User talk:Kurt Salzmann

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Kurt Salzmann!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−


Image deletion warning Image:Wiki-1009-Kurt-Salzmann-Chagall.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Drahreg01 (talk) 22:58, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello Kurt Salzmann!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 10:57, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Hallo Kurt,
das Entfernen einer passenden Kat von Image:Kirchenfenster Blau.jpg ist gleichbedeutend mit Vandalismus und schützt das Foto vor allem auch nicht vor dem Problem aller Chagall-Derivate, die sich momentan auf Commons finden. Ich habe deine "Anregung" in der Löschdiskussion der anderen Kopie (Duplikate sind hier auch nicht erwünscht, sondern werden schnell-gelöscht, nur so am Rande) aufgegriffen und eine generelle Diskussion/Entscheidung über das "Problem Chagall" vorgeschlagen. Es geht bei weitem nicht nur um deine Fotos. Obwohl ich kein Kunst-Copyright-Kenner bin, ist die Sache rechtlich eigentlich klar. Aber vielleicht findet sich ja ein Ausweg. --Túrelio (talk) 11:57, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Hallo Túrelio, "Vandalismus" tolle Sache das - ich werde es in Zukunft lassen mich einzubringen, lösch die Fotos. Aber vergiss all die anderen um Gotteswillen nicht. Es gibt nicht nur Chagall... http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Stained_glass_windows

Meine Idee war es die Fotos, dem Lexikon Wikipedia als Zitat dieses Werkes bereitzustellen. Deshalb die geringe Auflösung und Grösse. Um sich ein Bild von etwas unbekanntem zu machen braucht es ja kein Poster. Und diesen Zweck erfüllen solche Mini Bilder in einem Lexikon - auch online. Ein Schaden hat davon garaniert niemand.... Immer bezogen auf die kleinen Bilder!

Grüsse Kurt Salzmann 13:01, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Nimm das alles nicht so persönlich. Ich und andere Admins löschen hier nichts, weil es uns gerade so Spaß macht (das tut es nämlich durchaus nicht), sondern weil hier massenhaft eindeutige und weniger eindeutige Copyright-Verletzungen hochgeladen werden. Wenn wir uns nicht darum kümmern würden, dann könnte nicht nur Wikimedia-Commons direkt Schaden erleiden (z.B. durch Klagen der Rechteinhaber; die franz. WikiQuote wurde m.W. aus diesem Grund dicht gemacht), sondern auch indirekt, wenn Re-user, die Medien von Commons in gutem Glauben verwendet haben, ihrerseits verklagt werden. (Auch wenn es nichts mit Commons zu tun hat: Vor einer Woche hat ein deutsches Gericht eine deutsche Firma für 6 unlizensiert verwendete Bilder einer Agentur (Getty) zu 10000 Euro Schadensersatz verurteilt.) Das, was du im letzten Absatz geschrieben hast, entspricht so in etwa der Fair-use-Rationale, die in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia (weil die Gesetzeslage in den USA das erlaubt) und einigen wenigen anderen akzeptiert wird. Auf Commons ist diese Argumentation aber kontraproduktiv, weil sie nach fair-use "riecht" und das hier eben nicht zulässig ist. Warte doch einfach mal ab, was die angestossene Diskussion ergibt (bzw. beteilige dich daran). --Túrelio (talk) 13:20, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dem Experten-input auf COM:AN zufolge - und entgegen meiner Hoffnung - scheint das Schweizer FOP nicht auf Innenaufnahmen anwendbar zu sein, weshalb doch mit einer Löschung dieses und aller vergleichbaren Bilder zu rechnen ist. Ich empfehle dir, das Bild auf :en under der fair-use-Klausel neu hochzuladen (sobald es hier gelöscht ist, aber nicht vorher). Dann kann es zumindest auf :en und den wenigen anderen Wikipedien, die das erlauben, verwendet werden. --Túrelio (talk) 07:22, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Do you have a better version of File:Eisenbahn S41.jpg?

[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  français  magyar  Nederlands  polski  português  svenska  suomi  македонски  українська  日本語  עברית  +/−


Thank you for your submission of File:Eisenbahn S41.jpg. While all submissions are useful, do you think you might be able to supply a better quality version of the same, or similar, content? In many cases, the largest and highest resolution possible is the most useful version to have available. (MediaWiki has automatic resizing functionality, so there is no need for multiple versions of the same image at different sizes, users can select any size and the software will generate and cache the needed resolution on the fly.)

If you can supply the same exact image as File:Eisenbahn S41.jpg at a larger resolution (or media at a higher bitrate, etc.), please just upload it over the original, users will get the new higher quality version with no further effort on your part. If on the other hand, the content is only similar, it is best to select a new image name, as there may be uses already where some aspect of the existing media was key to the usage. In the latter case, if you can provide a crosslink reference to the new image in the older one and vice versa, that will be extremely helpful.

Again, thank you very much for your contribution, it is appreciated.

High Contrast (talk) 09:48, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Herbst_Badi_Talegg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

178.82.138.169 21:04, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Hallenbad Embrach.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:06, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kirchenfenster Blau.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

P. S. Burton (talk) 23:25, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]