User talk:Gzen92/QI/2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Towarb - tête de cerf (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:57, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Démontage de grue (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:18, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grande roue (Colmar) (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grande roue (Colmar) (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Passage à poissons (Vogelgrun).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Iketsi 14:13, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque sur la frontière franco-allemande.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, would be better with center crop --Iketsi 14:13, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Squelette de mammouth laineux (Mammuthus primigenius) en plastique phosphorescent.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Iketsi 14:13, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Collégiale Saint-Étienne (Vieux-Brisach).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Draceane 13:51, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Démontage de grue (Colmar) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:39, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Décoration d'un chalet (Strasbourg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 23:10, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Décorations devant le sapin, place Kléber (Strasbourg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 23:02, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour hagenbach (Vieux-Brisach).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Draceane 12:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Collectivité européenne d'Alsace (Colmar) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 17:12, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Collectivité européenne d'Alsace (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Shougissime 20:05, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardin du souvenir français (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 15:59, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardin du souvenir français - canon (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:04, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison du fonctionnaire municipal (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 00:31, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Notre-Dame-des-Douleurs - cadran solaire (Kientzheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 00:33, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte basse (Lalli) (Kientzheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 00:31, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument aux morts des Première et Seconde Guerres mondiales (Kientzheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:10, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Char M4A4 Sherman (Kientzheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:44, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cigogne blanche (Ciconia ciconia) (36).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:43, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Notre-Dame-des-Douleurs (Kientzheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:30, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte basse (Lalli) - sculpture (Kientzheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:30, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saints-Pierre-et-Paul (Sigolsheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:14, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fontaine de la Sainte-Richarde (Sigolsheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Radomianin 07:20, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque descriptive 5e DB (Kientzheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:10, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Square Thomas - sculpture (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:53, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle Saints-Félix-et-Régule (Kientzheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 10:48, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saints-Pierre-et-Paul - portail (Sigolsheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good but there is a slight ccw tilt --Poco a poco 17:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Gzen92 11:59, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Better, but if you want to improve it, go back a little bit, you overcorrected --Poco a poco 20:36, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument aux morts des Première et Seconde Guerres mondiales (Sigolsheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:41, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Riad Salih 23:59, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cigogne blanche (Ciconia ciconia) (37).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 16:56, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument aux morts des Première et Seconde Guerre mondiale et de la guerre israélo-égyptienne (Mackenheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit dark for my taste, but considering the date and time it was taken it's OK for me --D-Kuru 20:00, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coq (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 17:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paon bleu (Pavo cristatus) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 17:39, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument aux morts pour la patrie (Stosswihr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support I have some doubts, if the subject is slightly tilted CCW, but good as it is. --LexKurochkin 12:14, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cerisier du Japon (Prunus serrulata) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 19:14, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fresque murale (Sélestat).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:26, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument au général Charles de Gaulle (Sélestat) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:31, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument du couvent des Dominicains (Sélestat).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:31, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Synagogue (Sélestat).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:26, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Décor de papillons (Sélestat).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, interesting subject. --Plozessor 04:24, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour de l'horloge (Sélestat).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:15, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Grégoire - intérieur (Marckolsheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:02, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Écluse de l'Ill (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Grégoire (Marckolsheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bateau (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 21:06, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barge (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. I fixed the categories a bit --MB-one 10:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cadran solaire (Herrlisheim-près-Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 17:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roue à aubes (Herrlisheim-près-Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:07, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Croix (Herrlisheim-près-Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment I correct white balance. Gzen92 06:03, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 22:25, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Michel (Herrlisheim-près-Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment I correct exposure. Gzen92 06:07, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 22:25, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Renouée bistorte (Bistorta officinalis) (Belmont).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:48, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour du Champ du Feu (Belmont).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good qualituy --Michielverbeek 19:34, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chalet du Champ du Feu (Belmont).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Drow male 19:58, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vue depuis le Champ du Feu (Belmont).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centaurée des montagnes (Centaurea montana) (Belmont).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment Beautiful image, but very likely a misidentified specimen of Centaurea montana. Centaurea triumfettii might be absent or rare in the area. Have you got another photo where the involucral bracts are shown? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:48, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I don't have any other photos. Gzen92 06:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I modify. Gzen92 08:54, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cigognes blanches (Ciconia ciconia) (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:21, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Sainte Anne (Turckheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality but small cw tilt? --ArildV 08:21, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:22, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Festivités (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:04, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mise en place à l'hôtel d'Alsace (Colmar) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 17:42, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calvaire (Turckheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 19:59, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Wendelin (Niedermorschwihr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 20:35, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Gall (Niedermorschwihr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cité administrative - tour en déconstruction (Colmar) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:33, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cité administrative - tour en déconstruction (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:02, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macaque de Gibraltar (Macaca sylvanus) - tête (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 04:17, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macaque de Gibraltar (Macaca sylvanus) - tête (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:08, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macaque de Gibraltar juvénile (Macaca sylvanus) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:27, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macaques de Gibraltar (Macaca sylvanus) qui s'épouillent (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 04:16, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macaque de Gibraltar (Macaca sylvanus) (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:59, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macaque de Gibraltar (Macaca sylvanus) (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lvova 08:37, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macaque de Gibraltar (Macaca sylvanus) (28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 13:35, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macaque de Gibraltar (Macaca sylvanus) - tête (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lvova 08:37, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macaque de Gibraltar (Macaca sylvanus) - tête (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:59, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macaque de Gibraltar (Macaca sylvanus) - tête (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ibis rouge (Eudocimus ruber) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:39, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manchot du Cap (Spheniscus demersus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:45, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Otarie à crinière (Otaria flavescens).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Very good quality. --MB-one 09:37, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pécari du Chaco (Catagonus wagneri).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 22:18, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tortue rayonnée de Madagascar (Astrochelys radiata) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The blown hightlights should be fixed. --Ermell 12:48, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done On the head, not much better... Gzen92 10:37, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:14, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame (Chartres) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:39, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame - cadran solaire (Chartres).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 06:44, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame - pavillon de l'horloge (Chartres).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:05, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rivière (Chartres).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:28, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tombeau de Merlin (Paimpont).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:28, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wallaby des rochers (Petrogale xanthopus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 20:31, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Épée du roi Arthur (Iffendic) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:02, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phare (Roscoff).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 14:21, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Agapanthe (Île-de-Bréhat).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mickaël en résidence 12:12, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Riom (Île-de-Bréhat) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 10:48, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vue du village (Roscoff).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. just so, a bit dark --Georgfotoart 11:38, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Croix (Île-de-Bréhat).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 22:28, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Val sans retour - siège de Merlin (Paimpont).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 10:57, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goéland argenté (Larus argentatus) (43).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 16:20, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goéland argenté (Larus argentatus) - tête (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 10:59, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moulin à marée du Birlot (Île-de-Bréhat).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:50, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paysage (Île-de-Bréhat) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:55, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paysage (Île-de-Bréhat) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 10:59, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle Notre-Dame de Kéranroux - intérieur (Île-de-Bréhat).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 16:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paysage (Île-de-Bréhat) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 17:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paysage (Île-de-Bréhat) (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:51, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phare du Paon (Île-de-Bréhat) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:46, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle Notre-Dame de Kéranroux (Île-de-Bréhat).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 06:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame - intérieur - tour de chœur à Chartres (Eure-et-Loir).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It Needs an Adjustment of the aspect ratio, to get the circle cicular (via stretching the y-axle a bit out) --Poco a poco 05:39, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Gzen92 10:37, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I see also some tilt in ccw direction --Poco a poco 07:40, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Sorry. Gzen92 09:50, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'd expect horizontal lines to be horizontal, but that's not the case --Poco a poco 06:42, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Indeed, sorry. Gzen92 07:59, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:01, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruelle (Île-de-Bréhat).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 12:04, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vue depuis la chapelle Saint-Michel (Île-de-Bréhat).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
a bit dark and too much sky --Georgfotoart 12:05, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Gzen92 12:30, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 19:59, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame - portails (Chartres).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:07, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paysage (Plougrescant) (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:34, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paysage (Plougrescant) (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:24, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Michel (Île-de-Bréhat).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A little underexposed. --Benjism89 16:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Gzen92 07:52, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 05:19, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Val sans retour - rocher des faux amants (Paimpont).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 19:13, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame - intérieur - vitraux (Chartres).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument aux morts des Première et Seconde Guerres mondiales (Tréguier).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 20:34, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathédrale Saint-Tugdual (Tréguier).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:28, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathédrale Saint-Tugdual - intérieur - vitraux (Tréguier).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:28, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rocher et vague (Plougrescant).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
IMO too dark. Please check your image. --XRay 06:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Gzen92 08:58, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:03, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paysage (Plougrescant) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
tilt CW --George Chernilevsky 07:33, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Gzen92 09:01, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now --George Chernilevsky 12:02, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paysage (Plougrescant) (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
tilt CW --George Chernilevsky 07:35, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Gzen92 09:03, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now --George Chernilevsky 12:02, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame (Chartres) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Tilted CCW, maybe too much saturation/contrast. --C messier 20:02, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Gzen92 09:22, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:09, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phare de Nantouar (Louannec) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 11:32, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison de Castel Meur (Plougrescant).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 19:30, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phare du Paon (Île-de-Bréhat) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:38, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Fontainebleau (Fontainebleau).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 20:38, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vue de Ploubazlanec depuis le bateau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 19:25, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phare du Paon (Île-de-Bréhat) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
CCW tilt otherwise QI --ArildV 08:50, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Gzen92 09:09, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Аныл Озташ 21:30, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cactus (Fraispertuis-City).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:20, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pirate Attack (Fraispertuis-City).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:56, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Timber Drop (Fraispertuis-City) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:56, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathédrale Saint-Mammès - nef (Langres).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 12:34, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrée de ville (Langres).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:57, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte des Moulins (Langres).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 15:45, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phare de Nantouar (Louannec) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
CW tilt. I think you should also increase contrast a bit. --Benjism89 19:30, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Gzen92 21:05, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now. --Benjism89 11:07, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phare de Nantouar (Louannec) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
CW tilt. --Benjism89 19:30, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Gzen92 21:07, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now. --Benjism89 11:07, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goélette Rara Avis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Ok quality but very dark and strong ccw tilt. --ArildV 10:46, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Gzen92 07:57, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thank you. Ok imo. Sorry for late response. --ArildV 00:54, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château du Schlossberg (Kaysersberg) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:38, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château du Schlossberg (Kaysersberg) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:38, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château du Schlossberg (Kaysersberg) (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support A bit too bright but still ok --Poco a poco 16:40, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phare de Nantouar (Louannec) (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 23:46, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cheval - tête (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Can you lower the contrast a bit. It may help as your subject is dark and sky is overexposed. --C messier 19:25, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Better? Gzen92 21:11, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 16:47, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mémorial Irène et Frédéric Joliot-Curie (Ploubazlanec).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 21:33, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle Sainte-Anne (Sigolsheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:51, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oratoire du pont sur la Weiss (Kaysersberg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 10:33, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Fontainebleau - escalier (Fontainebleau).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good symmetry --FBilula 14:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathédrale Saint-Mammès (Langres) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Too dark IMO --Ermell 06:56, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Gzen92 11:21, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:34, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château du Schlossberg (Kaysersberg) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:37, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flum (Fraispertuis-City).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support A bit dark in shadowed parts, but acceptable IMO --Екатерина Борисова 00:58, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Notre-Dame et Saint-Laurent (Grez-sur-Loing).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 16:42, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goéland argenté (Larus argentatus) (42).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 20:56, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Timber Drop (Fraispertuis-City) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathédrale Saint-Tugdual - intérieur - cénotaphe de Saint-Yves (Tréguier).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
TBH, the original crop is better. --C messier 20:14, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Better? Gzen92 20:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --C messier 21:15, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château du Schlossberg (Kaysersberg) (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
White balance OK (green tint)? Tilted slightly to the left --Georgfotoart 10:48, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Better? Gzen92 20:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 11:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Sainte-Croix (Kaysersberg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 17:59, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coucher de soleil (Plougrescant).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 19:19, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Could be a little brighter. Also suggest pulling up a little more shadow detail in the Plougrescant coast - all fixable. --GRDN711 19:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Better? Gzen92 20:23, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --GRDN711 23:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! École de gendarmerie (Fontainebleau).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A bit underexposed and needs some perspective correction. --C messier 16:42, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Better? Gzen92 20:27, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is still dark overall (not just the shadows) --C messier 21:15, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ DoneOk thanks. Better? Gzen92 08:39, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --C messier 13:02, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château du Haut-Koenigsbourg (755 m) (Orschwiller) (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:29, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château du Haut-Koenigsbourg (755 m) - Vitrail (Orschwiller) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:29, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château du Haut-Koenigsbourg (755 m) - Entrée (Orschwiller) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:00, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbaye de Murbach (Murbach) (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --A. Öztas 18:17, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbaye de Murbach (Murbach) (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:28, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:27, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbaye de Murbach et chapelle Notre-Dame-de-Lorette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 13:40, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cour d'assises - escalier (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:43, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château du Schlossberg (Kaysersberg) (1) edited (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 21:23, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Fontainebleau (Fontainebleau) edited (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 21:23, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château du Haut-Koenigsbourg (755 m) (Orschwiller) (19) edited (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 16:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]