User talk:JuTa/Archive 07

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Imbissstand in Hamburg.jpg

File:Imbissstand in Hamburg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

84.58.160.177 09:13, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Template:NoFoP-Greece

Template:NoFoP-Greece has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:22, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

File:PlaestinaIglesia.jpg

Hey JuTa, I would recommend you don't delete this image. Like a week ago Wikimedia Foundation sent us an e-mail to thank all who donated to wiki, in that e-mail comes attached a video in which Jimmy Wales makes an appearance himself, talking proudly about how knowledge or/and Wikipedia can reach the most remotes places in the world, like Palestina, a small village in the jungle of Peru, and how easy is to create an article in Wikipedia. In the video you could see kids from Palestina in a classroom surfing the internet with their little laptops and finding out there was no information about their village and decided to create an article about it in Wikipedia, guided by their tutor, Michael Kleiman. That was awesome! to see those little kids editing themselves and feeling proud and amazed when doing so. One of the kids says "that's the picture we took" referring to the picture you intend to delete. I know you are helping in keeping Wikipedia in good terms, and your help is much appreciated, but I don't think these kids know much about the rules and ways nor Michael Kleiman. I think Kleiman registered to make this article only, so it will probably be hard to contact him to help providing more information about this image, which is required, I know. So I am asking you to wait so we can fix this issue. I think if you watch the video you will get some of your questions answered. Name of the video in YouTube: Children of Peru write their own history in Wikipedia. Thanks. --Cefaro (talk) 04:15, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

I guess you shooted the photo yourself. In this case all you need to do is to choose a free license and put the corresponding template onto the description page of the image. A list of such licenses you'll find i.e. here regads. --JuTa 06:55, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Images from The Other Side of the Sun

Hi, I see that you have deleted File:The_Hundredth_Princess.png. The image is out of copyright. What is the best way to reinstate the image - can you undo your edit, or does the image have to be re-uploaded? If it did not have copyright information appended to it, I will make sure that it does when it goes back up in wikicommons SeMelmoth (talk) 17:20, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Hmm, you named Percey Dearmer as the author. This is not en:Percy Dearmer, isn't it? Do you know when he died? Normaly works stays protected 70 years after the author death. As soon I will get a good evidence that this work is allready out of copyright I will undelete it. regards. --JuTa 18:10, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

File:170505 nazi-spam-welle-screenshot 1-756x567.jpg

File:170505 nazi-spam-welle-screenshot 1-756x567.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Storkk (talk) 18:34, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Truth

Hi,What should I do to fix the problem of those two files: File:VéritéImberbe.jpg, File:VéritéPoilue.jpg ? Thanks --YanikB (talk) 00:03, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

File:StromkastenAlsSpongebob.JPG

Pay attention to copyright
File:StromkastenAlsSpongebob.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yours sincerely, Vera (talk) 15:09, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Camp Kinser Red Hat Demo.jpg

Hi, please restore these deleted photo. The photo is the work of the US government. A photo copy of the is held within the Okinawan Prefectual Archives with open copyright and originals are in the US national Archives. I believe that the photos and where it came from are sufficiently described with a link and I had assumed that the license information was included correctly. Can you restore the photo as it is critical to the Operation red hat article and a DoD press event is happening today and inform me of what is missing and how to avoid this issue in the future.

Thank you,Johnvr4 (talk) 15:11, 5 March 2013 (UTC)


File:Herbicide Stockpile Kadena AFB.png

Hi, please restore these deleted photos. The photos and original document are the work of the US Military. I believe that the photos and where it came from are sufficiently described with a link and I had assumed that the license information was included correctly. Can you restore the photo as it is critical to the Operation red hat article and a DoD press event is happening today and inform me of what is missing and how to avoid this issue in the future. Thank you,Johnvr4 (talk) 15:11, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo européen AB.jpg

Hello,

Could you please leave a comment why you deleted this logo? Others have said Keep. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:09, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I thought my reasoning was sound in this DR, I would appreciate an explanation of what it was that you thought I misunderstand. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 12:13, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello JuTa,

I've added the OTRS template for the following files with missing license:

I don't know why UploadWizard accepted the upload for this files, but now the issue is ammended.

Cheers,--Dura-Ace (talk) 11:54, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Kit body Barcelona SC local 1966.svg

This is an SVG image. Look at the picture at 2000 pixels and you will see the shield. Cameta (talk) 22:51, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Lukaschenko Briefmarke

Ich habe die Briefmarke zumindest selber eingescannt. Welche Lizenz ist das dann? --Simpsonfreak (talk) 15:22, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi, laut Commons:Stamps/Public_domain#Belarus wäre das wohl {{PD-BY-exempt}}. Gruß --JuTa 18:10, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Kuupik Kleist

Hallo JuTa

Could you please help me setting the right license for this image [1], there is a cropped version of [2].

Thanks

--Jonas Søby 22:09, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

OK, done - see here. --JuTa 22:13, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Chevrolet Camaro logo.jpg

File:Chevrolet Camaro logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 19:37, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Hoof mapped.jpg

Hello, I didn't know what kind of license should I select adding a picture. The website of the group, where it come from http://pets.groups.yahoo.com/group/thehappyhoof/ and to which group I belong also, has no copyrights, description of the group: "This group is for hoof research, teaching and sharing of corrective and maintenance hoof trimming, as described and taught by Linda Harris on her youtube channel The Happy Hoof at http://www.youtube.com/user/thehappyhoof?feature=mhee There are NO COPY RIGHTS on any material posted here. People are welcome to copy, paste, plagerize, misunderstand and take anything out of context you wish, if that's the kind of person you are. It will all come out in the wash(...)". So I am sure this picure can stay on wikimedia commons, but not sure, what kind of license it is... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Visenna9 (talk • contribs) 2013-03-11T19:47:38‎ (UTC)

I cant access the source webpage: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/thehappyhoof/photos/album/261803100/pic/520205963/view?picmode=&mode=tn&order=ordinal&start=1&count=20&dir=asc. But in general every webpage is protected by copyright until otherwise stated. If you cannot find any sign of a free license you cannot use the image. sorry. --JuTa 19:54, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Yes, on this site it is stated that there are no copyrights for it, as I copied above. Sorry, I forgot that the site is only available for signed users. So what knd of license should I choose from the list when adding a picture if the situation is like this? I'm sure that it's free and there are no copyrights, I can copy all the regulations written on the main site there, where it's stated, would it be enough? (Visenna9 (talk) 09:28, 18 March 2013 (UTC))

Sorry, I cant find statmnt that the content is free. http://pets.groups.yahoo.com/group/thehappyhoof/ states all rights reserved and http://www.youtube.com/user/thehappyhoof?feature=mhee states nothing. Maybe if the copyright holder (the fotografer) snds an email to our so called OTRS-Team the file might get undeleted. For details see COM:OTRS. regards. --JuTa 17:04, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

ok, thank You for checking. Too much trouble, so I'll use another photo, this time my own, but first I wanted to add this one, because it was better. (Visenna9 (talk) 06:34, 19 March 2013 (UTC))

Thanks for the note JuTa

these two files are part of a press release by the publisher, i am one of the editors there but couldnT find the right box to check in the upload. please do not remove, i checked with the publisher and the authors. Can you please help to get this in order? Thanks! DannyMacY (talk) 19:52, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Well, the copyright holder(s) should send an email to the so called OTRS-Team specifying under which free license they wish to release the images. For details see COM:OTRS. regards --JuTa 02:09, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Babirusa image tagged, but Upload Wizard must have malfunctioned...

Hi JuTa, thanks for the dire warning. I've tagged the image (an 1869 publication being pretty safe territory...) but as I uploaded it with the Upload Wizard, it must have malfunctioned for some reason (temp. glitch or new coding error, I've no idea). It has always worked well up to now. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:43, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Top Race Original

OK. I wasn't sure about the domain of that image, since it appears on the internet, but there is no detail regarding to the domain or to the owner of that image. But there are no problems, you did well to delete it. However, I found among my files, another photo taken by me, to which I would like to raise if it is that you can with the same name, as well as an edited version. Do you think? Best regards!

--Diego HC (talk) 04:16, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dorothy Walton.jpg

What was the reason for deleting? Unknown author, 83 years old image. --Florentyna (talk) 19:59, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

That was the reason. The author hould only have lived for more 13 years and the image is not PD. Compare i.e. COM:PRP. regards. --JuTa 20:01, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

I can't translate this note into spanish but yes into calatà language??

Hi! I'm spanish and speak spanish and a little bit english. You have sent me this note:

Copyright status: File:Barranco del draguillo.jpg
bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Barranco del draguillo.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 22:24, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

I can't translate it into spanish language but I can translate to català (catalán)?? Català is not an official idiom, so I don't understand anything.

Someone could explain it? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mololo (talk • contribs) 2013-03-25T21:00:30‎ (UTC)

Hi, there is currently no spanish verion of {{Image license}}. The problem was that there was just no licensing on th image description page - see Commons:Licensing or in spanish Commons:Sobre las licencias. The other problem was that ou didn't made the photo yourself, so the photografer would need to send a permission mail to the Commons-Support-Team, see Commons:OTRS or in spanish Commons:OTRS/es. regards. --JuTa 17:36, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the answer but, thats not the question. The problem is how is posible it doesn't exist a spanish {{Image license}} version? How could i make it? Thanks. --Mololo (talk) 14:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Ahh I see. Thats a bit complicated. First ou have to create Template:Image license/es and Template:Image license/heading/es. Compere that with i.e. Template:Image license/en and Template:Image license/heading/en. After that you have to update Template:Image license/lang. All pages for this template in various languages you find here. regards. --JuTa 17:34, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks so much JuTa! Bye!--Mololo (talk) 19:52, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Undelete 2014?

Hallo JuTa,

das [3] verstehe ich nicht: In den USA ist das Bild wg. URAA noch bis Ende 2028 geschützt, damit bis Anfang 2029 nicht commonsfähig. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 16:08, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Stimmt, ich hatte infach 1933 + 70 gerechnet. Habs jetzt geändert. Gruß --JuTa 16:11, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
OK, danke. --Rosenzweig τ 13:08, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Toyota Alphard G's Love Live!.jpg

Why you deleted File:Toyota Alphard G's Love Live!.jpg and File:Toyota Alphard G's Love Live! rear.jpg (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Toyota Alphard G's Love Live!.jpg) while other photos of Category:Itasha such as File:Toyota Estima Itasha 2009 Tokyo Auto Salon.jpg had not been deleted?--TTTNIS (talk) 23:00, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

As I wrote in the DR: The manga characters a clearly coprighted and COM:FOP does not apply on cars. COM:De minimis does not apply in my eyes. You can try a COM:Undeletion request. regards --JuTa 23:05, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Spastic Contracture of the Lower Extremities.png

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Spastic Contracture of the Lower Extremities.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 06:58, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Can you give me more information on why you decided that this file was in violation and removed? It is from a medical presentation over 150 years old, so it's copyrights have expired if they ever existed. I am frustrated that you wouldn't open a dialogue with me before making rash deletions. Andersonmatt1125 (talk) 20:18, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

The file was missing a copyright tag, denoting its copyright status. All files uploaded to Commons must have a copyright tag, otherwise they will be deleted. You also wrote as "Date" 22. March 2013, which seems not to be correct in this case. You're welcome to re-upload the file, but be sure to include a copyright tag and correct date. --JuTa 09:07, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Danke für deine Nachricht. Die Quelle des Fotografs gibt kostenlose Urheberrechterlaubnis aber es ist mir nicht klar, welche Lizenz sie ist. Wann ich diesen Upload gemacht habe, ich habe eine Erklärung bei File_talk:FURWIT06.jpg gemacht, und darin habe ich eine Bitte für Hilfe damit gemacht.

Der neuer Artikel RMS Nova Scotia (1926) braucht einen Foto des Schiffes, und ich habe Schwierigkeit gehabt einen urheberrechtlose Foto zu finden. Wenn du kannst entweder mit dem Urheberrecht dieses Fotos hilfen, oder einen anderen urheberrechtlosen und guten Foto des Schiffes zu finden, du würdest sehr viel helfen und ich würde sehr dankbar sein!

Es grüßt dich, Motacilla (talk) 20:20, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Nun, der original Photograph müsste eine Freigaberklärung an das Support-Team schicken. Siehe dazu COM:OTRS/de. Gruß --JuTa 20:29, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

La licence de ce fichier est correcte, me semble-t-il : File:Bronze square ding (cauldron) with human faces 01.jpg

The photography has been taken by : user:Smartneddy in a museum in China. The work of art is of much more than 100 years old and the other is unknown. I only corrected the colors as you can see. The dimensions are strictly the same : 800 × 981 px. Correct? Ismoon (talk) 21:36, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes, you got automaticly informed because you uploaded a new version of that file. --JuTa 21:39, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Coat of Novovelichkovskoe.gif

Hello. I've inserted the correct license for this file and removed the template.

Public domain
This work is not an object of copyright according to article 1259 of Book IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation No. 230-FZ of December 18, 2006.

Shall not be objects of copyright:

  • official documents of state government agencies and local government agencies of municipal formations, including laws, other legal texts, judicial decisions, other materials of legislative, administrative and judicial character, official documents of international organizations, as well as their official translations;
  • state symbols and signs (flags, emblems, orders, any forms of money, and the like), as well as symbols and signs of municipal formations;
  • works of folk art (folklore), which don't have specific authors;
  • news reports on events and facts, which have a purely informational character (daily news reports, television programs, transportation schedules, and the like).
Comment – This license tag is also applicable to official documents, state symbols and signs of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (union level[1]).

Warning – This license tag is not applicable to drafts of official documents, proposed official symbols and signs, which can be copyrighted.

Warning – This Russian official document, state symbol or sign (postage stamps, coins and banknotes mainly) may incorporate one or more works that can be copyrightable if separated from this document, symbol or sign. In such a case, this work is not an object of copyright if reused in its entirety but, at the same time, extracting specific portions from this work could constitute copyright infringement. For example, the denomination and country name must be preserved on postage stamps.

  1. ↑ Official documents, state symbols and signs of 14 other Soviet Republics are the subject of law of their legal successors. See respective license tags.

--Bagratun (talk) 16:04, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Welsh lake.jpg

Thank you for the kind concern regarding copyright status of the file. I've updated its PD status. If there's anything else I can do, please do let me know. Regards, Hindustanilanguage (talk) 17:43, 2 April 2013 (UTC).

File:EPR-Experiment Bohm 1676x516 zh.png

Thanks for informing me about the lack of proper copyright status. I've included the necessary copyright information in its page and also removed the deletion template. Please take a look. If it's not OK, please let me know. I'll do my best to comply. --老陳 (talk) 03:41, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi, thx for trying. Not everything was OK, but I've corrected that now. Ceers --JuTa 07:43, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Re: File:Flag Upornaya.gif

Template removed and license added, please correct it if you find official symbols as coats of arms or flags of the Russian Federation institutions or Soviet republics. The license is {{PD-RU-exempt}}

Public domain
This work is not an object of copyright according to article 1259 of Book IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation No. 230-FZ of December 18, 2006.

Shall not be objects of copyright:

  • official documents of state government agencies and local government agencies of municipal formations, including laws, other legal texts, judicial decisions, other materials of legislative, administrative and judicial character, official documents of international organizations, as well as their official translations;
  • state symbols and signs (flags, emblems, orders, any forms of money, and the like), as well as symbols and signs of municipal formations;
  • works of folk art (folklore), which don't have specific authors;
  • news reports on events and facts, which have a purely informational character (daily news reports, television programs, transportation schedules, and the like).
Comment – This license tag is also applicable to official documents, state symbols and signs of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (union level[1]).

Warning – This license tag is not applicable to drafts of official documents, proposed official symbols and signs, which can be copyrighted.

Warning – This Russian official document, state symbol or sign (postage stamps, coins and banknotes mainly) may incorporate one or more works that can be copyrightable if separated from this document, symbol or sign. In such a case, this work is not an object of copyright if reused in its entirety but, at the same time, extracting specific portions from this work could constitute copyright infringement. For example, the denomination and country name must be preserved on postage stamps.

  1. ↑ Official documents, state symbols and signs of 14 other Soviet Republics are the subject of law of their legal successors. See respective license tags.

. --Bagratun (talk) 15:32, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

The license looks OK. But it seems during the transfer the original desfription got lost. Please try to recover that. Thx. --JuTa 18:35, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Chief Constable Frank Richardson .jpeg

I do not understand the problem. Please explain. I assume the j.peg in question refers to a photograph I submitted for the file Ernest Frank Richardson, (1871-1951) Chief Constable of Salisbury Wiltshire. As I have stated, he was my grandfather. This photograph is of many which are part of our "Family Archives." This photograph is a 'family ' photograph, and as the grandson and the inherited owner of the photograph, (and other ducuments etc.) I also own the copyright for what it is, as it is now 108 years old. TimothyWF (talk) 19:16, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Well, if the image was created by you grantfather you might use the template {{Heirs-license}}. But for me it looks like the image is showing your grantfather fotografed by an unnamed fotografer. Owning an image dos not mean owning the copyright of it. Because of the age of the image the copyright might have been expired allready. But it would be good to know the name and livespan of the fotografer to detrnime if he/she dies before 1942. regards. --JuTa 19:27, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

COM:UD#File:Kreisleiter Walter Aldinger und seine Mitarbeiter.jpg

Hallo JuTa, kannst Du wohl dort mal vorbeischauen? Danke --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  20:02, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Ich habe dort geantwortet. Gruß --JuTa 20:10, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

To be completely honest, I actually want to remove the photo that I uploaded; is it possible? --GymClerk (talk) 23:35, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes it it. I've deleted it. regards --JuTa 03:37, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Alright, thank you very much! --GymClerk (talk) 16:51, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Editor's summary: File:Aaa DUMFRIESSHIRE Civil Parish map c.1868.jpg does not have a license

Thank you. I have added the licence information. Scotire (talk) 04:44, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Danke

Danke für Deine Nachricht. Ich habe heute zum ersten Mal eine eigene Fotografie von einem Flugblatt einer 1992 verbotenen Organisation, welches in der Innenstadt von Bonn 1991 verteilt wurde hochgeladen. Falls da noch etwas unklar sein sollte, sag bitte Bescheid. LG--KarlV (talk) 14:34, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

In Reference to the image you declared a copyvio

Hi,

That image is a scan from a publication dating 1835, I provided the reference to the original source in the upload. As it predates the 1923 limit by some 80 years it is no longer protected by copywrite. It can be used by anyone. There are many other examples of older works like this being used on WP. Apart from what I already did what do you need?

Cheers Faendalimas (talk) 15:15, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

The file was missing a copyright tag, denoting its copyright status. All files uploaded to Commons must have a copyright tag, otherwise they will be deleted. You also wrote as "Date" 4. April 2013, which seems not to be correct in this case. I will correct this now. But please next time pls try todo that yourself. regards --JuTa 09:07, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your assistance. Cheers Faendalimas (talk) 22:38, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Professor Universitar Dr. Iulia Motoc.jpg

The author send me an email stating that i am aloud to upload the file on commons.Can you take the deletion flag of?Receptie123 (talk) 06:38, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Please follow the intructions describted in COM:OTRS and use the template {{OTRS pending}} afterwards. regards --JuTa 07:46, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for telling me.Receptie123 (talk) 08:27, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

OTRS volunteers

How do i become am OTRS volunteer?Receptie123 (talk) 09:00, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

See meta:OTRS/Volunteering. But you have to be an expirienced Commons-user, I don't see a big chance for you. --JuTa 09:03, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

copy right status changed please remove banner

Liebe JuTa,

vielen Dank fuer den Hinweis bezueglich der fehlenden Copyright Information der folgenden Fotos:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:V_2012_ARIA-a-Antibes-VIII_Web.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:AK_nudite_ii006.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:V_1988_AK_oratorio.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:AK_Generations004.jpg

Ich habe den copyright Status soeben geandert und bitte von einem Loeschen der Datein abzusehen. Bitte entfernen Sie bei Gelegenheit die Banner.

Vielen Dank im Voraus. Annaluka (talk) 15:14, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Hallo, das ist leider ein etwas komplizierter Fall. Es handelt sich hier ja um Fotos von modernen Skulpturen. Sowohl der Künstler Alain Kirili als auch die Fotografin Ariane Lopez-Huici besitzen an dem Bildern Urheberrechte. Du kannst da leider nicht einfach eine freie Lizenz hinzufügen. Beide müssten eine sog. Freigabeerklärung an das hiesige Support-Team schicken. Näheres dazu findest Du unter COM:OTRS bzw. COM:OTRS/de. Anschließend sollte die Vorlage {{OTRS pending}} gesetzt werden. Viele Grüße --JuTa 18:00, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Straßenbahn Halberstadt

Vom Bildautor Bernd Dütsch erhielt ich per E-Mail eine Erlaubnis zum Veröffentlichen seiner historischen Fotos aus Halberstadt.

z.B. File:Straßenbahn Halberstadt Gröper- Ecke Dominikanerstraße 1980 Bild 4.jpg

Wie kann ich dies an Wikipedia weiterleiten? In einem ähnlichen Fall (z.B. File:Strab Brem 1963 927 3 Gröpelingen.jpg) im Jahre 2011 lief das per E-Mail über OTRS. Die E-Mail von Herrn Dütsch möchte ich hier nicht veröffentlichen, nur auf Anfrage weiterleiten. Meine eigene E-Mail ist uwca(ätt)gmx(punkt)de. Was kann ich jetzt tun? Viele Grüße und vielen Dank im Voraus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uwca (talk • contribs) 2013-04-08T20:59:48‎ (UTC)

Ja OTRS ist richtig, siehe COM:OTRS bzw. COM:OTRS/de. Anchließend bitte Vorlage {{OTRS pending}} setzen, das "verzögert" i.d.R. die Löschung, weil das häufig eine ganze Weile dauern kann (u.U. mehrere Wochen). Gruß --JuTa 21:04, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi! I add license. Can you remove deletion status? - Корінь (talk) 05:33, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done --JuTa 06:34, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Colonel Bogey March

Please read here: http://archive.org/details/ColonelBogeyMarch_191 It's a Creative Commons license: Public Domain Mark 1.0 Best regards: OsvátA

OK, I set the license-template now. Next time pls. try to do that youself. regards --JuTa 19:41, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks! - OsvátA

Liebe JuTa,

Vielen Dank fuer den Hinweis bezueglich der fehlenden Copyright information der folgenden Dateien: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:V_2012_ARIA-a-Antibes-VIII_Web.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:AK_nudite_ii006.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:V_1988_AK_oratorio.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:AK_Generations004.jpg

Ich habe die fehlenden informationen eingetragen und bitte von einem Loeschen der Dateien abzusehen. Ist es moeglich den Banner zu entfernen?

MfG, Annaluka (talk) 14:03, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Wie ich Dir oben schon gschrieben habe müssten Künstler und Fotograf eine sog. Freigabeerklärung an das OTRS-Team schicken. Anschließend setzt Du am besten die Vorlage {{OTRS pending}} auf die Bildbeschreibungsseite. Gruß --JuTa 16:43, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Ich sehe. Vielen Dank fuer die Erklaerung. Das werde ich sogleich in die Wege leiten. Viele Gruesse. 208.120.212.70 01:10, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Ich habe {{OTRS pending}} eingefuegt. Der Autor der Bilder hat mir zugesichert dass er die Freigabeerklaerung in den naechsten zwei Tagen and Wiki Commons schickt. Ich hoffe dann ist alles in Ordnung. Viele Gruesse.

Bilder im Zusammenhang St. Gallen Symposium

Ich habe gesehen, Du hast heute Nachmittag alle Bilder, die im Zusammenhang mit dem St. Gallen Symposium von mir hochgeladen wurden, dabei hatte ich wie auf meiner Diskussionsseite von Russavia gefordert an das OTRS-Team eine vollständige Erklärung des Rechteinhabers betreffend Urheberrecht eingereicht, auf die auch nicht geantwortet wurde. Da hätte ich schon ganz gerne eine Erklärung dafür. MfG --Seadart (talk) 20:13, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Nun, sie waren in der entsprechenden Tageskategorie. Wenn das mit OTRS positiv ausgeht werden sie idR problemlos wiederhergestellt. Beim wieder einfügen in die entsprechenden Artikel helfe ich dann gerne, wenn Du mir hier dann nochmals kurz bescheid gibts. Gruß --JuTa 21:21, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Boulevard21.jpg

According to the description the file was made by Patricia Dionisi. So how do we know that User UNLP is Patricia Dionisi? In Spanish Wikipedia the User was blocked because he used the name of an university. --Mister Deletion (talk) 11:17, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Where did you get that author from? --JuTa 11:19, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Description Español: Foto tomada por Patricia Dionisi. --Mister Deletion (talk) 11:21, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
OK, its deleted. --JuTa 11:23, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JuTa/Archive_07&oldid=200599075"