User talk:FrDr/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
categorieën en zo
Welkom in Commons en bedankt voor je uploads. Gelieve niet te enthousiast categorieën toe te voegen aan afbeeldingen die je oplaadt of die je vindt. De beste categorisatie is één categorie voor één object. Lees eens de richtlijn COM:CAT. Henxter (talk) 11:17, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
- Ik herhaal: gelieve afbeeldingen voor een bepaald object niet in verschillende algemene categorieën te plaatsen, maar alleen in de specifieke categorie. Henxter (talk) 17:05, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
File:Herdenking onthoofding Egmont en Horne, 5 juni 2018, Brussel 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Henxter (talk) 21:06, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
File:Concert Lamoraal van Egmont Sint-Martinuskoor Velzeke.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Henxter (talk) 21:16, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Egmontherdenking 1968 Zottegem 02.jpg
- File:Egmontherdenking 1968 Zottegem 03.jpg
- File:Egmontherdenking 1968 Zottegem 04.jpg
- File:Egmontherdenking 1968 Zottegem 05.jpg
- File:Egmontherdenking 1968 Zottegem 06.jpg
- File:Egmontherdenking 1968 Zottegem 07.jpg
Yours sincerely, Henxter (talk) 21:23, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
File:Concert Lamoraal van Egmont Crescendo Zottegem.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Secondarywaltz (talk) 16:14, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
File:Bier 'KopAf' 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Natuur12 (talk) 14:28, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Bier 'Vaarwel Graaf zonder Hoofd' 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Natuur12 (talk) 14:29, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Klaas Van der Linden 07.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
And also:
- File:Klaas Van der Linden 04.jpg
- File:Klaas Van der Linden 05.jpg
- File:Klaas Van der Linden 06.jpg
- File:Klaas Van der Linden 03.jpg
- File:Klaas Van der Linden 01.jpg
Yours sincerely, Ies (talk) 14:40, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Boudewijntoren Oudenaarde 01.jpeg
Copyright status: File:Boudewijntoren Oudenaarde 01.jpeg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Boudewijntoren Oudenaarde 01.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:16, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Boudewijntoren Oudenaarde 01.jpeg
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Boudewijntoren Oudenaarde 01.jpeg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Boudewijntoren Oudenaarde 01.jpeg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
CptViraj (📧) 04:57, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey
Hi FrDr/Archive 1,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 01:16, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey
Hi FrDr/Archive 1,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey
Hi FrDr/Archive 1,
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Beislovenpark Zottegem 53.jpg
- File:Beislovenpark Zottegem 54.jpg
- File:Domein Breivelde Zottegem 17.jpg
- File:Domein Breivelde Zottegem 18.jpg
- File:Domein Breivelde Zottegem 20.jpg
- File:Domein Breivelde Zottegem 21.jpg
- File:Domein Breivelde Zottegem 22.jpg
- File:Domein Breivelde Zottegem 23.jpg
- File:Domein Breivelde Zottegem 24.jpg
- File:Domein Breivelde Zottegem 25.jpg
- File:Domein Breivelde Zottegem 32.jpg
- File:Domein Breivelde Zottegem 58.jpg
- File:Egmontpark Zottegem 16.jpg
- File:Fietsnetwerk Vlaamse Ardennen 01.jpg
- File:Fietsnetwerk Vlaamse Ardennen 02.jpg
- File:Infobord Vallei van de Cotthembeek 01.jpg
- File:Infobord Vallei van de Cotthembeek 02.jpg
- File:Infobord Vallei van de Cotthembeek 03.jpg
- File:Infobord Vallei van de Cotthembeek 04.jpg
- File:Kloosterbos Zottegem 02.jpg
- File:Middenloop Zwalm 24.jpg
- File:Mijnwerkerspad Zottegem 01.jpg
- File:Mijnwerkerspad Zottegem 02.jpg
- File:Mijnwerkerspad Zottegem 14.jpg
- File:Mijnwerkerspad Zottegem 15.jpg
- File:Mountainbikeroutes Zottegem.jpg
- File:Parkbos-Uilenbroek 01.jpg
- File:Parkbos-Uilenbroek 31.jpg
- File:Provinciaal Archeocentrum AVE Velzeke.jpg
- File:Romeinse weg Velzeke-Bavay.jpg
- File:Steenbergse bossen 37.jpg
- File:Wachtspaarbekken Bettelhovebeek 04.jpg
- File:Wachtspaarbekken Bettelhovebeek 06.jpg
- File:Wachtspaarbekken Bettelhovebeek 11.jpg
- File:Wachtspaarbekken Bettelhovebeek 27.jpg
- File:Wachtspaarbekken Bettelhovebeek 30.jpg
- File:Wandelnetwerk en fietsnetwerk Vlaamse Ardennen.jpg
- File:Wandelnetwerk Vlaamse Ardennen 02.jpg
- File:Wandelnetwerk Vlaamse Ardennen Zwalmvallei 01.jpg
- File:Wandelnetwerk Vlaamse Ardennen Zwalmvallei 02.jpg
- File:Wandelnetwerk Vlaamse Ardennen Zwalmvallei 03.jpg
- File:Wandelnetwerk Vlaamse Ardennen Zwalmvallei 04.jpg
- File:Wandelnetwerk Vlaamse Ardennen Zwalmvallei 05.jpg
- File:Wandelnetwerk Vlaamse Ardennen.jpg
- File:Zottegem Egmontstad 01.jpg
- File:Zottegem Egmontstad 02.jpg
- File:Zottegem Egmontstad 03.jpg
Yours sincerely, Fæ (talk) 20:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment. I have moved it to be under the nomination statement, where comments normally go. --Fæ (talk) 20:38, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Postcards
Hello FrDr, thanks for uploading postcards. Maybe you are interested in COM:WPPC. Best regards --sk (talk) 04:29, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Stationsplein Zottegem (historische prentbriefkaart) 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:11, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Sint-Maria-Oudenhove (historische prentbriefkaart) 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:15, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Oombergen (historische prentbriefkaart) 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:17, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Egmontcrypte (historische prentbriefkaart).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:19, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Sint-Martinuskerk Oombergen (historische prentbriefkaart) 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:21, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Kasteel van Leeuwergem (historische prentbriefkaart) 08.jpg
- File:Kasteel Lauwereyssens Zottegem (historische prentbriefkaart).jpg
- File:Uitkijktoren Kasteel van Leeuwergem (historische prentbriefkaart) 03.jpg
Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:36, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Egmontroute Zottegem.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gasthuis (talk) 19:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Sint-Maria-Oudenhove 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |