User talk:Gérald Garitan/Archives 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hi, I added a move proposal because I wasn't sure whether you had a reason for spelling it 'watremarks'. wqnvlz (talk | contribs) 23:13, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy (talk) 20:58, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Postcards

[edit]

Hello Gérald Garitan thanks for uploading postcards to commons. Maybe you are interested in COM:WPPC. You are welcome to be an participant of this project. - Also I want to informe you, that I will move the name of some categories from Category:Cartes postales de Royan to Postcards of Royan. (See also Commons_talk:WikiProject_Postcards#Categories_name_standardization) Best regards -- sk (talk) 09:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, je ne comprend rien à votre bannière Autotranslate premièrement car il n'est pas traduit en français après internationalisation de la page explicative. Deuxièmement la bannière invoque la tranduction alors que sur l'image il est question du droit d'auteur ? Lors du versement j'utilise la license proposée en premier par l'assistant de versement. Que faut-il donc faire, à part supprimer les images ? Gérald Garitan (talk) 10:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gérald, these images were tagged "Obviously it‘s not his own work.", which seems to be appropriate, considering the obvious age. Could you provide the source and the true date (year) of the original photography. Why did you claim to be the author even for images from 1930? --Túrelio (talk) 13:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
bonjour certaine images sont taguées autotranslate alors que l'auteur a ballu est signalé, savez vous combien de français sont centenaires ? le bandeau affirme que les droits d'auteur sont violés et vous m'expliquez qu'e vous emmettez un doute sur le remplissage des lignes de description. vous ne répondez rien au sujet de l'usage de traduction. qu'y a t-il à traduire ? Gérald Garitan (talk) 15:33, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Ambulances du 1 52.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

And also:

Yours sincerely, (`・ω・´) (talk) 09:35, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Afrikaans | azərbaycanca | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | Nederlands | norsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | sicilianu | Simple English | suomi | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | Ελληνικά | български | македонски | русский | српски / srpski | українська | հայերեն | मराठी | हिन्दी | বাংলা | മലയാളം | ไทย | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | עברית |العربية | فارسی | +/−


Hello Gérald Garitan.

You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful.

This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

(`・ω・´) (talk) 09:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replied. (`・ω・´) (talk) 14:29, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Je ne comprend rien à ce message. Gérald Garitan (talk) 15:18, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What? You should see my talk page if you want to see the reply. (`・ω・´) (talk) 15:28, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:Cognac Matha 1004049.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 21:33, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Combats chateau mondement 07663.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 22:59, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ambulances du 1 52.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 23:04, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vos images

[edit]

Bonjour,

D'abord, j'ai archivé votre page de discussion qui devenait illisible. C'est pour cela que les messages n’étaient pas traduits. Voyez User talk:Gérald Garitan/Archives 2020.

Ensuite, il faut que vous donniez les bonnes informations pour vos images sinon elles seront supprimées : source complète et précise, auteur, date (au moins approximative), et une licence valide. "Creative Commons" n'est pas une licence valide si vous n’êtes pas l'auteur de la photo. {{PD-France}} + {{PD-US-expired}} est acceptable pour des photos anciennes, mais à condition d'avoir des informations complètes. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 23:06, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voici un exemple de ce qu'il faut faire :

Cordialement, Yann (talk) 23:40, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

merci Yann, qu'en est-il des discussions entamées par akko sur la traduction ? Avant j'utilisait pd-old, mais de nombreuses images ont été alors supprimée. akko avait aussi mis des bandeaux alors que l'auteur ballu était mentionné, je n'ais alors rien changé à ces boites de description. merci de votre aide Gérald Garitan (talk) 14:32, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Les informations fournies ne sont pas suffisantes : date, origine des documents ? Nom des photographes ? Il manque aussi une licence valide. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 17:16, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, Merci d'indiquer le nom du peintre, le lieu ou se trouve ce tableau, etc. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 23:22, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, merci pour votre demande, pour le lieu c'est l'église de mondement, l'image est catégorisée dans ce sens, pour le peintre, la signature est illisible et aucune recharche n'a abouti à faire connaitre le peintre. Cordialement Gérald Garitan (talk) 10:29, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, Merci d'indiquer le nom du peintre, le lieu ou se trouve ce tableau, etc. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 23:23, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Louis Alfred Vuarnesson 94 RI 688.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:34, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Général Lestoquoi 678.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:34, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:La prise du Château de Mondement E Ganty 1918.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:35, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chateau mondemant 07665.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anniversaire de la Bataille de la Marne.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:39, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Espace basilical tebessa 160628.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 23:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:La roChelle port 1003963.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 23:51, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:La roChelle le port 1003964.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 23:51, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Basilique tebessa reconstitution 160628.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 23:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Colonel Lestoquoi 07678.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 23:55, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ambulance 1 52.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 23:55, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Colonel grossetti 07688.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 23:56, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Basilique tebessa 09600001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:56, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:508e et 501e 07684.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 23:56, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Basilique de tebessa 09600005.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 23:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cour proche basilique 1004304.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

L'Inconstant (brig) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 09:26, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:146e RI 78156.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Le Petit Chat (talk) 09:47, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Samira el ayachi 1102462 au Cellier.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

85.169.235.171 10:56, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:146e RI 78156.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:146e RI 78156.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Missvain (talk) 21:55, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:1952 bao dai décore des soldats 1105611.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tekstman (talk) 10:41, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !

[edit]

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:26, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Laura alCoba 1002062.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A01:CB08:281:9D00:E9DD:6C1D:6996:47EA 13:57, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Laura alCoba 1002062.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A01:CB08:281:9D00:E9DD:6C1D:6996:47EA 14:13, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Laura alCoba 1002062.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

80.13.50.138 14:44, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fichier:Cour écurie palais gouverneur 09356.jpg

[edit]

Bonjour Monsieur,

Je travaille pour la Ville de Nancy et je me permets de vous contacter pour vous prévenir que nous avons dû retirer votre photo de l'article sur le palais du gouvernement pour des raisons de sécurité. En effet, la photo prise des balcons du palais donne sur la cour utilisée par les services techniques des parcs et jardins de la ville et outre le peu d'esthétique de tout le matériel qui ne mets pas du tout en valeur ou à l'honneur le le site sur la page wiki du Palais du Gouvernement, cela pose des problèmes de sécurité pour ces services municipaux. Nous ne pouvons pas la supprimer de wikicommons, seriez-vous d'accord pour l'enlever s'il vous plaît? Je suis vraiment désolée pour le dérangement occasionné. J'espère que vous comprendrez nos prérogatives. Par avance merci, Cordialement, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sophiekatmusée (talk • contribs) 13:26, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Sophiekatmusée, merci pour ce message, je souhaitais représenter les écuries, qui sont me semble t il classées ? Pour ce qui est des problèmes de sécurité je ne comprend pas quels ils pourraient être sur cette image ? Vous ne pouvez pas supprimer l'image sur Commons c'est normal et moi non plus je n'ais pas accès a cette possibilité. Il se peut que d'autre wikipédiens, si ils cherchent une illustration des écuries soient tentés par la seule image accessible. Je comprend votre soucis et vos efforts, je me permets de vous alerter sur ce que seraient vos prérogatives en regard du projet wikipédia. Bien cordialement Gérald Garitan (talk) 08:36, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:Laura alCoba 1002062.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A01:CB08:281:9D00:56E:7844:E040:565A 20:11, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Laura alCoba 1002062.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A01:CB08:281:9D00:6119:C0CA:70B5:F8FD 17:17, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Au sujet du plateau d'argent du Château d'Albâtre

[edit]

Bonjour, j'ai rétabli l'ancienne image de la tombe à char gauloise File:Tombe de somme bionne 06125.JPG qui avait été écrasée par une autre image que j'ai téléchargée sous un autre nom : File:Plateau d'argent ciselé du chateau d'Albatre.jpg. Quelle est la source (lien internet) de l'image de la tombe qui est en couleur alors que celles de la Bibliothèque de Reims sont en N et B ? - Siren-Com (talk) 10:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, merci pour ton action j'ai remis l'image dans son bon livre/catégorie, j'espère que celà répond à ta question. Cordialement Gérald Garitan (talk) 12:42, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:Laura alCoba 1002062.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A01:CB08:281:9D00:8525:F767:211B:5B94 17:03, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Demande suppression image

[edit]

A l'attention de M. Gérald Garitan,

J'ai demandé à plusieurs reprises la suppression d'une image de moi que vous avez publiée (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Laura_alCoba_1002062.jpg File:Laura alCoba 1002062.jpg ) Cette image me blesse, je souhaite que vous la supprimiez. Je crois que vous avez déjà été informé de cette demande, mais vous êtes resté sourd jusqu'ici. C'est la raison pour laquelle je tenais à vous informer que, sans réaction de votre part (à savoir la suppression de cette image), je m'apprête à contacter le service juridique de ma maison d'édition pour leur soumettre ce problème que j'ai avec vous.

Laura Alcoba — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A01:CB08:281:9D00:52A:2F8F:D439:7980 (talk) 08:05, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,— Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A01:CB08:281:9D00:52A:2F8F:D439:7980 (talk) 08:05, 26 October 2021 (UTC), je ne sais pas qui vous êtes, vous ne signez pas ce qui est demandé lors que l'on écrit à quelqu'un sur les projets Wikipédiens. Qui se cache derrière 2A01:CB08:281:9D00:52A:2F8F:D439:7980 ? Vous pouvez vous prétendre de n'importe quelle identité réelle, sans le prouver, où celà vous mène-t-il ? Il existe une procédure et des règles pour les images et leur suppression. Les avez vous respecté ? De plus toutes vos demandes de suppression d'image ont été traitées ; pas par moi car je ne peut être juge et partie. Pour le fond je ne pense pas avoir besoin de le traité avec, avec qui au fait ? Bien cordialement Gérald Garitan (talk) 15:30, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour Gérald, je suis agent bénévolé de l'équipe VTRS de soutien. Je suis bien sûr qu'il s'agit de la personne présentée dans la photo, car elle nous a écrit (Ticket:2021101410006838) pour demander comment elle pouvait joindre le photographe. Je lui ai recommandé ta page de discussion. Salutations d'Allemagne, --Mussklprozz (talk) 13:01, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour Gérald, je me permet d'intervenir car du fait que je suis déjà intervenu sur votre page de discussion, elle est entrée dans ma liste de suivi et j'ai été intrigué par le sujet. J'ai eu pour ma part la même demande en 2012 pour des photos de Raymond Depardon et Claudine Nougaret (Category:Raymond Depardon, Category:Claudine Nougaret) faites à La FNAC lors d'une présentation publique, je suis resté neutre dans cette histoire n'ayant pas de position de principe, mais la décision de la communauté a été de conserver ces photos. Il me semble que la nature de la blessure invoquée chaque fois est toujours incompréhensible et non expliquée. Les personnes publiques, photographiées dans l'exercice de leur métier ne peuvent s'opposer à la prise de vue (sauf cas exceptionnel ou la photo les dessert d'une façon artificielle ou truquée). Commons applique cette politique. Les personnes peuvent cependant s'opposer à la réutilisation en publication de leur image pour des objectifs contraires à leur intérêts ou falsifiés, mais elles doivent alors s'en prendre aux réutilisateurs secondaire et non à Commons et à l'auteur de la photo. Ceci n'est que mon avis mais j'ai constaté que dans 99% des cas les demandes d'effacement sont rejetées, donc pas de crainte à avoir. Bien cordialement. - Siren-Com (talk) 01:39, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour à vous Siren-Com et Mussklprozz merci de votre attention. Je crois que les lecteurs et en général les utilisateurs d'internet ne se rendent pas bien compte de leur façon d'intervenir, pas bonjour ou merci ce qui s'applique dans la vie quotidienne. Mais surtout d'appliquer les règles de base de l'usage d'un site, notre société manque de pédagogie et surtout de formation sur ses sujets, presque tous avouent n'avoir jamais lu les conditions d'utilisation des sites qu'il(le)s utilisent. Je ne souhaite pas insister sur un cas particulier mais j'essai de prendre des précautions avant de publier les images, auprès de l'organisation et des personnalités même si se sont des personnages publiques et se médiatisant dans un cadre public. Sincèrement Gérald Garitan (talk) 09:22, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:Convois 124 chariot salonique.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 23:58, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sabyl ghoussoub Cormontreuil 1301631.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Serart (talk) 07:55, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sabyl ghoussoub cormontreuil 1301582.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Serart (talk) 07:57, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Laura alCoba 1002062.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A01:CB08:281:9D00:D567:7D17:F309:D64 14:16, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]