User talk:GRDN711/Archive 1

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, GRDN711!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 01:49, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-11-22 MV TUSTUMENA - IMO 6421086 18-09-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please check your image. Resolution too small, leaning out, sharpness must be better. --XRay 05:12, 23 November 2018 (UTC) Increased resolution from orginal. Please review again. --GRDN711 12:36, 23 November 2018 (UTC) It's still not sharp enough and it's leaning out too. Another question: Is this the full resolution now? --XRay 13:23, 23 November 2018 (UTC) Thank you for your comments. Increased resolution to maximum possible – 7639 pixels long side. To minimize distortion of 5-image stitch, applied lens correction and manual vertical upright correction using building edge on right. --GRDN711 04:21, 24 November 2018 (UTC)  Support It's only a weak support. The sharpness could be better. And I've added some missing categories for you. --XRay 06:27, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

Dear GRDN711,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your participation in Wiki Loves Love 2019

Wiki Loves Love 2019 has ended and team Wiki Loves Love sends you greetings and appreciation for joining us in spreading love around the globe and documents how love is expressed in different cultures. We hope to see you again in 2020. Till then stay tuned to know the results of WLL19 that will be out in this April. Please make sure that your email is enabled so we can communicate with you if you are one of our prize winners.(learn more how to do)

Best regards.

Wiki Loves Love International Team

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:31, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-03-16 03 Aquaculture in Chile.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 16:51, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-03-16 01 Aquaculture in Chile.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:04, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-02-15 074 Roseate spoonbill (Platalea ajaja) at Sian Ka'an Biosphere Reserve, Mexico.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:31, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-03-03 Chinstrap penguin on Barrientos Island, Antarctica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:17, 24 July 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Nirmal Dulal 08:20, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2019-03-03 Chinstrap penguin on Barrientos Island, Antarctica.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2019-03-03 Chinstrap penguin on Barrientos Island, Antarctica.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 17-08-02 FIREBOAT 3 - City of Vancouver, BC, Canada 17-07-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. It's not sharp enough. --XRay 04:51, 27 July 2019 (UTC) Although it is a good image, I did not realize that Frank was going to nominate it for QI. I uploaded this image nearly two years ago when I had just started with Commons and accidentally upsampled the original cropped image through misunderstanding. I have uploaded a new version for review. Please see if this is better. --GRDN711 03:07, 29 July 2019 (UTC)  Support It's still not the best, but acceptable. So here is my very minor support. --XRay 06:27, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011-06-04 Kjeungskjær Lighthouse (The Red Sailor), Sør-Trøndelag, Norway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:38, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States – Back for 2019!

This user participated in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Want to show your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019? Add {{User Wiki Loves Monuments 2019}} to your userpage!

Hello! Last year you contributed to Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in the United States. Thanks to people like you it was a great success, with over 1,900 people contributing over 10,000 photos of cultural and historic sites from all over the country. Hundreds of these photos now help illustrate Wikipedia articles, improving our open knowledge about United States history, culture, and heritage. If you haven't seen the winners yet, be sure to check them out here.

I'm pleased to say that we're back this year with Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in the United States, and I'd like to welcome you to participate once again in the event. Check out our updated event page for more information. Just like last year, you'll be able to upload your photos of any registered historical site in the United States through the end of September (even if the photos were taken before this month).

If you've traveled and taken photos of monuments in non-US countries, you can see if those countries are also participating here.

Once again, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2018, and we hope to see you again in this year's event! If you'd like to respond to this message directly, please do so on on my talk page. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 05:15, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pygoscelis antarcticus (Chinstrap penguin), in the wild, walking.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Look at the scope changes according to the rules. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment we should not have in Antarctica in scope. Charles (talk) 09:04, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Will remove oppose GRDN711 when scope changed. Charles (talk) 11:38, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment @Charlesjsharp: we can discuss pleonasm, and make a remark, but in no way vote negatively. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment I can't find pleonasm @Archaeodontosaurus: (I had to look the word up!!) as this penguin lives in other places apart from Antarctica. I am not aware that the Antarctic population differs from the others. The VI rules cover this exact issue of adding a location to a scope: "storm clouds over London" would not be acceptable unless there were buildings or other features visible which could distinguish it from, say, "storm clouds over Sydney" or "storm clouds over Tokyo"." Charles (talk) 08:00, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
• I thought you did not want to see wild and antartic together. I understand better, and you're right, but it's important to make a difference with an image of Zoo. So we have to keep in the scope: Wild or Antarctic. What annoys me the most is how to welcome newcomers. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:50, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Sorry, I didn't realise GRDN711 was a newcomer. I have edited scope myself to our standard format for his reference. Charles (talk) 13:50, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
• --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

08:50, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment Thank you both for your assistance with defining the correct scope for this image.

Commons:Photo challenge/2019 - July - Fishing/Winners

	Photo Challenge – Third Place
	Congratulations! Your picture 2019-03-16 03 Aquaculture in Chile.jpg won the 3rd place in the Photo Challenge Fishing, in July 2019. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 11:55, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States 2019 – Last day to enter!

This user participated in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Want to show your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019? Add {{User Wiki Loves Monuments 2019}} to your userpage!

September 30th is the last day to upload photos for Wiki Loves Monuments! We're thrilled that the United States has almost reached 4,000 contributions so far this year. Of these images, ~370 (~9%) have already been used to help illustrate Wikipedia articles and pages on other wiki projects, which is fantastic.

If you've already made a photo contribution this year, thanks so much! If you have any last-minute photos of U.S. historical sites to upload and enter into the contest, today's the day to do it. Check out the United States event page for more information. Judging will take place throughout the month of October, after which the top-ten national finalists will be announced in early November.

If you've traveled and taken photos of monuments in non-US countries, you can see if those countries are also participating here.

As always, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments! If you'd like to respond to this message directly, please do so on on my talk page. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 05:49, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-03-12 NAVIMAG ferry, EVANGELISTAS - IMO 7627962.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Armenak Margarian 13:45, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-03-14 NAVIMAG ferry, TRINIDAD I - IMO 8917871.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 12:41, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aquaculture mussel farming in Chile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aquaculture fish farming in Chile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chilean NAVIMAG ferry, EVANGELISTAS.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chilean NAVIMAG ferry, TRINIDAD I.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. -- ~riley (talk) 00:28, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014-04-29 Northwestern crow (Corvus caurinus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 02:55, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Northwestern crow (Corvus caurinus), adult.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment done - hope this helps --GRDN711 (talk) 00:11, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment ''{{c|Corvus caurinus}}'' this syntax points to the category; this one ''[[Corvus caurinus]]'' towards the gallery. Both are acceptable, but for the gallery you must also put your picture.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-08-14 02 KEILIR - IMO 9849928.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:27, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-08-14 01 KEILIR - IMO 9849928.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:11, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-08-13 02 LEYNIR - IMO 9126388.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:34, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-08-13 01 LEYNIR - IMO 9126388.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:42, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-08-13 01 Purple Sandpiper (Calidris maritima), Reykjavik Iceland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:41, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-03-19 SOCIBER VALPARAISO III floating drydock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 22:01, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-08-13 02 Purple Sandpiper (Calidris maritima), Reykjavik Iceland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Axel Tschentscher 06:51, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Floating drydocks in Valparaíso, Chile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Category:Interior of St Nicholas Church, Wallasey

It helps if you also move the contents of a category to the new name. It doesn't happen automatically. Thanks. Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:33, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Actually the parent category is Category:St Nicholas's church, Wallasey, so you've also broken the naming existing convention. Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:35, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Also, we don't do what Wikipedia does, because they don't take much care about getting things right. We do here. Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:36, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello @Rodhullandemu:

Thank you for pointing out the necessity of moving all images to a new sub-category name. I should have remembered that...

The real issue I was trying to address was the spelling of the Commons parent category name (Category:St Nicholas's church, Wallasey) and all sub-category names. The church web site says “Welcome to St Nicholas Church, Wallasey”, as does Wikipedia and Google. I would propose that “St Nicholas's church, Wallasey “ be changed to “St Nicholas Church, Wallasey” in all Commons category and sub-categories names. No ‘s and all first letter caps indicating a name rather than a possession.

Your thoughts?

GRDN711 (talk) 02:17, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

• I agree that we should use the names of organisations and institutions that they themselves use, as long as we are consistent about it. I'm currently uploading a sequence of photos of the church interior, so when I've finished that I'll move the whole lot to Category:St Nicholas Church, Wallasey. Cheers. Rodhullandemu (talk) 08:04, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Now  Done Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Thak you, @Rodhullandemu: , for your help with this. --GRDN711 (talk) 17:36, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-08-29 RIO - IMO 8613047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:07, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear GRDN711,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:34, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 11-05-30 020 DNFS Young Highland bull, Denmark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 23:12, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 11-05-30 018 DNFS Young Highland bull, Denmark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:20, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011-05-30 008 Young Highland bull, Denmark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:20, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dun-colored, young Highland bull.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Not a good scope. Species of animal is relevant, not location. Charles (talk) 13:23, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment The Wikipedia topic on Highland cattle describes the spread from Scotland to other countries and there are 17 countries listed as sub-categories in the Commons category of "Highland cattle by country". Still, I see your point and have put together a new scope. Does this work better? --GRDN711 (talk) 21:41, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 11-05-30 019 DNFS Young Highland bull, Denmark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 December 2019 (UTC)