User talk:Helpingyoulaugh
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 23:23, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons is not an amateur porn site
[edit]One or more of your recent contributions has been identified by another Commons user as a possible image not in Commons' scope. Commons has guidelines on nudity, as a result of already having a large number of photos of genitalia, specifically the male reproductive system and the penis.
If you have objections to the proposed deletion of your image(s), please see the links to the relevant deletion discussion(s) (listed above or below this message box). This message is not intended to be taken personally. Thank you for your understanding.Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:21, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Artwork nudity.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
1989 (talk) 16:36, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Please do not remove deletion requests
[edit]
--1989 (talk) 20:21, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
REPLY : injustificada i contraproduent
[edit]Hi, The picture was taken in late 2018 by me (Rosend). I have the original file which does not incude the sepia effect nor the censored version to preserve our identiy. It was uploaded on Flickr in late 2018 by my partner (on the picture) which username was Levyni, under free license. several unknown people reposted the picture in other websites. Someone did a lazy reverse image search and speculated that it was "certainly" not my own work. I don't have to claim neither prove what it my own work. stop vandalising, thank you. we'd appreciate a little more in depth research before stating what is false. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Helpingyoulaugh (talk • contribs) 20:17, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for visiting my page. Frankly I prefer you did not. Your words "stop vandalising" are quite distasteful. What previous interactions we have had to be able to use those words? My "opinion" is vandalism? Go away. Thanks for not coming back. Best regards. --E4024 (talk) 20:24, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Vandalism warning
[edit]
--1989 (talk) 06:49, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Softcore beautiful photography.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Softcore beautiful photography.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Softcore beautiful photography.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Praxidicae (talk) 11:48, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
File:NIS GT sensual poster.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|