User talk:Jaqen/Archive 5

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Enrique Breccia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
John Wick.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:55, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Corrado Roi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Milena Gabanelli by Paolo Visone - International Journalism Festival 2011.jpg

File:Milena Gabanelli by Paolo Visone - International Journalism Festival 2011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:53, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Category:Monica_Frassoni

Monica Frassoni has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 12:10, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Parametri archeowiki

Ho visto in File:Museo Rambotti - St 157355 - Tavoletta enigmatica - Cultura di Polada.jpg che c'è un parametro vuoto "{{{add}}}". --Nemo 16:34, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alwyn Hamilton.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:02, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Taiyō Matsumoto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:41, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:02, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paolo Mori.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:41, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:02, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Romano Prodi in 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Serge Latouche.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Ezarateesteban 14:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Steven Erikson.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paolo Guerrieri.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Difficult subject: the only reference is an article written by the interested person itself. we could think of self-promotion. Besides, he could have smiled.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Question @Jaqen: shouldn't the scope (and the Category) be "Paolo Guerrieri Paleotti"? At least that's how he's called in the wikipedia articles and on the website of the Senato della Repubblica … Apart from that, I think all relevant criteria are met: being a professor and member of the senate makes him notable enough, imho. --El Grafo (talk) 08:57, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

  @El Grafo: His complete name is indeed Paolo Guerrieri Paleotti but Paolo Guerrieri is most commonly used. Here a few examples: College of Europe, Senators of the Democratic Party, personal website. The website of the Senate always use the complete name, even if it's not commonly used, e.g. Paolo Gentiloni Silveri. Imho the Wikipedia articles should be moved: I've just opened a discussion on Italian Wikipedia. --Jaqen (talk) 09:17, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

• @Jaqen: Well, I guess there would be good arguments for and against any versions of the name. But if he's known under that name I'm OK with that. Could you maybe add a few words to the file description explaining who he is (Senator of X since YYYY …)? --El Grafo (talk) 09:44, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

• @El Grafo: Done! --Jaqen (talk) 09:52, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

• Great,  Support now. --El Grafo (talk) 10:10, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:32, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Luisa Gnecchi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - Best in scope, but I don't think Category:Palace of autonomous region Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol should be linked at the bottom of this photo, because although it was taken at a conference there, we can't see the palace in any meaningful way. Do you all agree or disagree? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:53, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

  @Ikan Kekek: I've moved it to a subcat! --Jaqen (talk) 15:03, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

•  Support - I'm fine with this. I think it's OK for a photo to appear in two galleries, but if it isn't, I hope someone speaks up. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:41, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:42, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vittorio Fravezzi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:42, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ryan Hoover.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Federico Taddia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:53, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Romina Falconi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Clearly best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:02, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Very good! -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 22:33, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Milo Manara.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:23, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Davide Reviati.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:23, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alex Young.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Adriano Tomasi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:26, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Corrado Mastantuono.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good image, used and useful -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:44, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:26, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tuono Pettinato.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support no other picture of this person --Trougnouf (talk) 10:36, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:40, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Danielle Nierenberg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support no other picture of this person --Trougnouf (talk) 10:37, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:40, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manuel Meli.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support no other picture --Trougnouf (talk) 10:37, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:41, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Michele Salvati.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gino Cuccarolo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Mikaela Shiffrin

Ciao! Ho provato a migliorare un po' l'illuminazione con una trasformata gamma. L'ho caricata come nuova versione, ma mi è venuto il dubbio che forse avrei dovuto caricarla come un differente file, non sono molto pratico con le regole in merito all'upload di versioni corrette di immagini preesistenti, rollbacka pure se ho sbagliato qualcosa :-) Buon proseguimento! --Tino (talk) 07:26, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brandon Graham.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope – I'm taking the liberty of removing the "(comics)" from the scope though (scope ≠ category) --El Grafo (talk) 17:07, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:23, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Antonio Nicaso.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 07:05, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fabio Vettori.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brian Azzarello.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Massimo Bacigalupo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Adriano Prosperi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kelly Sue DeConnick.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Augusto Minzolini.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fabrizio Zilibotti.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:20, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Fotografie di edifici recenti in Italia

Ultimamente un IP (151...) sta proponendo a manetta per la cancellazione tutte le foto di edifici recenti italiani. Ho rifiutato in massa, ma sarebbe bene mobilizzarci tutti, onde evitare cancellazioni ridicole. Ho preparato un testo di spiegazione: User:Ruthven/Italian_Copyright_Law da sottoporre agli altri admin. Magari lascia commenti in discussione, perché l'ho sottoposto anche ad altri utenti.

L'idea è che: in Italia c'è un organismo che gestisce i diritti d'autore per le opere architettoniche. Una commissione decide se un'opera vale la protezione oppure no. Quelle che non sono "registrate" presso il ministero, sono sotto la soglia d'originalità e quindi si possono fotografare (non che le altre non si possano, perché sembra che la protezione riguarda solo le mura, ma sarebbe guerra persa contro il PRP). Mi fai avere il tuo avviso? --Ruthven (msg) 10:16, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument to Dante (Trento) - Details and sculptures. Atonement, by Cesare Zocchi..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

  @Archaeodontosaurus:  Done --Jaqen (talk) 21:35, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:17, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Flavia Franzoni with her husband Romano Prodi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Two people should not constitute a scope. Charles (talk) 11:09, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp: Why not? --Jaqen (talk) 21:45, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Common sense; custom and practice; Example given in VI guidelines A portrait of a notable person Otherwise we could have an infinite number of scopes for pairs of things. Not the best image of Prodi. Charles (talk) 21:59, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

But this is not just a random pairs of things. They're a former prime minister of Italy and his wife. And the example is just an example. --Jaqen (talk) 07:32, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

I agree husband and wife is fine and the scope should reflect that I think. Charles (talk) 09:39, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp:  Done, thanks! --Jaqen (talk) 14:35, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

 Support good now. Charles (talk) 14:41, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:17, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Muretto di Alassio: signature of Carlo Levi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment This must be a facsimile signature. Charles (talk) 11:10, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp: I'm not sure about how the tiles are done, but I've modified the scope. --Jaqen (talk) 09:57, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

 Support Better now. Charles (talk) 14:56, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:21, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vittorio Emanuele Parsi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:44, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:00, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Linus (radio personality).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - By far the better of the 2 photos of him on Commons, as you said. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:15, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:12, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
→ Pia-no-jaC ←.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:05, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:12, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brandon Sanderson.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:27, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Daniele Piccini.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:35, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:12, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Roberto Casati.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:12, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument to Dante (Trento). Front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:50, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:12, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Faida di Piné.jpg

File:Faida di Piné.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:59, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Roberto Fico.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope Voltmetro 18:17, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Massimo Gramellini.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope, I agree.--Jebulon (talk) 09:09, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:28, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Antonio Graves.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:28, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Claudio Cerasa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:36, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
J-Ax.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:37, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Robert Crumb.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:59, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Renato Ballardini.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
B.J. Elder.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:08, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sylvie Goulard.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:54, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace of autonomous region Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol: Council Hall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:55, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marco Boato.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:50, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maurizio Zanolla (portrait).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:39, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:50, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Grazie

Si credo di aver capito come mantenere il peso delle immagini senza scalare, sono alle primissime armi con GIMP ed è dura! Uso purtroppo il cellulare e ciò non mi aiuta per niente. Vedrò più avanti. Ho anche in problema con le categorie, non mi ricordo come posso in una categoria generare una sotto categoria p.e.: cat:chiese --> cat:chiesa di XY; mi ricordi come si fa? Grazieeeeeeeeeeee!OppidumNissenae (talk) 08:47, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Dove sbaglio? [1]OppidumNissenae (talk) 09:38, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Ho provato a sistemare le chiese a CL, forse ho fatto alcune cat. ridondanti, non ti scoccio più grazie.OppidumNissenae (talk) 10:19, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carlo Cottarelli.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:44, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:26, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Domenico De Masi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:36, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:53, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bob Allen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:40, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:53, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Branko Milanović.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:20, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:54, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Remo Bodei.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:01, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Picte (talk) 14:18, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Richard Baldwin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Picte (talk) 14:18, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stefano Rodotà.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Peulle (talk) 19:43, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Picte (talk) 10:25, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Piero Badaloni.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Picte (talk) 10:26, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carlo De Benedetti.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Picte (talk) 10:27, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rasheed Araeen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope — Rhododendrites ^talk |  01:46, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Picte (talk) 10:27, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alessandro Tambellini.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zu (band).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:51, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument to Dante (Trento), Minos sitting on the dragon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

  @Archaeodontosaurus:  Done! --Jaqen (talk) 07:38, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:41, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Massimo Cialente.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Giovanni Battista Unterveger, San Romedio, ante 1881.jpg

Copyright status: File:Giovanni Battista Unterveger, San Romedio, ante 1881.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Giovanni Battista Unterveger, San Romedio, ante 1881.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

4shadoww (talk) 19:36, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joy Buolamwini - Wikimania 2018 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:18, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Joy Buolamwini.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support High quality image that captures the subject's personality well. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:20, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:51, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

foto tagliata

Caro Nicola, perchè questa foto è tagliata in alto? è un tuo errore o un tetto la taglia? Ciao --Giaccai (talk) 10:37, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mark Buckingham.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:37, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:22, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Richard McGuire.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:03, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:45, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments ti aspetta, con centinaia di nuovi comuni fotografabili

Concorso Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2018 (English version)

Gentile Jaqen, ti ringraziamo ancora una volta per la tua passata partecipazione a Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM). Il più grande concorso fotografico del mondo si svolge anche questo settembre per documentare e promuovere il patrimonio culturale italiano, con una licenza copyright libera.

Quest'anno è doppiamente facile partecipare: gli oggetti fotografabili coprono quasi 1000 comuni in più, grazie all'adesione di centinaia di nuovi enti fra cui Roma, e alla possibilità di fotografare circa 2000 alberi monumentali. Controlla le liste di monumenti fotografabili! Carica tutte le foto che hai e magari organizza una visita presso i monumenti che ancora non hanno una foto.

Quest'oggi il Parlamento europeo ha respinto la proposta di estendere la libertà di panorama. E allora scattiamo e pubblichiamo tutte le foto che possiamo, almeno per questi monumenti per cui ci è legalmente consentito!

Grazie, Nemo 16:06, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Non fare lo stupidotto

Ad essere reattivi si finisce con l'essere reazionari anche nella vita reale. Ti vuoi vendicare? Non cancellare un file che ho trasferito da it.wiki (e che è pubblicato prima del 1923!) --Ruthven (msg) 19:23, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Ah no! Troppo facile così. L'avviso lo lascio per farti contento perché, io, in fondo ti voglio bene :* Ruthven (msg) 19:28, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Ma se correggo la licenza, levo pure l'avviso. Ti pare? Se proprio lo vuoi tenere quel file, usa {{PD-anon-1923}} (è pre-1923, quindi non ci sono problemi di sorta lato US), questo sopponendo che sia un'opera anonima, altrimenti lo si può ripristinare pacificamente nel 2031 con {{PD-old-assumed}}. Lascio a te la scelta. --Ruthven (msg) 19:49, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

"Riscrivimi quando hai voglia di discutere seriamente, ciao!" <3 --Ruthven (msg) 20:02, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

No, è che –pieno di Wikilove– io presumo la buona fede dell'utente che caricò il file. :) --Ruthven (msg) 20:09, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Ovvio. Non mi fido di te (cit.) --Ruthven (msg) 20:37, 8 October 2018 (UTC)