User talk:Llez/Archives/2019 (4)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Olivella volutella, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Meets all criteria -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:16, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Albinaria senilis ssp. leucadia, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nassaria recurva 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:56, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ailurus fulgens - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:56, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nassaria pusilla 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:15, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Simochromis diagramma - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:31, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cebuella pygmaea - Karlsruhe Zoo 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:45, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pygocentrus nattereri - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:31, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Demoulia abbreviata (Obtuse Demoulia), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Llez/Archives/2019 (4),

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Micromys minutus - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:22, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gnathochromis permaxillaris - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:41, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Simochromis diagramma.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Étang de Salses-Leucate 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Étang de Salses-Leucate 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ailurus fulgens - Karlsruhe Zoo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:36, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nassaria pusilla (White Phos), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --GRDN711 (talk) 02:21, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gnathochromis permaxillaris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nassaria recurva, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Harpago arthriticus 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Harpago arthriticus 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:41, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:40, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:40, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Étang de Salses-Leucate, view from east.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:39, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Étang de Salses-Leucate, view from west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nassarius distortus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:27, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:09, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Armenak Margarian 07:43, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:09, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tritia nitida 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:21, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:03, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:03, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The fringes at the left of the tower should be removed. --Ermell 06:41, 5 October 2019 (UTC)  Done Thanks --Llez 07:54, 5 October 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:28, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tritia neritea var. kamiesch, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:41, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dust shots in the sky --Armenak Margarian 07:03, 6 October 2019 (UTC)  Done Thanks --Llez 08:43, 6 October 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Armenak Margarian 08:59, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I see a lot of dust spots around the turret. --Tournasol7 06:41, 6 October 2019 (UTC)  Done Thanks. A lot of crows were flying around this morning, I hope, I found them all --Llez 08:43, 6 October 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Thank you! --Tournasol7 14:04, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nassarius distortus (Distorted Nassa), shell, smooth form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Altolamprologus compressiceps - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Altolamprologus compressiceps - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caesalpina gilliesii 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:40, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caesalpina gilliesii 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:40, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 06:44, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tritia nitida, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:45, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:57, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:58, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:59, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Siciliaria lamellata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Question - There are two varieties of this shell, right? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:16, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 Info No, the term "aff" (abbreviation for the latin affinis = similar) in the name of the other specimen means, similar to a species, but not the species itself. The other shell looks similar to Siciliaria lamellata, but differs in some characters. But I found no description of a shell with all the characters of aff. Siciliaria lamellata. This means either, that the other specimen is already described, but I didn't find the corresponding literature, or it is a new, hitherto undescribed species. In no case aff. Siciliaria lamellata is conspecific with Siciliaria lamellata (this, the nominated picture). --Llez (talk) 06:31, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Support - Thanks for your explanation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:51, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:34, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:34, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:34, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Megastomia winfriedi, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:19, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The tower is a bit crooked, but good quality for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:51, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:50, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:49, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:03, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:04, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:05, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Powellisetia fallax, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --GRDN711 (talk) 21:36, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:47, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:47, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:46, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turbonilla textilis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Granaria illyrica, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Odostomia turrita, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 India - Jury Round

Hi @Llez: , Hope you are doing fine. We have created the first jury round and added you. The first round is about eliminating the images you think is not suitable for the competition. We plan to complete this round by 18th of October. Please do let me know if you have any queries. Thanks --Sumit Surai (talk) 14:57, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Llez: , we have created round 2. This would be the final round where you need to rank the images. The round we plan to end by 22nd of this month. Please do let me know if you have any queries. Thanks --Sumit Surai (talk) 10:16, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Llez: , Montage is not supporting more than 100 images for ranking, so I changed it to rating in this round. Really sorry that we would have to do a final ranking round after this. Do let me know if there are any other issues. Thanks --Sumit Surai (talk) 15:15, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Llez: , I have created the final round. In this round, you need to rank the final 52 images. We plan to end this round by 24th of this month. I am emailing you about the details of ranking images. Thanks --Sumit Surai (talk) 12:21, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:38, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:39, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:03, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:06, 13 October 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 05:06, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:04, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euparthenia bulinea, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but I would clone the bottom white spot--Famberhorst 06:03, 14 October 2019 (UTC)  Done Thanks --Llez 06:21, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:59, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:00, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:01, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alinda serbica, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bubo scandiacus - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bubo scandiacus - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:55, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:55, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:22, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:22, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:23, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ondina modiola, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull --Ercé (talk) 06:37, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Armenak Margarian 04:47, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:50, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Armenak Margarian 04:46, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salses-le-Château - Forteresse 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:00, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cap Leucate - lighthouse 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 04:56, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Fitou 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:57, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Fitou 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:58, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barleeia tincta, shell, juvenile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Boothsift 02:01, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turbonilla insularis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xerocrassa homeyeri, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment - Another potential FP. Remarkable sharpness for a shell with a diameter of 1.2 cm! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:47, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cap des Frères 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:06, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cap Leucate - Sémaphore 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:07, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cap Leucate - TV-transmitter 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:09, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château de Fitou, view from southwest.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment: I suggest cropping out the house on the left and also part of the foreground. Your image is the chateau, not the chateau and its environment. Martinvl (talk) 16:04, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment Cropping the house of the left would result in a very tight and would also mean to crop the drawbridge of the castle (which definitively belongs to the castle). In the foregrund I didn't crop for I would have cropped only parts of the houses, so that only the upper parts of the houses would have remained, which does not lokk good IMO --Llez (talk) 04:54, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Used and Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:00, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phare du Cap Leucate (Cap Leucate lighthouse).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

FP promotion

75px|center|

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Set/The main altar of St. Georg, Mundelfingen, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/The main altar of St. Georg, Mundelfingen has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sympetrum sanguineum - Leucate 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:02, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sympetrum sanguineum - Leucate 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:01, 21 October 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Armenak Margarian 05:06, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leucate - dead tree.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:03, 21 October 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Armenak Margarian 05:06, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Odostomia acuta var. attenuata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Boothsift 02:01, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cap Leucate - lighthouse 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:52, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cap Leucate - lighthouse 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:52, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cap Leucate - lighthouse 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:52, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tropidophora philippiana 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:21, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leucate - Beach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:22, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cap Leucate - Ruined buildings 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:13, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cap Leucate - Ruined buildings 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:12, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cap Leucate - Ruined buildings 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:13, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pyrgulina pupaeformis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Boothsift 05:39, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Quéribus - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:55, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cap Leucate - lighthouse 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:56, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leucate - Falaise 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:56, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tectus fenestratus (Fenestrate Top Snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:08, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 23:20, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

 Comment I just noted that we have two VIs of this species --Llez (talk) 04:40, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tropidophora philippiana, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cap Leucate - lighthouse 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cap Leucate - lighthouse 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Odostomia scalaris var. nitida, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Quéribus - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:34, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Quéribus - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Quéribus - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corbières Massif - Pyrenees - Panorama 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:28, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corbières Massif - Pyrenees - Panorama 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:29, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Quéribus - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:30, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Folinella excavata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rissoa parva interrupta var. bifasciata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marginodostomia suturamarginata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Quéribus - 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:07, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Quéribus - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:06, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Quéribus - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:05, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theodoxus fluviatilis ssp. dalmatinus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Quéribus - 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:48, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Quéribus - 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:50, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Quéribus - 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:51, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château de Quéribus, Pillars' room.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

[:File:Bubo scandiacus - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg]]

Moin moin! Da hat die Kaskadensperre zugeschlagen, das Foto wird auf der FR-wiki Hauptseite verwendet. Sag einfach auf meiner Diskussionsseite was geändert werden soll, ich setze das gerne fuer Dich um. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 23:35, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Peyrepertuse - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:47, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Peyrepertuse - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:47, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duilhac-sous-Peyrepertuse - Aude - France 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:47, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cucugnan - Aude - France 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:47, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turbonilla pupoides, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and used. --GRDN711 (talk) 19:27, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:00, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cucugnan, Dept. Aude, France, view from south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:01, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Duilhac-sous-Peyrepertuse, Dept. Aude, France, view from southeast.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:02, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anentome helena 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:55, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Peyrepertuse - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:02, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Peyrepertuse - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:56, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Peyrepertuse - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:57, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Peyrepertuse - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:58, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turbonilla lactea, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turbonilla pumila, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pseudotorinia amoena, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Peyrepertuse - 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:55, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Peyrepertuse - 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:57, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Peyrepertuse - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:58, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anentome helena (Assassin snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Peyrepertuse - 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:01, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Peyrepertuse - 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:01, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Peyrepertuse - 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:01, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Peyrepertuse - 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:02, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Peyrepertuse - 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:57, 31 October 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Mikmaq 12:49, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Peyrepertuse - 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:40, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Peyrepertuse - 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:40, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Peyrepertuse - 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:40, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Peyrepertuse - 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:40, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chrysallida nioba, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leonia mammillaris 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:01, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eus - Pyrénées-Orientales 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hanooz 06:01, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eus - Pyrénées-Orientales 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:02, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Peyrepertuse - 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:01, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Peyrepertuse - 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:04, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Megastomia conoidea, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support It's the right name, the species has been reclassified and confirmed. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

 Comment Yes, for the whole synonymy see here --Llez (talk) 12:32, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dromaius novaehollandiae - Maroparque 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dromaius novaehollandiae - Maroparque 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villefranche-de-Conflent 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:54, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villefranche-de-Conflent 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:55, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ligne de Cerdagne - wagons 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:56, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort Libéria 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:57, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eus, Pyrénées-Orientales, view from southeast.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leonia mammillaris, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villefranche-de-Conflent 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:30, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villefranche-de-Conflent 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:21, 5 November 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Mikmaq 08:10, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villefranche-de-Conflent 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:31, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Odostomia acuta, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:21, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villefranche-de-Conflent - Église Saint-Jacques 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:10, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villefranche-de-Conflent - Town hall 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villefranche-de-Conflent 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:12, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villefranche-de-Conflent 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:39, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villefranche-de-Conflent 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:21, 5 November 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Mikmaq 19:36, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pyrgulina consimilis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xerosecta pharussica alba 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:11, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villefranche-de-Conflent - Église Saint-Jacques 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:15, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villefranche-de-Conflent - Église Saint-Jacques 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:12, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villefranche-de-Conflent - Église Saint-Jacques 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:14, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villefranche-de-Conflent - Église Saint-Jacques 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:13, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort Libéria 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:18, 8 November 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Mikmaq 23:58, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort Libéria 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:19, 8 November 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Mikmaq 23:58, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort Libéria 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:04, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villefranche-de-Conflent 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:20, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xerosecta pharussica ssp. alba, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:06, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:04, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Triviella aperta 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Triviella aperta 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort Libéria 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:40, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort Libéria 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:43, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort Libéria 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort Libéria 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:44, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Anentome helena 01.JPG, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Anentome helena 01.JPG. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort Libéria 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:14, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort Libéria 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mikmaq 06:42, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort Libéria 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:15, 10 November 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Mikmaq 06:42, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank You !!!

	Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in India - Jury Barnstar
	Hi Llez, we are grateful for your precious time and energy, which you used to judge the photographs of Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in India and select the winners. This is a small token of appreciation to you from the organizing team. You are awesome! --Sumit Surai (talk) 13:01, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tropidophora coquandiana 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbaye Saint-Michel de Cuxa 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbaye Saint-Michel de Cuxa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort Libéria 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:45, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Longchaeus insularum, shell, juvenile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbaye Saint-Michel de Cuxa - Cloister 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:58, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbaye Saint-Michel de Cuxa - crypt 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:53, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbaye Saint-Michel de Cuxa - crypt 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:58, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbaye Saint-Michel de Cuxa - crypt 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:54, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Villefranche-de-Conflent, view from north.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:07, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tropidophora coquandiana, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:07, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbaye Saint-Michel de Cuxa - Jesus on the Mount of Olives 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:49, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbaye Saint-Michel de Cuxa - Main church 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:15, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbaye Saint-Michel de Cuxa - Cloister 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:07, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbaye Saint-Michel de Cuxa - Cloister 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ailurus fulgens - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ailurus fulgens - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbaye Saint-Michel de Cuxa - Benedict of Nursia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:15, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbaye Saint-Michel de Cuxa - Right side chapel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:15, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbaye Saint-Michel de Cuxa - Mary with Jesus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:15, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbaye Saint-Michel de Cuxa - Left side chapel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:15, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbaye Saint-Michel de Cuxa - South tower 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:00, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbaye Saint-Michel de Cuxa 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:57, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbaye Saint-Michel de Cuxa - Cloister 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:58, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbaye Saint-Michel de Cuxa - Saint Michael.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:55, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Site des Orgues 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Site des Orgues 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:33, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Site des Orgues 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:33, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Site des Orgues 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Planorbis planorbis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Leonia mammillaris compacta 01.JPG, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leonia mammillaris compacta 01.JPG. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Site des Orgues 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:49, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Site des Orgues 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:50, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Site des Orgues 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:50, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Site des Orgues 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:51, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Hacienda San Jorge - Los Cancajos 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hacienda San Jorge - Los Cancajos 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Site des Orgues 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice!--Famberhorst 06:37, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Site des Orgues 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:21, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Site des Orgues 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:36, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Site des Orgues 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:21, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Megastomia tenera, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Site des Orgues 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Site des Orgues 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Site des Orgues 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:47, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Site des Orgues 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort Libéria 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:26, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villefranche-de-Conflent 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:46, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pyrgohydrobia grochmalickii, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sympetrum sanguineum - Leucate 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sympetrum sanguineum - Leucate 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hinemoa indica, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pyramidelloides mirandus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:51, 21

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Étienne d'Ille-sur-Têt, view from west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ammonicera binodosa, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panthera leo - Réserve africaine de Sigean 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Equus grevyi - Réserve africaine de Sigean 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Struthio camelus - Réserve africaine de Sigean 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:28, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Struthio camelus - Réserve africaine de Sigean 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aepyceros melampus - Réserve africaine de Sigean 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Damaliscus pygargus - Réserve africaine de Sigean 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Syncerus caffer nanus - Réserve africaine de Sigean 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Étienne d'Ille-sur-Têt 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:50, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ilex aquifolium - roots 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:10, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Site des Orgues 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:10, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Site des Orgues 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:50, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Site des Orgues 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:14, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Site des Orgues 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:06, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Site des Orgues 026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice!--Famberhorst 06:08, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Site des Orgues 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:19, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Site des Orgues 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Site des Orgues 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:30, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Site des Orgues 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Site des Orgues 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:30, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:26, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ochridopyrgula macedonica, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceratotherium simum simum - Réserve africaine de Sigean 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:23, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceratotherium simum simum - Réserve africaine de Sigean 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:48, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceratotherium simum simum - Réserve africaine de Sigean 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:23, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceratotherium simum simum - Réserve africaine de Sigean 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:48, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xerosecta globuloidea 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:00, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Equus hemionus onager - Réserve africaine de Sigean 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:28, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Camelus dromedarius - Réserve africaine de Sigean 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:01, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bos primigenius f. taurus - Réserve africaine de Sigean 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:02, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Equus zebra hartmannae - Réserve africaine de Sigean 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:28, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Babella mariellaeformis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Étang de Bages-Sigean 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dromaius novaehollandiae - Réserve africaine de Sigean 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:49, 27 November 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:49, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kobus leche - Réserve africaine de Sigean 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaine Africaine - Réserve africaine de Sigean 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:02, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xerosecta globuloidea, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leptoptilos crumenifer - Réserve africaine de Sigean 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Background is a bit disturbing. But good enough for me in photo.--Famberhorst 06:31, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phoenicopterus roseus - Réserve africaine de Sigean 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:55, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phoenicopterus roseus - Réserve africaine de Sigean 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:52, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pelecanus rufescens - Étang de Bages-Sigean 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:52, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Struthio camelus - Réserve africaine de Sigean 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:15, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turbonilla dalli, fossil shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardea goliath - Réserve africaine de Sigean 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 06:31, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mycteria ibis - Réserve africaine de Sigean 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:29, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ephippiorhynchus senegalensis - Réserve africaine de Sigean 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:30, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acryllium vulturinum - Réserve africaine de Sigean 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent quality and beautiful. Possible FP, even though captive. -- Ikan Kekek 06:28, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardea goliath - Réserve africaine de Sigean 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:14, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardea goliath - Réserve africaine de Sigean 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:17, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardea goliath - Réserve africaine de Sigean 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:16, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Odostomia turneri, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Featured Videos FV

Hi. I wonder if you can help. I was looking for 'good pictures' in . Many files, including your file File:Psittacula krameri - Maroparque 01.jpg show up as FV. Any thoughts as to what is happening here? Thanks, Charles (talk) 16:37, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phoenicopterus roseus - Réserve africaine de Sigean 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 07:27, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phoenicopterus roseus - Réserve africaine de Sigean 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:28, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phoenicopterus roseus - Réserve africaine de Sigean 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:10, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alycaeus jagori, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:52, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tragelaphus strepsiceros - Réserve africaine de Sigean 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sus scrofa f domesticus - Réserve africaine de Sigean 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phoenicopterus roseus - Réserve africaine de Sigean 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:13, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kobus ellipsiprymnus defassa - Réserve africaine de Sigean 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Damaliscus pygargus - Réserve africaine de Sigean 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aepyceros melampus - Réserve africaine de Sigean 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:52, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Omalogyra atomus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull --Ercé (talk) 08:18, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Struthio camelus - Réserve africaine de Sigean 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:05, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Connochaetes taurinus - Réserve africaine de Sigean 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 17:20, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antidorcas marsupialis - Connochaetes taurinus - Réserve africaine de Sigean 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:08, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Xesta fulvizona balantensis 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Xesta fulvizona balantensis 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tragelaphus angasii - Réserve africaine de Sigean 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:29, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antidorcas marsupialis - Réserve africaine de Sigean 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:27, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Struthio camelus - Réserve africaine de Sigean 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:30, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Polemicella polemica, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:44, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Equus africanus somaliensis - Réserve africaine de Sigean 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:11, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tragelaphus angasii - Réserve africaine de Sigean 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:08, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tragelaphus angasii - Réserve africaine de Sigean 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Famberhorst 06:10, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tragelaphus angasii - Réserve africaine de Sigean 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:38, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trochoidea schembrii, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barge - Centre Ostréicole - Leucate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magallana gigas - Mytilus edulis - Centre Ostréicole - Leucate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beach - Île de la Corrège - Leucate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A little bit dark, but a good composition (and IMO sharp enough). --XRay 06:55, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centre Ostréicole - Leucate 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:38, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centre Ostréicole - Leucate 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:39, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magallana gigas - Centre Ostréicole - Leucate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:39, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Odostomia contracta, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tropidophora perinetensis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:26, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breakwater light - Port Leucate 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:27, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breakwater light - Port Leucate 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:45, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Odostomia mauritiana, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tropidophora perinetensis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good --Ercé (talk) 07:50, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Extatosoma tiaratum - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Extatosoma tiaratum - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dendrobates tinctorius - Karlsruhe Zoo 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too bad the feet and part of the legs are out of focus, but a pretty frog, and otherwise good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:14, 11 December 2019 (UTC)  Info The frog as only 3 cm! --Llez 07:54, 11 December 2019 (UTC)  Comment - Never mind! -- Ikan Kekek 08:41, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bubo scandiacus - Karlsruhe Zoo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:00, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gazella subgutturosa subgutturosa - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:01, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cingulina laticingula, juvenile shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cyclophorus batanicus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:40, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Autumnal tree - Malsch 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:40, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malus domestica - Malsch 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:08, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Babella gloria, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wayside cross - Malsch 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:22, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wayside cross - Malsch 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:22, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Quéribus - 04a.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Quéribus - 04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Quéribus - 04a.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Quéribus - 04.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wayside cross - Malsch 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:59, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wayside cross - Malsch 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:00, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cyclophorus batanicus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Miralda scopulorum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:50, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Household utensils - artwork - Malsch 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:22, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Autumnal trees - Malsch 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:22, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Allium cepa 003.JPG

Dear Llez,

we are currently working on a student textbook with the title “Biologie” scheduled to be published in 2020. In addition an electronic version of this book is planned which will be sold to scientific institutions and libraries. In this book we would like to use the following illustrations

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Allium_cepa_003.JPG https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ginkgo_biloba_007.jpg

We want to kindly ask you for the nonexclusive permission to use this material in this and future editions of our book including the electronic version and for the German speaking countries (Germany/Austria/Switzerland). Thanks in advance for your assistance.

Kindest regards UniDuE Biodiversity (talk) 14:44, 19 December 2019 (UTC)UniDuE Biodiversity

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cochlorina lateralis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:07, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macrolepiota procera - Malsch 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:07, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Quéribus - 04a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:14, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turbonilla obliquata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull --Ercé (talk) 14:23, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Abbaye Saint-Michel de Cuxa - Jesus on the Mount of Olives 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Abbaye Saint-Michel de Cuxa - Jesus on the Mount of Olives 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cyphotilapia frontosa - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:53, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trichoglossus forsteni forsteni - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:54, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cochlorina lateralis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:55, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Symphysodon aequifasciatus - Karlsruhe Zoo 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:54, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dendrobates tinctorius - Karlsruhe Zoo 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:54, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dendrobates tinctorius - Karlsruhe Zoo 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:03, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cyprichromis leptosoma 'Kitumba' - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:08, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Melanotaenia boesemani - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:23, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2020!

		* Happy Holidays 2020, Llez! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:06, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy 2020!

Dear Liez, thank you for your kind wishes.
I also wish you happy holidays and a happy and healthy 2020.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:05, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy 2020!

Dear Liez, thank you for your kind wishes.
I also wish you happy holidays and a happy and healthy 2020.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:29, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Merci !

Thank you for your wishes I wish you happy holidays for you and your family. We are old friends, but since the seabed and the butterflies are inexhaustible we are still here for a long time! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Placostylus porphyrostomus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:03, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dendrobates tinctorius - Karlsruhe Zoo 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:06, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dendrobates tinctorius - Karlsruhe Zoo 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:05, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Re: Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!

My best wishes to you as well, Llez, have a peaceful time among yours and lots of health in 2020! All the best, Poco a poco (talk) 11:40, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vieja melanura - Karlsruhe Zoo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 06:12, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saimiri boliviensis boliviensis - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:42, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trichoglossus forsteni forsteni - Karlsruhe Zoo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

	Merry Christmas Llez/Archives
	Hi Llez/Archives, I wish you and your family a Merry Christmas and a very happy and New Year, Keep on contributing with the same joy and enthusiasm 2020 , --Ermell (talk) 16:31, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Placostylus porphyrostomus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:46, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anas platalea - Karlsruhe Zoo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:15, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anas platalea - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:16, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Symphysodon aequifasciatus - Karlsruhe Zoo 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:52, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tropheus moorii 'Moliro' - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trichoglossus forsteni forsteni.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:47, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rissoella inflata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

75px|center|

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Phoenicopterus roseus - Étang de l'Oeil de Ca, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Phoenicopterus roseus - Étang de l'Oeil de Ca has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angulyagra misamisensis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:46, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lamprotornis superbus - Karlsruhe Zoo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:48, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lamprotornis superbus - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:25, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Obtusella macilenta, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boulengerella maculata - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 December 2019 (UTC)