User talk:King of Hearts/Archive/2016/Q3

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Philadelphia from South Street Bridge July 2016 panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:26, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Philadelphia from South Street Bridge July 2016 panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:26, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Philadelphia from South Street Bridge July 2016 panorama 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:26, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Code issues in User:King of Hearts/monobook.css

Hi King of Hearts, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:King of Hearts/monobook.css. Glad to see you coding in css! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 3 new prettyCss issues — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in css writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 6 char number 13 - Evidence: 10px
2. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 7 char number 10 - Evidence: 1px
3. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 8 char number 14 - Evidence: 7px

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 03:01, 5 August 2016 (UTC).

Code issues in MediaWiki:Common.css

Hi King of Hearts, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited MediaWiki:Common.css. Thank you for caring about Wikimedia Commons's css pages.
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 3 new prettyCss issues — the page's status is now having warnings.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in css writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine.

1. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 9 char number 14 - Evidence: 250px
2. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 14 char number 14 - Evidence: 150px
3. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 24 char number 14 - Evidence: 3px
4. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 25 char number 17 - Evidence: 3px
5. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 28 char number 14 - Evidence: 2px
6. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 29 char number 17 - Evidence: 2px
7. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 35 char number 16 - Evidence: 20px
8. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 42 char number 16 - Evidence: 20px
9. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 50 char number 10 - Evidence: 1px
10. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 52 char number 17 - Evidence: 3px
11. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 54 char number 18 - Evidence: 3px
12. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 65 char number 10 - Evidence: 1px
13. WARNING: unknown-property:speak: line 67 char number 2 - Evidence: speak
14. WARNING: autocorrect-swap: line 72 char number 90 - Evidence: left
15. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 73 char number 16 - Evidence: 16px
16. WARNING: unknown-property:speak: line 97 char number 2 - Evidence: speak
17. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 105 char number 10 - Evidence: 1px
18. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 127 char number 10 - Evidence: 1px
19. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 139 char number 10 - Evidence: 1px
20. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 188 char number 18 - Evidence: 8px
21. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 191 char number 18 - Evidence: 8px
22. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 212 char number 16 - Evidence: 10px
23. WARNING: browser-unsupported:ie7: line 213 char number 11 - Evidence: table
24. WARNING: browser-quirk:ie8: line 213 char number 11 - Evidence: table
25. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 216 char number 16 - Evidence: 10px
26. WARNING: browser-unsupported:ie7: line 217 char number 11 - Evidence: table
27. WARNING: browser-quirk:ie8: line 217 char number 11 - Evidence: table
28. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 224 char number 17 - Evidence: 1px
29. WARNING: browser-only:ie: line 259 char number 26 - Evidence: bicubic
30. WARNING: browser-unsupported:ie9: line 259 char number 26 - Evidence: bicubic
31. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 261 char number 13 - Evidence: 600px
32. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 270 char number 10 - Evidence: 1px
33. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 274 char number 10 - Evidence: 1px
34. WARNING: unknown-property:speak: line 292 char number 2 - Evidence: speak
35. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 299 char number 13 - Evidence: 10px
36. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 300 char number 10 - Evidence: 1px
37. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 301 char number 14 - Evidence: 7px
38. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 308 char number 13 - Evidence: 10px
39. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 309 char number 10 - Evidence: 1px
40. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 310 char number 14 - Evidence: 7px
41. WARNING: unknown-property:counter-reset: line 406 char number 5 - Evidence: counter-reset
42. WARNING: unknown-property:counter-increment: line 409 char number 5 - Evidence: counter-increment
43. WARNING: extra-tokens-after-value: line 425 char number 22 - Evidence: none
44. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 434 char number 13 - Evidence: 1px
45. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 440 char number 14 - Evidence: 1px
46. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 486 char number 17 - Evidence: -1px
47. WARNING: unknown-property:word-spacing: line 512 char number 5 - Evidence: word-spacing
48. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 537 char number 10 - Evidence: 1px
49. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 538 char number 10 - Evidence: 2px
50. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 539 char number 11 - Evidence: 2px
51. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 548 char number 10 - Evidence: 2px
52. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 608 char number 10 - Evidence: 1px
53. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 616 char number 10 - Evidence: 1px
54. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 621 char number 10 - Evidence: 1px
55. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 626 char number 10 - Evidence: 1px
56. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 638 char number 14 - Evidence: 2px
57. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 638 char number 20 - Evidence: 2px
58. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 643 char number 14 - Evidence: 2px
59. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 643 char number 24 - Evidence: 2px
60. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 649 char number 12 - Evidence: 1px
61. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 655 char number 13 - Evidence: 1px
62. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 656 char number 18 - Evidence: 10px
63. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 660 char number 17 - Evidence: -1px
64. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 667 char number 14 - Evidence: 2px
65. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 667 char number 20 - Evidence: 2px
66. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 670 char number 14 - Evidence: 2px
67. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 670 char number 24 - Evidence: 2px
68. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 674 char number 18 - Evidence: 10px
69. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 677 char number 18 - Evidence: 10px
70. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 681 char number 18 - Evidence: 10px
71. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 684 char number 18 - Evidence: 10px
72. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 687 char number 18 - Evidence: 10px
73. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 690 char number 18 - Evidence: 10px
74. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 693 char number 18 - Evidence: 10px
75. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 698 char number 13 - Evidence: 4px
76. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 700 char number 13 - Evidence: 3px
77. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 707 char number 13 - Evidence: 4px
78. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 711 char number 13 - Evidence: 3px
79. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 714 char number 13 - Evidence: 3px
80. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 718 char number 13 - Evidence: 3px
81. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 721 char number 13 - Evidence: 3px
82. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 724 char number 13 - Evidence: 3px
83. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 727 char number 13 - Evidence: 3px
84. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 730 char number 13 - Evidence: 3px
85. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 733 char number 13 - Evidence: 3px
86. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 737 char number 13 - Evidence: 3px
87. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 742 char number 13 - Evidence: 3px
88. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 744 char number 13 - Evidence: 1px
89. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 752 char number 17 - Evidence: 4px
90. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 753 char number 20 - Evidence: 4px
91. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 754 char number 13 - Evidence: 4px
92. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 775 char number 13 - Evidence: 4px
93. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 777 char number 13 - Evidence: 1px
94. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 782 char number 13 - Evidence: 1px
95. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 785 char number 13 - Evidence: 2px
96. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 789 char number 13 - Evidence: 2px
97. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 792 char number 13 - Evidence: 1px
98. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 795 char number 13 - Evidence: 1px
99. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 798 char number 13 - Evidence: 1px
100. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 801 char number 13 - Evidence: 2px
101. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 806 char number 13 - Evidence: 4px
102. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 808 char number 13 - Evidence: 1px
103. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 812 char number 13 - Evidence: 2px
104. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 821 char number 13 - Evidence: 2px
105. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 825 char number 13 - Evidence: 2px
106. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 828 char number 13 - Evidence: 2px
107. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 831 char number 13 - Evidence: 2px
108. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 834 char number 13 - Evidence: 2px
109. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 838 char number 13 - Evidence: 1px
110. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 846 char number 13 - Evidence: 1px
111. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 853 char number 13 - Evidence: 1px
112. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 866 char number 13 - Evidence: 1px
113. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 876 char number 13 - Evidence: 1px
114. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 887 char number 13 - Evidence: 4px
115. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 887 char number 19 - Evidence: 4px
116. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 888 char number 12 - Evidence: 238px
117. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 893 char number 13 - Evidence: 4px
118. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 893 char number 21 - Evidence: 4px
119. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 894 char number 12 - Evidence: 238px
120. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 915 char number 11 - Evidence: 250px
121. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 916 char number 20 - Evidence: 2px
122. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 922 char number 12 - Evidence: 238px
123. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 939 char number 30 - Evidence: 1px
124. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 943 char number 30 - Evidence: 1px
125. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 947 char number 30 - Evidence: 1px
126. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 951 char number 30 - Evidence: 1px
127. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 955 char number 30 - Evidence: 1px
128. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 959 char number 30 - Evidence: 1px
129. WARNING: unknown-property:unicode-bidi: line 1040 char number 3 - Evidence: unicode-bidi
130. WARNING: unknown-property:unicode-bidi: line 1041 char number 3 - Evidence: unicode-bidi
131. WARNING: unknown-property:unicode-bidi: line 1042 char number 3 - Evidence: unicode-bidi
132. WARNING: unknown-property:unicode-bidi: line 1043 char number 3 - Evidence: unicode-bidi

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 03:02, 5 August 2016 (UTC).

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Philadelphia from South Street Bridge July 2016 panorama 1.jpg, uploaded by King of Hearts and nominated by King of Hearts at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Philadelphia from South Street Bridge has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Philadelphia from South Street Bridge July 2016 panorama 2.jpg, uploaded by King of Hearts and nominated by King of Hearts at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Philadelphia from South Street Bridge has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Philadelphia from South Street Bridge July 2016 panorama 3.jpg, uploaded by King of Hearts and nominated by King of Hearts at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Philadelphia from South Street Bridge has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:30, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 30th Street Station Philadelphia July 2016 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:56, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Translation notification: Template:Abusefilter-warning-baduploads

Hello King of Hearts,

You are receiving this notification because you signed up as a translator to Spanish and Chinese on Wikimedia Commons. The page Template:Abusefilter-warning-baduploads is available for translation. You can translate it here:

• translate to Spanish
• translate to Chinese

The priority of this page is medium.

Your help is greatly appreciated. Translators like you help Wikimedia Commons to function as a truly multilingual community.

You can change your notification preferences.

Thank you!

Wikimedia Commons translation coordinators‎, 15:00, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Philadelphia from Spring Garden Street Bridge July 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:53, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

30th St. Station pics

Hi. I was looking at these photos with the thought that perhaps one of them might be a good FP candidate. I like the bluer one better. However, I see what look like 2 dust spots in the same location near the upper left corner in both pics. Are they in fact dust spots, or is there another explanation for them?

All the best,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:32, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Looking through all my images shot that evening, I see that those two spots suddenly appeared out of nowhere within a minute, i.e. no picture taken before that time had the spots and all pictures taken after that time had them. I didn't change the lens or even the angle of view, so neither dust spots nor lens flare seems like a great explanation. I have no idea what it is but I'll clean it up before nominating. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:59, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 30th Street Station Philadelphia July 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:33, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 30th Street Station Philadelphia July 2016 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:33, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ida B Wells High School San Francisco January 2013 002.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ida B Wells High School San Francisco January 2013 002.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prospect Park New York October 2015 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:58, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prospect Park New York October 2015 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:57, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prospect Park New York October 2015 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:09, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Central Park New York January 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:40, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Central Park New York January 2016 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:09, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! William Tecumseh Sherman Monument New York January 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:40, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sherry-Netherland New York January 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:09, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Newark Penn Station June 2015 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:56, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prospect Park New York October 2015 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good perspective, beautiful colours, sharp enough for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 05:03, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prospect Park New York October 2015 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:30, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Central Park New York January 2016 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:00, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! William Tecumseh Sherman Monument New York January 2016 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:04, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New York Botanical Garden November 2015 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 03:02, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New York Botanical Garden November 2015 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 03:01, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Central Park New York January 2016 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Central Park New York January 2016 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 04:09, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New York Botanical Garden November 2015 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:30, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New York Botanical Garden November 2015 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 04:07, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoboken Terminal May 2015 panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:30, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza Hotel New York January 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:05, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Central Park New York January 2016 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I`m grateful, that you show us the most charming sides of New York. Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:47, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New York Botanical Garden November 2015 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful. Wish I could walk that charming alley. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:45, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoboken Terminal May 2015 panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I simply like your photographs. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:51, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very convincing and Wow! Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:53, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Stunning. Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:42, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Philadelphia skyline from South Street Bridge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment This picture is beautiful ;it is used only 3 time. This image Philly skyline.jpg is bad it is used 58 ; times this one Philadelphia skyline August 2007.jpg 82 times. What do the labels if Labelled images remain useless? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:40, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

  Those are taken from the Spring Garden Street Bridge, and so are out of scope. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:11, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

  Anyways, I've gone and done a few replacements so it's now used in more places. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:51, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Good start, continue to develop. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Making fortune cookies.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Central Park New York January 2016 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 04:28, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mummelgrummel 04:05, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 04:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 04:34, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Zabriskie Point Death Valley December 2013 002.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zabriskie Point Death Valley December 2013 002.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:08, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:58, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:58, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 04:01, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:23, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New York Botanical Garden November 2015 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 03:55, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:39, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New York Botanical Garden November 2015 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 05:49, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 05:20, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in the United States - Thank You!

Hi there! Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in the United States. We're excited to see people uploading thousands of photos from all over the country! You and others have collectively uploaded 4,929 photos so far, all of which are viewable at Category:Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in the United States (sorted by state).

We encourage you to continue contributing through the rest of the month. Uploading your photos of monuments isn't the only way to contribute, however. If you're interested, we have compiled a list of auxiliary ways to contribute - which include improving Wikipedia's coverage of historic and cultural sites, as well as finding existing free photos that can be shared on the Commons. While these contributions don't count towards the contest, we are still keeping track of them and they are great ways to contribute to the spirit of the project.

If you are interesting in contributing to Wikipedia, WikiProject National Register of Historic Places is also great place to start. The WikiProject showcases the work that has been done so far in covering NRHP sites, and can also help you find articles that need improving.

If you're on Twitter, give us a follow @WLMUnitedStates for updates, news, and more.

If you have any questions between now or the end of the month, feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Thank you! ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 09:28, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 03:50, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 03:50, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 03:50, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 08:10, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 08:10, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 08:10, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Hoboken Terminal

I closed this as confirmed featured and set the FP category as Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#United States. I hope that's correct. INeverCry 22:29, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Sounds fine, thanks. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:33, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

75px|center|

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Hoboken Terminal, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Hoboken Terminal has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New York Botanical Garden November 2015 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 02:55, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 04:28, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 02:47, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manzanar September 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 02:58, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New York Botanical Garden November 2015 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:58, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Victoria Embankment London May 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:58, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:38, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:38, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower of London June 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:58, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 02:58, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Groovy! Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:16, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manzanar September 2016 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:01, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New York Botanical Garden November 2015 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:27, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manzanar September 2016 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:27, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St James's Park London May 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:03, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 05:23, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westminster London June 2016 panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 08:46, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bodie September 2016 019.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bodie September 2016 019.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:31, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 13:19, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 04:59, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manzanar September 2016 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 21:19, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St James's Park London May 2016 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 04:34, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace of Fine Arts San Francisco January 2014 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:34, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:33, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:33, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:29, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manzanar September 2016 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 06:26, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sion College London June 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:32, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:24, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:24, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manzanar September 2016 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:06, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:24, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:21, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 05:50, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manzanar September 2016 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 05:50, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace of Fine Arts San Francisco January 2014 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment See the notes about CAs and dust spot. --Halavar 05:50, 27 September 2016 (UTC) Fixed --King of Hearts 05:55, 27 September 2016 (UTC)  Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 06:45, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:22, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westminster London June 2016 panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and very informative. --Milseburg 14:19, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Asking for Social Media

hello @King of Hearts: are you on Facebook or Twitter i want to send you a friend request so we can talk and teach me more about commons community . Thanks a lot sirMustaphaKamel (talk) 21:07, 30 September 2016 (UTC)