User talk:Liberaler Humanist/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Liberaler Humanist!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:56, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Image:Angeblicher Brandanschlag WKR-Ball.JPG was uncategorized on 2 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:56, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Einladung für den Jahreskalender 2016

Hallo, ich lade dich hiermit herzlich dazu ein Fotos (von dir) für den gedruckten Jahreskalender 2016 von Wikimedia Österreich zu nominieren, die 2015 hochgeladen und mit {{Supported by Wikimedia Österreich}} gekennzeichnet wurden. Gruß --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 14:11, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quincaillerie Jézéquel, Paimpol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:00, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schneebergbahn, oberhalb Baumgartner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok. --Cccefalon 13:21, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlossanlage Walterskirchen, Hainburg (Frontalansicht, Querformat).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:52, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galgenkreuz Irdning 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:53, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bildstock Bahnhofstraße, Maria Rain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ. --Palauenc05 09:23, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Comment Geocode would be nice, though. --Palauenc05 09:28, 8 January 2016 (UTC) Comment I included a geocode in the EXIF-data, i don't know why the bot hasn't processed it yet, so i added it manually.
* Fine, thanks. --Palauenc05 11:16, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ÖBB 5022 im Bahnhof Maria Rain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Really very nice! --Hubertl 09:49, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Straßenbahn Wendeschleife Trauner Kreuzung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:43, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
@Liberaler Humanist: It would be hepful if you mentioned the city name in the description of your photo: "Trauner Kreuzung" does not really tell me where this is on this world. --Rftblr 07:16, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kremstal Straße samt Plus City und Straßenbahnhaltestelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:43, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
@Liberaler Humanist: It would be hepful if you mentioned the city name in the description of your photo: "Kremstal Straße" does not really tell me where this is on this world. --Rftblr 07:16, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krokus am Freinberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Jahreszeitliches Dokument. --Steschke 14:06, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fenster an Turm VI, Pöstlingerg, März 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:41, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trafik Keplerstraße 58, Graz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:40, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orangerie, Mirabellgarten, Seitenansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 03:07, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue samt Brunnen, Orangerie, Mirabellgarten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 03:07, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vorplatz Salzburg Hauptbahnhof, Mai 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:13, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Imbergstiege 2, Salzburg, Mai 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Probably the murales is a more accurate description of the state of the building :-) --Moroder 06:07, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Überschätze f/16 nicht

gerade bei den Bahnfotos wäre bei 42mm f/8 wahrscheinlich ausreichend. Alles über 14 birgt die Gefahr von Verzerrungen. Schau dir das mal hier an. Die Entfernung zur Lokomotive war ca 12 m, mit f/8 und 42mm hättest du praktisch von 8m bis unendlich alles im Focus. Vorteil von f/8: kürzere Belichtung, wahrscheinlich schärferen Messpunkt. (Spotmessung???, Ich hoffe doch!) die wahrscheinlich optimale Blende für diese Linse ists zw. 6.3 und 8.0. Alles was drunter und drüber ist, sollte man ganz bewusst auch für Effekte einsetzen (Bokeh bei Offenblende). Ansonsten: sehr gute Bilder, die 610er ist ein nettes Ding, wie ich annehme. --Hubertl 14:15, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ÖBB 5144, Bahnhof Semmering, 09.07.2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sehr schön! Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:48, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ghegadenkmal, 09.07.2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Railjet 559, Bahnhof Semmering, 21.0.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Railjet Garnitur 49, Kalte Rinne, 09.07.2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality--Lmbuga 00:49, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue und Wandbild im Hof Kolleg St. Benedikt, Salzburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 17:34, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Imbergstiege, Salzburg, Vor Hausnummer 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:10, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nonnberggasse 9, Salzburg, Nordwest, 07. Mai 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:10, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwarzstraße 1, Salzburg, 7. Mai 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI imo.--ArildV 08:43, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boulevardsbanen north of Vesterport station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:04, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ÖBB 1116-102, Trattenbach, 23.09.2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:17, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ÖBB 4024-076 nahe dem Bahnhof Matrei, Brennerbahn, 01.11.2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 16:29, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ÖBB 5022-036 im Bahnhof Kötschach-Mauthen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. (Du besserst Dich deutlich. ;-)) --Haeferl 23:17, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfarrplatz 10, 10a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 06:14, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Mariä Heimsuchung, Gries am Brenner,.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 12:57, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ÖBB 1144-094 and 1144-256 with a roll on-roll off train near Trattenbach, 23.09.2016, Photo 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 20:14, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EC 163 bei Fieberbrunn, 08.12.2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 13:22, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DB 101-105 passes Pfarrwerfen with EC 217, 13.12.2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 22:43, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RJ 596 near Pfarrwerfen, 13.12.2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:26, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schmirn-Leite 104a, St. Jodok am Brenner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:43, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ÖBB 1116-231 and 4020-313 at Semmering, Photo 2, 27.09.2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:58, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ÖBB 4020-227, Gersthof, 05.10.2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:23, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ÖBB 4020-227, Hernals, 05.10.2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:28, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Railjet 860 approaches Jenbach, 30.12.2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:47, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! S-Bahn between Schwaz and Pill-Vomperbach, 30.12.2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:40, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EC 163 Transalpin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Regionalzug bei Seefeld, Mittenwaldbahn, 19.01.2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --СССР 02:13, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ÖBB 4024-076 near Seefeld in Tirol, Mittenwaldbahn, 20.02.2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:38, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ÖBB X 628-013 in Wolfsbergkogel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:59, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Die Steirische Seite des Semmeringpass unmittelbar vor der Passhöhe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:55, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saltsjöbanan, Unit 2915 in Störangen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:55, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Panhans, Hochstraße, 08.02.2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:34, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ÖBB 5022-027 bei Förolach, 13. März 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:07, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weichenüberwachungssignal, Nötsch, Gailtalbahn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 18:15, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EC 216 samt DB 101 bei Schloss Trautenfels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me. --C messier 19:56, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ÖBB 1144-004 with a freight train on the Kalte Rinne Viaduct, 01.10.2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There at least two dust spots and some blue CAs on the trees, could you fix it, please? --Basotxerri 20:19, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Comment I have corrected the dust spots, but i am not sure about the nature of the blue rims around the trees - the image is corrected for CAs with Lightroom. In the uncorrected file, they lack the red counterparts. I slightly suspect that these things could be some sort of shadow on the underside of conypheres - they don't appear on the few leaf trees. -- Liberaler Humanist 12:31, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Don't worry, it's OK for me. --Basotxerri 17:44, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

WikiDaheim ist eher vorbei

Hallo LH, Beschreibungen und Kategorisierungen / ev. IDs würde ich mir wünschen. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 00:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Die Beschreibungen sind tendenziell nicht aus dem Lightroom-Plugin übernommen worden, bzw. ist der Upload nicht so recht anhand der Vorgabe aus dem Plugin verlaufen. Ich sehe mir das nocheinmal an. -- Liberaler Humanist (talk) 01:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Danke für die Teilnahme bei WikiDaheim 2017 in Österreich!

Hallo Liberaler Humanist!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb zu WikiDaheim! Von Ende Juli bis Anfang Oktober wurden so insgesamt mehr als 7.000 Bilder hochgeladen und viele Ort in Österreich in der Wikipedia und anderen Projekten mit neuen Bildern versehen, was nur dank der vielen Beiträge wie Deinem möglich war.

Die 561 besten Bilder wurden in den letzten Wochen von einer Vorjury ausgesucht, die Du dir hier anschauen kannst - vielleicht sind auch Bilder von Dir dabei! :-) Eine Jury wird nun bis Mitte November die zehn besten Bilder aussuchen, die Preisträger werden danach von uns verständigt.

Nochmals vielen Dank für Deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikimedia-Projekte bebilderst! Im 2. Halbjahr 2018 wird WikiDaheim wahrscheinlich wieder stattfinden - wir würden uns freuen, wenn du dann wieder dabei wärst :-) Solltest Du Fragen haben, so kannst Du Dich gerne an wikidaheimwikimedia.at wenden.

(Braveheart für das Team von WikiDaheim, 11:47, 2. Nov 2017 (UTC))

P.S.: File:IC bei Schloss Trautenfels.jpg ist ausserdem für den internationalen Wettbewerb von WLM 2017 vorgeschlagen worden! Gratuliere und viel Glück in dem Wettbewerb! :-) LG, Braveheart (talk) 18:24, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saugrabenviadukt, Mariazellerbahn, 30. September 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:54, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Evangelische Kirche Annaberg, 30. September 2016.jpg

Hallo Liberaler Humanist! Ich wünsche Dir ein gutes neues Jahr 2018. Eine Frage: Darf ich oben stehende Foto verschieben nach File:Evangelische Kirche Annaberg, 30. September 2017.jpg? --GT1976 (talk) 08:35, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Natürlich. -- Liberaler Humanist (talk) 21:37, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Danke! :-) --GT1976 (talk) 05:18, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alte und neue Angerschlucht-Brücke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 21:26, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rinnsal neben der Angertalstraße, Bad Hofgastein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 21:26, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ÖBB 4024-006, Trattenbach, 23.09.2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 02:55, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Römerstraße 68, Linz samt Efeu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:06, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bahnhaltestelle Buchberg am Kamp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:27, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kaiser Franz Josef I-Jubiläums-Volksschule, Mauerbach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:26, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bahnhaltestelle Pillichsdorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment I'm not sure, but please check WB. IMO the photograph is too warm. --XRay 06:01, 4 March 2018 (UTC) Comment Thanks for the comment, I'll try to find my images from the same place and time to compare. -- Liberaler Humanist 21:21, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Support Thanks. --XRay 17:07, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

hide user cats

Hallo Liberaler Humanist, magst nicht deine user cats als versteckt anlegen, z.B. Category:Images by Liberaler Humanist/Innere Stadt, hier sind sie alle: [1]. Und wenn du bei Denkmälern die id versorgen könntest und als topic in der Vorlage {{WikiDaheim}} Cultural heritage monuments eintragen könntest, erhöht das deine Gewinnchancen (um WLM 2018 international). lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 20:01, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eurocity bei Matrei am Brenner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 18:40, 8 October 2018 (UTC) Comment There is slight vigneting imo. --Moroder 19:40, 8 October 2018 (UTC

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lokgezogener Zug bei Krimml, 25. September 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:58, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Regionalzug bei Altmünster, 16. August 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 18:14, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zug bei Krimml, 25. September 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 07:56, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Intercity bei Spital am Pyhrn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 13:05, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Nabin K. Sapkota 06:52, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alte Scheune bei Spital am Pyhrn, 27. August 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Very nice and good quality. --Tournasol7 23:00, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

WikiDaheim 2018 – Danke!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb zu WikiDaheim 2018! Von Ende Juli bis Anfang Oktober wurden so insgesamt mehr als 14.000 Bilder hochgeladen und viele Orte in Österreich in der Wikipedia und anderen Projekten mit neuen Bildern versehen, was nur dank der vielen Beiträge wie Deinen möglich war. Aus rund 500 von einer Vorjury ausgewählten Bildern hat nun eine Jury die Preisträger-Fotos dieses Jahres gewählt: Commons:WikiDaheim.

Mit herzlichem Gruß, für das Team von WikiDaheim, Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 18:01, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

WikiDaheim 2018 – Gratulation!

Hallo Liberaler Humanist!
nachdem nun auch die Jury des Bundesdenkmalamtes ihre Preisträger für mehrere Themenkategorien gewählt hat haben wir die Freude, Dir für File:Peraustraße 17, Villach.jpg zum 6. Platz in der Kategorie Denkmale zu gratulieren! Deinen Preis, eine kleine Anerkennung, würden wir Dir wenn möglich gerne persönlich überreichen. Du erhältst von mir in Kürze ein E-Mail mit den Details zur Preisvergabe.

Mit herzlichem Gruß, für das Team von WikiDaheim, --Manfred Werner (WMAT) (talk) 11:45, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Sensor Spots D 610.jpg

File:Sensor Spots D 610.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

188.22.239.157 19:27, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Martinskirche, Linz, 06.05.2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:01, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Fotoprojekt Volkskundemuseum-Depot

Wir haben am 5. Juni die einmalige Gelegenheit, 40 ausgewählte, nicht öffentlich zugängliche Objekte im Depot des Volkskundemuseums im Wiener Hafen zu fotografieren, zu denen wir auch Erläuterungen vor Ort sowie Beschreibungstexte bekommen. Es würde mich sehr freuen, wenn du Zeit und Interesse hast als Fotograf mitzumachen. Genauere Infos stehen auf Commons:GLAM/Volkskundemuseum Depot 2019, Rückfragen gerne auch direkt an Manfred.

Außerdem schon jetzt der Hinweis, dass für den 7. September ein größeres (Foto-)Projekt rund um immaterielles Weltkulturerbe im oberösterreichischen Tal der Feitelmacher in Vorbereitung ist, solltest du dir den Termin freihalten wollen (genauere Infos werden wir erst später veröffentlichen).

Liebe Grüße, --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 13:52, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8310 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

September är nästan slut: missa inte Wiki Loves Monuments 2019!

Hej,

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare bidragit med bilder till den svenska deltävlingen av Wiki Loves Monuments, och jag hoppas att du vill vara med i år också. Kategorierna är som vanligt byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, K-märkta fartyg och arbetslivsmuseer, och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september. Om du varit ute i världen och rest kan du även se om resorna sammanfaller med övriga internationella deltävlingar, och i så fall vara med och tävla även där.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 15:32, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erzbergbahn bei Vordernberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:14, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Murtalbahn zwischen Tamsweg und Ramingstein, 30.09.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:14, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Empty Categories?

Why are you creating empty categories in Aalborg? --Hjart (talk) 20:27, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

I am preparing the upload of a collection of images which i organise in Lightroom using LRMediawiki. Each created category corresponds to an image that will be uploaded in bulk at a later point. -- Liberaler Humanist (talk) 20:45, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Note to self: Move future contents of Category:Danmarksgade (Ålborg) to Category: Category:Danmarksgade (Aalborg). -- Liberaler Humanist (talk) 21:32, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Do note though that the name of the city can be correctly spelled both ways. Personally I prefer "Ålborg" because it's faster to write and in my head "processes" faster when read. --Hjart (talk) 04:54, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Nu är det dags för Wiki Loves Monuments 2020!

Hej!

(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare har deltagit i de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Monuments eller Wiki Loves Earth! För någon vecka sedan blev det klart vem som tog hem förstapriset i Wiki Loves Earth 2020 – stort grattis till Brydand100 och hans fotografi av Röttlefallet! Alla vinnare kan du se här – tack alla deltagare för fina bidrag!

Den 1 september inleds 2020 års svenska deltävling av Wiki Loves Monuments, där det skulle vara väldigt roligt om du ville vara med och delta! Målet med Wiki Loves Monuments är att fotografera svenska kulturarvsmonument. De kategorier som ingår är byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, K-märkta fartyg och arbetslivsmuseer – och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Eric Luth (WMSE) (talk) 14:26, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

A description is required.

Hallo, du hast rund 1600 Bilder mit der leeren Beschreibung Description = . Schaffst du das alleine oder brauchst du Unterstützung? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 07:58, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Das hat schon seinen Sinn. Die Bildbeschreibung ist zu den Titeln redundant. Ich sehe z.b. bei den Latest files kaum Bilder, in denen sich die Bildbeschreibung vom Titel unterscheidet. Der Upload-Prozess auf Commons erfordert die Eingabe zu vieler Metadaten, die eine effizienzreduzierende Zeitbelastung erzeugen. Titel, Beschreibung, Structured Data, Kategorien (die man zuerst mühsam suchen muss), Positiondsdaten, ggf. Wikidata-Einträge uvm. Trotz dieses hohen Aufwands ist es kaum möglich Bilder zu suchen. Ich tendiere daher dazu, unnötige Metadaten wegzulassen und würde auch die Kategorien weglassen. Mmn reichen Titel, Positionsdaten und Schlagworte und empfehle zum Vergleich Flickr. -- Liberaler Humanist (talk) 13:58, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A tram in Havnegade, Aarhus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Quality is good, but you need to add the description. --Tournasol7 06:35, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Support Well exposed - very detailed - no disturbing elements --Virtual-Pano 11:30, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rolling road transport at Matrei am Brenner, 14.10.2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:02, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 3033, Ubahntag 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 21:38, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardins du Musee Saint-Michel, 01.08.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 14:18, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Liberaler Humanist,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:20, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dimmelstraße 26, Linz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 05:23, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buildings in Grand Rue, Mont Saint Michel, 13.08.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vorderseite Peraustraße 15, Villach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 22:38, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stefansdom und Alte Residenz, Passau, 07.07.2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 00:32, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IC bei Spital am Pyhrn, 27. August 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Well composed! --Augustgeyler 17:15, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baie du Maneric, Batz-sur-Mer, different crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:43, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veste Niederhaus, Passau, 07.07.2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:13, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche St. Michael samt Inn, Passau, 07.07.2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:07, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dreieinigkeitskirche, St. Georg, Hamburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:13, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wehrturm Innbrückgasse, Passau, 07.07.2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Same here... --Poco a poco 18:45, 20 November 2020 (UTC) Done One sensor spot found and corrected. -- Liberaler Humanist 22:35, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:40, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Figurenbildstock Heiliger Florian, Eferding, 08.07.2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Dust spot over the statue --Poco a poco 18:44, 20 November 2020 (UTC) Done One sensor spot found and corrected. -- Liberaler Humanist 22:35, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:40, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dreifaltigkeitssäule Eferding, Stadtplatz, 08.07.2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Sam dust spot, top middle --Poco a poco 18:44, 20 November 2020 (UTC) Done One sensor spot found and corrected. -- Liberaler Humanist 22:35, 21 November 2020 (UTC}
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:40, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kongens Nytorv 4, København.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 23:27, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christuskirche, Salzburg, 14.07.2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 23:27, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nyhavn 11,13,15 and 17, København.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 23:27, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Comment Please fix your file description; use text instead of a non-working template. -- Ikan Kekek 09:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Empfangsgebäude, Bahnhof Uelzen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 17:37, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Mintmaster house (Møntmestergården), Den gamle By), Aarhus, 26.08.2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:11, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olaus Petri kyrkogårdskapell, Örebro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:12, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klostergatan 1, Örebro, frontal view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Beautiful! There is already some diffraction; IMHO f/14 should not be necessary for a rather flat subject; but overall good. --Aristeas 16:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Svartån River and Karolinska läroverket, Örebro, Perspective 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:46, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deutsches Schauspielhaus, Kirchenallee, Hamburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Yes, and the weak spots as well. --Ermell 23:15, 21 November 2020 (UTC) Done I found the dust spot on the top right corner. Noice was reduced, some of the noise reduction was forfeited for brightening the sky. -- Liberaler Humanist 20:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:58, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Güterzug beim ehemaligen Bahnhof Gesäuse Eingang, 08.09.2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 23:54, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sølvgades Kaserne and its gate, Perspective 1, Copenhagen, 09.08.2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 12:45, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arbetshuset and Kanslibron, Örebro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 12:45, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Floragatan 1, Örebro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 16:47, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Örebro rådhus, Örebro, Perspective 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 16:47, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vävaregården, Wadköping, Örebro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 16:47, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The western entrance to Wadköping, Örebro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 16:47, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burgarhuset and Kungstugan, side view, Wadköping.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 16:47, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The middle section of northern Nyhavn, København.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Very well composed image. But can you improve sharpnes, please? --Augustgeyler 10:52, 26 November 2020 (UTC) I turned sharpness a slight bit up. -- Liberaler Humanist 02:53, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Support It improved. QI for me now. --Augustgeyler 19:19, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Starhemberg, Eferding, 08.07.2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:11, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The cemetry of Vaxholm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 19:47, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Borgarhuset, Wadköping, Örebro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:49, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Behrns Hus, Wadköping, Örebro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 19:46, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skomakaregården, Wadköping, Örebro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 19:46, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boat stoarge near the Universitetsallén bridge, Örebro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:49, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The old station clock at the Stockholm Central Station with details of the facade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:20, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Storgatan and Centralpalatset, Örebro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:22, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stortorget 5, Örebro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:57, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Örebro slott seen from northwest in the evening.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:57, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skolgatan 36 and 38, Örebro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Shame about the car but OK --Podzemnik 01:01, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karolinska Gymnasiet, Örebro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:01, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A lamp at Vävaregården, Wadköping, Örebro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Olaus and Laurentius Petri, Örebro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:43, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Östra Nobelgatan 9, Örebro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:43, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stureskolan, Örebro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:43, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Svarvarhuset, Wadköping, Örebro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:43, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Örebro slott in the evening, Örebro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 19:25, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olaus Petri kyrka, Örebro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Needs more categories. --Ermell 10:20, 26 November 2020 (UTC) Done This one slipped through the categorisation, the category for this church was resubmitted. -- Liberaler Humanist 16:18, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:13, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Örebro rättscentrum seen from Östra Bangatan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:39, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canonballs at a niche in Vaxholm Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, I hope, they aren't in use anymore :) --PantheraLeo1359531 13:18, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nyhavn 35 and 43, København.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:04, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nyhavn 9,11,13,15 and 17 with boats, København.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 21:17, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Nu presenterar vi vinnarna i Wiki Loves Monuments 2020!

Hej,
(For information in English, see here.)
Årets WLM-jury har efter hårt kämpande och stor vånda kommit till ett resultat, och på fredag 11 december, 10.00 (SNT), tar vi första steget i tillkännagivandet när vi i en livestream på youtube presenterar de tio bilder som går vidare till internationella finalen. Du, och alla andra, är välkommen att vara med när bilderna presenteras av Eric Luth och Johanna Berg.
Passa även på att boka in 15 januari då pallplatserna kommer att tillkännages under födelsedagsfirande i samband med Wikipedias 20-årsdag. /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 10:23, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Østerågade 23 and 25, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:57, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bernstorffsgade 7, København.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, the people on the right, are "special" :D --PantheraLeo1359531 20:13, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buildings along Innkai, Passau, 07.07.2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Slightly titled CCW. --C messier 22:48, 27 November 2020 (UTC) I rotated the image slightly but am not sure if this is correct. -- Liberaler Humanist 14:35, 2 December 2020 (UTC) Comment Better. Now please crop the white triangles at the corners. --C messier 09:48, 5 December 2020 (UTC) Done -- Liberaler Humanist 03:30, 6 December 2020 (UTC) Good quality. --Moroder 05:42, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 10 December 2020 (UTC)