User talk:George Ho/Archive 2

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hal Holbrook.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I support, per my comments in the previous nomination. cmadler (talk) 12:43, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:43, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
William Frawley.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Easy support; meets all criteria. cmadler (talk) 13:29, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 22:53, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vivian Vance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--MrPanyGoff 08:23, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 05:21, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Desi Arnaz.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:04, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:43, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rod Serling.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support - I find this as best among others.--MrPanyGoff 08:25, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

•  Support I agree. cmadler (talk) 13:31, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:45, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tony Randall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support This is a higher-resolution version of the same underlying image (different print). I wonder if the other version should be deleted? cmadler (talk) 16:53, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
  •  Comment You must not without user's permission. The other came first, but... that's all I can say. --George Ho (talk) 17:00, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
  •  Info On the other hand, "we hope" wants his own version deleted. Nomination of my version is still open. --George Ho (talk) 19:29, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

• Since this remains the only nomination in this scope after withdrawing the other nomination in a MVR it should be placed in the upper list with the nominations. Bear in mind that the required time for supported nomination to be in the list is not finished.--MrPanyGoff 04:52, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 07:28, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

re: eBay images

Both of these guys are on my list. Will get them done now, though--thanks!! :-) We hope (talk) 06:38, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Farrah Fawcett.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

•  Support Meets all criteria. cmadler (talk) 13:11, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:04, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
I Love Lucy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I think this one is better because they are in frontal portait rather than profiles. cmadler (talk) 12:59, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. I Love Lucy Cast.JPG: +1
2. I Love Lucy 1955.JPG: +0 
=>
File:I Love Lucy Cast.JPG: Promoted.
File:I Love Lucy 1955.JPG: Declined.

--MrPanyGoff 17:21, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tim Robbins.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment I tend to support but can you put a camera location.--MrPanyGoff 22:16, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

•  Done --George Ho (talk) 22:52, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Good enough and best in its category, imo.--MrPanyGoff 21:05, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 10:07, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jennifer Hudson.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support This is currently the best image we have of this acrtice in COMMONS --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:02, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Jennifer-Hudson 2012-01-17 Barnes-Noble Chicago photoby Adam-Bielawski.jpg: +0
2. Jennifer Hudson.png: +0 
3. Jennifer Hudson 2011 AA.jpg: +1 
=>
File:Jennifer-Hudson 2012-01-17 Barnes-Noble Chicago photoby Adam-Bielawski.jpg: Declined.
File:Jennifer Hudson.png: Declined.
File:Jennifer Hudson 2011 AA.jpg: Promoted.

--MrPanyGoff 06:50, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Filet-O-Fish.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. cmadler (talk) 13:35, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment - Is there some significant visual difference between most of the McDonald's sandwiches? I think there isn't. I think we need here just one scope: „McDonald's sandwiches” and that's all!--MrPanyGoff 07:01, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
  • "McDonald's sandwiches" is a broader scope. If I must nominate all sandwiches this sandwich as part of the "McDonald's sandwiches" scope, then I must nominate ALL sandwiches as a set. --George Ho (talk) 19:21, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
    • By the way, Category:McDonald's products and Category:McDonald's products - breads. --George Ho (talk) 20:27, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
      • See here: McChicken.jpg - one and the same. --MrPanyGoff 21:15, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
• The difference between the Fish and the Chicken is the patty. The fact that the buns are the same is irrelevant. By the way, that image is also a candidate for the Most Valued Image of McChicken. What's your point? --George Ho (talk) 21:35, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
  • The difference is not only the patty, but also the toppings. "McDonald's sandwiches" would be as broad a scope as "Disney movies", "Verdi operas", or "Structures by Le Corbusier". It's too broad. cmadler (talk) 14:12, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
•  Support DimiTalen 15:37, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:17, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
John Cleese.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Archaeodontosaurus (talk • contribs) 09:26, 28 May 2012‎ (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:24, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
McRib.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I prefer this one because it clearly shows the standard toppings (onions and pickles). Also, I think the color is better here. cmadler (talk) 14:06, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. McRib.jpg: +0
2. McD-McRib.jpg: +1 
=>
File:McRib.jpg: Declined.
File:McD-McRib.jpg: Promoted.

--MrPanyGoff 21:41, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
McChicken.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I'm not entirely satisfied with this photo -- I'm not a fan of the side-on view -- but I think it is the best we have. cmadler (talk) 14:09, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. McChicken.jpg: +0
2. McD-McChicken.jpg: +1 
=>
File:McChicken.jpg: Declined.
File:McD-McChicken.jpg: Promoted.

--MrPanyGoff 21:42, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heather Morris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. Yann (talk) 06:50, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:19, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gillian Anderson.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. Yann (talk) 06:54, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:20, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Matthew Bomer.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. 6.7.11MattBomerByLuigiNovi1.jpg: +0
2. 6.7.11MattBomerByLuigiNovi2.jpg: +1 
=>
File:6.7.11MattBomerByLuigiNovi1.jpg: Declined.
File:6.7.11MattBomerByLuigiNovi2.jpg: Promoted.

--MrPanyGoff 07:03, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Hostess CupCake.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Hostess CupCake.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Priscilla Presley.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Used 20x; best in scope; criteria satisfied. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 01:44, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:31, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Michael Palin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Michaelpalinnightingale.jpg: +0
2. Michael Palin.jpg: +1 
=>
File:Michaelpalinnightingale.jpg: Declined.
File:Michael Palin.jpg: Promoted.

--MrPanyGoff 16:45, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Betamax recorders.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Betamax recorders.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
DK Bongos.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Supportthis is the best of both images --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. DK Bongos.JPG: 0
2. DK-Bongos.JPG: +1
=>
File:DK Bongos.JPG: Declined. <--
File:DK-Bongos.JPG: Promoted. <--

--Ikar.us (talk) 00:00, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
George Harrison.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support--Paris 16 (talk) 06:44, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:37, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --MrPanyGoff 17:27, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- JLPC (talk) 06:33, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. George Harrison 1974.jpg: +4 <--
2. George Harrison Chanting Hare Krishna.jpg: 0 
=>
File:George Harrison 1974.jpg: Promoted. <--
File:George Harrison Chanting Hare Krishna.jpg: Declined.

--Ikar.us (talk) 23:46, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bruce Willis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support These both are equally good for VI but let me choose this one. Actually, I would prefer some photo from the 1990s but there isn't a good one.--MrPanyGoff 17:18, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Bruce Willis by Gage Skidmore.jpg: +0
2. Bruce Willis by Gage Skidmore 2.jpg: +1 
3. BruceWillisLFDHpremiere07.jpg: +0 
=>
File:Bruce Willis by Gage Skidmore.jpg: Declined.
File:Bruce Willis by Gage Skidmore 2.jpg: Promoted.
File:BruceWillisLFDHpremiere07.jpg: Declined.

--MrPanyGoff 21:07, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

« MVRs are "discussed"; "portrait" for paintings »

Hello, I saw your changes, I'll try to make it right the next time ;) Totodu74 (talk) 10:14, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Portrait v landscape (v panorama)

These descriptions refer not to the content of the image but to the orientation. Portrait orientation is generally a more vertical image (taller than it is wide), landscape orientation is more horizontal (wider than it is tall), and panorama is very horizontal (much wider than it is tall). See en:Page orientation. I've reverted your edit to the Yalta Conference VI nomination, but wanted to explain. cmadler (talk) 12:08, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Big Mac.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. cmadler (talk) 16:04, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:48, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Subway restaurant.svg

Please see who has been uploaded the file and see the history before nominating. The file has been transfered by a Bot using CommonsHelper, and clearly does not qualify to fair use, because the arrows in the S and the Y are simple geometric forms with the text, and the PD trademark tag is OK. Also, the file was uploaded originally in 2011 and is widely used in many Wikipedias. Amitie 10g (talk) 05:48, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mark Harmon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. Yann (talk) 19:18, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:50, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Steve Guttenberg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Criteria met, useful! Totodu74 (talk) 08:30, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:20, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Woody Harrelson.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Even though the top of his head is cut off, I find this to be the best. It is well-focused on his face, the background is not distracting, and perhaps most important, the facial expression "looks like him". cmadler (talk) 12:31, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope, recent, illustrates subject well. Crop a little unfortunate, but acceptable. --Slaunger (talk) 06:18, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Woody Harrelson by David Shankbone.jpg: -1
2. Woody Harrelson 2009.jpg: +2
3. Woody Harrelson (1988).jpg: +0 
=>
File:Woody Harrelson by David Shankbone.jpg: Declined.
File:Woody Harrelson 2009.jpg: Promoted.
File:Woody Harrelson (1988).jpg: Declined.

--MrPanyGoff 08:12, 19 June 2012 (UTC)