User talk:Kpalion
Please leave your message on my talkpage in the English Wikipedia.
Zostaw, proszę, swoją wiadomość na mojej stronie dyskusji w angielskiej Wikipedii.
Merci de laisser votre message sur ma page de discussion
dans la Wikipédia anglaise.
Image Tagging Image:Lech_Walesa_with_workers.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Lech_Walesa_with_workers.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH • talk 16:10, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Uchwała_o_kokardzie_narodowej.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Uchwała_o_kokardzie_narodowej.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH • talk 16:13, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Smoking_jacket.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Kan8eDie (talk) 22:15, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! Image File:DorotaRabczewska.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
File source is not properly indicated: File:Prezsam.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Prezsam.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Prezsam.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
shizhao (talk) 13:12, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Prezsam.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Prezsam.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Prezsam.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
--Deerhunter (talk) 13:40, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Orły.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
and File:OrzelekPrzemysla.jpg. JDavid (talk) 09:31, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Orzel_KazimierzaW.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Orzel_KazimierzaW.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Orzel_KazimierzaW.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
JDavid (talk) 19:37, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
TUSC token 17b00c1bb669e655ab58088503836fff
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Herb
[edit]To jest rekonstrukcja herbu Korony Królestwa Polskiego (co jest zresztą zaznaczone) oparta na poświadczonych historycznie pzresłankach. Zobacz pieczęć majestatyczną Jagiełły [1] trzymaczem heraldycznym herbu Korony królestwa Polskiego jest Anioł. Od XIII wieku w zasadzie wszystkie herby z pieczęci są rekonstrukcją bo nawet nie mamy pewności jakie barwy miał Orzeł z pieczęci Przemysła II. [2]
Zresztą tego herbu z Aniołem użył Sławomir Leśniewski w swojej najnowszej książce Wielka Historia Polski [3], pozdrawiam Mathiasrex (talk) 09:08, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Napoleonki
[edit]Cześć. Rok temu ładnie podrasowałeś File:Kremowki dwie.JPG. Czy mógłbyś zrobić to samo z File:Napoleon cake 02.JPG? SpiderMum (talk) 15:52, 28 March 2012 (UTC).
- Ślicznie. Dzięki!. (I sorrki, dopiero teraz zauważyłam prośbę o zostawianie wiadomości na angielskiej Wikipedii.) SpiderMum (talk) 22:05, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
- Done
File:Tatrzański Park Narodowy LOGO.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Lothse1 (talk) 07:38, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
I've nominated your image for a VI status. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 18:46, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Autopatrol given
[edit]Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry (talk) 01:10, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Pasztecik
[edit]Cześć - w jadłospisie było pasztecik, ale zgadzam się z Tobą, że z kulinarnego punktu widzenia przypomina to bardziej krokiet. Pzdr. MOs810 (talk) 20:16, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
Pierogi z cebulką
[edit]Duplikaty plików są wyszukiwane i usuwane... Radziłabym przyciąć plik, żeby odróżniał się od oryginału. Wieralee (talk) 22:36, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Powiadomienie o tłumaczeniu: Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion
[edit]Otrzymujesz tę wiadomość e-mail, ponieważ zarejestrowałeś się jako tłumacz Wikimedia Commons w projekcie polski. Strona Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion jest dostępna tłumaczenia. Można ją przetłumaczyć tutaj:
Priorytet tej strony to średni .
Twoja pomoc jest bardzo mile widziana. Tłumacze tacy jak Ty pomagają projektowi Wikimedia Commons tworzyć wielojęzyczną społeczność.
Możesz zmienić swoje ustawienia powiadomień.
Dziękujemy!
Koordynator tłumaczeń Wikimedia Commons, 15:23, 27 March 2016 (UTC)Powiadomienie o tłumaczeniu: Template:Abbedabb/ESC/i18n
[edit]Otrzymujesz tę wiadomość e-mail, ponieważ zarejestrowałeś się jako tłumacz Wikimedia Commons w projekcie polski. Strona Template:Abbedabb/ESC/i18n jest dostępna tłumaczenia. Można ją przetłumaczyć tutaj:
Twoja pomoc jest bardzo mile widziana. Tłumacze tacy jak Ty pomagają projektowi Wikimedia Commons tworzyć wielojęzyczną społeczność.
Możesz zmienić swoje ustawienia powiadomień.
Dziękujemy!
Koordynator tłumaczeń Wikimedia Commons, 20:23, 11 May 2016 (UTC)Powiadomienie o tłumaczeniu: Commons:Picture of the Year/2015
[edit]Otrzymujesz tę wiadomość e-mail, ponieważ zarejestrowałeś się jako tłumacz Wikimedia Commons w projekcie polski. Strona Commons:Picture of the Year/2015 jest dostępna tłumaczenia. Można ją przetłumaczyć tutaj:
Twoja pomoc jest bardzo mile widziana. Tłumacze tacy jak Ty pomagają projektowi Wikimedia Commons tworzyć wielojęzyczną społeczność.
Możesz zmienić swoje ustawienia powiadomień.
Dziękujemy!
Koordynator tłumaczeń Wikimedia Commons, 05:40, 29 May 2016 (UTC)Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Piwo z Grodziska 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Kingdom of Galicia.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 01:13, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 10:49, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Coat of Arms of the Polish Crown.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Museum of the History of Polish Jews inside 2013 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Museum of the History of Polish Jews inside 2013 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Museum of the History of Polish Jews inside 2013 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Museum of the History of Polish Jews mezuzah 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
File:Konrad Krajewski.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:27, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Szczerbiec Wawel crop.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Also:
MGA73 (talk) 16:25, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:13, 16 October 2024 (UTC)