidgeous. But they can't exactly stop you singing it at a party. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:56, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «H1 Svitzer Laceby and Millennium Dome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:57, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «51 Nightingale Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 15:15, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

"too contrasty"

I noticed you chose to decline File:Church_of_St._Mary_Cavella_0414.JPG at QIC. Can you give an explanation what you mean by "too contrasty"? Lewis Hulbert (talk) 10:50, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Well, you have a fairly bright background, but rather a dark subject. You'd need to bring up the low levels fairly significantly in order to correct this. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:06, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I see what you mean now. I just didn't understand the terminology you used. Lewis Hulbert (talk) 14:07, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Victoria station MMB 08 465037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 11:08, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «I9 Windmill Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:16, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flax Bourton railway station MMB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dustspots everywhere on the sky --A.Savin 13:13, 31 October 2013 (UTC) Fixed Mattbuck 14:10, 2 November 2013 (UTC) OK. --A.Savin 21:00, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aysgarth Falls MMB 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:46, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gloucester railway station MMB 10 153329.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:36, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB »31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:19, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham MMB I7 A52 Clifton Boulevard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 11:01, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amersham station MMB 12 5521.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:16, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 44 150281.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

A question of perspective

Hi Mattbuck, I have read your feedback regarding my image http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Palais_de_la_Nation_Bruxelles.jpg (candidate for QI), thanks for this. This monument is huge and a wide angle is mandatory to take a shot like that (have you considered watching other shots of this building in Google Images?), so there's of course a slight wide perspective. Just like the perspective of this image, actually one of your QI: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:London_MMB_%C2%AB77_Cabot_Square.jpg Given these elements, could you please tell me what do you think of this? --Oakenchips (talk) 22:16, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

I'm not unsympathetic to the perspective argument, and honestly I quite like the photo. But you're so close to correct perspective, why did you stop? -mattbuck (Talk) 15:03, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Actually I wanted to save a maximum of space in the corrected photo, but I managed to obtain a satisfying final result. Please check this out! --Oakenchips (talk) 22:16, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

50 images for review

I'm really sorry about adding 50 images altogether at one shot. I would be more considerate next time. Namayan (talk) 10:14, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Severn Beach railway station MMB 11 143621.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 16:37, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birmingham MMB 31 University of Birmingham.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:54, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kidderminster railway station MMB 13 150125.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 08:00, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Byland Abbey MMB 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 12:09, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Hough Green Photos

Matt - im not sure if this is the best way to contact you but i would like original files of your photographs of Hough Green station which you appear to have taken on 8th October 2012? Please can you confirm if you are able to and if you will provide me with copies?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎87.102.28.2 (talk • contribs)

I think you have me confused with someone else - I've never been to Hough Green, and didn't take any photos on 8 October 2012. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:19, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi and thanks for your reply - i found some photos on here and it gave me links you toyr page - sorry

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «D3 Cabot Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 21:55, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winchcombe railway station MMB 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 16:35, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leeming Bar railway station MMB 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Dark areas (underexposed areas?). A bit of CAs (see note)--Lmbuga 00:08, 1 November 2013 (UTC) Fixed Mattbuck 14:04, 2 November 2013 (UTC) {{Comment}} Sorry, I can't vote against because my monitor is a bit dark. The image is dark IMO to be taken at 11:48, 12 September--Lmbuga 20:11, 5 November 2013 (UTC)  Support New review watching the faces of the people. QI for me, but I'm not sure--Lmbuga 20:18, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «78 Cabot Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:54, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB 71 222009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:19, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reading railway station MMB 65 458011 458017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments dust spot (see notice) --P e z i 20:33, 6 November 2013 (UTC) Fixed Mattbuck 21:27, 6 November 2013 (UTC)  Comment OK now --P e z i 22:10, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloo station MMB 06 455XXX 455915.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 12:17, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weston-super-Mare MMB 94 Uphill Junction 220XXX 150243.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yellow part a bit overexposed but ok --Christian Ferrer 12:17, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paddington station MMB 83 166215.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Right and left are leaning out --Christian Ferrer 12:09, 4 November 2013 (UTC) Fixed Mattbuck 21:03, 5 November 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 12:10, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB »13 Trent Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:12, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB «40 Sir Colin Campbell Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:05, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harringay railway station MMB 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:29, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cleethorpes railway station MMB 18 144006 185123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 15:37, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB 16 170523.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --P e z i 22:29, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «59 Coates Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspectives : right and left are leaning in --Christian Ferrer 12:17, 6 November 2013 (UTC) Fixed Mattbuck 21:14, 7 November 2013 (UTC) Not perfect (need a little more) but better --Christian Ferrer 05:47, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carlton railway station MMB 01 156408.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 16:41, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheffield station MMB 49 222006 222XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 16:41, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Highbury and Islington station MMB 13 378015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:20, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East Midlands Parkway railway station MMB 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Kreuzschnabel 12:14, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2013 MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

File tagging File:LGBT UK History Project Time Capsule logo.jpg

Thanks for your comments on the permission information on this file. I've added a link to the original image on our own Wiki, where it is clearly stated that the image is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. Is this sufficient? (I must admit I'm unfamiliar with the finer details of the Commons licensing arrangements, and hadn't previously been challenged in this way.) --Ross Burgess (talk) 09:20, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes, that should be fine. Adding group or corporate media is always tricky, but that should be fine. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:29, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pensford Viaduct MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:35, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rievaulx Terrace MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:07, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blackfriars station MMB 09 319378.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 21:08, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «56 Canary Wharf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Halicki 11:41, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Southampton Central railway station MMB 37 444003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:02, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham Autokarna MMB 21 Buick Riviera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'd have cropped the upper part (see note) but the quality is good anyway. --JLPC 16:49, 12 November 2013 (UTC) --JLPC 16:49, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shildon railway station MMB 02 142023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:30, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «A9 Millennium Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:27, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charing Cross station MMB 16 465242 375705.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 22:53, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! York railway station MMB 06 43238.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:55, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB U3 Melton Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 22:53, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

seems someone forged your Flickrreview

Hi Matt, as I cannot assume that DefJam7 (talk · contribs) is your SP, I have blocked that account for obvious forgery[1]. --Túrelio (talk) 09:55, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

I'm magic, I must be: I apparently reviewed a 2013 upload in 2008! -mattbuck (Talk) 10:55, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Woodford tube station MMB 01 1992 Stock.jpg

I am satisfied that it is sunny in England, like that England rudby team can see the ball and entrainer a little, and you you can stop making us your "bad compositions"! ha ha ha, it's a joke! --Christian Ferrer 19:30, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charing Cross station MMB 08 377156.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice reflex in train window --The Photographer 13:43, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leeds railway station MMB 12 144002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 20:34, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Willesden Junction station MMB 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK, I guess. --Pleclown 12:06, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2009 MMB 12 «2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Pleclown 12:06, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham MMB F8 Wensor Avenue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 05:54, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Earl's Court tube station MMB 06 D-Stock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 05:54, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Undel

Hi, I have raised the suspected Facebook related images for undeletion at Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Files_in_Category:Images_using_filenames_with_Facebook_photo_identities so that they can be individually reviewed rather than removed en-mass. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 18:36, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Healey MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 16:35, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beeston MMB 23 Fireworks.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Halicki 10:37, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acton Works MMB 08 1967 Stock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:40, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taunton railway station MMB 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Kreuzschnabel 18:07, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB »15 Trent Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:58, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hawnby MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 11:37, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stratford International station MMB 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:07, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woodford tube station MMB 01 1992 Stock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support maybe a bit overexposed (girl on right, house in baskground) but ok --Christian Ferrer 05:54, 14 November 2013 (UTC) I'm not sure anyone has ever said one of my photos is overexposed before. Mattbuck 22:05, 15 November 2013 (UTC) yes inded, it's a beginning, congratulation!! --Christian Ferrer 05:54, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Which category for trains or interiors of trains in a station?

Hi,

(following this discussion)

I think I share your point of view. I made a test by creating the sub category: Category:Trains in gare de Rives in which I have moved all pictures of trains in this station. Maybe the name of the category is not suitable, but this is the idea. --Poudou99 (talk) 19:10, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Trains at gare de Rives would be better English, but that seems OK to me. That said, I'd personally say the station category isn't large enough to warrant dispersal. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:26, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Ok, I will proceed to a rename with that name. My real concern was initially the mix of interiors of trains (without any view of the station) with pictures of the station itself or trains inside the station. --Poudou99 (talk) 21:36, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

I don't see that as especially relevant. I categorise things on two bases:

1. Is X in the photo?
2. Was the photo taken at X?

If either is yes, then it gets categorised. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:38, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

For the case we discuss (interiors of trains at Rives stations) :

1. Is X in the photo?  no
2. Was the photo taken at X?  yes

This why I did not categorize my pictures showing only interiors of trains under the category of the station (only under the category of the train itself). Jeriby did it, then I tried to avoid a mix of these pictures with those really showing the station. Finally, I do not think it is an real issue nor an error. is it ?

I don't think it's an issue. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:07, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Retford railway station MMB 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:06, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB U5 Millwall Dock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:07, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hillingdon tube station MMB 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dustspot (see note) --Christian Ferrer 06:27, 13 November 2013 (UTC) you clearly have better eyes than me, even knowing where to look I can't really see it. Still, applied a fix to the area, hopefully that sorts it. Mattbuck 16:21, 16 November 2013 (UTC) Support No but it's very hard to see, so --Christian Ferrer 18:54, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

What is the purpose of Commons

Since it was you who kicked off Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ultra7, would you please clarify for me what you think the basic purpose of Commons is? Is it a repository of educationally useful free imagery where the best available photos are retained until better images come along, or is it merely a repository of 'high quality' photography where usability is a secondary issue? As I'm sure you've noticed, I upload thousands of images to Commons, both my own and third party work, and I am now seriously questioning whether it's worth it if deletions like this are allowed to happen. Despite being low quality, these images were sufficient to show details that are simply not present in anything else on the site currently or in the images that were claimed by Rod to be adequate replacements, as I outlined in my post of 13:29, 8 October 2013. And now they are gone. Now there is a gap in the coverage of Haymarket Metro station, which cannot be filled with replacement photography because the tunnels no longer looks like that. Do you think that's a good thing, or what? Given you know more than a little about the topic as far as I can tell, do you think it's acceptable for there to be gaps in Commons' historical coverage of things like UK stations, just because the imagery was deemed to be not perfect? Should I even bother considering to upload images that are not perfect in future, even if they show things that are not present on any existing files? Ultra7 (talk) 12:50, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

I do not by any means require that images be "perfect", and by and large I'm an inclusionist, but there are limits. Your photos were of a dark green, blurred wall - to my mind, there was no educational use to the file. Other photos we have do show the wall, admittedly not face-on, but they show it. We don't expect to create a perfect repository in a day, a month or even a decade - there's no time limit, and there are plenty of photos out there. If you disagree with the deletion, I suggest you take it to COM:UDEL. It's certainly not worth quitting over two images - everyone gets images deleted occasionally, it's inevitable. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:46, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

They weren't my photos. I sourced them from Flickr, which I am sure you know, is not an easy task with things whose only keywords are 'Haymarket' and 'Metro'. The photos we do have do not show the rails, they do not show the power lines, and they do not show the geometry of the tunnel side, and a few other things too. That was the educational value of those images. The only photo we had showing those details for that station, were the ones now deleted. And it won't matter how long we wait - the station has since been refurbished, so replicating those images is no longer possible. I have already listed it at UDEL, but it's turning out to be the same farce as the original DR. They are, for the purposes of Commons, lost forever. If someone wants a freely licensed image of those details - they will have to waste time replicating research I had already performed. Please consider that the next time you put an image up for deletion on the basis that you think it's not usable even though others have already decided to use it. Ultra7 (talk) 14:22, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limehouse station MMB 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:33, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limehouse station MMB 11 DLR 62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:30, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «B8 1 Canada Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 11:50, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gloucester railway station MMB 16 170109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 11:50, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardiff Central railway station MMB 28 153362.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 11:50, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Whitechapel station MMB 04 378148.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 11:48, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westbury railway station MMB 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:07, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «A3 Columbus Courtyard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:39, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dunster railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support It seem blurred but it's not, it' the weather conditions --Christian Ferrer 12:35, 18 November 2013 (UTC) It was a miserable day. Mattbuck 21:33, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2011 MMB 60 Christmas tree.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aysgarth Falls MMB 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 14:04, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «H4 Bristol East Junction 43098.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support train is a bit dark but still QI IMO --P e z i 21:39, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rievaulx Abbey MMB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 13:14, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harringay railway station MMB 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --P e z i 18:44, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East Croydon station MMB 08 377450.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --P e z i 18:45, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clapton-in-Gordano MMB 10 M5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:50, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lydney Junction railway station MMB 12 3717 "City of Truro".jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yes. --Pleclown 12:08, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham MMB J8 Lenton Lane.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:08, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clevedon MMB 79 M5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yes. --Pleclown 12:08, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardiff Central railway station MMB 43 150217.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support nice --Christian Ferrer 06:31, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Queenstown Road railway station MMB 05 455723.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support nice --Christian Ferrer 06:34, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

File rename

I see you beat me to the file rename of File:Protests against Governor Scott Walker in the Wisconsin Capitol.jpg. My move left a redirect, not sure how to proceed.--Sphilbrick (talk) 22:35, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

You change the redirect to the correct file (done). -mattbuck (Talk) 00:21, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks.--Sphilbrick (talk) 00:23, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weston-super-Mare MMB 61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 13:06, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Husthwaite MMB 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --Cccefalon 17:00, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB S1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 20:48, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lymington Pier railway station MMB 04 421497.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 20:48, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «Y9 Students' Union Elections 2013 Results Night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 20:48, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Camden Road railway station MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment can you bright the shadows a bit please? --Christian Ferrer 06:36, 20 November 2013 (UTC) Yes. Mattbuck 16:37, 21 November 2013 (UTC)  Support QI --Christian Ferrer 18:54, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Same problem as here

Same problem as here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Philipp-Fuerst-von-Eulenburg_%281847-1921%29.jpg in these images. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Unknown_authors_around_1900 Best wishes. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raskelf MMB 04 East Coast Main Line (West Moor Road).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 14:52, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wirksworth railway station MMB 10 79900.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:22, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paddington station MMB 77 332003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. Is this the 4:50 from Paddington? --Kreuzschnabel 11:56, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acton Works MMB 07 1967 Stock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Cccefalon 09:48, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lawrence Hill railway station MMB 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dudley Port railway station MMB 16 323217.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 12:45, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crewe railway station MMB 06 323224.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:06, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «F4 River Thames and Ontario Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Cccefalon 10:59, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aysgarth Falls MMB 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support very good --A.Savin 17:01, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Andrews Road railway station MMB 24 66084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 12:54, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Deletion requests and dragon penis

Hi mattbuck,
I saw you answered on several of my deletion requests yesterday on unsharp or low quality genitalia. Just to explain: I am not against having pics from genitalia or even "porn" (whatever that means) - it is more the reverse as I am one of those clearly stating an oppinion against any image filter or censorship and I am responsible for most of the articles on genitalia in the german wikipedia incl. the "legend" vulva. On the other hand I think it is necessary to have a clear focus on at least a minimum of quality in this area and in my opinion lots of the hundreds of bad penis and other sexual content pics cannot meet this and are superfluous stuff disturbing the concentration on the smaller amount of acceptable or even good ones. So I would think to narrow down the amount is of value for us - but if not it will not be the end of the world for me.

As a second point: I found some pics uploaded by you on a penis toy you described as a dragon-style zeta toy (animal penis replica). Am I right that this is only fantasy-based and does not fit into the Category:Animal penis? Best regards, -- Achim Raschka (talk) 07:03, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

I assume the dragon is based on someone's fantasy, otherwise there's someone out there suppressing the knowledge that dragons really exist. It seemed reasonable to put it in animal penis, I figured that someone who knew that section of the category tree better would put it in its right place. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:03, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

The black one however is based on a wolf, so I guess that counts as animal penis. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:02, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «Q7 Bristol East Junction 220030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok. Perhaps removing the bird? --Cccefalon 16:47, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «35 Orchard Hotel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:16, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weston-super-Mare MMB 69 Grand Pier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice atmosphere.  Support --Cccefalon 19:09, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grantham railway station MMB 06 91XXX 158863.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 15:47, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Newport MMB 03 River Usk 43091.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:24, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Kruusamägi 01:32, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Camden Road railway station MMB 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --P e z i 18:50, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB A5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 12:02, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2013 MMB 90 Bonfire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 12:02, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Help Desk

I notice you seemed to know a bit about flkr commons licences. Could you reply to my question here.Blethering Scot (talk) 22:51, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acton Works MMB 02 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:44, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wolverhampton railway station MMB 15 390044 221117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:17, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Windermere MMB 34 Lakeside.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sky a bit too noisy, fixable. --Moroder 17:30, 27 November 2013 (UTC)  Support QI --P e z i 21:16, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drayton Park railway station MMB 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --P e z i 21:19, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «P4 Cabot Circus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --P e z i 21:21, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stratford station MMB 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 17:37, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «60 Queen's Medical Centre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 17:37, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Victoria station MMB 13 460001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 13:03, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2013 MMB 70 Bonfire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:34, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leeds railway station MMB 02 91117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Is it tilted or like that in reality? --Christian Ferrer 11:59, 26 November 2013 (UTC) In reality. Mattbuck 16:51, 27 November 2013 (UTC) Support ok --Christian Ferrer 17:01, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orpington railway station MMB 13 465177.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --P e z i 23:32, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rievaulx Terrace MMB 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:10, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Worksop railway station MMB 17 156404.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality! --P e z i 19:12, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harrow and Wealdstone station MMB 10 350121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 15:41, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wolverhampton railway station MMB 20 221133.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --P e z i 19:52, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gloucester railway station MMB 51 43194.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose unsharp --P e z i 20:59, 27 November 2013 (UTC) Sharpened and corrected perspective. Mattbuck 22:30, 27 November 2013 (UTC)  Support not one of my favorite pics; but think it's QI now --P e z i 11:14, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peterborough railway station MMB 02 321404.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 07:18, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hartsop MMB 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 15:11, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yate railway station MMB 11 43304.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 15:09, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grosmont Depot MMB 06 50027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:51, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross St Pancras tube station MMB 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --P e z i 23:00, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «E8 The Downs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 11:41, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marylebone station MMB 06 165019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like it --Pleclown 12:51, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hucknall station MMB 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:38, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Harry Potter & the Half-Blood Prince DVDs at Costco SSF ECR.JPG Strange copyright rules from author

Hi there! Since we're already talking about copyright issues, I would like to ask you about complicated notices like the one for this file: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Harry_Potter_%26_the_Half-Blood_Prince_DVDs_at_Costco_SSF_ECR.JPG. It says I can choose a license. What if I take one such picture and create a new version? The pas few months I have come across serveral of these notices, from different users. To me this feels like advertising by someone who hopes to make money off his uploads. Am I missing something here? --Judithcomm (talk) 09:26, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

The image in question is dual-licensed under CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GFDL-1.2. When you distribute it (or derivatives) you may choose to do so under the GFDL, under CC-BY-SA, or, like the user has done, both. This just makes it a bit easier to use. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:46, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank your very much for working on File:Kunming_Yunnan_China_East-temple-Pagoda-01.jpg with PS

I was not able to get there with Lightroom. The photo is really much better now. Might it be, that you want to change Nomination to Promotion to turn the frame to green? Cheers, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 09:35, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

I feel that given I edited the photo, I cannot promote it myself. COI and all that. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:46, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Awww, right! I forgot! --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 10:07, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

However, this is of course, why I wanted to have a clarification on QI talk page. I can feel in favour for your statement as well as for the statement of King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠. Anyway, concerning the the Pagoda photo, I can wait for someone else stopping by for review. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 10:26, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cattal railway station MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Weak support Good quality, but may be more interesting with a train. --XRay 15:33, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB W5 Millennium Dome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! --Kreuzschnabel 11:11, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brimham Rocks MMB 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:39, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charing Cross station MMB 19 465242.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 13:35, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 85 221XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:19, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «92 Rutland Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:19, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Byland Abbey MMB 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:19, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB Y3 Sherwood Hall and Rutland Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:16, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloo station MMB 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The photo is tilted a little bit ccw. And more light would be a good idea, too. --Cccefalon 12:20, 24 November 2013 (UTC) Is that better? Mattbuck 22:23, 27 November 2013 (UTC) Yes, better now. --Cccefalon 19:25, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crewe railway station MMB 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:12, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Netherfield railway station MMB 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:12, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taunton railway station MMB 03 220014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice railway motif without disturbing wires. Can you remove the CA (very stron on the left side but also present at the right side of the photo)? --Cccefalon 12:12, 28 November 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 17:10, 2 December 2013 (UTC) I like the atmosphere of hot summer with the heat shimmering over the tracks. --Cccefalon 18:24, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2011 MMB 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice use of DOF. --King of Hearts 10:15, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB V6 Millennium Dome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit dark, but ok I guess --Poco a poco 10:44, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scarborough railway station MMB 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 09:09, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wirksworth MMB 02 Ecclesbourne Valley Railway 101XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 09:09, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cleethorpes MMB 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 22:36, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB »32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 12:23, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2012 MMB 68.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:17, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! West Ruislip station MMB 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:26, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Penrith railway station MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 14:19, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB S6 Canary Wharf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:32, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle Combe Circuit MMB F7 750MC Toyota MR2 Championship.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --Pleclown 20:13, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aysgarth Falls MMB 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 20:13, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bedminster railway station MMB 10 67005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:00, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle Combe Circuit MMB F5 750MC Toyota MR2 Championship.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:00, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «76 Trent Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:35, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birmingham MMB 28 Cross Country Route 43366.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I like the composition!--ArildV 20:08, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Milton Keynes Central railway station MMB 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 17:54, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockport railway station MMB 17 175001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --P e z i 22:57, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stratford station MMB 13 1992-Stock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --P e z i 22:59, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katy Perry gig Nottingham 2011 MMB 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Weak support For this kind of situation: QI. (A little bit soft.) --XRay 09:50, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheffield station MMB 47 222006 220006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Weak support Large areas are in the shadow, but IMO still QI. --XRay 09:50, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

thank you

for your kind and informative reply to my grumbling at the village pump. While I have give up editing after drinking years ago perhaps i should refrain while not feeling at the top of my game as well. As it turned out, I was not even right about what one of the pictures was. As I recall nowm that model was from the 1930s, who knows who holds the rights to it, but it is not me. ciao. Carptrash (talk) 00:20, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

I'm happy to help, copyright can be very strange sometimes and frankly contradictory. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:44, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB 69.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --P e z i 22:59, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB »17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:34, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «04 Bathurst Basin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 06:00, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clapton-in-Gordano MMB 11 M5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like it. --Pleclown 12:03, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rievaulx Terrace MMB 10 Rievaulx Abbey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:20, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dudley Port railway station MMB 17 323217.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 12:00, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clapham Junction railway station MMB 25 450546.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:20, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «04 Rutland Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Okay although a bit unsharp. DerHexer 13:50, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Okay although a bit unsharp. DerHexer 13:50, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Weak support Good quality, but a little bit noisy in the shadows. And it looks dark (weather dependent). --XRay 06:31, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Starbeck railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Weak support Good quality, but crop at the top not optimal. --XRay 06:31, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «P4 Students' Union Elections 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 08:09, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

File:London MMB «41 City Canal.jpg

Hi Mattbuck, I improved the description of this file and add a category for the boat, see you later. --Christian Ferrer 09:05, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Merci. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:41, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salisbury railway station MMB 12 159014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 11:41, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Starbeck railway station MMB 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:14, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «46 City Canal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:14, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East Midlands Parkway railway station MMB 30 222012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:54, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pannal railway station MMB 05 150226 150275.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Might I ask for removal of CA (see lamp post) and the usual perspective correction. Beside that, it's as nice compo and I like especially the repeating blue elements. --Cccefalon 08:35, 6 December 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 10:33, 8 December 2013 (UTC)  Support Very good! --Cccefalon 19:40, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of Pricasso video

I've renominated this again via the wizard. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jimmy Wales by Pricasso (the making of).ogv In particular you should read the revised BLP resolution from the WMF at [2]. Smallbones (talk) 21:46, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stafford railway station MMB 02 221133.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:03, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

File:St Pancras railway station MMB I3 The Meeting Point.jpg

Hello Matt, I've uploaded a reworked version of this good composition, what do you think of it? if you nominate it at FPC, you have my vote --Christian Ferrer 16:45, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

FPC? I think you're being optimistic about my photographic skill there. But yes I like it. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:23, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Yes the quality is a bit low, I'm maybe a bit too much optimistic, but it helps to surpass itself to confront with the lions in the arena, there are sometimes constructive criticisms and in more sometimes not very good pictures with not very good quality are promoted IMO, and it's a good shopwindows to show our work. --Christian Ferrer 17:44, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

I can't say I expect to ever have a featured picture - if people want to nominate my stuff, fine, but my idea of excellent and theirs tends to be very different. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:58, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

I completely agree, their wow factor is more than very debatable, but I choose to nominate all my photos that I think of good ones, even when I know that it have no chance, in the first place to benefit constructive criticisms because sometimes there is and so to improve me, and secondly by pleasure to read some nonsenses. And then I like to think that I contribute to raise the level, can be not for the technique but for the approach. And then I have also to be a bit masochist, because I like receiving a whole lot of oppositions in faces, I have the impression to be more intelligent than some others. See you later. --Christian Ferrer 18:54, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staithes MMB 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:18, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «J5 Canary Wharf - Kniphofia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 15:08, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB W8 Millennium Dome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:44, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stapleton Road railway station MMB 15 220011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 07:13, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB 06 220020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support People in the shadow very dark, but IMO still QI. --XRay 07:13, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «41 City Canal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 08:20, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Windermere MMB 66 Bowness-on-Windermere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 08:21, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wirksworth railway station MMB 01 101XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 08:17, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Windermere MMB 38 Ambleside "Queen of the Lake".jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:41, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leeds railway station MMB 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 14:32, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB A6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:19, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harrow and Wealdstone station MMB 04 390XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 21:12, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harrow and Wealdstone station MMB 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 21:12, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aysgarth Falls MMB 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 16:47, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB I3 The Meeting Point.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support very good centring --Christian Ferrer 16:53, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2011 MMB 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:01, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hillingdon tube station MMB 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:01, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tottenham Hale station MMB 04 379014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:46, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brockley railway station MMB 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:23, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 09:29, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB Z1 20 Fenchurch Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:41, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «A8 Thames Quay.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:41, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East Midlands Parkway railway station MMB 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 06:00, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wirksworth MMB 01 Ecclesbourne Valley Railway 101XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Nice motif. However, it is still tilted cw and in my opinion the shirt should be a little bit brighter and less bluish. --Cccefalon 08:54, 12 December 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 10:16, 14 December 2013 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:29, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «48 Portland Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 16:58, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «87 Columbus Courtyard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 17:00, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Windermere MMB A7 Bowness-on-Windermere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support somebody wrote a note but it's not me --Christian Ferrer 16:42, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB A2 158847.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit unsharp at right but I know it's the warm diesel, can you just brighten a bit the shadows please? --Christian Ferrer 16:27, 12 December 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 10:10, 15 December 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 16:35, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «U5 Students' Union Elections 2013 Results Night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice but one hot pixel (see note) --Christian Ferrer 11:22, 12 December 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 10:05, 14 December 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:51, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lincoln MMB 10 Brayford Wharf East level crossing 153308.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:01, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leeds railway station MMB 30 333015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 15:06, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chigwell MMB 01 Central Line 1992 Stock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 14:14, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB Z5 River Thames.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 14:27, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Netherfield railway station MMB 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Cccefalon 11:35, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB V5 Millennium Dome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs some rotation anti-clockwise --A.Savin 18:00, 15 December 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 22:28, 16 December 2013 (UTC) OK --A.Savin 14:13, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tickenham MMB 05 M5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Purple fringing (see notes) --Christian Ferrer 16:57, 15 December 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 22:13, 16 December 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 05:50, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! York railway station MMB 40 185115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA (see note) --Christian Ferrer 16:44, 15 December 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 22:00, 16 December 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 05:47, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Patchway railway station MMB 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Need a very little sharpenind ant to bright a bit the shadows --Christian Ferrer 16:44, 15 December 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 22:00, 16 December 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 05:47, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «J1 Pan Peninsula.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:22, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London City Airport MMB 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 16:42, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «P8 River Thames.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 16:39, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Levisham railway station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 13:05, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beeston MMB 75.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 13:05, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB L1 Trent Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 11:55, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB B1 43061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 11:55, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB R7 South Quay Plaza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 11:55, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «P6 River Thames.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just ok. Good composition, but some noise due to strange settings.--ArildV 00:57, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wirksworth MMB 03 Ecclesbourne Valley Railway 101XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good qualiy.--ArildV 00:59, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cleethorpes railway station MMB 16 185123 144006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Poco a poco 11:00, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ullswater MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --A.Savin 16:15, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reading MMB 27 Reading Traincare Depot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 15:04, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Runswick Bay MMB 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 10:20, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

2014 !

	* * * 2014! * * *
	Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Happy holidays! -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:18, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pateley Bridge MMB 04 The Bridge Inn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Disturbing shadow in the bottom could be removed, but ok --Poco a poco 12:04, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Windermere MMB 42 Ambleside.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:09, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crewe railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:09, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

	Happy Holidays!
	G'day, just a quick greeting wishing you and your family happy holidays and all the best for 2014. And of course, a big thank you for putting a leg up by doing what you do on Commons, and helping to make it the fantastic project that it is. Greetings from a warm west coast of Aussie. russavia (talk) 01:43, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «32 City Canal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:56, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bow Church DLR station MMB 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:45, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «M7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 10:32, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Dear Matt, I wish and you and your family a Merry Christmas and lots of health and, of course, nice pictures for the coming year! Your Poco² 14:03, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Windermere MMB 51 Ambleside.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 12:51, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rievaulx Abbey MMB 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:29, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harrow and Wealdstone station MMB 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:39, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leyburn railway station MMB 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:12, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «C8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:12, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB 14 222004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good QI IMO--Lmbuga 22:01, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB S9 Canary Wharf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Haven't I promote this already, well, QI anyhow --Poco a poco 13:00, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Windermere MMB 24 Lakeside MV Teal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:48, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jervaulx Abbey MMB 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:00, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stapleton Road railway station MMB 10 158955.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good! --NorbertNagel 09:15, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stoke-on-Trent railway station MMB 05 153326.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 09:15, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brondesbury railway station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --Christian Ferrer 07:59, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tamworth railway station MMB 40 66XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support a bit blurred due to long exposure but ok --Christian Ferrer 07:46, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle Combe Circuit MMB D0.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments { Support ok --Christian Ferrer 07:44, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Farringdon station MMB 30 319439.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Very high contrast, so the areas in the shadow are somewhat too dark. Should be fixable easily, if Raw-file is available. Sharpness & composition ok. -- Smial 16:46, 23 December 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 00:26, 24 December 2013 (UTC) * Better. Thx. --Smial 09:25, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «78 Netham Weir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 16:22, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Long Eaton railway station MMB 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 16:24, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aysgarth Falls MMB 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 16:24, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gloucester railway station MMB 30 43139 221132.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you bright a bit the shadows please? --Christian Ferrer 18:11, 22 December 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 00:17, 24 December 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 05:42, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beeston MMB A6 Middle Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspectives, right and left are leaning in --Christian Ferrer 18:06, 22 December 2013 (UTC)  Done, though I'm not convinced this is QI due to blur on right. Mattbuck 00:09, 24 December 2013 (UTC)  Support Just acceptable IMO --Christian Ferrer 05:46, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle Combe Circuit MMB 92 Mini 7s and Mini Miglia Championship.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good coverage of the racing atmosphere. Some minor flaws (very light CA on the left side, see bill board) but beyond disturbance level. --Cccefalon 13:31, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB Y8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Stepro 02:58, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sutton Bank MMB 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:11, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is ok, though the composition is not very good. I believe, protrait oruientation would have been better, or somewhat more room (less crop) at the bottom. --Smial 10:03, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuneaton railway station MMB 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:11, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Windermere MMB A3 Bowness-on-Windermere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:06, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rievaulx Abbey MMB 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Soewhat weak corner sharpness, but all in all acceptable. Nice composition, and lighting. --Smial 10:16, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gloucester railway station MMB 38 221132.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you bright a little the shadows please? --Christian Ferrer 10:40, 22 December 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 13:12, 22 December 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 14:20, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB E3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 10:40, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marylebone station MMB 03 67014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Need a little sharpening --Christian Ferrer 10:40, 22 December 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 13:12, 22 December 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 14:20, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oxford Circus tube station MMB 01 1992-Stock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Right is leaning out --Christian Ferrer 06:07, 20 December 2013 (UTC) Hm, I probably aligned that by the overhead information board, I'll get on that. Mattbuck 22:03, 21 December 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 22:25, 21 December 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 07:13, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stoke-on-Trent railway station MMB 19 390048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:37, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Windermere MMB 48 "Princess of the Lake".jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:55, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «M6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:01, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Windermere MMB 65 Bowness-on-Windermere MV Teal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--ArildV 15:39, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB S1 Canary Wharf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:00, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2013 MMB 32 Bonfire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Cccefalon 12:50, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Patchway railway station MMB 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good picture, but there is a dust spot on the left (not the plane) --Shansov.net 08:46, 25 December 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 10:25, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «93 Rutland Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:12, 26 December 2013 (UTC) Good --The Photographer 18:56, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB 63.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:25, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leyburn railway station MMB 10 20166.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:29, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hewish MMB 07 G-RJXC.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dustspots (see notes) --Christian Ferrer 06:32, 26 December 2013 (UTC)  Done, but I had to be really increase the contrast to be able to see them at all. They were invisible as it was! Mattbuck 10:24, 26 December 2013 (UTC)  Support Yes, I have lynx eyes! --Christian Ferrer 11:58, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB T7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments To bright the shadows please --Christian Ferrer 07:59, 25 December 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 10:21, 26 December 2013 (UTC) it's a very little but ok --Christian Ferrer 11:48, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Long Eaton railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you bright a bit the dhadows please? --Christian Ferrer 07:53, 25 December 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 10:20, 26 December 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 11:29, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! West Ruislip station MMB 29 165018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you bright a litte the shadows please? --Christian Ferrer 07:46, 25 December 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 10:18, 26 December 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 11:26, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Willesden Junction station MMB 47 378227.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you bright just a little bit the shadows please? --Christian Ferrer 07:44, 25 December 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 10:18, 26 December 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 11:26, 26 December 2013 (UTC)