User talk:Knopik-som/Archive/December 2018 — June 2021

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Knopik-som!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 22:48, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Small Soviet Encyclopedia 02.jpg

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Small Soviet Encyclopedia 02.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:37, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lens - Carl Zeiss jena APO-Germinar W B-150 and filter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:01, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cameras Zenit 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:00, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

High-voltage substations

Hi, please do not add substation categories to images, which do not show any substation. --Te750iv (talk) 20:58, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cervezas de camboya.jpg

File:Cervezas de camboya.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 04:44, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hospital - Ream National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 17:53, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sihanoukville Autonomous Port - Cambodia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 17:03, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cambodian boat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 16:41, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sihanoukville - Japanese ships.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Любитель - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments SupportGood quality --E.3 13:18, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camera lens - Canon EF 70-200mm f4L USM.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:17, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:23, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Энциклопедический словарь.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:36, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Television remote control - black 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 20:04, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Энциклопедический словарь в трех томах.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Nice --Podzemnik 11:09, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moskva-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Preah Sihanouk National Park 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 19:14, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monkey in the jungle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camera Zenit 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:52, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! An engineer's vise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buddhism 13 Naga.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 02:34, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 10:11, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sainte-sophie, a Constantinople.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Oppose Ineligible for QI: not a Commoners original work. --MB-one 23:39, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
-Yes, lithographs from the private collection. My scans. You can see in the downloads - five scans of lithographs. --Dmitry Makeev 22:20, 24 April 2019 (UTC) Support Good scan.--Peulle 16:28, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sant-Marc de venise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Les Plus Belles Eglises DU Monde - Notre-Dame de Paris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coconut palms. Cambodia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Fixed the categorization. Please take better care next time. --MB-one 22:08, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Water buffaloes of Cambodia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:43, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beer factory.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:00, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sihanoukville - Prek Treng beach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 19:55, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cambodia - Sihanoukville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:18, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sihanoukville Province. Steung Hav Coal Power Plant 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sihanoukville - playa de Prek Treng.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Chenspec 11:02, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sihanoukville Province. Ream.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Arabsalam 11:46, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Гелиос-44М.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:59, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cambodia - Ream.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 16:48, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nature cambodia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 18:51, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lens Canon EF 70-200mm f4L USM.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:55, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naga - Buddhism.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:52, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lens Helios 44 M, extension tubes and hood.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:53, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sihanoukville coastline.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:40, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macaca fascicularis. Monkey in the jungle, on a branch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 16:30, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lens - Carl Zeiss jena APO-Germinar W B-150 and optical filter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:50, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cambodia - fishermen village.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 16:31, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sihanoukville nature.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 16:47, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edificios en Sihanoukville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 16:51, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Детская энциклопедия Что такое? Кто такой?.jpg

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Детская энциклопедия Что такое? Кто такой?.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:28, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sihanoukville - Prek Treng beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 09:42, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Смена 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 06:32, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sant-Ouen de Rouen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krong Preah Sihanouk 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 08:09, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lens - Canon EF 70-200mm f4L USM.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:00, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! វត្តលើ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support - Sharpness and quality of the Buddhas is IMO adequate, and the rest is background. -- Ikan Kekek 05:39, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tela Sihanouk Ville Oil and Gas Terminal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Eatcha 10:17, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! កំពង់ផែសមុទ្រ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Almost QI to me, I think the upper half should be denoised a bit and the picture is a bit too dark for what looks like a bright day --Trougnouf 09:22, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done New version loaded --Dmitry Makeev 18:42, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good and bright but it still needs to be denoised --Trougnouf 10:53, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pagoda. Ream National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 18:24, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sihanoukville Province - coconut palms.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 14:04, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roads to Stueng Hav District.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 10:45, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nature of Cambodia. Ream.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:01, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stung Hav Coal Power Plant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It's tilted and oversharpened. Fixable? --Podzemnik 07:36, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Corrections made --Dmitry Makeev 11:26, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Better, thanks --Podzemnik 21:31, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cambodia, Sihanoukville Province. Pagoda, Ream National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:42, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Power lines in Stueng Hav District.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:09, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old pier in Stueng Hav District.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:07, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hawaii beach - Sihanoukville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Seems oversaturated. Visible especially on the wooden roofs and left side of the image --Podzemnik 22:39, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Corrections --Dmitry Makeev 04:59, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Better, thanks. Geo code would be great --Podzemnik 20:22, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Geo code added. Thanks for the corrections --Dmitry Makeev 04:59, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carl Zeiss jena APO-Germinar W B-150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Usually we do want such "studio shots" to have a deeper DoF, but I think it just passes the bar for QI. --Peulle 12:20, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buildings in Sihanoukville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:26, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sihanoukville, sculpture. White Lion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality photo. --Acabashi 13:32, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sihanoukville. gates.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:49, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hospital - Parque Nacional Ream.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:39, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nature - Sihanoukville Province.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:23, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cambodia jungle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Technically OK, but location should be more presice from country level. --C messier 16:08, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
DoneCorrected. Sihanoukville Province. --Dmitry Makeev 09:25, 5 May 2019 (UTC){cmt}It's fine now. --Tobias ToMar Maier 21:30, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Need your presence at Featured sound candidates

		We request the honor of your presence at Featured sound candidates
		Dear Knopik-som, Featured sound candidates needs your help and you can participate by reviewing or nominating sounds for the FS tag. You can start reviewing/nominating sounds now. Welcome! -- Eatcha (Talk-Page ) 08:20, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sihanoukville Province - Lake.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:01, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sihanoukville - outskirts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:32, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monkey on the road.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
fix the ground (IMO overexposed) --Eatcha 06:31, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Corrections --Dmitry Makeev 04:45, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support As the corrections have been made, good quality image. --Acabashi 11:49, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cambodia Sihanoukville Autonomous port.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cambodia - Sihanoukville Autonomous Port.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Billy69150 13:42, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sihanoukville. Fishing boats of Cambodia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:14, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Любитель 166 универсал.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:17, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lens Helios 44 M and hood.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 13:24, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Collected paper on physics 1923 year.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:39, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prey Nob District. Ream school.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The photo seems slightly over-processed. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 06:21, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stueng Hav District - river.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:52, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake. Sihanoukville Province.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition --Moroder 11:59, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hospital - Ream National Park. Ambulance cars.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 15:27, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kmer boat in the Stueng Hav District.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:55, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It's tilted --Podzemnik 05:20, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
look at the pier. he is alright. Water level (ground) exactly --Dmitry Makeev 05:25, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
According to the water level it's leaning to the right --Podzemnik 05:30, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I think 0.5° spin would do it. --Acabashi 12:56, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
tilt changed. See photos https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sihanoukville_Province,_fishing_boat.jpg - there all the boats are crooked. Pier level. Probably a design feature --Dmitry Makeev 13:20, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
We're not talking abou the pier or boats - check the water level in the back, it's like 1 or 1.5 degrees off --Podzemnik 21:48, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
tilt correction --Dmitry Makeev 15:25, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not perfect but much better, thanks! --Podzemnik 20:31, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trucks in Cambodia - oil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 04:26, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sihanoukville - Hawaii beach, beach house.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:02, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sihanoukville Province - fishermen village.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:02, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vacas en la carretera en Sihanoukville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 22:26, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sihanoukville. Boat on the sandy coast.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:25, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sokimex Warehouse 7 km.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:49, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cows on the road in Ream.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice, good composition and QI -- Spurzem 09:05, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Road to Keo Phos 17 km.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:22, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sihanoukville. Pagoda Leu. 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Needs titl/perspective correction and another (tighter) crop. --C messier 17:57, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done tilt correction done. --Dmitry Makeev 10:27, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Stepro 23:37, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! មូលដ្ឋានកងទ័ពជើងទឹក.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 01:56, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sphynx - studio portrait photographs of cats.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:05, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Road signs in Cambodia. Electricity Factory 5 km.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. IMHO the small DOF is good here. --Aristeas 08:54, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cambodia, Sihanoukville Province.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:41, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Water buffalo calf in cambodia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 00:37, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cambodian transport 05 scooter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 00:37, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waste Water Treatment Plant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 00:37, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sihanoukville - city at dawn. In the morning 3-46 a.m.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 00:40, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sihanoukville - city at dawn. In the morning 3-50 a.m.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 00:40, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fotocor N1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:14, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zorki 4 USSR cameras.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:15, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mir USSR cameras.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:16, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crystal KMZ cameras.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:18, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Smena 2 USSR cameras.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:20, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hawaii beach, Sihanoukville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 11:12, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sihanoukville - dirt roads.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:41, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sihanoukville - Prek Treng beach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:41, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cambodia. Nature - Sihanoukville Province.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:18, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge in Sihanoukville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 06:49, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roads in Cambodia. Stueng Hav District.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:12, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sihanoukville Province, Stueng Hav - river.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:12, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of the outskirts of Sihanoukville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:40, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coasts in Sihanoukville 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 09:20, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sphynx kittens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:13, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fotocor N1. USSR camera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:13, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pine branch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Can you improve the title and the description? For example which species, where? --Tournasol7 06:59, 29 May 2019 (UTC) Done[reply]
Added description and map --Dmitry Makeev 08:05, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks! Good quality onw. --Tournasol7 14:15, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! កំពង់ផែស្វយ័តក្រុងព្រះសីហនុ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support ΟΚ. --C messier 12:04, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cambodia. Sihanoukville Province - quarry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:19, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Preah Sihanouk National Park 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Doesn't look as much an "invitation" as a "sign" but otherwise good quality. --Peulle 17:52, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nature of Cambodia. Stueng Hav District.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. EXIF data is missing. --XRay 12:50, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! White Horse Garden 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:58, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sihanoukville Province, Stueng Hav - river 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:58, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coasts in Sihanoukville 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:31, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nature of Cambodia. Palm trees.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:31, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ বাংলা ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello Knopik-som/Archive/December 2018 — June 2021, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Детская энциклопедия 1959 года.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:

use in any work, regardless of content
creation of derivative works
commercial use
free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

File:Тома детской энциклопедии 1974 года.jpg

Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 07:51, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Knopik-som/Archive/December 2018 — June 2021,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:12, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Knopik-som/Archive/December 2018 — June 2021,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Knopik-som/Archive/December 2018 — June 2021,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:01, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! On the outskirts of a village in the Tver region.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:03, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CompactFlash Kingston 1 GB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:21, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Janbery 12:05, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plowing with horses in the Russia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:28, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toropets. Monument of urban planning and architecture.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cameras Kiev 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:51, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lens enlarger Vega-5u.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:35, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lens camera Industar 26 m.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:35, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USSR lens Industar 26 m.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:35, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled rights given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. - FitIndia ^{Talk Mail} 20:06, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kingston Technology DataTravele G4 USB flash drives USB 3.0 32Gb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Done Dmitry Makeev 06:18, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 14:44, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zenit 11, Lens Helios 44 M, hood and eyepiece.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 10:47, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camera Zenit TTL. Olympics - 80.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Stoxastikos 13:34, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camera Zenit avtomat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 09:55, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saratov City Park. img 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Is it just my impression, or the greens have a tiny bit too much blue/yellow in them? Or maybe they are just a bit oversaturated? --Stoxastikos 21:25, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support For me the colors are good. And I think the quality is good. -- Spurzem 23:39, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you are probably right. The color cast may be illusory here due to the difference in color temperatures of light sources (sunlight vs. more diffused light in shadows). The leaves in the darker areas look blueish while these in the brighter ones look yellowish. These two predominant tints are closely intersected with one another, creating a strong color contrast, which prevents one from noticing the fine color gradations common to natural foliage. Thus an illusion of exceeding color monotony is created. One can try to lower the overall saturation of the picture and shift the opposing yellow-blue pair of colors closer together to minimize the difference and mitigate the contrast, "releasing" finer, more subdued tints. But it's an author's call, of course. --Stoxastikos 20:20, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saratov City Park. img 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:30, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zenit 11 and lens Helios 44 M. img 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 22:01, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ATX Computer cases, back view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for me, thanks for the annotations :) --PantheraLeo1359531 12:06, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Industar I 96 U. USSR lens. img 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:17, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elektrostal. Painter A. Toloka. 06.jpg

File:Elektrostal. Painter A. Toloka. 06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:08, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Elektrostal. Painter A. Toloka. 05.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:09, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Elektrostal. Ceramics Toolkit in Art school. img 120.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:13, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Breads of Russia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The description and categorisation should be more precise here. --Ermell 08:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Edited. --Dmitry Makeev 19:36, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 10:40, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toropets. Old house. img 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USSR camera FKD 13x18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 20:23, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:28, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cat Sphynx. img 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:36, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toropets. Building on Gogol 13 street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
There are perspective issues. For example please have a look to the left, the image is leaning in. --XRay 05:34, 6 January 2020 (UTC) Done Fixed --Dmitry Makeev 05:43, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support IMO OK now. --XRay 05:59, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Breads of Moskovskaya Oblast. img 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:31, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chat Sphynx.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:38, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1 adult cat Sphynx. img 047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Disturbing foreground (maybe crop) --MB-one 07:39, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done Made by. --Dmitry Makeev 16:15, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:17, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gato Sphynx.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:07, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Firewood in Russia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muromtsevo - Khrapovitsky Castle - Усадьба Храповицкого в Муромцеве 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 21:00, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muromtsevo - Khrapovitsky Castle. img 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:36, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muromtsevo - Khrapovitsky Castle - Усадьба Храповицкого в Муромцеве 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments --PJDespa 18:11, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muromtsevo - Khrapovitsky Castle. img 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments --PJDespa 18:11, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cambodia. Water buffaloes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 14:21, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suzdal. Church of Saints Peter and Paul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:50, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suzdal. Spaso-Yevfimiyev Monastery, fortification. img 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:41, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suzdal. Pokrovsky convent. Wall with a tower 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:48, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suzdal. Pokrovsky convent. img 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:41, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plowed field outside the village.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
IMO a touch of green. And the categorization should be better. --XRay 06:07, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done Edits made. --Dmitry Makeev 10:51, 10 January 2020
Support Good quality now. Thank you. --XRay 10:52, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suzdal. Pokrovsky convent. img 036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality --Michielverbeek 21:00, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trinity Gate at Rizopolozhensky Convent.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Dust spot on top right --Poco a poco 18:41, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks, fixed --Dmitry Makeev 18:55, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:35, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suzdal. Pokrovsky convent. img 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Is there a chance to offer more crop at the top? --Poco a poco 18:48, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done Made by. --Dmitry Makeev 19:55, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:35, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camera Zenit 11, lens Gelios 44M. View from three sides.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 20:05, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suzdal. Church of the Annunciation and bell tower at the Episcopal Court. img 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 06:36, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suzdal. Church of the Resurrection of Christ. img 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Breads of Moskovskaya Oblast. img 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It would be interesting to know what the bread is called. What do I have to order from the baker if I want such bread? --Ermell 21:23, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done Added description - Long loaf, wheat flour bread. --Dmitry Makeev 22:00, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:37, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Antipia and Lazarevskaya Church - Suzdal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:29, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suzdal. Ascension Church of the Alexandrovsky Monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:29, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kideksha. Saints Boris and Gleb Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:29, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camera FKD 13x18. Camera cassette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. EXIF data would be nice. --XRay 05:06, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suzdal. Church of the Resurrection of Christ. img 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please fix the very large dust spot in the sky. When you do, this will be a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 06:01, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done Fixed. Thanks you. --Dmitry Makeev 21:15, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Thank you. -- Ikan Kekek 23:41, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suzdal. Church of the Resurrection of Christ. img 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:16, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suzdal. Moskvina house.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Dust spot here as well. Fixable. --Ermell 08:28, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done Fixed. Thanks you. --Dmitry Makeev 21:15, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:19, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 25 rubles in 1918, developed by the Provisional Government.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 18:29, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suzdal. Pokrovsky convent. img 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:08, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suzdal - Spaso-Yevfimiyev Monastery, fortification.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:29, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toropetsky District. Kunya River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:41, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paraskeva Pyatnitsa Church - Suzdal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:54, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suzdal. Church of Saints Peter and Paul. img 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 11:53, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muromtsevo - Khrapovitsky Castle. img 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 11:24, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suzdal. Church of the Resurrection of Christ. img 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 23:36, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Russia, nature of Toropetsky District.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:19, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Russia, nature and road of Toropetsky District.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:19, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suzdal. Pokrovsky convent. img 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Slight perspective correction needed. --Tournasol7 07:36, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done Fixed. Thanks you. --Dmitry Makeev 12:15, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good now, thanks. --Tournasol7 08:50, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Babies male 2 months.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Shizhao 01:12, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cat Sphynx. Kittens. img 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:39, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toropetsky District. Peasant horse. img 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:59, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suzdal. Church of the Resurrection of Christ. img 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Chenspec 20:58, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suzdal. Pokrovsky convent. img 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 18:06, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teykovo 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Babies male - 2 months.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2005 year - Abandoned village in the Tver region. Village houses in Russia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
I do not know the name of the village, this house is on a rural road in Toropetsky District. --Dmitry Makeev 15:14, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:15, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Cat Sphynx. Kittens. img 11.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cat Sphynx. Kittens. img 11.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suzdal. Pokrovsky convent. img 035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:58, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Cambodia. Water buffaloes.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cambodia. Water buffaloes.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toropetsky District. Winter sunset in field.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muromtsevo - Khrapovitsky Castle - Усадьба Храповицкого в Муромцеве 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ, but geocode would be fine. --Palauenc05 07:39, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my support. I've decided not to promote it without geocode. --Palauenc05 23:31, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done geocode set. Thanks you. --Dmitry Makeev 01:21, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
OK. --Palauenc05 15:29, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abandoned villages in Russia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Comment Technically this image is ok. But if the main subject should be "abandoned villages", then I think this picture shows too little of it (as the decayed building is hidden behind a thick layer of branches). --Domob 17:19, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done added to the description and categories "Snow". --Dmitry Makeev 03:37, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks, good quality --Domob 05:43, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de la Natividad de Súzdal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 17:23, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Russia - elderly man in a gray sweater.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 18:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image corruption detected in File:Journal. Academic Theater Programs. 1927 year № 12. img 010.jpg

Deutsch | English | +/−

Hello Knopik-som, it appears that the version of File:Journal. Academic Theater Programs. 1927 year № 12. img 010.jpg which you uploaded 2020-03-17T19:33:58Z is broken or corrupt. Please review the image and attempt to correct this issue by uploading a new version of the file. TheSandBot will re-review this image again in 7 days. If it is still corrupt at that time, then the file may be nominated for deletion. This is most likely to happen when a substantial portion of the image is corrupt. Thank you,

TheSandBot (talk) 19:35, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elektrostal. City newspaper "Novosti Nedeli". img 010.jpg

File:Elektrostal. City newspaper "Novosti Nedeli". img 010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:33, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1986 year. 5¼-inch floppy disks.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:45, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RSFSR. Post stamp. img 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:00, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stamp. USSR. Revenue stamps of the Soviet Union. img 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:40, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stamp. USSR. Revenue stamps of the Soviet Union. img 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:24, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zhukovsky Air Force Engineering Academy. 1970 year.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Screens. Halftone process in printing. img 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for me --PantheraLeo1359531 18:50, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cat Sphynx. Kittens. img 22.jpg

File:Cat Sphynx. Kittens. img 22.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

GRDN711 (talk) 15:41, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USSR. Calculator. Elektronika MK-51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:44, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Radio station Communist International. img 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:58, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Digital studio flash.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:41, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USSR. Calculator. Elektronika MK-51. Calculator keyboard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:08, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Вам на заметку

COM:Форум#Энциклопедический контент или спам. Хотите высказаться или нет, но так продолжаться не может. --A.Savin 18:04, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Большая советская энциклопедия второе издание 5 том.jpg

File:Большая советская энциклопедия второе издание 5 том.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:46, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Заброшенные деревни

Добрый день, Дмитрий. Я сгруппировал ваши снимки заброшенных деревень в категорию Category:Abandoned villages in Tver Oblast Скажите, они все сделаны в одной деревне? В какой? Если в разных, то напишите, пожалуйста, в описании снимков. У вас, кстати, была хорошая практика проставлять координаты снимков, как здесь. --Figure19 (talk) 13:14, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Figure19 Добрый день. Деревни разные, названия скорей всего не вспомню, это были умирающие населённые пункты с парой дворов. Район области и управление (сельсовет) могу написать, если это необходимо. Координаты устанавливал вручную, т.к. камера была без GPS. Заметил, что такие снимки автоматически попадают в категорию - координаты есть, но отсутствуют в EXIF. Предположил, что это не нужно или считается ошибкой. Knopik-som (talk) 07:25, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Конечно, это не ошибка, большинство ставит координаты вручную. Просто это местная мания - группировать снимки по какому-нибудь признаку, авось пригодится. --Figure19 (talk) 00:17, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Picea abies. img-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Acer platanoides. img-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Acer platanoides. img-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Acacia. img-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camera FKD 13x18. Cassette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:46, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Picea abies. img-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 13:02, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Betula. img-029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 13:02, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Betula. img-030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 13:02, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Alchemilla vulgaris. img-005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:56, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Alchemilla vulgaris. img-006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:56, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Acacia. img-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It would be useful to know the species, since the photo aims on a certain part of the plant… --Nefronus 07:13, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done Added description --Knopik-som 07:36, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Nefronus 08:09, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image is not public domain. --Tournasol7 16:30, 23 May 2021 (UTC) Support -- ~~Not CC-by-saLmbuga 16:35, 23 May 2021 (UTC)~~ [reply]
This file has a license - CC-BY-SA-4.0. This is a free license and not a public domain. Public domain CC-0. --Knopik-som 19:36, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good--Lmbuga 14:08, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Rosa. img-008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:02, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Picea abies. img-003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:02, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Photo cassette 13X18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:09, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suzdal. Church of the Suzdal. Paraskeva Pyatnitsa Church and Resurrection of Christ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Taraxacum. img-003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:56, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020. Herbarium. Dryopteris dilatata. img-007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:56, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020. Herbarium. Dryopteris dilatata. img-008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:53, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camera Zenit avtomat. 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support The camera is a bit dirt, but I think that the quality is good--Lmbuga 15:46, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Oak. img-031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. ---Lmbuga 15:37, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Oak. img-031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. ---Lmbuga 15:37, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carl Zeiss jena APO-Germinar W B-150. img 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. ---Lmbuga 15:38, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camera FKD 13x18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:46, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Rosa. img-007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. ---Lmbuga 15:28, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Corylus avellana. img-007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. ---Lmbuga 15:26, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Corylus avellana. img-008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. ---Lmbuga 15:26, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Urtica dioica. img-013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Urtica dioica. img-014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Ranunculus acris. img-003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --GRDN711 02:56, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Ranunculus acris. img-004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --GRDN711 02:56, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Taraxacum. img-004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:39, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! USSR. Camera FKD 13x18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Lambda 19:57, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020. Herbarium. Vaccinium myrtillus. img-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:20, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Populus tremula. img-025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:47, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Populus tremula. img-026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:20, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Ranunculus acris. img-009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:49, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Ranunculus acris. img-010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:47, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020. Herbarium. Oxalis. img-011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Nefronus 09:38, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020. Herbarium. Oxalis. img-012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Nefronus 09:38, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lens USSR Moment 24 C, Moskva-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:54, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Studio Flash.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
No Metadata --F. Riedelio 15:14, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done New file uploaded --Knopik-som 16:19, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Color space not calibrated.--F. Riedelio 07:26, 29 May 2021 (UTC) Good quality. --Moroder 03:02, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Fraxinus. img-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:31, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Fraxinus. img-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:31, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camera Zenit 11 on a tripod.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 09:53, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 22:23, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Crataegus. img-005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:41, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Crataegus. img-006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:41, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Asarum europaeum. img-005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:41, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Asarum europaeum. img-006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:41, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020. Herbarium. Vaccinium myrtillus. img-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:31, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 10:11, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020. Herbarium. Fragaria vesca. img-019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 07:11, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 10:11, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020. Herbarium. Fragaria vesca. img-020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 07:11, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 10:12, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Oak. img-032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:36, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Industar I 96 U. USSR lens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:00, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Rosa. img-009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:00, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Rosa. img-010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Tilia cordata. img-013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Tilia cordata. img-014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cameras Kiev 4 and flash Chajka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:32, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Alchemilla vulgaris. img-007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:32, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 13:30, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Alchemilla vulgaris. img-008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:37, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 13:30, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Oak. img-021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:37, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 13:31, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Oak. img-022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:37, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 13:31, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clouds in Russia. img 497.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Artemisia vulgaris. img-003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:31, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Artemisia vulgaris. img-004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Betula. img-007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Betula. img-008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cumulus clouds in Russia. img 093.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:51, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Malus sylvestris. img-035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:51, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Malus sylvestris. img-036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Rubus idaeus. img-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:51, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 year. Herbarium. Rubus idaeus. img-002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Кто это?

Добрый день. Не подскажете, что это за автомобиль? --Figure19 (talk) 06:40, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]