User talk:Kamel15/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Please give images better names
Hallo Kamel15,
danke fürs Hochladen. Aber du solltest deine Bilder mit einer brauchbareren Beschreibung versehen, damit sie auch von anderen genutzt werden können. Alle deine Roscoff-Bilder haben als einzige Bescheibung "Roscoff, Bretagne; Frankreich" obwohl sie völlig unterschiedliche Dinge zeigen. Dasselbe Problem besteht bei deinen Bildern von Plounéour-Ménez, Pleyben und Locmariaquer. Ergänze die Beschreibungen bitte so, dass sie aussagekräftig sind. --Túrelio (talk) 10:19, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
You've uploaded a derivative work | We're sorry, but File:Ile de Batz 2008 PD 01.JPG has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.
|
--Túrelio (talk) 14:50, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
You've uploaded a derivative work | We're sorry, but File:Ile de Batz 2008 PD 16.JPG has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.
|
--Túrelio (talk) 14:50, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
You've uploaded a derivative work | We're sorry, but File:Roscoff 2008 PD 103.JPG has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.
|
--Túrelio (talk) 14:50, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Siehe COM:FOP#France. --Túrelio (talk) 14:51, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Hallo Kamel15,
bei deinen Bildern des Modells von Mont Saint-Michel (wie z.B. File:Mont-Saint-Michel 2008 PD 37.JPG), die du wohl in einem Museum aufgenommen hast, wäre es wichtig zu wissen, wer der Künstler ist und wann er gestorben ist. --Túrelio (talk) 18:51, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
- Bildern des Modells von Mont Saint-Michel - ich weiß nicht, wer der Künstler ist. --Kamel15 (talk) 19:05, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Sinnvolle Namen für die Bilder - ganz so sinnlos finde ich die Namen für meine Fotos gar nicht, denn er gibt zumindest an, wo es ungefähr gemacht ist. Da ich die Fotos (alle selbst gemacht) zu Hunderten und Tausenden hochlade (mit Commonist) ist der Zeitaufwand anders für mich nicht zu schaffen. Oft weiß ich auch gar nicht genau, was das Bild zeigt. Ein Kenner mit Ortskenntnissen kann dann die Fotos immer noch mit genauerer Inhaltangabe versehen oder in Unterkategorien einordnen. Sorry, aber mehr ist (momentan) nicht drin. --Kamel15 (talk) 19:05, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Unkenntlichmachung
Wenn du solche (oder andere Bilder, die du nicht selber erstellt hast) hochlädst, achte bitte darauf, die Dateibeschreibung nich so aussehen zu lassen, als hättest du sie selbst erstellt und ihnen unten sogar eine andere Lizenz gibst. Dann müssen andere nicht immer hinterher arbeiten. Grüße, --~/w /Talk 12:23, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, ich werde mich bessern. --Kamel15 (talk) 18:31, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Tours
Your images of Tours are in the wrong category: Category:Tours instead of Category:Tours (France). - Erik Baas (talk) 23:46, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, I will correct it. --Kamel15 (talk) 13:42, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
- Done/Erledigt --Kamel15 (talk) 14:35, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
You've uploaded a derivative work | We're sorry, but Image:Château d'Angers 2008 PD 15.JPG has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.
|
-mattbuck (Talk) 17:13, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
eine Frage
Hallo Kamel 15,
hätte eine Frage an dich: ich würde gerne dieses Bild: [1] für eine Vereinszeitschrift (kinderschutz.at [2]/,Verein für gewaltlose Erziehung) verwenden, verstehe aber diese Angaben zu "GNU General Public License..." nicht ?! bzw. kann nicht die 1,5Seiten Lizenzvertrag dazu geben (siehe:[3])
wie kann ich dich als Quelle korrekt zitieren?
Danke für deine Hilfe! LG blogbuster
- Gerne, ihr könnt das Bild gerne verwenden. Das mit der Lizenz ist mir als Bildautor schnuppe. Also laßt den sinnlos langen Lizenztext einfach weg. Gruß --Kamel15 (talk) 21:14, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
File:Pointe de l'Arcouest 2008 PD 06.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--- Zil (d) 11:47, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Image:Nantes 2008 PD 53.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Eusebius (talk) 19:20, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
File:Nantes_2008_PD_04.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eusebius (talk) 15:05, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Please give images good descriptions
Please give some thought to writing a good description of uploaded images. This ensures that they can be used. It also helps those that review and improve categories do a better job, which also ensures that images will get used in novel and interesting ways. Thanks, and happy editing!
Pymouss Tchatcher - 16:31, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
File:Tours_2008_PD_04.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eusebius (talk) 17:54, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Notice of deletion of pictures
Greetings. I deleted three of your pictures:
- Abbaye de Saint-Wandrille de Fontenelle 2008 PD 03.JPG
- Abbaye de Saint-Wandrille de Fontenelle 2008 PD 04.JPG
- Abbaye de Saint-Wandrille de Fontenelle 2008 PD 05.JPG
because they were derivative work of copyrighted signs. There is no freedom of panorama in France. guillom 09:41, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
File:Vierville-sur-Mer d-day museum 2008 PD 27.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Duch.seb (talk) 09:49, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
File:Vierville-sur-Mer d-day museum 2008 PD 01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Duch.seb (talk) 11:57, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
File:Vierville-sur-Mer d-day museum 2008 PD 24.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Duch.seb (talk) 15:06, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
File:Locmariaquer_2008_PD_07.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:31, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Roscoff_2008_PD_42.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Pieter Kuiper (talk) 01:37, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
License migration
Because Wikimedia is currently migrating from the GFDL to cc-by-sa-3.0. feel free to change the licenses of my uploaded pictures. I agree with cc-by-sa-3.0 or whatever license you like. --Kamel15 (talk) 21:16, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
- Done Thank you. I added {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} to your images. --MGA73 (talk) 23:52, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
File:Nantes_2008_PD_56.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eusebius (talk) 20:53, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
File:Saint_Malo_2008_PD_10.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eusebius (talk) 19:58, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
Kid
Hey men, how old is the boy in this photo?
?
PLEASE, ANSWER! Luispihormiguero (talk) 12:33, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
- 5 year old boy --91.96.61.18 18:03, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
File:Angers 2008 PD 06.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Peter17 (talk) 19:07, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
File:Carnac 2008 PD 31.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Túrelio (talk) 22:44, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
File:Normandy American Cemetery and Memorial 2008 1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
---Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 01:31, 21 August 2010 (UTC)