User talk:Kadellar/2012

2012

Re:Uploading

Feliz año. No sé que decirte. Normalmente aprovecho que tengo que hacer algún otro trabajo para subir imágenes. A veces incorporo los datos de las imágenes el día siguiente (con upload wizard). Mi conexión es de 6 megas, por lo que tengo menos de un mega de subida. No noto diferencia grande con Flickr seguramente porque las imágenes que subo a Flickr no pesan nunca más de 10 megas y las de Commons pueden llegar a pesar 21.

Hubo un tiempo en que tenía serios problemas, hasta se me colgaba la subida. Tengo conexión mediante R (creo que solamente la hay en Galicia y que es algo así como ONO). Después de cambiar la contraseña y el tipo de contraseña, pues un vecino estaba pirateando la conexión inalámbrica, me pusieron un pequeño aparato al final del cable para no tener tanta intensidad de señal (o algo así), desde ese momento no siento nada extraño y no se me cuelga.

Cuando suba la próxima imagen, miraré lo que pesa y contaré el tiempo que tarda, así tendrás una referencia; pero ojo, yo tengo -creo- solamente 600 y pico kbs de subida y me conecto inalámbricamente. Un abrazo--Miguel Bugallo 01:55, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Subir una imagen de 14,1 MB me ha llevado tres minutos y quince segundos--Miguel Bugallo 12:59, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biblioteca de Celso - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 07:21, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charing Cross railway station - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 07:23, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pergamon - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! İzmir Saat Kulesi - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:06, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vara de Asclepio - Éfeso.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Are you sure of the identification ? looks like a tripod, not like a rod...--Jebulon 18:23, 1 January 2012 (UTC) The rod is in the middle, the other parts are support for the table or the pile or font up, I think. --Kadellar 14:40, 2 January 2012 (UTC)Really I'm afraid it is not a "rod of Asclepius". Anyway, a good picture, nice and sharp. QI

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St George the Martyr, Borough, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment is advisable to add "exterior" in scope, in order to eventually promote a view of the inside --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:11, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
  •  Comment I agree with that. Thanks for the review. --Kadellar (talk) 12:22, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:11, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Afrodisias - Aphrodisias - Odeón.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:57, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta de Domiciano - Hiérapolis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--ArildV 17:36, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! İsa Bey Camii.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great composition. -- Felix Koenig 19:24, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! İzmir Saat Kulesi - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Pudelek 15:45, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

File:C-petra-5597.jpg

Blue and yellow CA? It's a usual problem with shift lens, it gives horrible CA. I will fix the spire next week and inform you. Thanks for the idea.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:23, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

 Info In two languages, for you know Russian and will like the comparison

English: I have uploaded the image with fixed CA on the spire. Thanks once more for the good suggestion. The blue and yellow shades at the sides of the spire were desaturated and some places on the cross I retouched.

Русский: Я загрузил изображение с исправленной Х/А на шпиле. Спасибо еще раз за хорошее предложение. Синие и жёлтые тени по сторонам шпиля потеряли цвет и в некоторых местах на кресте я ретушировал.

--PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:12, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Concerning the hardships of language, one Russian scientist said: «It's a shame not to speak English, even the most stupid Englishman speaks it fluently». Your phrases are correct, but sometimes you mess Latin and Cyrillic letters. Say, Latin p (pi) differs from Cyrillic р (ar), or Latin B (bi) differs from Cyrillic В (ve). The Greek alphabet had alpha, beta, gamma. In Cyrillics there's an addition between beta and gamma: a, be, ve, ge. Finally, here's a funny fact for you. Near my town Pereslavl there is a small chapel, there was a wooden cross centuries ago, so its name is Chapel Cross now. In Russian it is Часовня Крест. There's a road sign near the place, it is some kind of bilingual. The 1st line says, «Часовня Крест», and it is for Russian-speakers. The 2nd line says, «Chasovnya Krest», and it is for those knowing the words but missing the alphabet. The previous sign said «Часовня Крест | Chapel Krest», but it was changed for some reason. I think that's because the old sign looked too obvious...--PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:57, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Éfeso - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:58, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Obelisk Tomb, Petra, Jordan3.jpg

Hola Kadellar, ya hacía unos días que no hablábamos. Al ver que nadie se animaba a juzgar la imagen decidí inspecionarla de nuevo con un ojo crítico y me pareció que algunas áreas estaban sobreexpuestas, por lo que apliqué un filtro para disminuir el contraste, eliminando así la sobreexposición. Al terminar vi que la habías dado por buena, ¿podrías echar un ojo a la versión actual y decirme si está mejor así o si, por lo contrario, me la acabo de cargar (creo que no)?. Tampoco he entendido el comentario que dejaste al revisarla, ¿la ves torcida?. También he subido una nueva versión de la imagen contigua de La Catedral de Petra, ¿qué te parece esa imagen? te mando un saludo, Poco a poco (talk) 21:31, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Acabo de subir una nueva versión de la tumba del Obelisco, yo esa foto no la veo torcida, fíjate en la línea principal sobre la puerta, está recta ¿o me quieres decir que la torcida es la otra, la del Monasterio?. El caso es que tampoco esa la veo torcida, dado que la foto fue desde un ángulo, no sé que hacer. En cualquier caso acabo de subir una nueva versión siguiendo tus consejos para el contraste, ¿qué te parecen las dos fotos? saludos y buenas noches! Poco a poco (talk) 22:12, 23 January 2012 (UTC) PD: Acabo de subir otra del Monasterio, la versión anterior no me convencía. Ahora sí, hasta mañana!

Puede que sí tengas razón, finalmente la he girado un poquito (0,4 grados), ¿te parece aceptable? Poco a poco (talk) 20:06, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Nerón y Agripina.jpg on QIC

Hi, sorry about my comment on the QIC, I hope it's not too harsh. What I mean is generally for statues and portraits I rather see pictures taken with long focale length (> 70mm in fullframe). The wide angle has generally a spherical distortion that is not aesthetics on people. Note that it's used a lot for landscape, city pictures, it also can be used for portaits but it really needs to use the distortion in the composition IMO. It's only my opinion, I might be wrong don't hesitate to answer and share your opinion. --PierreSelim (talk) 23:25, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Looks like it will be a QI. So keep on the good work. :-D PierreSelim (talk) 22:39, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Topkapı - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could do with some more contrast maybe? Dark areas aren't very dark, also could do with more blue contrast. Mattbuck 00:58, 18 January 2012 (UTC) I've just uploaded a new version. Thanks for the review. --Kadellar 19:26, 20 January 2012 (UTC) Better. Mattbuck 14:41, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tetrapilón - Afrodisias - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 06:17, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galata Kulesi - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Authentic colors. --Ralf Roletschek 20:43, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Los portadores de la antorcha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Difficult shot but good. Unavoidable noise.--Jebulon 17:45, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estadio - Afrodisias - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:33, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bazilika Matere Usmiljenja - Maribor - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 19:41, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nerón y Agripina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Why such a wide angle ? --PierreSelim 23:28, 20 January 2012 (UTC) 6,1? Note that it isn't DSLR! --Kadellar 14:52, 21 January 2012 (UTC) I know with crop factor it's supposed to be 28mm which is a wide angle. PierreSelim 17:43, 21 January 2012 (UTC) OK, just in case you didn't notice. Why not a wide angle? I mean, it's not problematic here. --Kadellar 20:24, 23 January 2012 (UTC) Seems OK to me. Mattbuck 14:27, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Re; Imagen nueva, archivo viejo

Hola, por aquí todo bien, muy liado ¿y tu? ¿cómo va eso?. No he entendido nada de tu mensaje, pero si lo has solucionado, pues perfecto ;) hasta pronto, Poco a poco (talk) 20:35, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Kloster-chorin-suedseite-baufortschritt.jpg

Hola,

¿My castellano es muy mal, podría lo has entiende mi traduccion, mas o menos? --Ralf Roleček 15:58, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

About the value

The photo shows 2 museum workers who organize the youth festival named «Crossing» in the town of Pereslavl. This festival started in 2007 and unites the young people from several towns of Yaroslavl region of Russia. In this very photo we see not only 2 people, but also a picturesque moment of the process, when they take the decorative bread (a traditional symbol of many countries) and invite the audience to share it. I think the image has some historical value. IMHO, we rarely mind the value of current events, yet they will be interesting in time.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:54, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

RetouchedImage

Hola Kadellar.

Antes de que la foto File:Enrique Bunbury - 17.jpg fuese promovida, la retoqué dos veces intentando mejorarla. No me gustó el resultado ninguna de las dos veces, pero al final me he decidido a subir la segunda de las variaciones (File:Enrique Bunbury - 17 Retouched.jpg), sobre todo por haber pasado el trabajo de retocarla.

He hecho mención en la página de propuestas de QI, pero no me atrevo a poner tu versión en discusión porque no tengo claro que lo que he hecho sea mejor que lo que tú has hecho: Tu versión es más natural... probablemente mejor.

Por otro lado, expresarte lo gratificante que resulta poder hablar con otro usuario en una lengua en la cual puedes expresarte y matizar las palabras: Encantado de que estés ahí, y gracias por tus fotos--Miguel Bugallo 14:19, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre de Cristal (Madrid) - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Now QI for me --Moroder 17:05, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Enrique Bunbury - 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like it.--ArildV 13:31, 16 February 2012 (UTC) Other version of the image here--Lmbuga 14:01, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre de Cristal (Madrid) - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 14:40, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Eurostars Madrid Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 01:40, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre de Cristal (Madrid) - 03b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments phantastic colors. --Ralf Roletschek 20:48, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 06:07, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teatro de Aspendos - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition but I'm not convinced by the quality. Lack of sharpness and few details in the background.--ArildV 13:28, 16 February 2012 (UTC) Could do with sharpening, but it's ok. Mattbuck 19:44, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris - 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - is this HDR? --Ralf Roletschek 18:45, 24 February 2012 (UTC) No, it isn't. Note that if it was HDR we could probably see the walls much better. --Kadellar 13:40, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris - 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 23:46, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris - 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs a perspective correction IMO.--Jebulon 13:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC) It's a bit skewed but I like it, no correction needed. Mattbuck 23:46, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! John Petrucci - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --1Veertje 00:12, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! John Petrucci - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 19:59, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris - 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Crop seems a bit tight on the bottom. Mattbuck 01:16, 28 February 2012 (UTC) Yes, I know, it's due to the perspective correction. --Kadellar 16:28, 28 February 2012 (UTC)  Support very good. Crop at bottom a little bit tight, but I don't want to see more tourists --Carschten 19:54, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Debod - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 05:22, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour Eiffel - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont des Invalides - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 06:42, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Los portadores de la antorcha - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Difficult but successful night shot, IMO.--Jebulon 00:52, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Real de Madrid - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 18:14, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Estación del Norte (Madrid).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment It is said that „Estación del Norte“ is the former name and now it is named „Príncipe Pío train station”? Also we usually add „(exterior)” at the end of the scope.--MrPanyGoff 20:05, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

• Formerly this was the station's main entrance. Actually we have this facade closed (and quite abandoned) and only part of the old station is in service (named Príncipe Pío and only for metro and short-distance trains, not long-distance as it was before). The rest of the building, which facade was restored, is a shopping centre, also named Príncipe Pío. I don't think we should add "exterior" to the scope, because interior would now be "Príncipe Pío" and not Estación del Norte. --Kadellar (talk) 21:58, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

• And now this part of the building is something like a monument?--MrPanyGoff 16:22, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

• No, it isn't. It is just the old facade. The only valid pictures for the category are pictures of this old facade and older pictures from the time when it really was Estación del Norte (North Station). I nominated it because I think it is the best one showing how the building looks like. --Kadellar (talk) 17:36, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

• I just wonder how to treat it as a matter of categorisation in this project, otherwise, for me it is a good valuable document of a notable building.--MrPanyGoff 17:50, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

• Maybe we can split the existing category in two: Recent pictures of the old building and then Historical pictures of the station. We'd get this picture in the first one. Would it be easier then for the project's categorisation system? What do you think? --Kadellar (talk) 18:03, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

•  Support Well, finally I find it as best in its category which is a certain scope of a notable building. The new transformation of the structure is to be in a separated scope.--MrPanyGoff 12:00, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:12, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charing Cross railway station - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 09:33, 21 March 2012 (UTC) Are people who aren't me allowed to nominate UK railway photos? Mattbuck 04:49, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Blue sky

Hi Kadellar

According to your request, Emperor Francis II (I) has now a nice blue sky behind him. Would you please have a look ?

Thanks in advance.--Jebulon (talk) 23:24, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de Justice de Paris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 07:54, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Manuel y San Benito - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI if we leave aside a little CA in the tree. --Moonik 06:09, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Aberraciones cromáticas

Hola Kadellar, ¿qué tal va todo?. He visto que has comentado que en dos de mis últimas candidatas a QI hay problemas de CA, problemas que no termino de localizar, ¿dónde están los famosos halos? te mando un saludo, --Poco a poco (talk) 19:39, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Hola, gracias por las inidicaciones, efectivamente he podido detectar algunos problemas de CA. He subido nuevas versiones con la esperanza de solventar el tema. Si sigues viendo problemas, te agradecería sobremanera que incluyas una nota, porque sino casi que me dejo los ojos :) un saludo! --Poco a poco (talk) 20:53, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sainte-Chapelle du Palais.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 06:11, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cimetière du Père-Lachaise - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:39, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilique du Sacré-Cœur de Montmartre - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 16:31, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont des Invalides et Tour Eiffel - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:59, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Category:Panning of skaters

Hello,

I've made the change you reverted, because the Category:Skaters is a disambig category, where no subcats should exist. I suggest to remove Category:Skaters and add Category:Skating instead.--Funfood ␌ 14:52, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Austrian armour

¡Holà Kadellar!

Thanks for reviewing "my" austrian armours. You were right regarding the flaws you saw on the "white-backgrounded" one.

Therefore, I've withdrawn my nomination, completely reworked the original file, re-uploaded a new version of the same subject, and re-nominated it. It is far from perfection, but I think it is better. Dou you think you could be kind enough to have another look on it ? I'm very interested by your opinion. Thanks in advance.

Cheers,--Jebulon (talk) 09:22, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks !--Jebulon (talk) 10:07, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

¡Holà Kadellar!

Me again, and with an austrian armour again...(not the last, I'm afraid...)

According to your suggestion, I've withdrawn my nomination, completely reworked the original file, provided another background (something between "vanilla" and "ivory" ;), good idea !), and re-uploaded the picture, then renominated.

Again, it is far from perfection, but I think it is better. Dou you think you could be kind enough to have another look on it ? And again, I'm very interested by your opinion, very useful to me in many occasions. :Thanks in advance, and sorry for the conflict you were a witness of.

Hope you will enjoy the new version,

Cheers from Paris,--Jebulon (talk) 22:49, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Tilted

Por favor, respeto. Si pregunto donde está torcida una imagen mía, se me puede responder o no responder, pero no se puede actuar contra mi voluntad. Gracias--Miguel Bugallo 23:43, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris - 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 19:37, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Alexandre III - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 19:37, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris - 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI quality. --S nova 18:17, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panthéon de Paris - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, crop and colors. --Selbymay 19:59, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont des Invalides et Tour Eiffel - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good quality, but the pole at the bottom is disturbing. A slight crop would be much better (see note). Yann 07:08, 3 April 2012 (UTC) Thanks for the review. Yes, you were right. At first I wanted to keep a bigger part of the river. Better now? --Kadellar 16:09, 3 April 2012 (UTC) OK now. --Yann 12:26, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westminster Abbey - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 12:40, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Los portadores de la antorcha.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Los portadores de la antorcha.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guard of Buckingham Palace - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 01:36, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuente de las Conchas - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me.  Comment sp Me costaría mucho decirlo en inglés: La imagen me parece buena, pero un poco amarillenta de más. Es una opinión personal. Por otro lado, el lado derecho es demasiado grande, yo lo habría recortado un poco para que el centro de la estatua respetase más la regla de los tercios. Es una opinión: La imagen es buena--Lmbuga 22:38, 10 April 2012 (UTC) También creo que puede ser truncada por la derecha. Sin embargo, QI. --Ralf Roletschek 19:50, 13 April 2012 (UTC) Thanks to both of you. Lmbuga, I think you mean I should check the white balance. I already did, but I felt this was the right version (es posible que sea un poco amarillenta, pero las otras versiones no me convencían). Ralf, danke schön. "Truncada" ist richtig aber eigentlich würden wir "cortada" sagen (cortar bedeutet schneiden). Der Unterschied ist aber ganz klein. --Kadellar 11:43, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London Eye - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting view, and sufficient DoF. Good for QI imo, - A.Savin 12:58, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Victoria Memorial and Buckingham Palace - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buckingham Palace - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments overexposed, contrast missing --Carschten 15:24, 14 April 2012 (UTC) New version uploaded. Please have a look, thanks! --Kadellar 15:50, 14 April 2012 (UTC) could be even some more contrast, but now a QI for me --Carschten 19:46, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guard of Buckingham Palace - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition, lacks some sharpness and is a bit noisy. But QI for me. --Smial 23:38, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento a Miguel de Cervantes - La Gitanilla.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This picture respects the scene. I would have cut better the left part.--Telemaque MySon 12:16, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Big Ben - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 00:18, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Real Casa de Correos - 2 de mayo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good shot, but maybe you could get rid of the metal plate with a tighter crop in the bottom, imo--Moroder 07:26, 28 April 2012 (UTC)  Done Yes, you are right. Thanks for reviewing. --Kadellar 14:56, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta del Sol - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:50, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento a los aviadores del Plus Ultra - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:49, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta de San Vicente - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:17, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Wikimedia Foundation Blog Feature

Hi Kadellar,

My name is Jordan and I'm a communications intern with the Wikimedia Foundation in San Francisco. We're starting a new feature on the Foundation blog [1] to profile the photographers behind the beautiful photos that become Picture of the Day (POTD) on the Commons home page. You can see some of our past POTD posts here: http://blog.wikimedia.org/c/communications/picture-of-the-day/

Given that your photo is scheduled for 20May 2012, we'd love to do a short interview with you either by phone, Skype, or email to discuss your work and your POTD. Please let me know if you think you'd be interested!

Thanks,

Jordan Hu Communications Intern Wikimedia Foundation

communicationsintern2@wikimedia.org

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro de la Moncloa - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some noise, otherwise good and nice view.--ArildV 16:33, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta del Sol - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Is it really my fault? --Coyau 09:23, 30 April 2012 (UTC) Haha could be. I already had similar older pictures (not here), but possibly this one is your fault a little bit. Thanks for the review. --Kadellar 10:55, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estadio Santiago Bernabéu - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, this i say as a member of Barça --Ralf Roletschek 12:00, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arco de la victoria - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good work IMO. --Florstein 19:38, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arco de la victoria - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok.--ArildV 07:47, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raquel Bollo - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:10, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! María Teresa Campos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quite noisy, but overall ok. --kallerna 14:33, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estatua de la Mariblanca - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 15:49, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arco de la victoria - 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, but could you maybe denoise the sky ?--Jebulon 16:41, 1 May 2012 (UTC) I'll try, thanks for the review. --Kadellar 17:09, 1 May 2012 (UTC)  Done File updated. --Kadellar 19:01, 3 May 2012 (UTC) Nice --Moroder 12:37, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isabel Pantoja - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 08:55, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isabel Pantoja - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice shot, deserves QI, too bad for the noise --Moroder 21:09, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estatua ecuestre de Carlos III - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. He is watching the clock, right? --Coyau 15:36, 5 May 2012 (UTC) I think so. Thanks for the review. --Kadellar 12:30, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Real Casa de Correos - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:05, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Mezquita Sheikh Zayed-Abu Dhabi3455.JPG

Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 15:34, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento a los aviadores del Plus Ultra - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:20, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento a los aviadores del Plus Ultra - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--ArildV 18:57, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento a los aviadores del Plus Ultra - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--ArildV 18:57, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 4 BIC pens and lids.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- JLPC 21:57, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 4 BIC pen caps.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --JLPC 08:23, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blue and red BIC Cristal pen caps.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit unsharp maybe, but ok. --Mattbuck 13:12, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel de Ville de Paris - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, but need rotation. — Jagro 11:13, 9 June 2012 (UTC) Now? Tiny rotation. --Kadellar 21:38, 9 June 2012 (UTC) Now QI for me --Jagro 15:01, 10 June 2012 (UTC) Thanks for the review. --Kadellar 19:25, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Hola

Hola Kadellar, ya le reduci los artefactos de compresión a File:AutoantiguoColoniadelSacramento2.jpg. fijate ahora. Saludos!!! Ezarateesteban 19:32, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Es que es medio díficil reducir los artefactos de compresión generados por una camara compacta Ezarateesteban 21:34, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

hice varias tomas de ese auto, podrás fijarte si hay alguna pasable? Gracias!!! --Ezarateesteban 21:43, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:GR - Steinkirche Cazis2.jpg

Hi Kadellar,

the picture is now with a wider crop online. Thank you for your advice. Regards --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:48, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

{{Supported by Wikimedia ES}}

Gracias por crearla y gracias también por colocarla en las fotos de la Campus Party 2011 y en otras muchas más. Un abrazo. Dorieo (talk) 19:11, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amaia Montero - Rock in Rio Madrid 2012 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:30, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Filename

I would like to ask you about the filenames, why do you think it's unperfect? File:P-filatov-0422.jpg means p as person, filatov as surname, 0422 as unique file number.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 15:18, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gogol Bordello - Rock in Rio Madrid 2012 - 55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tomer T 19:12, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El último vagón - Rock in Rio Madrid 2012 - 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 13:30, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parroquia de santa Cristina - Madrid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Carschten 13:30, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calvin Harris - Rock in Rio Madrid 2012 - 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Danrok 19:07, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Just a note

As soon as I don't speak Spanish, all your filenames tell nothing to me . I hope you won't rename them into Russian to make my life easier, for the traditional way is to add Russian descriptions.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 18:37, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iglesia de Santa Cristina, Madrid, Exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope, meets all criteria. cmadler (talk) 12:52, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment Simple detail: it would be useful to add scope to the term (Exterior)--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:44, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
  • There aren't any pictures of the interior at the moment, but ok. --Kadellar (talk) 13:53, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
  •  Support All criteria meet, with the new scope. Now, you're forced to make images of the interior :) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
    • Hahaha good trick. Maybe another day. --Kadellar (talk) 11:16, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:31, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Imágenes de Rock in Rio Madrid 2012

Hola Kadellar, me gustaría dar por buenas algunas de tus imágenes de los conciertos pero veo demasiado ruido (no es de extrañar a un ISO de 1600). El caso es que el ruido es una de las cosas que más pesan cuando reviso imágenes. ¿No hay formar de reducirlo con algún filtro? Yo los RAW con ruido suelo tratarlos con buenos resultados, por ejemplo aquí o aquí. Un abrazo, Poco a poco (talk) 18:28, 13 August 2012 (UTC) PD: A propósito, me ha surgido una duda, ¿ves posible que un miembro de un jurado de WLM puede ganar el concurso?

No veo porque no ibas a poder ser parte del jurado, si tú no eres apto, yo menos. Tampoco entiendo lo que comentas de que no tienes fotos, joer, ¡pues coje la cámara y sal! :) abrazos, Poco a poco (talk) 13:21, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Real Casa de Correos - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:05, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento a los aviadores del Plus Ultra - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:51, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuente de las Conchas - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:07, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estatua ecuestre de Carlos III - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:40, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de la Almudena y Palacio Real - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 15:58, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Incubus - Rock in Rio Madrid 2012 - 67.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 13:57, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Incubus - Rock in Rio Madrid 2012 - 66.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 13:35, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Procyon lotor - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Firilacroco 20:40, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Procyon lotor - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good to me. QI to me. --Steinsplitter 20:58, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1955-1957 Chevrolet Bel Air in the SunRice Festival parade in Pine Ave.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Many distracting elements all around, but the main subject is very good IMO.--Jebulon 13:49, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

My answer

Hi, my answer is here --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:24, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta de la Latina - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments And it is the coat of arms of... ???--Jebulon 17:35, 2 September 2012 (UTC)  Done Included now. --Kadellar 18:18, 3 September 2012 (UTC) it is better now, thank you. QI, of course !--Jebulon 20:25, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Real de Madrid - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:25, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Real de Madrid - 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:37, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Real de Madrid - Jardines de Sabatini - Jaime I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:02, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Overdose in QIC ?

¡Holà Kadellar!

Many thanks for your comments and support following my message in the QI discussion page. Reading the discussion, I was a bit dubious about the clarity of my arguments... But reading your opinion, I was at least at ease with it: you understood very well what I meant. So, I feel a bit less alone...

As you can see, I spend some weeks in your country this summer, and I found it, again, very beautiful. Your pictures from Madrid are very nice !

¡Hasta pronto!,

--Jebulon (talk) 15:09, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Real de Madrid - 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 20:13, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Real de Madrid - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:32, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Felipe III - Plaza Mayor de Madrid - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--Jebulon 19:08, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Pediment cathedral of Seville in QIC

¡Holà Kadellar!

Thank you for review and comments, always useful for me. I've corrected the perspective of the pediment you noticed too strong, you were right. Would you be kind enough to have a new look now ?

Thanks in advance.--Jebulon (talk) 21:06, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Real Casa de la Aduana - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 20:59, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Linares, paseo de Recoletos y Torres de Colón.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sky is a bit grainy (1/1600 sec) but who cares. -- Aisano 18:54, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Felipe III - Casa de la Panadería - Plaza Mayor de Madrid - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Much better (aunque yo hubiera elegido otro ángulo mostrando la cara) Poco a poco 18:37, 14 September 2012 (UTC) Cierto. La anterior sí había salido y ya me olvidé, me centré en la composición yo creo. --Kadellar 18:43, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Real de Madrid - 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good for QI--Jebulon 19:08, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Comunicaciones - 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Firilacroco 14:58, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Comunicaciones - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I agree about the not strict correction of the perspective ;)--Jebulon 14:43, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Comunicaciones - 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 12:20, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San José - Madrid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Firilacroco 14:56, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biblioteca Nacional de España - 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--Jebulon 13:35, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulum - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:50, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chichén Itzá - 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:33, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chichén Itzá - 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 19:33, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulum - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Biopics 12:15, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erzherzog Karl Denkmal - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Iifar 16:39, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

QIC comment and discussion

Hi Kadellar, hope you dont mind me contacting you, With regards to your comments left on my nominated picture of Longleat house, I found it to be a bit harsh. I am new to wiki commons and media and started to enjoy placing pictures on here for people to view and comment. I take on board what people say, but recently I have found people to be very rude and not being helpful with there comments they are leaving. This picture in particular I asked what was meant by your comment, I changed the decline to discuss as I feel when I am looking at the photo full screen it looks clear so wanted to ask for other opinions which is the whole point to dicussion, you can appreciate if one person declines, many others may not or they may agree.Your last comment of "Please stop changing decline to discuss, it's not you who should do that. It's the third time I write it!" there is nothing in the rules which says that the nominator cannot or shouldnt change decline to discuss as you have said, it does say "You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer" which I have done, so I see that I have done nothing wrong, simply changing it is denying me the option to a discussion. I am sorry if you disagree with me and I also appologise to you if I am in the wrong, I will hold my hands up and say sorry. I just feel a little disappointed and frustrated lately with peoples sharp comments or them leaving comments which I cannot learn from or worse, not even reviewing the pictures. I hope you dont feel that im having ago, thats not my intention. Kind regards --Danesman1 (talk) 20:55, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Liberty - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:21, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Murallas de Ávila - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 18:09, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cobá - 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice composition --Moroder 18:48, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estatua de Murillo y Puerta de Murillo del Museo del Prado - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good now Poco a poco 18:28, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosendo - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 10:19, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brooklyn Bridge - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:51, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red Hot Chili Peppers - Rock in Rio Madrid 2012 - 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:06, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brooklyn Bridge - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 18:44, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Washington Monument - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:34, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Círculo de Bellas Artes - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Tulum - 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tulum - 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:37, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Velázquez - Jardines del Retiro - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:57, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Debod - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:33, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Brooklyn Bridge - 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brooklyn Bridge - 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fitz-Greene Halleck - Central Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice light. --Iifar 16:11, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Real de Madrid - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Jebulon 16:41, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo de América de Madrid - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Jebulon 16:41, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuente del Ángel Caído - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:46, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Booooring facade

¡Holà Kadellar !

Following your advice, I've tried [[2]] this.

First comments are a bit...well...discouraging (to be polite) ?

--Jebulon (talk) 14:18, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

• Thank you Kadellar. Maybe it is a FP...only for those who know the place ! Let's wait...--Jebulon (talk) 20:08, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo de América de Madrid - 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:38, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chichén Itzá - 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:57, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Biblioteca Nacional de España - 11.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Biblioteca Nacional de España - 11.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Comunicaciones - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 16:28, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum Wien - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO, a little bit more contrast could add, also with the cloning out of the ladies arm at right...--Jebulon 15:50, 8 October 2012 (UTC) I hadn't seen the arm! I'll try to rework. Thanks for the review. --Kadellar 15:53, 10 October 2012 (UTC)  Done now. Please have a look, thanks! --Kadellar 16:00, 10 October 2012 (UTC) Yes ! Far much better now ( to me).--Jebulon 19:04, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuente de Cibeles - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:20, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Santa María la Real de la Almudena - 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:44, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Santa María la Real de la Almudena - 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:55, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuente de Cibeles - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --Poco a poco 02:51, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edificio de las Cariátides - Instituto Cervantes - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --JLPC 21:18, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chichén Itzá - 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 23:01, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

File:SantPere.jpg

Bonjour,

J'ai constaté que le 5 octobre 2012 tu avais apposé le bandeau {{Watermark}} sur cette image. Après avoir scruté – longuement – l'image, je ne vois rien. Pourrais-tu m'indiquer à quel endroit se trouve le marquage numérique ?-- Bertrand GRONDIN  → ^(Talk) 14:21, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El oso y el madroño - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skater - Barrido-Panning - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 20:17, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Santa María la Real de la Almudena - 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 16:43, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Kadellar, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 11:46, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ek' balam - 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 01:34, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Palacio de Comunicaciones - 14.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palacio de Comunicaciones - 14.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Creo que esto te corresponde...un saludo! Poco a poco (talk) 14:12, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Intento de arreglo

Lo siento, creo que no hice un buen trabajo, quería sorprenderte --The Photographer (talk) 17:33, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Capricho - Jardín Artístico de la Alameda de Osuna - 52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK to me. - A.Savin 20:00, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teatro Real de Madrid - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good now (although sharpness could be higher) --Poco a poco 16:18, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Cristal - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:41, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wall Street - New York Stock Exchange.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:49, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Liberty - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, intersting composition. --Julian Herzog 15:38, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! White House and Marine One - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very very nice composition. But Noise, underexposed and CA --The Photographer 15:19, 7 November 2012 (UTC) It's a bit noisy and underexposed because it was getting dark and I had to use a fast shutter speed, there was also a lot of contrast between building and sky. Where do you see CA?? That thing on the tree must be a light for the helicopter. --Kadellar 15:50, 7 November 2012 (UTC)  Info This is a light to indicate the landing. This image has a quality sufficient for me. I suggest your nomination as valuable image too --The Photographer 02:02, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche 911 Carrera S - Barrido.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good motion control. --Esquilo 14:41, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuente de Cibeles - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Qi for me. --JLPC 18:16, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Comunicaciones - 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 18:36, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Cristal - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective distortion --The Photographer 18:42, 9 November 2012 (UTC) Yes, there ist perspective distortion, but to correct it, would give an unnatural impression --Haneburger 11:25, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de la Villa - 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems tilted. Mattbuck 17:39, 2 November 2012 (UTC)  Done Is it ok now? It is a small square. Thanks for the review. --Kadellar 13:00, 4 November 2012 (UTC) Hm, I think it probably needs a crop at the top, rather a lot of blue sky. Mattbuck 02:56, 7 November 2012 (UTC) But then I'll crop the antenna on the right and that will be worse. --Kadellar 10:59, 7 November 2012 (UTC) I considered that but thought it would be worth it. Mattbuck 03:32, 10 November 2012 (UTC)  Support A bit noise in the sky, but not disturbing. Good shot considering the wide angle. --Esquilo 17:28, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Здравствуйте! Мне очень понравились фотографии, которые вы сделали, они великолепны! Диана960 (talk) 21:50, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Stari most - Maribor - 01.jpg

And also:

• File:Stari most - Maribor - 02.jpg Eleassar ^(t/p) 10:09, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Korean War Veterans Memorial.jpg

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 11:05, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El oso y el madroño - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:04, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle Mayor de Madrid - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality.--ArildV 07:14, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neue Burg vor Burggarten - Hofburg - Wien - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very well done. --Lucasbosch 17:58, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chichén Itzá - 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:40, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ek' balam - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine QI of a monument --Isiwal 18:45, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Segovia, Segovia, and... Segovia

¡Ola Kadellar!

Thank you very much for your reviews.

First, I would like to congratulate you for your picture of the cathedral of Segovia (1) with the snowy mountains, I've found it really beautiful.

I will check with a grid the straightness of the town hall of Segovia (2), but I'm not sure there is a so great problem. Would you please check again? Thanks.

You are right with the aqueduct of Segovia (3), I've corrected the perspective, and I think it is good now. Would you be kind enough to have another look ? Again, thank you.

Anyway, what a nice city !! I spend only one night there, and did not have enough time to visit the Alcázar ! Next time maybe...--Jebulon (talk) 10:43, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle del Codo - Madrid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK fir QI. --NorbertNagel 16:51, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa de Cisneros - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:17, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Comunicaciones - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I've already seen it somewhere :-) But you've included the fountain.Good idea! --Selbymay 09:20, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Santa María de Segovia - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful ! --Jebulon 00:57, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Liberty - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not the perfect light, nevertheless QI --PierreSelim 10:32, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardines de Sabatini - Torre de Madrid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The lamp and the tree on the left side are tilted. --Berthold Werner 15:15, 9 December 2012 (UTC) I didn't notice, I'll rework it. Thanks for the review. --Kadellar 20:11, 10 December 2012 (UTC)  Done now, could you review it again, please? Thank you. --Kadellar 21:42, 11 December 2012 (UTC) Good now. --Berthold Werner 08:44, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Junta Municipal del Distrito de Moncloa-Aravaca - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --Rjcastillo 23:28, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estatua ecuestre de Carlos III - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:18, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Santa María de Segovia - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 20:44, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de la Vera Cruz - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good image, QI to me --DKrieger 22:00, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Wish you a Merry Christmas and a very very happy new year. -- Joydeep _Talk 17:59, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eva Hache - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximeg 03:14, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Catedral de Santa María de Segovia - 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral de Santa María de Segovia - 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:03, 27 December 2012 (UTC)