User talk:FunkMonk/Archive/2008
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Image Tagging Image:Uhhhu.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Uhhhu.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. --Filnik 21:36, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- I created it myself, I'm not sure what went wrong with the summary. I'll fix it. FunkMonk 21:40, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- I just don't understand why is this picture in categories "1911 births" and "1985 deaths". Could you please explain this to me? Thank you. --Joker Island 11:38, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- I have no idea, ask the Common Sense tool. FunkMonk 14:35, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Nouvellevagueband.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Jmudry 10:20, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:The_short_cut_to_india_(1909)._caffeeshop_in_diyarbakir.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Bangin@de@ku ¤ ρø$τ 12:21, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 02:47, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Caucasiodarmenian.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Yegoyan 16:32, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:49, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:10, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I see you claimed this image was in the public domain in the US because it was a work of the United States Federal Government under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. Do you have any proof for that? Wondering, Wikipeder 21:35, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- Seems like I was wrong, check this:[1] FunkMonk 16:46, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 03:32, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Father and children, showing costumes, Ramallah, Palestine.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by User:Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 06:46, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Thylacoskullcope.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Thylacoskullcope.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by User:Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 15:50, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Goniopholis.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Goniopholis.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by User:Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 17:29, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by John Bot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. -- John Bot(My Operator|My Contribs) 17:32, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0
It's non-free, any attempt to use that license purely will get it tagged for speedy deletion. It must be used under fair use on Wikipedia automatically, treated like any other copyrighted work, and used within our regulations. ViperSnake151 17:37, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Awright, thanks. FunkMonk 19:54, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Iraq,_Saddam_Hussein_(222).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Iraq,_Saddam_Hussein_(222).jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 14:00, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Details on Image:SyriacChurch-Mosul.jpg
Can you give me some details on the Image:SyriacChurch-Mosul.jpg. How I could acquire a larger image of the same image. Lijujacobk 14:53, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Try to contact the owner of this website: http://www.mideastimage.com/ FunkMonk 17:38, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Dino.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Dino.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Chech Explorer 03:41, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- Heh, it's a crappy image anyway, I wouldn't mind if it got deleted. FunkMonk 04:55, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Gamal_Abdel_Nasser_pic.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gamal_Abdel_Nasser_pic.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 22:28, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:GamalNasser.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:GamalNasser.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 22:29, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Scan00tri14.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 08:31, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Utahraptor_Model.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 08:31, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Scan001psoi6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 09:02, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Barosaurus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 09:02, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Pleurocoelus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 09:03, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:SpinoJP.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 09:04, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:DiloJP.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 09:04, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:JPraptor.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 09:04, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:DMNS38L_StygimolochSpinifer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 09:06, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Dinosaurs_at_CMNH_41.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 09:07, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Newmexico_naturalhistorymuseum_gorgosaurus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 09:14, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Jackalope_wyo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 09:14, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Fightsabertoothtiger.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 09:17, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:La_Brea_Tar_Pits_Mastadons.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 09:18, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:La_Brea_Saber-tooth_Model.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 09:18, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Photo of Dinny the Dinosaur
Why is someone's a photo of a toy or a famous landmark a copyright violation? This seems overly broad to the point of being silly. Can you provide where you're getting your information. --MarsRover (talk) 05:00, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- I thought it was silly too, but an admin showed me this: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Freedom_of_panorama FunkMonk (talk) 12:24, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks --MarsRover (talk) 04:21, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Carnotaurus02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 00:24, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
?
I hope you are happy since you seem to be on a personal tear to get other people's images deleted since yours was. The debate was closed so freaking fast I couldn't even get a copy of my own damn image. Hope this gives you pleasure. Pschemp (talk) 03:40, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- Calm down. This is not about pleasure, this is about learning that a law actually exists. There are a lot of featured dinosaur articles, they're better off without a lot of images that would eventually get deleted anyway. If you want a copy of the image, just ask an admin, they aren't deleted from the database. FunkMonk (talk) 09:10, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Duplicates
Template:Duplicate is intended only for files that are exactly the same or scaled-down versions of another file, see Commons:Deletion guidelines#Duplicates and the next section about redundant files. The important part is:
- "If the file is the same file type and you're sure that it is exactly the same content (colours, quality, etc) tag it with {{duplicate|Image:example.jpg}}"
That means that if the quality is not the same, the file should not be considered a duplicate. Non-exact duplicates can still be redundant. If you want the file to be deleted you should follow the instructions for redundant files:
- "Redundant or low quality files get only deleted on a case by case basis after they got listed the usual way at Commons:Deletion requests."
Image deletion warning | Image:Unaysaurus_tolentinoi_foto_unay.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 15:51, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Unaysaurus_tolentinoi_fossil.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 15:52, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Dizzy_Gillespie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 03:13, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:2nd_Aust_Armd_Div(AWM_129661).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 08:14, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:MicroraptorGui-BeijingMuseumOfNaturalHistory-May23-08.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Captmondo (talk) 16:22, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Woolly.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 02:42, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
about Wooly Mammoth-RBC.jpg
The image in question was (as far as I could tell) a photograph of a painting; freedom of panorama in Canada only extends to architectural works and sculptures. HTH, Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 07:08, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- uh wait, disregard that. I've just restored it. I thought it was a painting and it wasn't. they don't call me Lewis "reckless abuse of admin tools" Collard for nothing... Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 07:14, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Heh, well, I was going to post this, an alternate angle of the model, so here it is anyway: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Mamut_lanudo.jpg FunkMonk (talk) 07:15, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Scan0ff017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 10:37, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Sheiks_alawi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 09:22, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Juvenile_Tyrannosaurus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 11:55, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:08, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:AcrohandDSC07215.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 19:56, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Scan001aa5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 21:22, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Your nominations
You're right; I support the deletion requests. Will let someone else do the closing. Durova (talk) 01:04, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Heh, not singling you out or anything, I've just been image editing on extinct hominid related articles and nominated copyvios I found along the way. FunkMonk (talk) 01:06, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, not suggesting you were. Good call; I should have thought of it myself. Best wishes, Durova (talk) 02:34, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, and same to you! I've been nominating a lot of my own images too after learning more about freedom of panorama and the lack of it... FunkMonk (talk) 02:44, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, not suggesting you were. Good call; I should have thought of it myself. Best wishes, Durova (talk) 02:34, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:The_Heidelberg_Man.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 01:14, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Scandd0016.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 18:03, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Kgibran.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 23:29, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Fossil_of_the_Cladoselache,_a_Devonian_Shark.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 00:50, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Spinosaurus_vertebrae.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 00:52, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Spinosaurus_Monograph.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 00:52, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Khalidmohammed.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 02:54, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for your uploads! I have nominated Image:Sue in nyc dino trex.jpg for speedy deletion: the licence on Flickr is CC-NC-SA, which doesn't allow commercial uses. All files on Commons must be allowed to be used commercially; this is for example the case for files licensed under CC-BY or CC-BY-SA. There is more information on this on the upload form if you click "the work is from Flickr". If you have any questions, feel free to ask! Cheers, Pruneautalk 23:12, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
- That's fine, I had just moved it from Wikipedia, so I didn't check the Flickr link. FunkMonk (talk) 11:52, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Scanma0013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
FunkMonk (talk) 08:38, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Rhomaleosaurus.jpg
We had a server problem when you uploaded this image. Somehow, the license got lost. Please add the license manually, otherwise this file will be deleted after seven days. Cheers, Lupo 08:28, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Liang Bua Cave.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Hello, I just deleted this image. A quick browsing through the user's contributions made me rather suspicious: there seems to be other images that could be traces. Do you own the referred book? Maybe you could have a look into this? Thanks, Patrícia msg 12:28, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
- Hi, I've already nominated all the images there I knew were traces from the same book, all of them have now been deleted. I don't know about the rest though. FunkMonk (talk) 14:40, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Carnotaurus.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Carnotaurus.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. -Nard the Bard 01:40, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Rajasaurus_-2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rajasaurus_-2.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. -Nard the Bard 01:40, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- en:User:Benosaurus has been claiming since November 2007 he had OTRS confirmation on his uploads (see his talk) but nobody's been able to find the ticket. I know it's not your fault the images have unclear copyright status. -Nard the Bard 01:43, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I'd rather have them all removed actually, so our own artists can get to do the job, heh. There are still a few such images on Wikipdia itself. FunkMonk (talk) 07:12, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Image:Dicynodon lacerticeps.jpg
Image:Dicynodon lacerticeps.jpg seems to have two very different versions that in my opinion deserve to be seperated. (I don't know anything about the subject matter however.) Is there a reason you uploaded a new version over the top of the old one? Or is it a question of renaming? If you can, please reupload one of them under a seperate name so they can both be used. Thanks. -- Deadstar (msg) 10:10, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Well, the first one was just a drawing, which I found redundant since I later found actual photos of the same animal. But if you want to upload it, feel free to do it. FunkMonk (talk) 15:30, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Carnotaurus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
-Nard the Bard 12:13, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
File deletion warning | File:Sleeping_thylacine.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Mangostar (talk) 19:36, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
File deletion warning | File:Thylacine_cubs.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Mangostar (talk) 19:59, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
TUSC token 70be3ab44b5b50fab886d87554bd018b
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! Ok. FunkMonk (talk) 10:32, 27 March 2008 (UTC)