User talk:Greudin/archives 2
Image Tagging Image:CharlesWheatstone.jpeg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:CharlesWheatstone.jpeg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 10:41, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Salut, je viens de voir ton image sur wp:en et le tag qui est affiché ici est que l'image est dans le domaine public. Comme je suis un peu étonné que l'ETS mette une image de diplome dans le PD, je voulais savoir si tu avais reçu une autorisation, ou s'il y'avait une jurisprudence sur commons pour les diplômes. Voila, merci! (Si tu le peux, essaies de me répondre sur ma page sur en:wp, je passe très rarement sur commons). Merci! Lucasbfr 13:42, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- Salut, j'avais rajouté License / licence : public domain , but ask Educational Testing Service first. de demander à Educational Testing Service avant , mais en l'état il y a le logo de la boite dessus(pas DP) donc en théorie on devrait effectivement l'effacer de Commons et la copier sur Wikipedia fr si besoin est. Greudin 16:27, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Stamp-cheffer-marianne-1er jour-perigueux.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
Bonjour Greudin. J'ai l'impression que tu n'as pas été averti de cette demande de SI. Elle me paraît valide mais comme tu n'es pas un nouveau venu, tu peux avoir des arguments valides à opposer. A+ — Xavier, 14:00, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- Bonjour, dejà vu pas d'opposition, effacement légitime, espérons qu'un jour l'état français fasse un Freedom of Information Act rétroactif :). Greudin 17:20, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Tour_et_Taxi-bruxelles-interieur.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Karelj 00:09, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Tour_et_Taxi-bruxelles-interieur-hall.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Karelj 00:13, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Tour_et_Taxi-bruxelles.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Karelj 00:16, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- No problem for the 3 pics Greudin 12:19, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Salut Greudin. Je ne suis pas au top pour la manipulation de Commons. J'ai chargé hier soir un tableau du XIXe à l'adresse de l'image. Mais, comme il venait de ArtPrice, je me suis demandé après coup si je pouvais vraiment charger ce tableau (qui est pourtant normalement dans le domaine public - auteur mort en 1863). Dans le doute, j'ai préféré l'effacer, mais j'ai chargé à la place un autre fichier, qui ne correspond plus, alors que j'aurais aimé l'effacer purement et simplement. Pourrais-tu m'aider ? Là, je suis perdu ;)). Merci. Jmdesbois 13:41, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Traité, certaines juridictions nationales autorisent ton 1er téléchargement, sauf ... en France ;( Greudin 18:00, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oui, j'ai eu un doute... mais trop tard. Merci beaucoup. Cordialement. Jmdesbois 20:17, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello, you are the author of one of the images in the category Grande Arche. This category has been recently proposed for deletion under the pretext that there is no FOP in France. I believe not all the images in this category deserve to be deleted, some of them do not present copyright issues. You can express your opinion on this page Commons:Deletion_requests/Category:Grande_Arche if you believe the category should stay. I noticed this deletion request after one of my images (also featured picture) belonging to this category has been proposed for deletion here. Best Regards. --Atoma 16:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Image:Sobel-edges-sacrecoeur.png]]
[edit]Bonjour Greudin,
Pourrais-tu indiquer avec quel logiciel tu as réalisé la sobelisation du Sacré Coeur, pour ma part, je ne retrouve pas tout à fait le même résultat. Merci.
--Infofiltrage 21:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- C'est un bout de programme en C, j'ai ptet fait une erreur :*) la difference peut provenir du fait que je n'ai pas fait le calcul sur le module mais la différence des valeurs absolues des 2 gradients Greudin 08:36, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Deletion discussion
[edit]I have proposed at least one image you uploaded for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Images of skyscrapers in France. Jackaranga 22:16, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Guimard-16eme-artnouveau-rue-agar2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 20:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Guimard-16eme-artnouveau-rue-agar-detail2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 20:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Guimard-16eme-artnouveau-rue-agar-detail.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 20:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Guimard-16eme-artnouveau-hotel-mezzara.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 20:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Guimard-16eme-artnouveau-hotel-mezzara-porte.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 20:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Guimard-16eme-artnouveau-hotel-mezzara-fenetre.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 20:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Guimard-16eme-artnouveau-hotel-guimard.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 20:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Guimard-16eme-artnouveau-hotel-guimard-porte.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 20:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Guimard-16eme-artnouveau-hotel-guimard-facade.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 20:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Guimard-16eme-artnouveau-hotel-guimard-details.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 20:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Guimard-16eme-artnouveau-hameau-beranger2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 20:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Guimard-16eme-artnouveau-hameau-beranger1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 20:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Guimard-16eme-artnouveau-ensemble2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 20:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Guimard-16eme-artnouveau-ensemble.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 20:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Guimard-16eme-artnouveau-castel-beranger.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 20:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Guimard-16eme-artnouveau-castel-beranger-portail.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 20:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Guimard-16eme-artnouveau-castel-beranger-ensemble.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 20:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Guimard-16eme-artnouveau-21-rue-la-fontaine.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 20:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Guimard-16eme-artnouveau-21-rue-la-fontaine-entree.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 20:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Guimard-16eme-artnouveau-17-rue-la-fontaine-signature.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 20:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Guimard-16eme-artnouveau-17-rue-la-fontaine-entree.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 20:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Guimard-16eme-artnouveau-11-rue-millet.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 20:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Guimard-16eme-artnouveau-11-rue-millet-face.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 20:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Guimard-16eme-artnouveau-11-rue-millet-entree.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 20:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Guimard-16eme-artnouveau-11-rue-millet-cote.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 20:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Guimard-16eme-artnouveau-10-rue-agar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 20:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Guimard-16eme-artnouveau-10-rue-agar-fenetres-detail.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 20:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Synagogue rue pavée Paris01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 20:31, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Guimard-4eme-artnouveau-10-rue-pavee-synagogue-signature.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 20:31, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Guimard-4eme-artnouveau-10-rue-pavee-synagogue.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 20:31, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Synagogue rue pavée Paris02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 20:31, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Art nouveau
[edit]Salut Greudin,
Toi aussi on t'a supprimé des merveilles!
Voici la liste de mes photos supprimeés:
- Image:Immeuble Georges Biet 02 by Line1.jpg
- Image:Immeuble Georges Biet 01 by Line1.jpg
- Image:Immeuble du Docteur Aimé 03 by Line1.jpg
- Image:Immeuble du Docteur Aimé 02 by Line1.jpg
- Image:Immeuble du Docteur Aimé 01 by Line1.jpg
- Image:Immeuble Georges Biet 02 by Line1.jpg
- Image:Immeuble Georges Biet 01 by Line1.jpg
- Image:Maison du Dr Paul Jacques 05 by Line1.jpg
- Image:Maison du Dr Paul Jacques 04 by Line1.jpg
- Image:Maison du Dr Paul Jacques 03 by Line1.jpg
- Image:Maison du Dr Paul Jacques 02 by Line1.jpg
- Image:Maison du Dr Paul Jacques 01 by Line1.jpg
- Image:Banque Charles Renauld 02 by Line1.jpg
- Image:Banque Charles Renauld 01 by Line1.jpg
- Image:Banque Charles Renauld 03 by Line1.jpg
- Image:Maison de Lotissement 24 rue Félix 04 by Line1.jpg
- Image:Maison de Lotissement 24 rue Félix 03 by Line1.jpg
- Image:Maison de Lotissement 24 rue Félix 02 by Line1.jpg
- Image:Maison de Lotissement 24 rue Félix 01 by Line1.jpg
- Image:Maison de Lotissement 24-26 rue Félix 01 by Line1.jpg
- Image:Maison de Lotissement 26 rue Félix 02 by Line1.jpg
- Image:Maison de Lotissement 26 rue Félix 01 by Line1.jpg
Amitié Liné1 (talk) 04:59, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Salut, J'ai élargis le champ des documents hébergés par Wikilivres aux images. Ces images peuvent donc être hébergées sur Wikilivres : http://www.wikilivres.info/wiki/index.php/Wikilivres:Artists#Architects Cordialement, Yann (talk) 14:30, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- Merci Yann ! Greudin (talk) 17:11, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
suppression rapide
[edit]salut Greudin, je te serais gréer d'agir assez rapidement pour supprimer deux de mes anciennes images soit Image:Cache1.jpg et Image:Cache2.jpg commentaires:
After a look at internet foruma, I think, it would be necessary that someone delete this file as quickly as possible for not able any damage of people. And allow a protection of envirronment. Personnaly, I want that my file to desapear from the net quickly also beacause it is a military affair, and I want to resign from that quind of things.
merci à toi--Jonathaneo (talk) 17:16, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
- Salut, vu fait par Jastrow, ++ Greudin (talk) 11:52, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Nonno Design.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Teofilo (talk) 12:35, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Cow-Saint-Louis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Teofilo (talk) 17:36, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Phonecard-thermomagnetic-ptt-benin-presse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Mangostar (talk) 15:42, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
RFA
[edit] |
File deletion warning | File:Phonecard-thermomagnetic-ptt-benin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Isderion (talk) 00:04, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
File deletion warning | File:Phonecard-journal-telephone-france.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Isderion (talk) 00:19, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Administrative notice
[edit]Dear Greudin/archives 2. I am writing to you to inform you that because of inactivity, you may lose your adminship on Commons.
Commons has a new policy on admin activity, Commons:Administrators/De-adminship, taken into use on June 13, 2007 (after a two-week poll on the proposed policy's talk page).
If you want to keep your adminship, you have to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days. Note that if you don't make 5 admin actions in the following 5 months, you will then lose the adminship anyways.
Thank you — Mike.lifeguard 16:55, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
File:Hector Guimard Castel Béranger.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |