User talk:Jl FilpoC
|
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
File:La Magdalena, Catedral de Sevilla.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 11:20, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- Me podría comunicar cual es la causa? Jl FilpoC (talk) 10:54, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Olivenza
[edit]Buenas tardes Jl FilpoC. Me he percatado que hace unos años en la categoría de Olivenza retiraste, de forma totalmente comprensible, algunas categorías fuera de lugar y que cierto usuario te revirtió en varias ocasiones. Decirte que creo que tenías toda la razón. El caso es que son varios los usuarios a lo largo de los años los que han chocado contra el mismo muro, un único usuario que ha tomado posesión de la categoría como si fuera su feudo particular. Y que además roza el ridículo al integrar Olivenza en la región del Alentejo y le da rango de municipio luso. Yo he estado categorizando imágenes de la citada categoría (que estaba muy abandonada), al tiempo que he puesto orden en el tema de las categorías no puede ser que un usuario tenga secuestrado esto como si fuera su cortijo personal. CFA1877 (talk) 16:25, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Historias de Mafalda, Quino.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Günther Frager (talk) 20:33, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
File:L'Avis de chien de Bill, Boule et Bill.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kokonino (talk) 09:48, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Olivenza
[edit]Buenas noches. Pongo en tu conocimiento este tema que he denunciado en el tablón de administradores, dado que apareces mencionado en el mismo. CFA1877 (talk) 19:59, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Bueno, pues comentarte que se llevó el asunto al tablón de administradores y después de mucha discusión se ha acabado alcanzando un nuevo consenso sobre las categorías. Algo es algo. Saludos cordiales. CFA1877 (talk) 21:56, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Ocasión para saludarle cordialmente. Jl FilpoC (talk) 07:09, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Muy bien. Saludos Jl FilpoC (talk) 16:39, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Por favor
[edit]Deje de etiquetar imágenes como "trabajo propio" a menos que en realidad sean su propio trabajo. Tomar una fotografía del trabajo de otra persona no lo convierte en tu trabajo. Cada una de tus cargas deberá ser reparada; Es posible que sea necesario eliminar algunos de ellos. DS (talk) 20:23, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Buenos días: No entiendo el aviso. Todas mis fotografías las capto con mi máquina y no utilizo las fotografías de otro. Entiendo por "trabajo propio" que la fotografía es captada y procesada por mi. Le agradecería un ejemplo para tener conocimiento del asunto. Saludos Jl FilpoC (talk) 09:08, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- Si tomo una fotografía de un dibujo que hiciste, ¿se convierte inmediatamente en mi imagen? (No es asi.) Las fotografías de estatuas son diferentes. 100 personas podrían tomar 100 fotografías diferentes de 1 estatua desde 100 ángulos diferentes, y todas serían muy, muy diferentes. Pero una buena fotografía de un cuadro es funcionalmente equivalente al cuadro mismo. DS (talk) 15:10, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Male Call, Milton Caniff.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
DS (talk) 20:38, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- No tengo información de que sea una reproducción del original. Se expone en 9e Art Références. Saludos Jl FilpoC (talk) 12:25, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- Por favor publica tu comentario aquí. DS (talk) 15:52, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Sin objeción al borrado Jl FilpoC (talk) 17:17, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Error en descripción
[edit]Hola, tanto esta imagen, como esta otra esta otra corresponden al Monasterio de Leyre. Por favor corrígelo. Saludos Mar del Sur (talk) 11:18, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Buenas tardes. No encuentro error en el archivo Panorámica del Monasterio de Leyre Jl FilpoC (talk) 18:35, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
File tagging File:Kubla Khan, Frank Frazetta.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Kubla Khan, Frank Frazetta.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kubla Khan, Frank Frazetta.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Belbury (talk) 16:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Chihuahua a las 8 de la tarde, Jean Giraud.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Belbury (talk) 20:36, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Les Yeux du Chat, Jean Giraud.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Belbury (talk) 20:37, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Mayor Grubert. Le Garage hermétique, Jean Giraud.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Belbury (talk) 20:37, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
File:La Femme piège, Enki Bilal.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Hyju (talk) 12:04, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
File:El lagarto blanco, Frank Frazetta.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Hyju (talk) 16:22, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Girola del Monasterio de San Lorenzo (detalle), Carboeiro.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Girola del Monasterio de San Lorenzo (detalle), Carboeiro.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Girola del Monasterio de San Lorenzo (detalle), Carboeiro.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 08:05, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category
[edit]When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with {{SD|C2}} if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available or {{SD|C1}} if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused. In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page, as you did at Category:Church of the Convent of Santa Inés, Sevilla. ("C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion). Jmabel ! talk 06:08, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Prototyperspective (talk) 09:55, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Prototyperspective (talk) 10:40, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 12:44, 9 November 2024 (UTC)