User talk:Hans555
transfer to commons
[edit]Hey! While transfering images from local Wikipedias to Wikimedia Commons please pay attention to use the correct licence tags from the original uploader and to mention his name – otherwise it’s a violation of copyrights. Commons helper is a nice tool to automate image transfer – give it a try. Regards, --Polarlys 13:05, 14 May 2007 (UTC) PS: Heine’s photo from around 1900 is surely not licensed under GFDL and you are not the author ;-)
Habe das Bild nochmal hochgeladen und das alte gelöscht: Image:Carl Wilhelm Heine.jpg. Eine nette Bildbeschreibung ist doch immer wieder was schönes. Grüße, --Polarlys 13:14, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 16:21, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Charles Armstrong Lab1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
--Polarlys 13:49, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Kimmich_David_1972.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
AndreasPraefcke 19:09, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Alzey.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 22:47, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 05:53, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
*Image:UMKCmaincampus.PNG is uncategorized since 28 April 2009.
- Image:Nitecki09.jpg is uncategorized since 28 May 2009.
- Image:Emma Guntz.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Zinell1.jpg was uncategorized on 26 November 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Hans2010.JPG was uncategorized on 30 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Image:ErnstMayer.jpg was uncategorized on 18 October 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Heinegedenktafel.jpg was uncategorized on 3 November 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Hellmuthmayer.jpg was uncategorized on 16 November 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Franzbaumann.jpg was uncategorized on 4 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:57, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Image:Ludwig Schweizer.jpg was uncategorized on 8 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:16, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Hans, für ein solche Genehmigung braucht man die Commons:OTRS Prozedur zu folgen. Danke, Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 09:57, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Files you uploaded may be deleted
[edit]The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commonswikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 09:06, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Heinse_bueste-1.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Heinse_bueste-1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Martin H. (talk) 22:46, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
- Hallo Martin H.
- Du scheinst Deutsch zu können (bzw. Deutscher zu sein); deshalb bitte ich um eine Erläuterung der obigen Warnung. Warum nur dieses Bild? Alle anderen Bilder in der Kategorie
- Ernst Mayer (sculptor) haben die gleiche Lizenz. Ich habe die Erlaubnis des Fotografen, wie unter permission vermerkt. Was stimmt da nicht? Kommt da noch mehr auf mich zu?
- Muss ich vielleicht PD-author reinschreiben?
- Danke für eine baldige Antwort.--Hans555 (talk) 08:36, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
- Du hast das Problem vielleicht schon behoben. Ist Ernst Theodor Mayer der Fotograf oder der Bildhauer? Wir haben zwei Werke hier:
- Eine Skulptur, diese ist {{PD-old}}. Dieser rechtliche Status der Skulptur wird auf Commons vorrausgesetzt (siehe Commons:Bearbeitungen), daher bedarf es keine Erwähnung.
- Eine Fotografie eines dreidimensionalen Werkes, das fotografische Werk ist ebenfalls urheberrechtlich geschützt und muss unter einer freien Lizenz oder in die Gemeinfreiheit entlassen werden. {{PD-old}} ist das fotografische Werk wohl nicht wie ursprünglich angegeben.
- --Martin H. (talk) 11:31, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
- Du hast das Problem vielleicht schon behoben. Ist Ernst Theodor Mayer der Fotograf oder der Bildhauer? Wir haben zwei Werke hier:
- Ernst Theodor Mayer ist der Fotograf und zugleich der Ur-ur-enkel des Bildhauers. Ich habe inzwisschen alle Bilder mit PD-author|Ernst Theodor Mayer versehen und PD-old gelöscht.Lass mich wissen, ob dies in Ordnung ist. Ich will nämlich noch weitere Bilder dieser Quelle hochladen. Danke.
- --Hans555 (talk) 13:06, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
- Ja, damit ist das Problem geklärt und behoben und du kannst den "keine Lizenz"-Baustein entfernen. --Martin H. (talk) 13:29, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:Alzey.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Alzey.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Alzey.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:48, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Mueller Gebhard.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Mueller Gebhard.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Scoopfinder(d) 13:46, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
File tagging File:Mueller Gebhard.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Mueller Gebhard.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Mueller Gebhard.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Scoopfinder(d) 13:46, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted content
[edit]
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Der Freikorpskämpfer Gerhard Roßbach.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Der Freikorpskämpfer Gerhard Roßbach.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 02:06, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Hallo. Jatzt mal unter uns: das Bild ist doch ein Paßfoto. Das wird auch beispielsweise bei der AWK verwendet, oder auch bei Klett-Cotta. Das hast du aufgenommen? Urheberrechte sind nicht, wo man mal eben drüber weg gehen kann. Das muß stimmen. Am Ende ist die Person, die das hoch lädt - also du - haftbar. Das muß klar sein. Einfach irgend ein Bild um des Bildes wegen nehmen darf man nicht. Also noch mal ganz deutlich die Frage: das Bild hast du gemacht bzw. du hast die Nutzungsrechte einschließlich der Publikation unter freier Lizenz? Ich würde mich ja wirklich freuen - aber ich bin lange genug dabei um ernsthafte Zweifel zu haben. Marcus Cyron (talk) 10:36, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Hallo Hans555. Es ist schön, dass es bei Wiki Leute gibt, die selbst schon vor so vielen Jahren fotografierten und ihre Fotos zur Verfügung stellen. Könntest du die Angaben ergenänzen und angeben, wo und eventuell bei welcher Gelegenheit du die Fotos erstellt hast? Grüße --Mewa767 (talk) 22:07, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Klaus Meyer zu Uptrup1.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Klaus Meyer zu Uptrup1.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Klaus Meyer zu Uptrup1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:WMZU01.JPG
[edit]Copyright status: File:WMZU01.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:WMZU01.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Dr.MzU-2021.JPG
[edit]Copyright status: File:Dr.MzU-2021.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Dr.MzU-2021.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Drei plus.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Drei plus.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Drei plus.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:05, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
File tagging File:Stmaria.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Stmaria.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Stmaria.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |