User talk:Jeanhousen/Archive 3
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
File:20151105 lyon014.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Benoît Prieur (d) 19:47, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
File:20151105 lyon017.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Benoît Prieur (d) 19:47, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
File:20151105 lyon016.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Benoît Prieur (d) 19:48, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
File:20151105 lyon019.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Benoît Prieur (d) 19:48, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
File:20151105 lyon020.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Benoît Prieur (d) 19:49, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
File:20151105 lyon022.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Benoît Prieur (d) 19:49, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
File:20151105 lyon100.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Benoît Prieur (d) 19:50, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
File:20151105 lyon101.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Benoît Prieur (d) 19:50, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
File:20151105 lyon102.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Benoît Prieur (d) 19:50, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
File:20151105 lyon018.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Benoît Prieur (d) 19:53, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely Geraki TLG 07:49, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
File:20151105 lyon115.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Lophotrochozoa (talk) 21:15, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Quelques mots
Please could you tell me the meaning of "anatoliki" and "dytiki"? (Je suis très questionneuse!)
Thank you very much for your work on my greek files! --Ziegler175 (talk) 07:25, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
==="Anatoliki" is the adjective form for the greek word meaning "East" (so in greek "Anatoliki Anatolia" is East Anatolia (Eastern East), sort of pleonasm :-) - "Dytiki" is the same for the word meaning "West" --Jean Housen 08:49, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Overcategorizing vehicles in Belgium
Hello, Jeanhousen. I noticed that you reverted some changes of mine where I removed Category:Vehicles in Belgium. I did that because those categories were already in Category:Road vehicles in Belgium. Having them also under Category:Vehicles in Belgium is overcategorizing because Category:Road vehicles in Belgium is under Category:Vehicles in Belgium. Pages should not be in multiple places in the same branch of the category tree.
I see that you have several other messages here about this same kind of thing. Feel free to ask if you would like more information to help you understand this. I am going to undo the changes you did. Please don't change them back. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 00:18, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- It is NOT AT ALL overcategorization : there are on wikimedia some maniacs who think that categorize is putting the things into the more smaller category, like russian dolls, and finally you can't see the thing so it is buried deeply. When I consider a category, it's like an index at the end of a book, I go with my index (finger) along the list until, at the good alphabetical place, I find the word I'm searching, free to you to consider that when searching for automobiles in "vehicles in Belgium", I have to think to ONE characteristic (road vehicle) of many automomobiles to find it at "R". You'r NOT AT ALL helping those who are not familiarized with this wikimaniac logic... No need to help me or explain me anything : reverse it if you want and do exactly the inverse of logic, i'm not going on war edition. My only aim is to make easier and quicker a research for anyone unfamiliarized, and by the way, it is possible to consider anything on several points of views, an automobile (auto-mobile) is likely a "Motorized vehicles", beacause it needs a motor to move, why not categorize it in the unique category of "Motorized vehicles"...... --Jean Housen 07:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- It is overcategorization. It is the very definition of overcategorization. I do understand your point, though. If you think it's not reasonable to have a category for road vehicles, why not ask to delete the category, or at least take it out of Category:Vehicles in Belgium? (It might still be wanted to group vehicles under Category:Road transport in Belgium.) --Auntof6 (talk) 09:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Jet Petroleum has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Christian Giersing (da:) 18:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Category:Window_shutters_in_Trier has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Berthold Werner (talk) 11:47, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
2008 in Paros has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Themightyquill (talk) 08:33, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Automobiles with license plates of Belgium
Hallo Jeanhousen, Op deze afbeelding zijn de nummerplaten duidelijk zichtbaar. Wil je een nieuwe versie uploaden waarbij de nummerplaten onherkenbaar gemaakt zijn. Dank! Lotje (talk) 15:05, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
Your signature
Hello, Looks like you ignored my notice on my userpage. Please add a link to your userpage in the signature. It is required per official policy (The signature (...) must link to the user page, the user talk page or the user's contributions.). Thanks. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:55, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
File:20151105 lyon113.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Benoît Prieur (d) 21:23, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
- https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ehrenhof_(D%C3%BCsseldorf)&curid=3962944&diff=156625379&oldid=151065869
- https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ehrenhof_(D%C3%BCsseldorf)#Brunnen
- Ich weiß nicht, ob das Bild im Artikel bleibt. Aber wir lieben diesen immer lachenden Rikschafahrer (und wir grüßen uns inzwischen). Schönes Foto. -- Kürschner (talk) 07:44, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
- Wenn ich neue Tinte für meinen Drucker gekauft habe, bringe ich ihm das Bild ;-). -- Kürschner (talk) 10:32, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
File:20100411 athina102.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jebulon (talk) 21:48, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
File:20100411 athina103.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jebulon (talk) 21:48, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Change to {{mbyname|David|Jan Baptist}}
Hi, I have seen that you changed {{DEFAULTSORT:David, Jan Baptist}} to {{mbyname|David|Jan Baptist}} in Category:Jan Baptist David. That resulted in a non existing Jan Baptist (given name). Do you have a special reason to do that? Regards, Wouter (talk) 13:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) I see several other such categories added by that template, some of which have been created. I don't really see the need for that template, but if it's kept maybe it could be changed so that it doesn't add categories for multiple words. --Auntof6 (talk) 16:31, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, I noticed your edits through my watchlist i.e. by this. Could you please subst these templates in future because of i.e. this discussion, This means dont add {{mbyname|Surname|given name}} but {{subst:mbyname:surname|given name}}. And of corse create "red" categories resulting by it if required. Thx. --JuTa 17:04, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- And another question: What is the sense behind edits like this. This is mixing up the sort order i.e. in Category:François (given name) complety. Could you please leave this as it is. Thx. --JuTa 17:14, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:59, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Catégorie
Bonsoir,
La guerre d'édition que vous engagez est ridicule : Category:Plaques commemorating the French Resistance in Lyon est incluse dans Category:Monuments and memorials in Lyon.
Par ailleurs merci de vous montrer moins agressif : revert sec sans explication, motivation agressive avec ???.
Je ne suis pas votre chien.
--Benoît Prieur (d) 18:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
PS : Croire en la bonne foi de l'autre et en la civilité c'est super bien ! L'appliquer c'est encore mieux Bonne soirée. --Benoît Prieur (d) 18:24, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:20140412 lefkada147.JPG
- File:20140412 lefkada150.JPG
- File:20140412 lefkada151.JPG
- File:20140412 lefkada152.JPG
Yours sincerely Geraki TLG 17:20, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:20140412 lefkada200.JPG
- File:20140412 lefkada201.JPG
- File:20140412 lefkada202.JPG
- File:20140412 lefkada203.JPG
- File:20140412 lefkada204.JPG
Yours sincerely Geraki TLG 17:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
2010 in Zagora-Mouresi has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Themightyquill (talk) 07:28, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
(Sorry to write in Engilsh)
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 09:23, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
File:20151106 lyon248.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:21, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
File:20151106 lyon250.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:22, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
File:20151106 lyon246.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84.250.0.210 19:24, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
File:20151106 lyon249.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84.250.0.210 19:33, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
File:20151106 lyon263.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84.250.0.210 19:34, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
File:20151106 lyon301.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84.250.0.210 19:35, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:20170716 seraing154.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:20170716 seraing154.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:20, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Renommage fichiers
S'il vous plaît, abstenez-vous de renommer mes fichiers, qui ont une logique interne assez aisée à comprendre = une date + un lieu, ce qui permet de retrouver aisément la place d'un cliché dans une série : les catégories suffisent largement à identifier les aspects spécifiques de telle ou tel photo ; par ailleurs, tant qu'à exercer vos talents, veuillez éviter les erreurs, du genre "delhaut"' pour "delahaut" ; enfin, dans bien des cas, des catégories bien conçues évitent des renommages abusifs ou inutiles : quand vous nommer une photo "Relâche (Paul Machiels)" pourquoi ne pas la renommer "Joggeurs au Sart Tilman" : une photo peut avoir plusieurs contenus, et il est impossible de vouloir les contenir toutes dans un titre, sinon alors il faudrait mettre : "Joggeurs au Sart Tilman, devant la sculpture "Relâche" de Paul Machiels, sur le temps de midi d'un jour de printemps" : c'est absurde, en gros, vous croyez lettre dans l'ordre, alors que vous réduisez le champ.
Aussi, pourriez-vous expliquer à quelqu'un de raisonnable à quelles catégories vous comptez corréler une catégorie absurde comme "Views of Liège from above" ??? … Views of Liège from below, Views of Liège from right, Views of Liège from left, et encore : allez fourrer les quartiers de Liège au fond d'un espèce de jeu de poupées russes, dans des catégories qui n'aurant sans doute jamais qu'un seul item, du genre "Subdivisions of Liège", c'est franchement hallucinant, là encore c'est apporter de la complication là où il faudrait aider l'utilisateur moyen avec des catégories PRAGMATIQUES plutôt que des élucubrations pseudo-logique.
Je vous conseillerais de lire attentivement l'article https://labyrinthe.revues.org/4051
- Cher Monsieur,
- Je me permets avant tout de vous signaler que le ton de votre message est tout à fait inadéquat.
- Premièrement, je tiens à vous rappeler que les images sur commons ont pour utilité première d'illustrer les différents projets Wikimedia et que les noms de ces fichiers, selon les conventions de nommage, doivent être descriptifs, choisis en rapport avec ce que l'image montre ou contient et précis, surtout lorsqu'il s'agit des noms scientifiques, des noms propres, des dates, etc sont utilisés.
- Je sais qu'il est fastidieux de catégoriser et nommer tous les fichiers surtout quand l'importation est importante. Et je comprends que les titres suivent une certaine logique et permettent de retracer le parcours effectué. Ceci dit, les sous-catégorisations nécessaires cassent cette logique.
- Dans le cas présent, j'ai souhaité illustrer la page du Musée en plein air du Sart Tilman sur WP francophone. Remarquant que certaines œuvres (même situées au second plan) n'étaient pas reprises sous la Category:Musée en Plein Air du Sart-Tilman, Liège, j'ai effectué un travail de catégorisation qui me semblait nécessaire. Pour certaines œuvres, j'ai également créées des sous catégories plus précises et vous remarquerez que dans ce cas je me suis abstenu de modifier le nom. Cependant, le renommage de certaines images "uniques" telle que File:...Psy (Pierre Caille).jpg permet à l'utilisateur parcourant la catégorie du musée d'identifier directement l'oeuvre et son artiste, ce qui lui était très ardu sans aucune autre sorte de description.
- Ensuite, il est bien entendu qu'il est très souvent impossible de faire transparaître dans le titre tout le contenu d'une photo, je vous l'accorde. Il s'agit alors de choisir les informations essentielles, ce qui est très subjectif.
- En ce qui concerne les autres catégories que vous évoquez, il s'agit en effet de catégories précises et qui peuvent, certes, apparaître comme un jeu de poupées russes mais qui suit la logique de catégorisations des autres grandes villes. On peut bien sûr remettre en cause ces formes de sous-catégorisations mais il faut alors le faire globalement afin d'éviter de casser l'arborescence.
- Très cordialement, CrucialFriend (talk) 08:58, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Views of
Bonjour,
Je souhaitais vous demander quelques éclaircissements concernant des sous-catégorisations que vous avez effectuées et nommées views of. Je ne comprends pas très bien la raison et la plus-value de la création d'une sous-catégorie Category:Views of Union nautique de Liège quand il existe une catégorie Category:Union nautique de Liège.
En vous remerciant d'avance, CrucialFriend (talk) 09:09, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi Jeanhousen, could you add the name of the sculptor to the description. --Túrelio (talk) 08:28, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi Jeanhousen, are you sure that the creators of these busts are already dead since >70 years? --Túrelio (talk) 08:30, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Vevey
Merci ! --H2O(talk) 17:59, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello Jeanhousen,
I'm writing you as one of the most active Commons users right now. Since a while now, the idea of a dedicated Commons conference has been floating around. But since the last Wikimania concrete steps have been taken to actually make it happen next year. If you're interested in participation or maybe willing to help organize the first ever Commons Conference, I invite you to check out the project page and leave your comments; or just show your support for the idea, by signing up.
Cheers,
--MB-one (talk) 19:57, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Autobus de la SRWT
Salut à toi,
J'ai remarqué l'ajout récent de 2 fichiers à la catégorie TEC-SRWT.
N'hésite pas à catégoriser tes photos en modèle de bus + ligne TEC (quel TEC) bus line XXX.
Les fichiers comme les 2 intérieurs de bus sont actuellement inutilisables par la communauté.
Je reste à ta disposition pour toute question.
Dldwg (talk) 22:18, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Retouched photo: File:20100409 korinthos16 b crop retouch.jpg
FYI: Both the graphic artist & I think this turned out well. It gives the "feel" of being in the museum, taking the photo with a long lens. Here are various other tries: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Graphic_Lab/Photography_workshop#Help_clean_up_background_of_museum_photo
Service above & beyond, imo. Now, to find a place for this....
And thanks for taking, and posting, your photo of this very cool sculpture. Love her 'do! Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 21:01, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
I don't understand....
Category:Churches in Agios Nikolaos vs Category:Churches in Agios Nikolaos, Crete... Are categories to join?--Threecharlie (talk) 16:51, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Sorry
Sorry Jeanhousen, the pictures have mistakenly slipped into the wrong category of russia. Greetings from Austria: --GT1976 (talk) 07:52, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
License plates in Belgium has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
E4024 (talk) 11:18, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
For adding so many categories to Wikimedia Commons and making sure that this website is well-organised and that images are easy to find, often I look up who created buildings-related categories when I'm adding images to them and find that you were the original creator. Wikimedia Commons needs more people like you. 😉 Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:29, 23 March 2018 (UTC) |
Kropia has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Place Clichy 16:00, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Kallithea
Stop adding the Kallithea category to pages that have clearly nothing to do with the area (in the case of File:Hippodromos Delta Falirou.JPG even the file name says Faliro and you still remove the Faliro category and add Kallithea).--Catlemur (talk) 21:29, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Pierre Wolper
Bonjour Jean,
Tu n'aurais pas une photo de Pierre Wolper ?
Merci d'avance. Cordialement, Cymbella (talk) 08:34, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Bonjour,
C'est peut être très bien de complètement chambouler les catégories existantes. Peut-être as-tu même raison de choisir ce système (mais ce n'est pas nécessairement partout pareil). Mais dans le futur, ce serait bien de discuter avec les personnes actives dans la catégorie AVANT de commencer. Moi par exemple, à cause de tes changelents très importants, je peux m'amuser à reporter tout celà dans OpenStrettMap qui reprend les liens vers les catégories... Avec une discussion au préalable, j'aurai pu travailler en parallèle sur les deux environnements sans perdre la supervision... Maintenant, c'est devenu très difficile!
Merci.
LeFagnard (talk) 13:56, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Mein Vorschlag an den User JEANHOUSEN:
Wenn Deine Umgangsformen, Dein Sprachniveau und Dein Intellekt häufiger eine so tragische Einheit bilden, wie es in Deiner Anrede an mich zu sehen war, dann überwinde Dich und verlasse nach 8 Jahren, 9 Monaten und 29 Tagen (so Dein stolzer Ticker) Commons. Denn dann wäre es ein absolutes Plus für die Gemeinschaft.
PS.
Ich lege übrigens sehr großen Wert darauf, dass dieses Schreiben nicht auf Deiner Userseite verschwindet, sondern allgemein zur Kenntnis genommen wird, denn ich denke, nur so kann man Leuten, die meinen so auftreten zu können, wie Du es tust, ihre Grenzen aufzeigen.
--Horst70 (talk) 18:49, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Category:Views_of_Syros-Ermoupoli has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |