User talk:Kjetil r/arkiv8
Arkiv av brukerdiskusjonen til user:kjetil r mars 2014 – mars 2016
File:Ole G Solskjaer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:51, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- Seems to be a misunderstanding, you probably meant to nominate a different Solskjaer photo for deletion. Regards, Kjetil_r 23:29, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Your are in HELL!
[edit]File:Windows8-BSOD.jpg | Hell of win8 |
MWAHAHAHA! i like dog eye pic! Puppyofchina (talk) 09:12, 26 March 2014 (UTC) |
- It's written HAL not HELL. And HAL stands for Hardware Abstraction Layer. -- Rillke(q?) 10:20, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Re:
[edit]Sorry but don't writting in english, but...Frick usa sólo licencias genéricas, la cual es cc-by-2.0, es por eso que la he reemplazado. Disculpa de nuevo por no escribir en inglés. Saludos ♫♫ Leitoxx ♪♪ 21:32, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Puttgarden-2008 (crop).jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Puttgarden-2008 (crop).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 16:12, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Jarekt, it was just a copy/paste error when re-uploading the cropped version. I fixed it now, but couldn't you just have assumed that the cropped version had the same licenses as the original image, as it clearly is a derivative of a freely licensed work, with little or no creative input from me? Regards, Kjetil_r 23:04, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Geagea (talk) 00:51, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Mahir256 (talk) 04:51, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Hej Kjetil. Jeg har kopieret mange filer fra nn til Commons og jeg ved ikke helt hvor jeg skal gøre af billeder af brugerne. Jeg har fundet Category:Wikipedians in Norway. Den var ikke knyttet til en Wikipedia så jeg lagde den i både nynorsk og bokmål. Er det korrekt at gøre det? Vil du hjælpe med at få styr på det? --MGA73 (talk) 20:03, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
- Hei! Tror ikke Kjetil er så aktiv for tiden, så tar sjansen på å svare i stedet. Virker helt greit slik det ligger nå. Mvh.--Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 15:16, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
File:HMS Queen Mary Jutland.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 22:05, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed (or – transparency – rather was made aware of it by someone on IRC) that you have created a personal template here and added it to the top of file description pages of your uploads. As it's a personal template, please directly use the version in your user namespace and (let me) replace usages of the {{Chuck}} main template namespace shortcut so it can be speedily deleted. Although not explicitly generally forbidden by Commons' policies, I would also ask you to stop adding your template to the top of file description pages, as Commons is not a place to advertise and most users will find descriptions of your files' contents more useful. A more appropriate place for your template would be the permission field of the {{Information}} template. Thanks, FDMS 4 21:44, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hi FDMS 4.
- Feel free to do an automated mass replacement if you have the tools to do so. I'll do my best to keep in mind to use the user namespace link from now on.
- I probably uploaded a lot of files with the template at the top many years ago, but these days, I put the custom template here (i.e. in the Summary field).
- Regards, Kjetil_r 20:03, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for your cooperation, will do a batch replacement task of the template "paths" soon. As for the positioning, your example is exactly what I had in mind as the right location for it. FDMS 4 13:32, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed
[edit]Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Reebot. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Reebot~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
22:43, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
File:Julebrus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
File:016 traffic at Siam Square.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gunnex (talk) 12:12, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, INeverCry 01:12, 13 March 2016 (UTC)