User talk:George Chernilevsky/Archive/Archive 2009 1

Welcome

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, George!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower top 2007 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 01:34, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pachygrapsus marmoratus 2008 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. Lycaon 07:28, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rroject 775M AZOV 2008 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit on the small side, but technically OK. Lycaon 21:11, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poplar seed tufts 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me. Lycaon 16:34, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cherry tree blossom 2007 G1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Mbdortmund 19:06, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sand Lizard 2008 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice shot ! --Romanceor 16:28, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sand Lizard 2008 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice shot ! --Romanceor 16:28, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old tower 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Attractive historical building. --Iotatau 11:35, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tractor T-16MG 2009 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments An original road maintenance scene. --Iotatau 13:37, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cetonia aurata 2009 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --LC-de 09:07, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cetonia aurata 2009 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --LC-de 09:07, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pachygrapsus marmoratus 2008 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting animal in what looks like its natural environment. Sharp, good light. --Iotatau 08:22, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cetonia aurata 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Ianare 05:35, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ElectroLAZ 2008 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit of CA but useful for public transport articles. Good angle (front and side visible). --Iotatau 16:36, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bufo bufo 2009 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Camouflage well demonstrated, funny. --Iotatau 09:42, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ROSHEN Vinnitsa 2008 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. Maedin 14:50, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Very nice pictures again

Thanks for the nice gibelio pictures, time to use them now for the English wikipedia. I am planning to rewrite some articles there. Barbelfishing is not too succesful still. I have made a new blog, [1], that might interest you. It is about developing your own databases and data collection with a pda, attaching pictures to sightings, and there are some fish an lizard pics, and some short comments about the fish species shown on the pics. Viridiflavus (talk) 14:50, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Ok, i read this blog and wait for good article.

I write article about gibelio in russian Wikipedia. :-)

Regards, --George Chernilevsky (talk) 16:03, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bufo bufo 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 12:19, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bufo bufo 2009 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 12:19, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello...

...George! Do you upload more images from the Air Force Museum in Vinnytsya? Would be great to have as much as possible. Greets, High Contrast (talk) 19:50, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Ok, please wait little time.

I select better and correct it, if needed.

I got good help with categories from user BezPRUzyn

--George Chernilevsky (talk) 20:18, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for resuming your uploads. Upload as much images as you can. A question ahead: do you have more images of S-300-SAMs or other SAM-systems? Thank you in advance! --High Contrast (talk) 22:10, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phellinus igniarius 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good close-up. --Iotatau 17:05, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carassius gibelio male head 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. Lycaon 12:03, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

20

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rroject 775M AZOV 2008 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Technically the camera is struggling (see left border at full resolution) but otherwise good; documentary value. --Iotatau 19:10, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juglans regia 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Common subject, no flaws, good texture on fruits. --Iotatau 18:18, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Lilium bulbiferum 2009 G2.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lilium bulbiferum 2009 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good; like the composition. --Iotatau 18:07, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

renamed

Quality Image Promotion

File:Lilium bulbiferum 2009 G1.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lilium bulbiferum 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good DOF --Ianare 08:23, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

renamed

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old Tower night winter 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very attractive night image in good quality. Blue and yellow throughout the picture... --Iotatau 19:41, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pachygrapsus marmoratus 2008 G1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pachygrapsus marmoratus 2008 G1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! French marigold garden 2009 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Iotatau 14:00, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lucanus cervus male 2008 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. One of the advantages of compact cameras is the huge DOF compared to SLR. --Iotatau 15:56, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Natrix Natrix head 2009 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good portrait, useful --Mbdortmund 19:23, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Valued image candidates/Argyroteta aquatica Paar.jpg

Hi. I've changed the scope on this nom per Eusebius' comments. Please revisit. Regards. Lycaon (talk) 08:08, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Natrix Natrix bog 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good (considering camera) --Ianare 16:03, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blackberry fruits 2008 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Mbdortmund 23:25, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

30

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bufo_bufo_2009_G1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bufo_bufo_2009_G1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

May I please ask You to take one more look at the FP nomination ?

Hi, George, by suggestion of user Maedin I added the original image to that nomination. May I please ask to review the image? Thank You for your time.--Mbz1 (talk) 00:07, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Ok, I do it with enjoy --George Chernilevsky (talk) 16:24, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kh-15.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info Kh-15 USSR/Russia nuclear missile (NATO reporting name AS-16 "Kickback").

* Oppose - Not Geocoded. Rastaman3000 (talk) 16:52, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

•  Info this object cannot be geocoded. Read rules: "exceptions include: ...situations where the publishing of a location might be prejudicial". --George Chernilevsky (talk) 18:34, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment about geocoding: This may need no coordinates, but geocoding also requires that a statement is put in the description as to why there is no need for geocoding (e.g. studio shot, privacy reasons, protected species, etc.). Lycaon (talk) 15:08, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Info Geocode is impossible. It is protected military object. Part as museum open only 2 day in a year. --George Chernilevsky (talk) 16:31, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Info - Please add this information to the image description page as well, and then I'll support. Rastaman3000 (talk) 16:18, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

 Support - Geocoding is in fact not applicable; reason is clearly stated in the images description page. Fulfills all criteria. Rastaman3000 (talk) 18:05, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment About geocoding: the author/nominator could give the geolocalisation of the town of Vinnytsya (N 49.23333 E 28.48333, more or less), as the description precises that this photo was taken at the "Ukrainian Air Force Museum", and it is in the "Category:Ukrainian Air Force Museum in Vinnytsya". --Myrabella (talk) 22:01, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment in Vinnytsya exist several museums. Water tower are in category Museums in Vinnytsya\Water tower in Vinnytsya. It is not same Ukrainian Air Force Museum in Vinnytsya. You must be attentive --George Chernilevsky (talk) 05:20, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
    •  Comment I am attentive. In fact, I didn't refer to any peculiar museum in the town—there are the data that appear when asking for Vinnytsya in ACME mapper trough the English article. So I emend my suggestion: you could give the geolocalisation of the town of Vinnytsya, as indicated in wikipedian articles about this town : e.g. : en:Vinnytsia or ru:Винница. A rather broad localisation, but not totally inaccurate, as for proteced living species. --Myrabella (talk) 06:53, 9 July 2009 (UTC).
• I now add word Vinnytsia and city coordinates in description --George Chernilevsky (talk) 08:19, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 09:33, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orthodox church Vinnitsa S Bug 2007 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition, good exposure (clouds). Image date is in future :) --Iotatau 13:47, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you!

Cпaceбo бoлшe! He бecпoкoйcь o твoём aнглиcкoм ... так ты мoжеш видеть, я мoгy пoнимaть pyccкий xopoшo (или так мнe нpaвитcя дyмaть :-))

Я цeнy oбa пpoдвижeниe (нa пepвий paз, кapтинa чтo я cфoтoгpaфирoвaл нe oтклoнил пoтoмy чтo cлишкoм мнoго шyм ) и твoи кoммeнтapи. Загpyзил новий фaйл пoтoмy чтo зaxoтeл eго пepeимeнoвывaть тaк включaтъ мecтoнaхoждeние в нaзвaниe.

Тoжe, peдaктиpoвaл и кaдpиpoвaл opигинaл, тaк мнe нyжeн внoвь coздaвaть пepвyю кapтинy. Opигинaл нe тaк coвceм кpacoчный. Daniel Case (talk) 16:29, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old Tower night winter 2009 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Technically not perfect (noise, sharpness just ok, overexposed clock), but nonetheless I like it very much. Please add geolocation! -- H005 22:28, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rapana venosa (Veined rapa whelk).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Please format the scope and the links to other projects. Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:42, 6 July 2009(UTC)

•  Done --George Chernilevsky (talk) 11:08, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose - In my opinion, File:Rapana_venosa.jpg ilustrates the scope better (subject is visible from both sides). Rastaman3000 (talk) 14:23, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
  • File:Rapana_venosa.jpg too small (604 × 386 pixels) and showing only shell, not alive snail --George Chernilevsky (talk) 14:28, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support A life animal, showing the operculum is the best we have at the moment. Lycaon (talk) 15:05, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Agree with Lycaon. Yann (talk) 10:23, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support for the same reasons. -- H005 (talk) 21:01, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Agree with Lycaon, meets all of the criteria for COM:VI. --Captain-tucker (talk) 12:24, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Result: 4 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 12:26, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juglans regia 2009 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Mbdortmund 11:55, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Argiope bruennichi 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good, fine details --Mbdortmund 02:19, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! French marigold garden 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Afrank99 12:43, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

35

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boletus impolitus 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photographic quality -- H005 21:11, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! UAZ-452 Medical (EMS) 2006 G4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Neutral Technically good, the background is a pity. -- H005 18:04, 14 July 2009 (UTC)  Support Meets the criteria for QI in any aspects. --High Contrast 07:01, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

37

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Archispirostreptus gigas 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice. Yann 09:39, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pandinus imperator 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice beast. Might be FP. Yann 09:39, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brachypelma auratum 2009 G01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice documentation of the footprints, could you please ad a hint where you took the picture? --Mbdortmund 18:36, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brachypelma auratum 2009 G02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Kind of dark in some spots but overall a good image. ----Korall 13:47, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

41

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pogona vitticeps 2009 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Mbdortmund 15:14, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pogona vitticeps 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good work --Mbdortmund 20:57, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brachypelma auratum 2009 G03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brachypelma auratum 2009 G06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fomes fomentarius 2009 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments background a little noisy but otherwise good --Ianare 04:03, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

My photocamera

Hello

bad balance is on the one or more photos? for me balance is ok; my camera is a Fuji S9600 (nothing special) and settings are the norm.

Best regards --Pudelek (talk) 16:44, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

hmm, I don't now... for me it seems ok. may be opinion from other people from Commons? --Pudelek (talk) 23:09, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

New version from this photo: [2] --Pudelek (talk) 23:11, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pogona vitticeps 2009 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 21:10, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salaria pavo female 2009 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good and useful --Mbdortmund 19:55, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boletus impolitus 2009 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good picture. Could you add some location info? Lycaon 21:10, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salaria pavo female 2009 G4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good to me. --Korall 20:40, 29 August 2009 (UTC) Comment Could use brightening up a notch; shadow on top half of fish and overall image is rather dark. --Editor at Large 12:06, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

50

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Brachypelma auratum 2009 G03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brachypelma auratum 2009 G03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 17:45, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Project 1164 Moskva 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Cayambe 07:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brachypelma auratum 2009 G04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice details --Cesco77 12:00, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Brachypelma boehmei 2009 G01.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brachypelma boehmei 2009 G01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice details --Cesco77 12:00, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pogona vitticeps 2009 G4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Cayambe 09:57, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eublepharis macularius 2009 G7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great shot! --NormanB 01:33, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eublepharis macularius 2009 G6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good picture. I like this most from all these gecko pictures here. But do we really need them all? --Johannes Robalotoff 20:18, 10 September 2009 (UTC), QI is not a best of. The more pictures we can positively review the more choice our "customers" have. --Dschwen 02:06, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pogona vitticeps close-up 2009 G4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Rünno 15:39, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salaria pavo male 2009 G9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salaria pavo male 2009 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

зарегестрированый пользователь

Здравствуйте Георгий, Я - зарегестрированый пользователь , но почему Вы решили, что автор должен быть зарегестрированый пользователь? Как на счет NASA, например? Наилучшие пожелания.--Mbz1 (talk) 12:54, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Valued image candidates/BayArena neu 2009.jpg

Hi George, I have seen that a split of building scopes into exterior and interior is actually even encouraged in the VI rules, thus I have split the scope of Commons:Valued image candidates/BayArena neu 2009.jpg now. Can you please review it under the new scope? And I still believe the exterior view to be more improtant ... :-) -- H005 (talk) 18:10, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Valued image candidates/Balisique Saint Marc de Venise facade door 1.jpg

Hello George, Scope have been changed for this VIC so would you consider voting again? A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards... Thanks! --Myrabella (talk) 23:58, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carcinus aestuarii 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good. Yann 14:02, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brachypelma boehmei 2009 G06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 20:55, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lasiodora parahybana 2009 G05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Where do you get all these cute little spiders? --Mbdortmund 20:56, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Inkerman cave monastery 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. Very interesting --Berthold Werner 08:42, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clibanarius erythropus 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 22:47, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clibanarius erythropus 2009 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 22:47, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

65

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clibanarius erythropus 2009 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 09:44, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pachygrapsus marmoratus 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Flawless image, as far as I can see. --Johannes Robalotoff 19:49, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eublepharis macularius 2009 G5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Another very good gecko picture. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:08, 13 September 2009 (UTC)