User talk:HappyWaldo
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
File:Paste_up_Melbourne.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
80.187.103.79 20:50, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Please categorise images correctly
[edit]I stumbled upon File:Escape from Melbourne by mugley.jpg which you had uploaded. The image was categorised in only the most general categories such as Category:Water, Category:Skylines and Category:Clouds. I have changed all categories in to correct - more specific - categories such as Category:Clouds in Australia, Category:Skylines of Melbourne and Category:Bays of Australia. Please try to find the most specific possible categories for your uploads in future. You might want to read this for more information on categorising media in Wikimedia. - Takeaway (talk) 23:28, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Taking fish pictures.jpg was uncategorized on 10 December 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Peter Purves Smith - The Diplomats, 1939.jpg was uncategorized on 18 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:52, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Big barra daintree.jpg was uncategorized on 20 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:33, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- Image:George Sparrow 1895.jpg was uncategorized on 14 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:18, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Grace Cossington Smith Turramurra.jpg was uncategorized on 31 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:12, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Tipper Angry Penguins Dec 1944.jpg was uncategorized on 15 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:47, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Commons Galleries
[edit]Although policy does not absolutely require it, as a general rule, Commons galleries are useful only when the subject has many images in its category and we want to select a few representative images to show in one place. Policy does require that a gallery have more than one image.
Thus most of the galleries you have created recently are either explicit violations of policy or are outside of our usual practice.
You will find that there are half a dozen Admins who do New Page Patrol. Since 90% of all new gallery pages are out of scope -- usually vandalism, advertising, or articles with no images -- you will find that we are fairly quick to delete pages that are out of scope, including several of yours.
If you want to create new galleries, I suggest that you do it in a sandbox page in your own User space, such as User:HappyWaldo/Sandbox1 and then when the gallery is ready, including more than one image, copy it to the main gallery space. This will avoid it being deleted while you are in the process of populating it.
If you have any questions, you can leave a note here for the next week or so, or, anytime at my talk page. And thank you for your contributions to Commons. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:23, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, I should've investigated this beforehand. I did plan on developing some of the galleries into actual galleries, loosely modelled on Monet, Van Gogh, etc. But from now on I will avoid starting gallery pages unless it's absolutely recquired and could be helpful to users. - HappyWaldo (talk) 14:23, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Good -- while I don't want to discourage you from creating useful galleries, there are so many different things that Commons needs, that creating galleries that are very similar to their categories is not a high priority. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:31, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 10:57, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Treasury Casino Brisbane.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Treasury Casino Brisbane.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Ww2censor (talk) 04:02, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 06:20, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
year in Aust categories
[edit]Please dont remove year in Australia, or its subcategories from photographs as its a requirement of Wikimedia Australia that photographers who apply for assistance categorise their uploads in these categories. Gnangarra 05:21, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry. But why are you adding parent categories (Buildings in Fremantle) to images of buildings that already have their own categories, eg the Round House? It's messy. - HappyWaldo (talk) 19:41, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Autopatrol given
[edit]Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 19:53, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Ww2censor (talk) 14:26, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Ww2censor (talk) 14:30, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Ww2censor (talk) 14:31, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Howard Arkley Nick Cave.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Samuel Wiki (talk) 03:08, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Flickr2Commons
[edit]I have just come across a few images you have recently uploaded from Flickr. I would appreciate it if in the future, you used the Flickr2Commons tool. This tool allows images to be moved to Commons from Flickr without having to download the images to your own computer. It also brings in the largest resolution of the image, as well making sure to list the correct license and url, making it easy for the automated Flickr Review system. Also, it is fairly easy to categorize images with this tool. To use it, you just need to go to the url and authorize it (where it says "authorise first"). Elisfkc (talk) 16:35, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:PXIII by Berlinde De Bruyckere MONA Hobart.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:PXIII by Berlinde De Bruyckere MONA Hobart.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:05, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
File:Hobart, Mona - The Depraved Pursuit of a Possum by Tessa Farmer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:10, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:PXIII by Berlinde De Bruyckere MONA Hobart.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:PXIII by Berlinde De Bruyckere MONA Hobart.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Anselm Kiefer MONA Hobart Tasmania.jpg
- File:Yves Klein bleu sec MONA Hobart Tasmania.jpg
- File:Murakami Takashi Lonesome Cowboy MONA Hobart Tasmania.jpg
- File:Fat Car MONA Hobart Tasmania.jpg
Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:13, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
File:John Peter Russell Rough Sea.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:18, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Melbourne paste up be free.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
B dash (talk) 05:21, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
File:Ned Kelly crucified.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
B dash (talk) 05:23, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Please do not overwrite files
[edit]
--Bidgee (talk) 07:54, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:20200529075333!The Esplanade Hotel on The Esplanade in St Kilda.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:20200529075333!The Esplanade Hotel on The Esplanade in St Kilda.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:20200529075333!The Esplanade Hotel on The Esplanade in St Kilda.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:05, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Prahran Market.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Prahran Market.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Prahran Market.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:09, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Capitol Swanston Street Melbourne.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Capitol Swanston Street Melbourne.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Capitol Swanston Street Melbourne.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 03:05, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Tram Fitzroy Rd St Kilda.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Tram Fitzroy Rd St Kilda.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Tram Fitzroy Rd St Kilda.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:George Hotel St Kilda.jpg
- File:St Kilda old and new.jpg
- File:George Hotel Crystal Ballroom St Kilda.jpg
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 06:08, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Help please
[edit]Hi HappyWaldo, I was looking to redo the Queensland Art Gallery's page and I noticed you've already uploaded some of its collection to its images. Could you please upload more of the collection's paintings, as I'm unsure how the process works exactly with copyright and such. Any help is appreciated, thanks!--Caltraser5 (talk) 14:31, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:ANZ Gothic Bank Collins Street.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:ANZ Gothic Bank Collins Street.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:ANZ Gothic Bank Collins Street.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 05:05, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Parade Hotel Melbourne.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Parade Hotel Melbourne.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Parade Hotel Melbourne.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 01:06, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Scots Fremantle.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Scots Fremantle.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Scots Fremantle.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:05, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Ron Barassi 1953.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hekerui (talk) 12:03, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Almond Trees in Blossom 1887.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Almond Trees in Blossom 1887.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Almond Trees in Blossom 1887.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 07:05, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Portrait of Percy Lindsay.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hekerui (talk) 11:19, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
US license necessary
[edit]Hello, I notice you only indicate an Australian copyright status in your uploads. Please remember that the Commons, per Commons:Licensing, require a public domain work to be in the public domain in both the U.S. and the country of origin of the work. Therefore, please always indicate the US copyright status. You can use Commons:Hirtle chart as a help. Hekerui (talk) 11:26, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Grosvenor Chambers
[edit]I don't as rule remove other editors' work without consulting them, so do you agree that it might improve the article on the Grosvenor Chambers to replace your pic with John T. Collins' 1977 architectural photograph of the building facade (made before the construction of the monstrous high rise behind it) in the info box? It is more representative of its appearance, shows the whole building and is less oblique. Best regards, Jamesmcardle (talk) 01:38, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Aldersgate House Melbourne.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Aldersgate House Melbourne.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Aldersgate House Melbourne.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 08:05, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
File:Shepard Fairey Hosier Melbourne.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:28, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:A H Fullwood An Australian River.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:A H Fullwood An Australian River.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:A H Fullwood An Australian River.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:05, 18 September 2023 (UTC)