User talk:Hubertl/QI-Archiv 4-2015

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leica Ia, 1927 from mid-right, front with collapsed lens and lens cap.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:51, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:31, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leica I a, 1927 top view with expanded lens.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:52, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:31, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leica Ia, 1927, back view from right..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 21:09, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:31, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leica Ia, 1927 front side with attached distance meter.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:53, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:31, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leica Ia, 1927 back view with attached distance meter.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:55, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:32, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2015-08-13 - Leica I, 1927 - lange Fassung mit Musik.webm, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2015-08-13 - Leica I, 1927 - lange Fassung mit Musik.webm has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:LEI0440 190 Leica IIIf chrom - Sn. 580566 1951-52-M39 vs. Minox Leica IIIf Ohne Blitz Version 2-6124 hf.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:LEI0440 190 Leica IIIf chrom - Sn. 580566 1951-52-M39 vs. Minox Leica IIIf Ohne Blitz Version 2-6124 hf.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:11, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

QI nom - branches

Good evening, File:Portage Viaduct.jpg I was wondering if you were talking only about the branches that pass on front of the subject not the branches is the upper right. I wasn't able to add a comment after declination and I didn't quite want to contest. B137 (talk) 21:02, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

The branches in the foreground.Change the deline-tag to discuss.--Hubertl 22:02, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Well I was just wondering, I'm not sure any other user would disagree with you. I duly note that it is an issue. B137 (talk) 22:07, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Are you suggesting that I contest? B137 (talk) 23:13, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

sure, maybe I´m wrong! --Hubertl 23:14, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuffner-Sternwarte - das Heliometer-1133-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 18:38, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuffner-Sternwarte-Heliometertrakt 1008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --El Golli Mohamed 17:44, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20143 - Tritonen- und Najadenbrunnen - Brunnen A - southeast Anton Schmidgruber-0071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:14, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuffner-Sternwarte - Plattenmessapparat-1153-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:26, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuffner-Sternwarte - das Heliometer-1128-32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:26, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 89450 Straßenbrücke, Prutzer Innbrücke, Tirol-352.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 11:30, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 19522 Josefskapelle St. Leonhard-8130.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:24, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 7797 Heeresgeschichtliches Museum Feldherrenhalle - Statuen-0251 2 3 4 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:48, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HGM - Stiegenhaus 0357 58 59 60 61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:37, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Götska_tornet_November_2015_03.jpg

Would you mind having a look at the last version? The perspective settings are the same as for the second version (-40, the first version was -77), but I rotated the images 0,76 degrees cw. Regards--ArildV (talk) 22:26, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

It makes me kind of dizzy now, ArildV, but I think it´s better than before. Sorry for my maybe hauntingly reaction. --Hubertl 00:21, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 7797 Heeresgeschichtliches Museum Feldherrenhalle - Statuen-0221 2 3 4 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:44, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HGM - Stiegenhaus 0311 2 3 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:46, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gräf & Stift automobile of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-0486.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:06, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skoda 24 cm mortar M 1898 0541.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:06, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AJDUKIEWICZ Tadeusz (Thaddäus), Franz Joseph I. auf dem Manöverfeld 1891 HGM -0463-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:20, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Description in English Quality Image Promotion

Dear Hubertl, my friend (Valen1988) did not understand English but I helped him correct description it's good or it must do something else? --Armenak Margarian (talk) 14:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuffner-Sternwarte-Heliometertrakt 1003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:26, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuffner-Sternwarte - das Heliometer-1148-52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:26, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tugendbrunnen, Nürnberg June 2015-4530.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be a touch of blue/magenta. --XRay 10:26, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adolf Lieben (Nr. 61) Bust in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-9290.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:26, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 92849 Hotel Hochfinstermünz, Nauders-7800.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:26, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Hubertl, 48 hours have not passed since the last vote, nor 8 days from the start of the CR, neither is the result definite [1] --C messier (talk) 14:59, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

You are right, C messier, thank you! I´ve overseen, that Armenak Margarian placed his later vote before my comment. --Hubertl 15:01, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuffner-Sternwarte - Der Vertikalkreis-1168-71.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuffner-Sternwarte - Der Meridiankreis-1123-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:26, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13533 Richterhaus, Wenns-3813.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:26, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HGM armored cupela of fort Kessel-Antwerp for 22pound Horwitzer 0516.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HGM - Stiegenhaus 0455 49 50 51 52 53 54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 15:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Consensual Review

Hallo Hubertl, ich bin in letzter Zeit etwas konsterniert, wie schnell Du die consensual reviews schließt, z.B. hier. Das Bild wurde am 22.11. nominiert und war erst seit vier Tagen im consensual review. Bei anderen Bildern bist Du genauso schnell. Warum die Eile? --Code (talk) 06:29, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

@Code: Du hast richtig beobachtet: Wie es in den Regeln steht - Punkt 3 - kann ein CR 48 Stunden nach dem letzten Beitrag - und ich gehe davon aus, dass Beiträge von Stimmen gemeint sind, nicht jedoch Diskussionsbeiträge - geschlossen werden. Soferne es eine mehrheitliche Stimmmenge gibt. Bei Gleichstand werden 8 Tage seit Beginn des CR-Prozesses verlangt. Somit wäre ich mit diesen Entscheidungen regelkonform. In deinem Fall lagen zwischen der letzten Stimme und dem Schließen über 60 Stunden, wenn man die Abarbeitung durch den QI-Bot miteinbezieht waren es an die 68 Stunden.

Meine Überlegung war, dass man, wenn man das anwendet, dadurch die Anzahl der in Diskussion befindlichen Einzelprozesse reduziert, um mit einer verbesserten Übersicht einen Anreiz zu schaffen, dass sich mehr Leute beteiligen. Erinnerlich hatten wir bis zu 15 Einzelprozesse die vor sich hindümplelten. Ich muss aber gestehen, dass sich die Reduzierung nicht wirklich auf die Beteiligung ausgewirkt hat. Nach der Erfahrung von nun ca 10 Tagen sehe ich meine Erwartungen aber nur teilweise erfüllt. Es wäre vielleicht sinnvoll, dass man vielleicht zusätzlich an irgendeiner Stelle auf die Notwendigkeit hinweist, sich an CR zu beteiligen. Aber auch das ist eher ein Wunschdenken.

Mein Vorschlag wäre, dass man ev. die 48 Std. entweder auf den letzten Diskussionsbeitrag anwendet (damit wäre die Möglichkeit gegeben, dass der Betroffene sich die Diskussion selbst aktiv offenhalten kann, in der Hoffnung, dass das nicht exzessiv ausgenutzt wird) oder insgesamt die Zeitspanne von 48 Stunden auf - zB drei Tage - erhöht wird. Ersteres fände ich besser, denn vielfach gibt es keine Reaktion von den Betroffenen selbst. Natürlich könnte man noch den verkürzten Prozess nur für diese Fälle überlegen, wo es zB 1:3 bzw. 3:1 oder mehr steht. Dann wird es aber wiederum zu kompliziert, das den Leuten zu erklären. Fakt ist, dass es relativ selten zu solchen Entschiedungen kommt, wo sich wirklich - jenseits der Minimalstimmenanzahl - viele Leute beteiligen. Ich habe mir das mit den 48 Stunden mehrfach durchgedacht und bin zur Überzeugung gekommen, dass es sich dabei um den im Grunde genommen selben Zeitraum handelt, den auch der QI-Bot für sich anwendet, wenn es eine Mehrheit gibt. Bei Gleichstand ist es anders, folgt aber ebenfalls dem Muster des Bots, der gänzlich unbewertete Bilder ca 8 Tage stehen lässt, sie aber dann doch abräumt. --Hubertl 11:10, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Ok, danke für die Aufklärung. Ich hab nichts dagegen, wenn CR schneller geschlossen wird. Ich war es halt nur gewohnt, dass die Einträge dort bislang immer etwas länger diskutiert wurden. Ich hab das Gefühl, dass CR momentan mehr oder minder defekt ist. Zu wenig kompetente Beteiligung. Aber QIC ist ja allgemein irgendwie anders geworden in letzter Zeit. Leider habe ich selbst nicht mehr die Zeit, mich richtig zu beteiligen. Schön, dass Du Dich so intensiv kümmerst. Danke dafür. Viele Grüße. --Code (talk) 17:33, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

@Code: Ich kann deinen Eindruck nur dahingehend bestätigen, dass aktuell - wg. WLM und WLE - einige neue User dazugekommen sind. Durch die Metrics-Vorgaben der Foundation, welche die Chapter bei der Vergabe von Förderungen verpflichten, messbare, in diesem Fall messbar durch QI, Ergebnisse zu bringen, kommt es zu Fremdnominierungen, welche dann bei Rückfrage per Kommentar von den Nominierenden wie auch von den Photografen selbst nicht erfüllt werden (können). Ich mache ja immer Teilnehmer auf die gegenseitige Prüfungsverpflichtung aufmerksam, meistens nützt das auch was, nur ganz selten ist einer beleidigt. Bei Medium69 war es dann gleich so, dass er im Anschluss gleich wie eine Dampflok reingefahren ist, aber das ist besser als es zuvor war, als er nur beleidigt war, wenn er kritisiert wurde. Ein paar alte Herren tauchen immer wieder auf, auch um zu zeigen, dass sie alte Herren sind, wie zB der Alvesgaspar. Aber ich denke, so wird es immer sein. Kritisch wird es nur, wenn die Eigenprüfung der Bilder vor der Nominierung nachlässt, aktuell etwas bei Poco und XRay. Aber das sind temporäre Erscheinungen, meine ich. Dazu halt noch die Theoretiker, insgesamt aber doch eine erkennbar arbeitsfähige Mischung. Ich bin ja mit einigen von hier in gutem Kontakt, das erleichtert natürlich auch meine Aufräumarbeit (bei der ich immer wieder unterstützt werde), weil Fehler schnell und unkompliziert augebügelt werden können und man weiß, was man persönlich voneinander zu halten hat. lg nach Berlin, --Hubertl 17:55, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Seltsames Problem

Hallo Hubertl, ich habe eine seltsames Problem mit überarbeiteten Dateien. Seit vorgestern kann ich neue Versionen nur im Thumbnail sehen, aber nicht mehr in der Normalansicht. Beispielsweise bei File:101 059-4, Köln 2013-08-03.jpg sind immernoch lila Oberleitungen zu erkennen, obwohl ich sie bearbeitet habe. Hast Du einen Ahnung woran das liegen kann? Viele Grüße --Rolf H. (talk) 18:06, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Rolf, ich sehe beim Ursprungsbild auch den Magentastich, der aber beim aktuellen Bild nicht mehr da ist. Es gibt zwei Möglichkeiten, den beschriebenen Problemen entgegenzuwirken, der Grund liegt im Cache. Entweder in deinem, oder dem des Servers. Deinen Cache kannst du umgehen, indem du entweder oben auf der Seite bei "Mehr" auf Purge klickst, dann wird die Seite völlig neu vom Server geladen und jeglicher Zwischenspeicher umgangen. Ein weiteres mögliches Problem ist der Cache-Speicher auf deinem Rechner. Den umgehst du, dass du die Seite neu ladest, aber nicht mit dem üblichen Reload, sondern mit der Tastenkombination: Strg-Shift-R. damit wird der Cache übergangen. Falls das nicht funktioniert, dann ist es oft sinnvoll, einfach den Browser neu starten, wie ich es gerade vor ein paar Minuten gemacht habe. Und es hat zumindest mit deinen Bildern funktioniert.

BTW: die MagentaCAs waren relativ harmlos, gemessen am kritischen Kontrast, mMn.

Gruß aus Wien, --Hubertl 18:16, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Morjen Hubertl, erstmal vielen Dank für Deine Tipps. Am eigenen Cache lag es nicht, denn ich habe es auch noch mit Chrome probiert. Seit eben funktioniert es wieder (wie von Geisterhand).

Das Bild werde ich nich bei QI einstellen, es sollte nur zur Demonstration dienen. Für den Himmel müsste ich da m. E. zu sehr in den Farbpott greifen. Viele Grüße und schönes Wochenende --Rolf H. (talk) 04:31, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Ich machs lieber hier - da ich nicht weiß ob es wieder ein Cache-Problem ist, obwohl ich jetzt an einem anderen Rechner sitze. Ich sehe an dem Bild immer noch CAs - einmal am Markisenkasten und zum zweiten an dem grauen Fensterrahmen. Kannst mir ja bescheid geben, ob ich richtig lag. Gruß --Rolf H. (talk) 17:31, 4 December 2015 (UTC) Nachsatz: und Auf den beiden A von Kaas sind auch noch zwei dicke lila Spiegelungen. Gruß --Rolf H. (talk) 17:47, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

@Rolf H.: : Nein, es war kein Cache-Problem. Es gab in den Grenzbereichen tatsächlich noch ein Problem, das aber vom Kontrast her zu gering war, als dass es von der Farbkorrektur von Lightroom erfasst wurde. Da habe ich das mit Photoshop händisch nachgeholfen, war aber tatsächlich bereits auf Pixelebene. Man sieht aber, dass auch - wie in diesem Fall - ein 3000-Euro-Objektiv seine Grenzen hat. Ist meiner Meinung nach unvermeidbar (auch wenn es im Vergleich zu anderen natürlich wirklich gute Werte liefert) wenn es - wie an der Ecke, wo es einen Lichteinfall gegeben hat -, dann doch wahrscheinlich muckst. Da ich aber ohne jegliche Automatik fotografiere, alles selbst kontrolliere, außer der Belichtungszeit in diesem Fall, - 1/320, ISO 200, F/8 - ist ein Handhabungsfehler praktisch ausgeschlossen. Was erkennbar war, ist ein Motion-Blur, ausgelöst durch einen Windstoß genau an der Ecke, der minimal eine Bewegung in einem Teil des Markisenstoffes ausgelöst ist. Kein Kamera-Shake. Nicht ungewöhnlich in Wien, da windets immer. Die Spiegelung bei den Buchstaben ist echt, das ist kein Fehler, auch kein Farbfehler, die Frau Kaas achtet darauf, dass ihr Geschäftsschild sauber ist und alles blitzt, glänzt und spiegelt. Die Eigentümerin heißt tatsächlich Kaas, sie verkauft auch Kaas (Käse). Ich meine, um jetzt auf hohem Niveau zu bleiben, dass diese CA-Fehler nur durch die nächste Generation von Sensoren, wie sie nun in den neuen Sony/Nikon Profi-Kameras drinnen sind, vermieden werden können. Die 5D Mark III hat keinen besseren Sensor als ich in der 6D, möglicherweise wäre das mit der 5Ds R nicht passiert, ich habe da meine speziellen Theorien bzgl. dieser wahnsinnsauflösenden Sensoren. Aber ich hab grad nicht so viel in der Portokasse, dass ich da einen Wechsel vornehmen kann. Meine Objektive - ich habe nur L-Objektive - die würden das aber aushalten und den Qualitätssprung mitmachen. --Hubertl 19:53, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Albin Egger-Lienz, Die Namenlosen (1916), Heeresgeschichtliches Museum, Wien 0594-Bearbeitet.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Albin Egger-Lienz, Die Namenlosen (1916), Heeresgeschichtliches Museum, Wien 0594-Bearbeitet.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Josef Unger (Nr. 65) bust (bronze) in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-9324.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:46, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hermann Bonitz (Nr. 59) Statue in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-9307.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:46, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franz von Miklosich (Nr. 55) Bust in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-9386.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:46, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Schatten?

Offenbar habe ich dich nicht verstanden :-( --Ralf Roleček 18:11, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Mit "shadows" sind die Tiefen gemeint, du hast aber alles aufgehellt. Wuascht. Schönes Wochenende. --Hubertl 18:14, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuffner-Sternwarte - das Heliometer-1138-42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:06, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tugendbrunnen, Nürnberg June 2015-4542.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:06, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antoniuskapelle, Prutz in Tirol 346.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:06, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20143 Tritonen- und Najadenbrunnen, Hofmann von Aspernburg, southwest side-5283.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:12, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015-10-24 Karmelitermarket on saturday, Vienna 0691.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Michael Barera 02:11, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015-10-24 Karmelitermarket on saturday, Vienna 0683.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Very nice! --Michael Barera 02:11, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adolf Lieben (Nr. 61) Bust in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-9276.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:12, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 7797 Heeresgeschichtliches Museum Feldherrenhalle - Statuen-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:12, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adolf Lieben (Nr. 61) Bust in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-9274.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pity vertically far left but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 16:32, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leo Graf Thun und Hohenstein (Nr. 58) Statue in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-9357.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:01, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuffner-Sternwarte - Der Vertikalkreis-1163.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 00:32, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 71448 Hofkapelle Kompatsch, Nauders-447.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Michael Barera 01:35, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AJDUKIEWICZ Tadeusz (Thaddäus), Franz Joseph I. auf dem Manöverfeld 1891 HGM-0456.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 00:32, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015-10-24 Karmelitermarket on saturday, Vienna 0702.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I really like your market shots! --Michael Barera 01:35, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuffner-Sternwarte - Der Meridiankreis-1092-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but could be a bit brighter --Uoaei1 07:06, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marientormauer, Nürnberg June 2015-4814.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit on the dark side, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 16:27, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HGM - Stiegenhaus 0342 3 4 5 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imho --Berthold Werner 11:25, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HGM - Stiegenhaus 0347 8 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:36, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 7797 Heeresgeschichtliches Museum Feldherrenhalle - Statuen-0296 7 8 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:36, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Otto Benndorf (1838-1907), bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna (Nr. 67)-1261.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:36, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 39856 Festung Nauders, North Tyrol-483.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 01:47, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water cooled Airplane Motor 12 cylinder, Ferdinand Porsche 0564.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Outstanding quality! --Michael Barera 02:10, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedrich Jodl (1849-1914), bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna (Nr. 66)-1258.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Michael Barera 02:10, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Otto Benndorf (1838-1907), bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna (Nr. 67)-1270-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Very nice captures of busts! --Michael Barera 02:10, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015-10-24 Karmelitermarket on saturday, Vienna 0676.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:39, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Mittwoch?

Kann ich nächsten Mittwoch mal wieder bei dir nächtigen? Hab am Do. auf dem Amt zu tun..--Ralf Roleček 11:42, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Klar. Der 9. Dez, wahrscheinlich...--Hubertl 11:54, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Genau. Komme 16:30 in Bratislava an. Treffen dann im Beisserl? --Ralf Roleček 12:11, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Am Abend ist ja die Nachwehfeier der Preisverleihung... --Hubertl 12:41, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Deshalb habe ich mich da ja auch eingetragen. --Ralf Roleček 13:29, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Ich konnte nicht mehr Danke sagen. Hat übrigens alles geklappt, bin jetzt Wiener ;) --Ralf Roleček 20:55, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Na wenn das zu keinem langfristigen Schaden führt! Bei Bedarf gerne wieder! --Hubertl 21:25, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Innert 3 Monaten muß ich Daueraufenthalt beantragen, das wird weit anstrengender als heute. Dazu brauch ich dann auch wieder einen Donnerstag. Und mal wieder einen längeren Schwatzabend ;) Ich baue mir gerade ein mobiles Fotostudio im Koffer. --Ralf Roleček 23:32, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Ich schick dir den Donauwalzer (linksdrehend, musst üben) dazu noch die österr. Bundeshymne in der letzten Fassung. Das muss man alles können. Dazu natürlich die geläufigen Austriazismen. Brathendl ist man stilgerecht mit den Fingern, nicht mit Besteck.. Aber das sollte dir vom Pizzaessen geläufig sein --Hubertl 00:02, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Schon 6 Jahre her... Das könnten wir auch mal wiederholen :-) Ich habe übrigens auch etwas aufgerüstet. Das kann durchaus als kleine Blitzanlage dienen. --Ralf Roleček 20:43, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

War cool, damals. Damals waren die September so kalt/warm wie heute die November. Und - überraschenderweise ein selbstgebackenes Bauernbrot von mir. Der Rest war ja gekauft, außer die Paradeiser, die waren von meinem Dachgarten. --Hubertl 20:56, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Es war mein erstes Mal in Wien und das hat mich irgendwie geprägt. Sowas hab ich nicht erwartet. Du hast mich infiziert ;) --Ralf Roleček 21:10, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Josef Seegen (1822-1904), Nr. 72 bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1328.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Michael Barera 03:52, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Julius von Wiesner (1838-1916), Nr. 71 bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1315.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Michael Barera 03:52, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heinrich von Bamberger (1822-1888), Nr. 70 bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1299.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Michael Barera 03:52, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Robert Ultzmann (1842-1889), Nr. 69, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1284.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 01:19, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franz Klein (1854-1926), Nr. 68, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1276.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:47, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20143 - Tritonen- und Najadenbrunnen - Brunnen A - southeast Anton Schmidgruber-0067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very weak  Support Not easy. Only the fountain is sharp. Most parts of the image are unsharp. But I think this it what you want. --XRay 07:17, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedrich Jodl (1849-1914), bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna (Nr. 66)-1246.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:49, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

I believe he has to learn where is the correct location (it's not difficult). It is not the first time to do this mistake, which (s)he corrected later himself. --C messier (talk) 19:02, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

This is not the way, someone will learn anything. Tell him how. In a polite and respectful way. As you will do it with your children. If you don´t have some, take it as an advice, free of charge. --Hubertl 19:08, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 71448 Hofkapelle Kompatsch, Nauders-456.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:10, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 64835 Stanz mit Pfarrkirche hll. Peter und Paul-106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:10, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13527 Kath. Pfarrkirche hl. Johannes Evangelist und Friedhof, Wenns-8255.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:10, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Nebligen Sonne im Wasser.

Heinz Guten Abend,
vielen Dank für die Förderung der Datei-Foto: Morgennebel hängt über "Es Wikelslân. Ort, De Alde Feanen in Friesland 06.jpg.
Du meinst wohl den nebligen Sonne im Wasser.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Dominicus Bergsma.

Hallo Domenicus, ja, zuerst dachte ich dass es so ist. Aber dann habe ich es genauer studiert. Sonne. Ich wünsche euch einen schönen Dezember mit vielen stimmungsvollen Bildern! --Hubertl 18:32, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Vielen Dank.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:38, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herrman Bonitz (Nr. 59) Statue in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-9306.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:39, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Julius von Wiesner (1838-1916), Nr. 71 basrelief (bronce) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1314.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:39, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skoda 380mm M1916 HeeresgeschichtlichesMuseum, Vienna 0546 47 48 49 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:28, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 65034 Expositurkirche Mariä Reinigung (Falterschein)-7331.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:26, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 71448 Hofkapelle Kompatsch, Nauders-7721.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 02:23, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk (Nr. 8) Bust in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-1330-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 04:51, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 7797 Heeresgeschichtliches Museum Feldherrenhalle - Statuen-0276 7 8 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly tilted ccw (see central column) --Uoaei1 05:52, 2 December 2015 (UTC) *  Comment  Done tilt corrected. Thanks for reviewing, Uoaei1--Hubertl 09:46, 2 December 2015 (UTC)  Support --Uoaei1 10:16, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20143 Tritonen- und Najadenbrunnen, Hofmann von Aspernburg, southwest side-5272.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:49, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franz Exner (Nr. 57) Bust in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-9358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:53, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:08, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HGM Bust of Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Este 0501.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:35, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andreas Josef von Stifft (Nr. 2) - Bust in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-1326.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:13, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015-10-24 Karmelitermarket on saturday, Vienna 0705.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:35, 3 December 2015 (UTC)  Comment Please fix the cloning error (see note). --Tsungam 08:08, 3 December 2015 (UTC)  Done, thanks for your concentrated attention, Tsungam. Shit happens sometimes. But a good thing, to have a non-destructive workflow... --Hubertl 09:10, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

re:FP Promotion

Thanks for the voting :) --Pudelek (talk) 16:59, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferdinand von Arlt (1812-1887), Nr. 80 basrelief (bronce) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1402.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:50, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leopold von Dittel (1815-1898), Nr. 79 basrelief (bronce) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna 1397.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:50, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hans Horst Meyer (1853-1939), Nr. 78, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1361.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:54, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedrich Hasenöhrl (1874-1915), Nr. 77, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna 1382.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:11, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuffner-Sternwarte - das Heliometer-1143-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:12, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13527 Kath. Pfarrkirche hl. Johannes Evangelist und Friedhof, Wenns-8253.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ. --Palauenc05 18:20, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hans Horst Meyer (1853-1939), Nr. 78, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:21, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edmund von Neusser (1852-1912), Nr. 74, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1341.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:22, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20143 Tritonen- und Najadenbrunnen, Hofmann von Aspernburg, southwest side-5287.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:40, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Garrigue Masaryk (Nr. 43) Bust in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-1413.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:40, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anton Josef Hye von Gluneck (Nr. 45) Bust in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-1387.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:25, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Victor von Lang (Nr. 60) Bust in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-9314.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:44, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Josef Unger (Nr. 65) bust (bronze) in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-9321.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:21, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skoda 24 cm mortar M 1898 0536.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:08, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015-10-24 Karmelitermarket on saturday, Vienna 0667.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments please remove the CAs - see note --Rolf H. 13:11, 4 December 2015 (UTC)*  Comment  Done thanks for reviewing,Rolf --Hubertl 16:42, 4 December 2015 (UTC)  Support now --Rolf H. 06:52, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:HGM - Stiegenhaus 0347 8 9.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:HGM - Stiegenhaus 0347 8 9.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuffner-Sternwarte - Plattenmessapparat-1158-61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:22, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 64835 Stanz mit Pfarrkirche hll. Peter und Paul-7225.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful landscape. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:46, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 13533 Richterhaus, Wenns-3817-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems a little crooked, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 16:22, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water cooled Airplane Motor 12 cylinder, Ferdinand Porsche 0569 70 71 72.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Powerful engine. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:48, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20143 - Tritonen- und Najadenbrunnen - Brunnen A - southeast Anton Schmidgruber-0035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:22, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 64835 Stanz mit Pfarrkirche hll. Peter und Paul-7223.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 01:04, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skoda 380mm M1916 HeeresgeschichtlichesMuseum, Vienna 0531-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 01:04, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9339.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 20:21, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:05, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edmund von Neusser (1852-1912), Nr. 74, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1333.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:13, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andreas Josef von Stifft (Nr. 2) - Bust in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-1324.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carl Menger (Nr. 3) Bust in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-1329.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crosses of unknown soldiers, I. World War - HGM 0480 77 76 78 79.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:23, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gräf & Stift automobile of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-0496.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:27, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 71448 Hofkapelle Kompatsch, Nauders-424.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:59, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hans Horst Meyer (1853-1939), Nr. 78, bust (bronze) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1364.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:23, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 92849 Hotel Hochfinstermünz, Nauders--8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:10, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 19500 Wallfahrtskirche hl. Maria am Bichele mit 20 Stationsbildstöcken-8216.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:51, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 71448 Hofkapelle Kompatsch, Nauders-7702.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:51, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9220.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:58, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Josef Seegen (1822-1904), Nr. 72 bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1323.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:54, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water cooled Airplane Motor 12 cylinder, Ferdinand Porsche 0564 5 6 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 02:31, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ludwig Barth von Barthenau (Nr. 47) Bust in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-1366.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:10, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leopold Hasner von Artha (Nr. 56) Bust in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-9235-Bearbeitet-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:40, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hermann Bonitz (Nr. 59) Statue in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-9301.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:49, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9043.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9043.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 65034 Expositurkirche Mariä Reinigung (Falterschein)-7329.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:43, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:38, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:43, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20143 - Tritonen- und Najadenbrunnen - Brunnen A - southeast Anton Schmidgruber-0061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:01, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality images candidates

Hello. What should I do with my The Sundering of the Elves.png nomination for Quality image? I've uploaded a new version that is 2235×1570 pixels and it's not pixelated, but it still have 2 1 opposing vote saying it's too small and pixelated despite that I've uploaded a new version. Should I nominate it again? It's my first time with quality images so I don't know how it works. Agnaton (talk) 13:59, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Edit: Cccefalon changed his vote :) Agnaton (talk) 14:45, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

This is a typical Vector-Grafic-image, Agnaton, not made for Bitmap-format. This is the solution. Save it as svg-format and upload it.--Hubertl 14:22, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

I know but as I've said there, Sameboat - 同舟 said under my SVG_help question that this image will look good in svg only in full size so I must stay with png on this one so it look good in preview size in articles like Elf (Middle-earth) and Sundering of the Elves. So I hope that Dllu will see my new - not pixelated - version and change his vote :) Agnaton (talk) 14:45, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Edit: I've done my best and it's .svg now! :) Best regards, Agnaton (talk) 16:57, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 92849 Hotel Hochfinstermünz, Nauders-541.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:22, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gräf & Stift automobile of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-0491.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:22, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9332.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:37, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20143 Tritonen- und Najadenbrunnen, Hofmann von Aspernburg, southwest side-5303.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 03:03, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015-10-24 Karmelitermarket on saturday, Vienna 0665.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 03:03, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hans Horst Meyer (1853-1939), Nr. 78, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1362.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:23, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edmund von Neusser (1852-1912), Nr. 74, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1336.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:24, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Josef Seegen (1822-1904), Nr. 72 bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1326.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:24, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 7797 Heeresgeschichtliches Museum Feldherrenhalle - Statuen-203.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ. --Palauenc05 08:38, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015-10-24 Karmelitermarket on saturday, Vienna 0699.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:45, 13 December 2015 (UTC)  Comment I agree, but please remove the dust spot --Rolf H. 09:51, 13 December 2015 (UTC) *  Comment  Done Dustspot removed! Thanks Rolf --Hubertl 11:23, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015-10-24 Karmelitermarket on saturday, Vienna 0664.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:10, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 7797 Heeresgeschichtliches Museum Feldherrenhalle - Statuen-0236 37 38 39 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:12, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9213.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent quality. The next FP candidate? Most probably! --Johann Jaritz 14:13, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20143 Tritonen- und Najadenbrunnen, Hofmann von Aspernburg, southwest side-5251.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:55, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andreas Josef von Stifft (Nr. 2) - Bust in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-1322.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:12, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

QIC/recently promoted

Eigentlich soll das ja nun obsolet sein. Aber hast du verstanden, wie denn nun genau die Alternative aussehen soll? Ich nicht. Verfahren? Anleitung? Tools? Bots? -- Smial (talk) 11:36, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Smial, ich habe mir überlegt, was im Grunde genommen der Sinn von Quality Images sein soll - jetzt mal abgesehen davon, dass es eine Fotografierschule ist. Ich sehe dauerhaft den Sinn und auch den Anreiz für Fotografen dort, wo eine einfachere Nachnutzung durch externe Interessenten gefördert wird. Die internen Leute schaffen das ja über die Kategorie. Die aktuelle Struktur verschiebt die Bilder auf eine Seite (nicht unbedingt in eine spezielle Kategorie), in der halt entsprechend der QIC/recently promoted-Prozedur die Bilder dann geparkt werden. Wenn allerdings alleine auf der Kirchenseite zur Zeit 5.200 Bilder sind, dann ist das nicht mehr handhabbar. Für niemanden, ich habe eine ziemlich gute Workstation neben mir stehen, die schon muckt (wenn auch keine Spitzengrafikkarte, zu meiner Schande). Kein User macht die Seite auf und wartet 5 Minuten und arbeitet dann tausende Bilder durch.

Meine erste Eingebung wäre, solche "Kategorien" zumindest einmal nach Ländern zu ordnen. Das alleine würde schon genügen, um hier einen besseren Zugang mit einer überschaubaren Menge an Bildern zu schaffen. Auch wäre die Eingabe eines Landes bei der jeweiligen Nominierungsprozedur (wenn auch eventuell versteckt, muss ja auf der Bewertungsseite nicht sichtbar sein) kein so großes Problem für niemanden (hier ist halt Daniel gefragt, das etwas zu erweitern), bei FP hat man ja auch die Änderung auf eine Kategorie ohne Probleme durchgebracht. Man könnte dann die bisherige QIC/recently promoted-Prozedur verwenden, der Bot greift dann aber zusätzlich auf die Länderinformation zurück und verteilt dann, zusätzlich zur aktuellen Verteilung, auch nach Land. Wo es möglich ist. Aber wie ich das analysiert habe, sind sicher 80% aller Bilder davon einem Land zuzuordnen.

Beispiel: Commons:Quality images/Subject/Architecture/Religious/Churches/Austria (oder welches Land dann auch immer).

Das setzt natürlich auch voraus, dass man die bestehenden Seiten händisch ausmisten und die Dateien verschieben muss (ich kann mir schwer vorstellen, dass man das aus den Kategorien der Bilder heraus machen kann). Die Fotografen erkennen aus dem Dateinamen heraus ohne Schwierigkeiten ihre eigenen Bilder sofort. Bei inzwischen fast 110.000 Bilder nicht ein Zuckerschlecken. Aber je länger man zuwartet, umso größer wird das Problem, immerhin haben wir einen QI-Zuwachs von monatlich ca 2.700 Bildern. Man kann es ja einmal mit einer Gruppe versuchen.

Mehr als eben die zusätzliche Ländereingabe bei der Nominierung würde ich vorerst nicht machen. Ev. könnte ja über ein Cookie die Standardeingabe vorgegeben werden, ich weiß dass es geht, bin aber kein Programmierer. Wie man mit Bildern umgeht, welchen nicht länderspezifische Attribute beigefügt werden können, das muss man gesondert überlegen. Aber mit der Ländereinteilung hätten wir schon einmal eine besser handhabbarere (OMG, was für ein Wortungetüm) Struktur. Wenn es Leute gibt, welche dann in Folge für Ihr Land Untergruppen anlegen und diese auch warten, das sollte man dann denen überlassen. Was sich bewährt, kann man dann versuchen, in Zukunft per Bot zu machen.

Fakt ist, dass es ja schon ortspezifische Kategorien für QI-Images gibt. Aber das ist immer die Sache eines jeden einzelnen Mitarbeiters, ich zB schaffe für verschiedene Sachen meistens eine eigene, nicht personengebundene Kategorie: Quality images from/of xxxx. Dort sind dann alle QIs der jeweiligen Kategorie zusätzlich drinnen. Wenn das dann läuft, kann man sicher auf der Commons-Startseite einen Hinweis auf diese Struktur der Qualitätsbilder setzen. Quasi privilegiert, aber warum sollte man das nicht als Anreiz für andere anwenden, damit sie selbst ihre Skills einbringen.

Das wäre mal die erste Idee, die ich anbieten kann. --Hubertl 13:04, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Uh, oh, sorry, ich wollte dir keine zusätzliche Arbeit aufhalsen und komplette Konzepte erfragen. Mein Anlaß waren die Kommentatoren auf der Diskussionsseite, die das Verfahren grundsätzlich für veraltet ansehen (was ich nachvollziehen kann), aber keine für mich verständliche Alternativen anboten. --Smial (talk) 08:40, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Die Fotografen erkennen aus dem Dateinamen heraus ohne Schwierigkeiten ihre eigenen Bilder sofort. - Aber nur so lange, bis irgendein Depp die Dateien umbenennt ;) --Ralf Roleček 09:12, 20 December 2015 (UTC) jaja, bin ja schon weg...

Vorausgesetzt natürlich, dass die Fotografen ihren Bildern einen aussagekräftigen Namen geben. Du siehst das Problem in diesem speziellen Fall nicht, Ralf! Es geht um die Kategorisierung, eigentlich um das Einordnen auf bestimmte Seiten der resently promoted pictures. Das erledigen andere als der Fotograf bzw. der Nominator selbst. Wir mussten gerade über 8000 Bilder neu kategorisieren, genauer gesagt, der vorgegebenen Gruppe von Kategorien zuordnen, weil wir es einfach mehr als ein halbes Jahr haben Schleifen lassen. Ich kann ohne Probleme in 7-8 Sprachen eine Kirche aus dem Dateinamen extrahieren (außer armenisch und sonstige exotische Buchstabengebilde), aber bei Nummern steigen wir aus. Wir hatten - soferne es sich nicht um englisch- oder deutschsprachige Bilddateinamen handelte, oder eben Nummerngebilde, die du so liebst - die größten Probleme damit, die Bilder zuzuordnen. Und 8000 Bilder waren wirklich nicht wenig! Wenn wir etwas aufbauen, welches das Ziel hat, dass die Bilder auch tatsächlich gefunden werden - und zwar von anderen als von uns Insidern - dann müssen diese auch sinnvoll auch durch Google indizierbar sein. Und das macht Google vorrangig über die Dateinamen. Und genau das sollte ja gerade auch in deinem Interesse sein! Lightroom, im Bibliotheksmodus richtig angewendet, macht es höchst einfach. Ich benenne Bilder damit in kürzester Zeit richtig um. Es bleibt sogar die Information zum Ursprungsdateinamen erhalten, egal wie und wie oft ich es umbenenne! Schwierig wird es nur, wenn ich mehrfaches Bearbeiten in anderen Programmen außerhalb von LR durchführe. Aber auch nur dann, wenn ich nicht zuvor korrekt umbenannt habe. Also: Importieren, in Sammlungen aufteilen, sammlungsweise umbenennen und dann kommt erst das Postprocessing. Mehrarbeit? Keine!!! Hilfe für diejenigen, die diese Fleißaufgabe erledigen? Groß! --Hubertl 09:35, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Bei dieser 8000-Bilder-Aktion habe ich sehr häufig nach einem Blick auf den Dateinamen einsortieren können, außer bei griechischen oder bei kyrillischen Zeichensätzen, bei den Bildern aus Indonesien (sabah-bla-foo) und ... ja, bei Ralfs Bildern. Wo dann leider auch aus den Dateibeschreibungen häufig nicht hervorgeht, worum es sich beim abgebildeten Objekt denn nun handelt. Das bedeutet erheblichen Zusatzafwand, teils per umständlichster Google-Suche... -- Smial (talk) 09:46, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Ja, genau diese Erfahrung habe ich auch gemacht. Meistens ging es aber, wenn man dann die Bilder aufgemacht hat und eine sinnvolle Überkategorie vorhanden war. Auch da hast du ja bekanntlich deine Mängel, Ralf ;-) Oba woat, Ralf, mia weama dir de Wadln scho no fire richten! (Übersetzung ins Standarddeutsche: Warte ab, Ralf, wir werden dir die rückwärtige Unterschenkelmuskulatur (Waden!) schon noch an der Vorderseite, sprich Schienbein, platzieren! </Übersetzung>) - Was immer diese sinnlose Aussage tatsächlich bedeutet, aber so sagt man halt bei uns und jeder weiß, was damit gemeint ist. Komisches Völkchen, diese Ösis, ich weiß. --Hubertl 09:55, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

I hoab des schoa verstandn. Kategorien und Dateinamen halte ich nach wie vor für vollkommen überflüssige Dinge. Spätestens, wenn Wikidata die Kategorien abschafft, werden einige stöhnen, wieviel unnütze Arbeit sie sich gemacht haben. Aber egal, ich muß raus. Heute (naja, morgen) ist der kürzeste Tag des Jahres und hier in Helsinki wird es den ganzen Tag nicht hell. Ganz komisches Fotowetter, dazu noch Nebel und Regen :-) --Ralf Roleček 13:04, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

@RalfGruß an Cecil! --Hubertl 13:10, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Wir sind aneinander vorbeigeflogen. Als ich nach Helsinki gestartet bin, ist sie Richtung Linz. Das Wetter ist hochinteressant und anspruchsvoll, ohne Stativ geht nichts. Um 3 ist es dunkel geworden. --Ralf Roleček 19:50, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 90580 Wegkapelle Obsaurs-7416.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:07, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HGM Flugabwehrkanone 0579.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:27, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9080.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:36, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andreas Josef von Stifft (Nr. 2) - Bust in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-1325.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:27, 16 December 2015 (UTC)  Question There are some smaller circular spots. Dust spots or dirt on the wall? --Cccefalon 15:28, 16 December 2015 (UTC) thanks, Uwe, done. There were dustspots. --Hubertl 16:31, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015-10-24 Karmelitermarket on saturday, Vienna 0688.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Fine. --Palauenc05 15:32, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors

Hello Hubertl, this gallery is about interiors, why did you do this? Regards, --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:43, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, Anamnesia, Christian! Repaired and thanks! --Hubertl 15:07, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Critic of quality photo

Hello Hubert, firstly I want to thank you for your critic of my photos. Of course you sometimes very severely judge my photos but I'm not angry at you and try to understand the incomprehensible terms for me. I want you say that I chose the photo very carefully and do not put that horrible photo. I am a beginner and please do not get mad just tell me what to do and I'll do :))

thank you for your understanding, --Armenak Margarian (talk) 19:10, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Just for better understanding: Are you working with RAW-Pictures and with which postprocessing program are you working? --Hubertl 21:00, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Dear Hubert, i work with program Adobe Photoshop cs5 and Lightroom 5.7.1 but my camera is a very simple camera and don't have raw format. Sometimes I take the very good camera of my friends but mostly I have two simple cameras Canon PowerShot A1100 IS and fujifilm finepix s4500.

Thanks to your criticism, I learned a lot. And my goal is to enrich the wiki nice pictures. In the armenian Wikipedia, I did a lot and continues to do today. In the Armenian Wikipedia is a lot of not quality picture and i want to change it :)). Have a nice day, --Armenak Margarian (talk) 07:15, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Using Lightroom is a very good thing. Having it is one thing, really using it with all possibilities the other side. It makes many things much easier, but the programm itself is very powerful and needs a lot of understanding! And with your camera: beside the automatic mode, also the Finepix 4500 have more possibilities than just the automatic mode, even when you don´t have a RAW option. Read the manual! Change the measure mode to Spot-Mode. Don´t use the telezoom, when you are able to go closer, don´t use the wide-angle-mode, if you are able to go further back! Try to rule the camera by yourself as much as possible, otherwise the camera will rule you! Even when Fuji say, the cameras is smart, it´s wrong. Nothing is more stupid than a camera! --Hubertl 10:28, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

The waterline is not horizontal!

A special advice Armenak: It is so easy, to set something straigt in Lightroom. Use the R-Button, then the mouse-pointer together with the Command-key on the beginning of the water-line left and go to the end of the waterline right. Finished, it will be absolutely straight then! --Hubertl 10:55, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

I have very good feelings with Armenia, as most Austrians do, because of Franz Werfel and his famous novel. I met Susanna Mkrtchyan three times (London, The Hague, Vienna), the last time a few weeks ago in Vienna, we had a lot of fun together during a city tour! If you will meet her personally, please send her my personal greetings. --Hubertl 10:13, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Dear Hubert, thank you very much for your advice. I know very well Susanna Mkrtchyan and I gave your greetings. She immediately thought of you and told you multiple times read The Forty Days of Musa Dagh.

Can you see my photo File:Վանա լիճ124.JPG

I would like to ask you to let you advance looked my photos before put it in the section " quality images candidates" if you agree? And sorry for my english i speek very well french, russian, armenian but not english. thanks for all --Armenak Margarian (talk) 17:39, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9332.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9332.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:HGM Seitenraum der Ruhmeshalle, Heeresgeschichtliches Museum, Wien 0362 3 4 5 6.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:HGM Seitenraum der Ruhmeshalle, Heeresgeschichtliches Museum, Wien 0362 3 4 5 6.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:08, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9179.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good! -- Der Wolf im Wald 18:08, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 71448 Hofkapelle Kompatsch, Nauders-446.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Is a dust speck in the sky, but good quality for me.--Famberhorst 18:11, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arkadenhof der Universtät Wien-1211.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:12, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Büsten im Arkadenhof der Universtät Wien-1256.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:47, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20143 - Tritonen- und Najadenbrunnen - Brunnen A - southeast Anton Schmidgruber-0064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:29, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skoda 380mm M1916 HeeresgeschichtlichesMuseum, Vienna 0526.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:47, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 7797 Heeresgeschichtliches Museum Feldherrenhalle - Statuen-0241 2 3 4 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:29, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9185.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Awesome. --Tsungam 10:55, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015-10-24 Karmelitermarket on saturday, Vienna 0678.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:10, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arkadenhof der Universtät Wien-1230-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:12, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skoda 380mm M1916 HeeresgeschichtlichesMuseum, Vienna 0584.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments All the best for 2016! Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:54, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Congrats! Excellent quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:54, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9346.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:27, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arkadenhof der Universtät Wien 1206.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:44, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franz von Miklosich (Nr. 55) Bust in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-9383.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:27, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 7797 Heeresgeschichtliches Museum Feldherrenhalle - Statuen-0226 27 28 29 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:42, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leopold Hasner von Artha (Nr. 56) Bust in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-9378.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 71448 Hofkapelle Kompatsch, Nauders-439.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:54, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Wonderful holidays

Merry Christmas and a happy New Year! --Tremonist (talk) 15:50, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your constructive way to give and handle critics! --Hubertl 16:12, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heinrich von Bamberger (1822-1888), Nr. 70 bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1303.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:37, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Julius von Wiesner (1838-1916), Nr. 71 bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1312.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:49, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Josef Seegen (1822-1904), Nr. 72 bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1324.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:37, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edmund von Neusser (1852-1912), Nr. 74, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1335.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:39, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edmund von Neusser (1852-1912), Nr. 74, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1338.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:10, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:HGM - Stiegenhaus 0311 2 3 4.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:HGM - Stiegenhaus 0311 2 3 4.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9171.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 12:32, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20143 - Tritonen- und Najadenbrunnen - Brunnen A - southeast Anton Schmidgruber-0074.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:21, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Büsten im Arkadenhof der Universtät Wien-1255.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:13, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arkadenhof der Universtät Wien-1224-Bearbeitet-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Exactly! --Moroder 16:26, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9179.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9179.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Kuppelfigur Athene

Das Bild hat noch einen Grauschleier. --Ralf Roleček 21:25, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Ralf Danke, hab den Kontrast leicht erhöht. Weißt eh wie das ist bei fast über 200m Entfernung, habs grad nachgemessen... --Hubertl 21:32, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20143 - Tritonen- und Najadenbrunnen - Brunnen A - southeast Anton Schmidgruber-0084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:49, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9094.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Minor CAs at the brigt window at the top. --XRay 07:30, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HGM armored cupela of fort Kessel-Antwerp for 22pound Horwitzer 0511-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:30, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Josef Seegen (1822-1904), Nr. 72 bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1322.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:49, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 7797 Heeresgeschichtliches Museum Feldherrenhalle - Statuen-0231 2 3 4 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 00:55, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT-13763 Kuppelfigur Athene am Kunsthistorischen Museum 8970.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 13:24, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 20143 - Tritonen- und Najadenbrunnen - Brunnen A - southeast Anton Schmidgruber-0034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:30, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helios, Main figure (Johannes Benk) at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien-9877.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Pse remove two dust spots, see note. --Cccefalon 13:10, 24 December 2015 (UTC)  Done Thanks, Cccefalon --Hubertl 13:43, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuremberg, Hauptmarkt and Frauenkirche 4661.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:30, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuremberg, Hauptmarkt and Frauenkirche 4668.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Fine. --Palauenc05 15:05, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 71448 Hofkapelle Kompatsch, Nauders-430.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 23:22, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT-13763 Kuppelfigur Athene am Kunsthistorischen Museum 8970.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 22:36, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franz Exner (Nr. 57) Bust in the Arkadenhof, University of Vienna-9360.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:59, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helios, Main figure (Johannes Benk) at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien-8959.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 04:43, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuremberg, Hauptmarkt and Frauenkirche 4669.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 22:25, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuremberg, Hauptmarkt and Frauenkirche 4665.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 22:26, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helios, Main figure (Johannes Benk) at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien-9905.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 18:46, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pegnitzbrücke Plobenhofstraße, Nürnberg June 2015-4584.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:34, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Closing FP

Hi, You should wait for the bot to add the template. And then you need to change it like this. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:20, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Oh sorry, Yann, I thought, that user made the first attempt, than another User do the prove, than the bot closes the procedure. I didn´t knew it. The reason was, that there were more than five pictures waiting for more than one day without bot-reaction.--Hubertl 22:24, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

The bot usually works 3 times a day: 6:00, 14:00, 22:00 (UTC), but it didn't work today at 14:00. It happens quite often that it crashes. The bot owner needs to be informed. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:35, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for information! And your good work here on Commons! I wish you a happy new year! --Hubertl 22:41, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Deckenfresken der Ruhmeshalle, HGM, Wien 0428 32 33 34.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Deckenfresken der Ruhmeshalle, HGM, Wien 0428 32 33 34.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Julius von Wiesner (1838-1916), Nr. 71 bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1311.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:44, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edmund von Neusser (1852-1912), Nr. 74, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1339.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:44, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuremberg, Hauptmarkt and Frauenkirche 4659.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:29, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:29, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arkadenhof der Universtät Wien-1216.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:30, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Josef Seegen (1822-1904), Nr. 72 bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1325.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:05, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AT 7797 Heeresgeschichtliches Museum Feldherrenhalle - Statuen-0211 2 3 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:04, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuremberg, Hauptmarkt and Frauenkirche 4657.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:43, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hans Horst Meyer (1853-1939), Nr. 78, bust (bronze) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna-1357.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:59, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helios, Main figure (Johannes Benk) at the Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien-8909.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015-10-24 Karmelitermarket on saturday, Vienna 0686.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. (Shadow in the front is a little bit disturbing.) --XRay 07:00, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

	Fireworks from the Philippines to celebrate 2016
	Happy New Year Hubertl! I hope you still do your great work in 2016! ★ Poké95 07:07, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks a lot, Pokéfan95, the same to you! --Hubertl 07:28, 31 December 2015 (UTC)